Int J App Pharm, Vol 14, Issue 3, 2022, 95-102Original Article

BIOANALYTICAL METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF RIBOCICLIB AND LETROZOLE AND ITS APPLICATION TO PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES USING ULTRA-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY

S. PRASANTHI1, G. HIMABINDU1*, YAGATI VAMSI KUMAR2

1*Department of Engineering Chemistry, AUCE (A), Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530003, India, 2Department of Chemistry, Govt. Degree College (Men), Srikakulam 532001, India
Email: himabinduauce@gmail.com

Received: 15 Feb 2022, Revised and Accepted: 24 Mar 2022


ABSTRACT

Objective: An easy, quick, precise, active and reproducible UPLC technique was developed for the bioanalytical method of Ribociclib and Letrozole using Lapatinib as the internal standard.

Methods: This article summarizes the recent progress on bioanalytical UPLC method using phenyl column (100x2.1 mm, 1.7µ) column and an organic mobile phase of 0.1% Tri fluoro acetic acid and Acetonitrile in 50:50 with a flow of 0.5 ml/min. An injection volume of 5 microliters was used. Lapatinib was used as an internal standard.

Results: The drugs were found at Letrozole (m/z 435.46/216.55), Ribociclib (m/z 506.34/167.43) and Lapatinib (internal standard, m/z 582.37/184.29), respectively. Tests were performed in less than five minutes on Ribociclib (r2 = 0.99953; concentration range: 2 to 40 ng/ml) and Letrozole (r2 = 0.99915; concentration range: 0.025 to 0.5 ng/ml). The study's precision and recovery results were determined to be accurate. Accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effect and stability results were found to be within the suitable limits. Simple and efficient method was developed and utilized in pharmacokinetic studies to see the investigated analyte in body fluids.

Conclusion: The application denotes all the parameters of system suitability, specificity, linearity and accuracy are in good agreement with USFDA guidelines and applied effectively for the investigation of pharmacokinetic studies in rabbit.

Keywords: Ribociclib, Letrozole, Development, Validation, Rabbit plasma


INTRODUCTION

In the treatment of hormonally sensitive breast cancer [1, 2] after surgery, letrozole is an aromatase inhibitor [3] offered under many trade names, including Femara (by Novartis). Letrozole's antiestrogen [4] effect has been demonstrated to be beneficial as a pretreatment for misoprostol-induced abortion [5]. Instead of pricey and unavailable mifepristone, it may be used [6]. Letrozole is occasionally used to treat gynecomastia [7, 8]; however, it is most successful if discovered early on in the condition's progression (such as in users of anabolic steroids). In male patients with nonobstructive azoospermia [9, 10], letrozole has been demonstrated in certain trials to help enhance spermatogenesis [11]. Mice treated with letrozole had their growth plates take longer to fuse, according to a study that examined the drug [12]. Letrozole has been demonstrated to be successful in one short-statured [13] teenage male when combined with growth hormone [14]. Endometriosis [15] patients have benefited from letrozole treatment. It has been shown that letrozole decreases serum oestrogen levels in endometrial stromal sarcomas. A promising alternative for the long-term treatment of this condition is letrozole. The amount of uterine myoma tumours was also effectively decreased with an aromatase inhibitor in one research [16]. Aromatase inhibitors provide a rapid beginning of action and prevent the early gonadotropin flare. Sweating, heat flushes, arthralgia (joint pain) [17], and weariness are the most prevalent adverse effects. Symptoms of hypoestrogenism [18] are often reported as adverse effects. Osteoporosis has been linked to long-term usage of bisphosphonates in particular patient groups, such as post-menopausal women or osteoporotics [19].

Inhibitors of cyclin D1/CDK4 (Cyclin-dependent kinase 4) [20] and CDK6 (Cyclin-dependent kinase 6) [21] are found in Ribociclib, which is marketed by Novartis under the brand names Kisqali and Kryxana. This drug is used to treat some types of breast cancer. The combination of aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant [22] for the treatment of pre/perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative (protein) advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as an initial endocrine-based therapy [23], is recommended for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Also being tested as a therapy for other drug-resistant tumours [24]. Novartis and Astex Pharmaceuticals collaborated on its creation and are the proud owners. All three MONALEESA clinical studies with diverse endocrine therapy partners, independent of menopausal state or treatment line, have shown that Ribociclib is the only CDK4/6 inhibitor with a demonstrable benefit on overall survival. Anemia [25] and neutropenia [26] (in 75% of patient’s vs 5% in placebo groups) were the most prevalent adverse effects in trials, as were reduced blood cell counts, particularly neutropenia (18 percent vs. 5 percent). Gastrointestinal problems [27] were also widespread, such as nausea [28] (52 percent vs. 29 percent) and diarrhea [29] (35 percent vs. 22 percent), as well as alopecia [30] (33 percent vs. 16 percent). Fig. 1 represents the chemical representation of Ribociclib and Letrozole and Lapatinib (Internal standard).

In the present research, UPLC was used for the simultaneous quantification of Ribociclib and Letrozole in rabbit plasma. Until now, there were no quantification methods for Ribociclib and Letrozole. UPLC offers better separation and can thus yield more information in a short period of time than HPLC. Thus, UPLC separation technique was employed for the purpose of separating Ribociclib and Letrozole.

Experimental study

Solutions and reagents

Zydus Cadila, an Ahmadabad provided the APIs of Ribociclib (C23H30N8O), Letrozole (C17H11N5), and Lapatinib (Internal Standard, C29H26ClFN4O4S). Acetonitrile (99.99 percent purity), water (Milli Q), and trifluoroacetic acid (99.99 percent purity) were acquired from Merck in Worli and Mumbai, India.

Ribociclib Letrozole

Lapatinib

Fig. 1: Chemical structures of Ribociclib, Letrozole and Lapatinib

Equipment

The experiment was carried out using Agilent1290 Infinity II LC System with a variable PDA detector [31-33], which was developed by the researchers. The data collection and processing were carried out using the chromatographic programme Empower-2.0.

Preparation of standard and internal control samples

Preparation of stock solution-A

Accurately weighed and transferred 8 mg of Ribociclib pure powder into a 100 ml volumetric flask. Approximately 70 ml of diluent was added, sonicated for 15 min to dissolve, and then diluted to the volume. One mill liter of the above solution was further transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask, made up to the volume with diluents. This is the stock solution-A.

Preparation of stock solution-B

Accurately weighed and transferred 5 mg of Letrozole pure powder into a 100 ml volumetric flask. Approximately 70 ml of diluent was added, sonicated for 15 min to dissolve, and then diluted to the volume. Two mill liters of the above solution was further transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask, made up to the volume with diluents. After that one mill liter of the above solution was further transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask, made up to the volume with diluents. This is the stock solution-B.

Preparation of standard stock solution

One mill liter of stock solution-A and stock solution-B were transferred to 10 ml volumetric flask, made up to the volume with diluents.

Preparation of internal standard stock solution

Accurately weighed and transferred 8 mg of Lapatinib pure powder into a 100 ml volumetric flask. Approximately 70 ml of diluent was added, sonicated for 15 min to dissolve, and then diluted to the volume. One mill liter of the above solution was further transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask, made up to the volume with diluents. After that one mill liter of the above solution was further transferred to 10 ml volumetric flask, made up to the volume with diluents. This is the internal standard stock solution.

Preparation of standard solution

For standard preparation, 200 µl of plasma was taken and 300 µl of ACN into a 2 ml centrifuge tube and 500 µl of standard stock solution and 500 µl of IS and 500 µl of diluents were added and vortexed for 10 min. These samples further subjected for centrifuge at 5000rpm for 30 min. Collect the solution and filter through 0.45µ nylon syringe filter and the clear solution was transferred into vial and injected into a system.

Bioanalytical method validation

The method was validated [34-39] in selective, sensitive, linearity, accuracy and precise, matrix condition, recovery study, re-injection reproducibility and stability.

Animal parameters

In vivo pharmacokinetic studies, 6 healthy white New Zealand female rabbits (body weight in between 2.0-2.5 kg) were obtained from Biological E Limited, Hyderabad, India. The protocol of animal study was approved by the institute of animal ethics committee (Reg. No: 1074/PO/Re/S/05/CPCSEA). The animals were housed in similar laboratory conditions with access to endive, carrots, fresh corn (few amount only); the animal feed should be kept at temperature of 36±3ᵒC and humidity was 51-63%. Before experimentation, all animals were fasted overnight and had water adlibitum.

Selectivity

Selectivity was carried out by investigating the rabbit plasma specimens from 6 various rabbits to test for obstruction from unknown specimens at retention times of Ribociclib, Letrozole and IS.

Matrix effect

The matrix effect for Ribociclib and Letrozole was eavluated by comparing the peak zone proportion in the post extracted plasma samples from 6 different medication-free plasma samples and slick recovery samples. Trails were carried out in triplicate with six separate lots of plasma at MQC levels with acceptable accuracy (percent CV) of ≤15%.

Precision and accuracy

It was evaluated at a lower quantification limit (LLOQ), low-quality control (LQC), medium quality control (MQC), and high-quality control (HQC) levels by replication analysis of quality control specimens (n=6). The level of CV should be less than 15%, except for LLOQ, where it should be less than 20%.

Recovery

By analyzing the six samples reproduce at each internal control concentration, is by extracting the Ribociclib and Letrozole. By comparing the height areas of extracted standards to the height areas of unextracted standards, recovery was evaluated.

Carry over

Carry over [40, 41] was performed with the analyte retained by the chromatographic system during the matrix with an analyte concentration ULOQC and above, diluting this sample with blank matrix.

Dilution integrity

Dilution integrity ought to be exhibited by spiking matrix above the ULOQC with an analyte concentration and diluting this test with a blank matrix.

Stability

Stability of stock solution was achieved by comparing the area response of the analyte in the stability [42] samples with the region response of the specimen prepared from the fresh stock solution. Sample Stability studies in plasma were performed at the LQC and HQC concentration levels using six replicates at each level. Analyte was considered stable if the change is a smaller amount than 15% as per US FDA guidelines. The perfectness of spiked rabbit plasma stored at room temperature was evaluated for twenty-four hrs. The stability of spiked rabbit plasma stored at RT in an autosampler was evaluated for twenty-four hrs. The autosampler stability (LQC, MQC and HQC) was evaluated by comparing the extract plasma samples that were injected immediately with the samples that were re-injected after storing with wet extract stability at room temperature after 12 h and 18 h at 2-8 °C. The reinjection reproducibility was evaluated by comparing the extracted plasma samples that were injected immediately with the samples that were re-injected after storing in the dry extract stability at room temperature after 12 h and 18 h at-20 °±3 °C. Freeze-thaw stability was conducted by comparing the steadiness samples that had been frozen at-31 °C and thawed 3 times with freshly spiked internal control samples. The short-term stability was conducted 7 d at 7 °C. For long-term stability evaluation, the concentrations obtained after 24 h were compared with the initial concentration.

Pharmacokinetic study

Before experimentation, all animals are starved overnight and had water ad-libitum. Topical anaesthetic procedure was used. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed for Ribociclib and Letrozole formulation. The samples were administered to each rabbit under fasting conditions. After oral administration of Ribociclib and Letrozole, blood samples were collected from rabbit marginal ear vein using a 25-guage, 5/8 inch needle by clipping the marginal ear vein with a paper clip shown in fig. 1 with volume of 0.5 ml to 1.0 ml at 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5,3,3.5,4,5,10,20,30,40 and 50 h. The blood was collected in Eppendorf containing 10% EDTA solution. Blood was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 30 min at 2-8 °C temperature. The clear supernatant plasma were collected and stored at-30 °C till its analysis. After the study, the animals were returned to the animal house for rehabilitation.

The pharmacokinetic parameters for Ribociclib and Letrozole oral administration were determined from plasma concentration data. Pharmacokinetic parameters like AUC, Cmax, Tmax the time at which Cmax occurred, Kel, t½, Ka and MRT were calculated using the data. Data was measured by the trapezoidal rule method from time zero to infinity of the concentration-time curve. Cmax and Tmax were obtained from the graph.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To acquire the best chromatographic conditions, we used different buffers with acetonitrile as mobile phase in different ratios for isocratic and gradient mode was tested. The mobile phase composition was modified at each trial to enhance the resolution and also to achieve acceptable retention times. Finally, 0.1% tri fluoro acetic acid and ACN in isocratic mode at 50:50 v/v ratio was selected as mobile phase because it gives a maximum response of the selected drugs. In the optimization method, we used different stationary phases like C18, C8 and CN-propyl was used. From the different trials we get good peak shapes of Ribociclib and Letrozole by using C8 column of dimensions 50 mmx1.0 mm, 1.7 µ connected to a PDA detector. Mobile phase flow rates were performed at 0.5 ml/min. By applying the above conditions, we get the retention times of the two drugs Ribociclib and Letrozole as 1.564 min and 3.045 min, respectively. The method under progress has been validated pursuant to USFDA guidelines [43]. Fig. 2, shows the standard chromatogram.

Fig. 2: Chromatogram of standard

Specificity

The specificity of the method to research Ribociclib and Letrozole simultaneously is proved. The chromatograms of blank as shown in fig. 3. The chromatogram of blank rabbit plasma and standard having no interference peaks were observed.

Matrix effect

Matrix effect [44] results of Ribociclib and Letrozole at LQC, HQC levels were 98.35, 99.17% and 98.73, 99.57%. Where % CV of both drugs was found at LQC and HQC levels 1.25, 0.37 and 1.05, 0.76. The results indicate that the matrix influence on the ionization of analytes and the internal requirements have been within the acceptable limit.

Linearity

The region at its height proportions in adjustment norms were relative under focus. The range of linearity for Ribociclib of this method was 20-40 ng/ml and 0.025-0.5 ng/ml for Letrozole (fig. 4). The curves of calibration were appeared over the linear concentration range [45] and the correlation coefficient was found to be beyond 0.99953 for Ribociclib and 0.99915 for Letrozole at different QC levels. Linearity and correlation results of Ribociclib and Letrozole are shown in table 1.

Fig. 3: Chromatogram of blank

Table 1: Results of linearity

Linearity Ribociclib Letrozole
Conc.(ng/ml) Area response ratio Conc.(ng/ml) Area response ratio
1 2.00 0.082 0.03 0.007
2 5.00 0.213 0.06 0.020
3 10.00 0.400 0.13 0.038
4 15.00 0.628 0.19 0.052
5 20.00 0.793 0.25 0.073
6 25.00 0.997 0.31 0.092
7 30.00 1.223 0.38 0.111
8 40.00 1.597 0.50 0.147
Slope 0.0403 Slope 0.2944
Intercept 0.00266 Intercept 0.00022
CC 0.99953 CC 0.99915

A

B

Fig. 4: Calibration plots of (A) Ribociclib and (B) Letrozole

Table 2: Precision and accuracy of ribociclib

QC name LLQC LQC MQC HQC
Conc.(ng/ml) 2 10 20 30
QC sample-1 2.021 10.154 20.153 30.154
QC sample-2 2.057 10.142 20.127 30.112
QC sample-3 2.032 10.174 20.151 30.209
QC sample-4 2.038 10.126 20.224 30.153
QC sample-5 2.067 10.198 20.163 30.164
QC sample-6 2.017 10.104 20.172 30.118
Mean 2.039 10.150 20.165 30.152
SD 0.020 0.034 0.033 0.035
%CV 0.97 0.33 0.16 0.1
Accuracy 101.07 100.62 99.96 99.64

Mean+SD (n=6)

Table 3: Precision and accuracy of letrozole

Qc name LLQC LQC MQC HQC
Conc.(ng/ml) 0.025 0.125 0.255 0.375
QC sample-1 0.027 0.123 0.257 0.374
QC sample-2 0.023 0.122 0.254 0.378
QC sample-3 0.024 0.129 0.258 0.372
QC sample-4 0.025 0.124 0.253 0.376
QC sample-5 0.022 0.128 0.251 0.375
QC sample-6 0.027 0.127 0.283 0.371
Mean 0.025 0.126 0.259 0.375
SD 0.002 0.003 0.012 0.002
%CV 8.37 2.30 4.58 0.53
Accuracy % 98.81 99.6 102.37 98.81

(n=6)

Precision and accuracy

By pooling all individual assay results of different internal control samples, the accuracy and precision [46] were calculated. It was obvious, based on the data provided, that the strategy was precise and effective. The precision results of Ribociclib and Letrozole was shown in table 2, 3. Ribociclib accuracy results in quality control samples 99.64-101.07 and Letrozole accuracy results in quality control samples 98.81-102.37.

Recovery

The recoveries for Ribociclib and Letrozole at LQC, MQC and HQC levels the results demonstrated that the bio-analytical method had good extraction efficiency. This also showed that the recovery wasn’t hooked into concentration. The recoveries for Ribociclib (99.43%-100.79%) and Letrozole (98.74%-100.11%) at LQC, MQC and HQC levels and % CV ranged from 0.32-1.56 for Ribociclib and 0.74-1.92 for Letrozole; the results demonstrated that the bio-analytical method had good extraction efficiency.

Ruggedness

The percent recoveries and percent CV of Ribociclib and Letrozole determined with two different analysts and on two different columns were within acceptable criteria in HQC, LQC, MQC and LLQC samples. The results proved method is ruggedness. The percent recoveries ranged from 98.53–101.23% for Ribociclib and 99.73%-100.24% for Letrozole. The %CV values ranged from 0.43-1.29 for Ribociclib and 0.38–1.58 for Letrozole.

Autosampler carryover

Peak area response of Ribociclib and Letrozole wasn’t observed within the blank rabbit plasma samples after successive injections of LLQC and ULQC at the retention times of Ribociclib and Letrozole. In autosampler carryover [47] this method doesn’t exhibit autosampler carryover.

Stability

The benchtop stability of Ribociclib and Letrozole was investigated by a stock solution was prepared and stored at room temperature for 18 h, in case of autosampler stability the stock solution was stored for 24h in auto sampler at room temperature gives reliable stability behaviour under these conditions. Assessment of freeze thaw stability, the stock arrangement was stored for 24 h at (-28±5) °C, in wet extract stability, the stock solution was stored for 18h at 2-8 °C, in dry extract stability, the stock was stored for 18h at (-20±3) °C. The short term stability shows stability of drugs was stored for 7 d at (5±3) °C, and in long term stability, the stock was stored for 28 d at (-20±3) °C and inject into the UPLC. Compare the stability results of freshly arranged stock solution with stock solution made before 24h. From this we observed a % change of Ribociclib and Letrozole was 1.27% and 0.75%, respectively, it indicates that solutions are stable up to 24 h [48, 49].

At room temperature Ribociclib and Letrozole were stable in plasma for different conditions. It was evaluated that LQC, MQC and HQC levels continued freezing and defrosting of plasma specimens spiked with Ribociclib and Letrozole, didn’t influence its stability. It was clear from long-term stability that Ribociclib and Letrozole were stable at a capability temperature of-30 °C up to 24 h. The overall stability results of Ribociclib and Letrozole were shown in table 4 and 5.

In vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation

The plasma concentration-time profiles of Ribociclib and Letrozole in rabbit are shown in fig. 5. The graph indicated a bell-shaped curve in both cases of the experimental formulation. Ribociclib and Letrozole could be traced to be present in the blood for 4 h and 2 h after oral administration, which indicates the effectiveness of drug release from the formulation.

The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, Kel, Ka, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, were calculated and the data is shown in table 6. The Cmax for Ribociclib and Letrozole were found to be 17.79 ng/ml and 0.2 ng/ml, respectively. The Tmax for Ribociclib and Letrozole were found to be 4h and 2h, respectively. The T1/2 values were 30 h and 40 h, respectively for Ribociclib and Letrozole. The AUC0-t for Ribociclib and Letrozole were found to be 274 and 4 ng-hr/ml respectively.

Table 4: Stability results of ribociclib

Stability experiment spiked plasma Mean conc. (n=6,ng/ml) Std dev (n=6,ng/ml) %CV
Bench top stability LQC 10.025 0.324 0.74
MQC 20.147 0.118 1.25
HQC 29.962 0.012 0.26
Auto sampler stability LQC 10.154 0.217 0.57
MQC 20.139 0.165 0.65
HQC 30.118 0.194 1.18
Long term(Day28) stability LQC 9.986 0.115 0.83
MQC 10.254 0.136 1.39
HQC 30.057 0.158 0.84
Wet extract stability LQC 10.547 0.214 0.47
MQC 20.054 0.178 1.13
HQC 29.869 0.163 0.69
Dry extract stability LQC 10.152 0.154 2.67
MQC 20.347 0.058 1.34
HQC 30.113 0.462 1.58
Freeze thaw stability LQC 10.068 0.247 0.93
MQC 19.941 0.192 0.84
HQC 30.038 0.084 0.99
Short term stability LQC 10.057 0.147 1.83
MQC 19.273 0.132 1.64
HQC 29.175 0.117 0.27

(n=6)

A

B

Fig. 5: Recovery plot of (A) Ribociclib and (B) Letrozole

Table 5: Stability results of letrozole

Stability experiment spiked plasma Mean conc. (n=6,ng/ml) Std dev (n=6,ng/ml) %CV
Bench top stability LQC 0.122 0.094 1.73
MQC 0.257 0.214 0.78
HQC 0.379 0.112 0.33
Auto sampler stability LQC 0.129 0.069 1.59
MQC 0.252 0.314 0.74
HQC 0.374 0.124 0.53

Long term

(Day 28)stability

LQC 0.126 0.185 0.84
MQC 0.259 0.174 1.33
HQC 0.378 0.124 0.46
Wet extract stability LQC 0.121 0.165 1.68
MQC 0.253 0.047 0.65
HQC 0.376 0.035 1.27
Dry extract stability LQC 0.118 0.118 1.55
MQC 0.249 0.162 0.73
HQC 0.381 0.094 0.68
Freeze thaw stability LQC 0.132 0.187 2.17
MQC 0.267 0.134 1.11
HQC 0.368 0.185 0.76
Short term stability LQC 0.122 0.169 2.38
MQC 0.246 0.284 0.65
HQC 0.389 0.256 1.27

(n=6)

Table 6: Pharmacokinetic parameters of ribociclib and letrozole

Pharmacokinetic parameters Ribociclib Letrozole
AUC0-t 274 ng-h/ml 4 ng-h/ml
Cmax 17.79 ng/ml 0.2 ng/ml
AUC0-∞ 274 ng-h/ml 4 ng-h/ml
Tmax 4 h 2 h
T1/2 30 h 40 h

AUC0−∞: Area under the curve extrapolated to infinity, AUC0−𝑡: Area under the curve up to the last sampling time, Cmax: The maximum plasma concentration, Tmax: The time to reach peak concentration, T1/2: Time the drug concentration

CONCLUSION

The first time a new UPLC technique has been successfully developed and validated for the evaluation of Ribociclib and Letrozole in 6 min rabbit plasma. After intravenous administration, Ribociclib and Letrozole were rapidly absorbed from the rabbit body and shows the pharmacokinetic behaviour. Here the described method is fast, rugged, and reproducible and it can be applied for pharmacokinetic studies successfully and to check the investigated analyte concentrations in body fluids with acceptable accurate results and good linear concentration range. These studies are warranted to validate our results in the near future as a reference. This method was validated as per USFDA guidelines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I thankful to my guide for encouragement and supporting to finish this research work.

FUNDING

Nil

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

All the authors have contributed equally.

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

Author declares that there have been no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Minghao W, Xiujuan W, Fan C, Yi Z, Jun J. Plasma prolactin and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25998.

  2. Jarde T, Perrier S, Vasson MP, Caldefie Chezet F. Molecular mechanisms of leptin and adiponectin in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.005, PMID 20889333.

  3. Tan RB, Guay AT, Hellstrom WJ. Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors in adult males. Sex Med Rev. 2014;2(2):79-90. doi: 10.1002/smrj.23, PMID 27784593.

  4. Riggins RB, Bouton AH, Liu MC, Clarke R. Antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors, and apoptosis in breast cancer. Vitam Horm. 2005;71:201-37. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(05)71007-4, PMID 16112269.

  5. Raymond EG, Grossman D, Weaver MA, Toti S, Winikoff B. Mortality of induced abortion, other outpatient surgical procedures and common activities in the United States. Contraception. 2014;90(5):476-9. doi: 10.1016/ j.contraception.2014.07.012, PMID 25152259.

  6. Lee VCY, Ng EHY, Yeung WSB, Ho PC. Misoprostol with or without letrozole pretreatment for termination of pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):317-23. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182073fbf, PMID 21252745.

  7. Thiruchelvam P, Walker JN, Rose K, Lewis J, Al-Mufti R. Gynaecomastia. BMJ. 2016;354:i4833. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4833, PMID 27659195.

  8. Chau A, Jafarian N, Rosa M. Male breast: clinical and imaging evaluations of benign and malignant entities with histologic correlation. Am J Med. 2016;129(8):776-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.009, PMID 26844632.

  9. Berookhim BM, Schlegel PN. Azoospermia due to spermatogenic failure. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):97-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.004, PMID 24286770.

  10. Lotti F, Maggi M. Ultrasound of the male genital tract in relation to male reproductive health. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(1):56-83. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu042, PMID 25038770.

  11. Schulze W. Evidence of a wave of spermatogenesis in human testis. Andrologia. 1982;14(2):200-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1982.tb03124.x, PMID 7103139.

  12. Eshet R, Maor G, Ben Ari T, Ben Eliezer M, Gat-Yablonski G, Phillip M. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole increases epiphyseal growth plate height and tibial length in peripubertal male mice. J Endocrinol. 2004;182(1):165-72. doi: 10.1677/ joe.0.1820165, PMID 15225141.

  13. Pedicelli S, Peschiaroli E, Violi E, Cianfarani S. Controversies in the definition and treatment of idiopathic short stature (ISS). J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2009;1(3):105-15. doi: 10.4008/ jcrpe.v1i3.53, PMID 21274395.

  14. Zhou P, Shah B, Prasad K, David R. Letrozole significantly improves growth potential in a pubertal boy with growth hormone deficiency. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):e245-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1536, PMID 15653791.

  15. Bulletti C, Coccia ME, Battistoni S, Borini A. Endometriosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(8):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9436-1, PMID 20574791.

  16. Sylvestre VT, Dunton CJ. Treatment of recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma with letrozole: a case report and literature review. Horm Cancer. 2010;1(2):112-5. doi: 10.1007/s12672-010-0007-9, PMID 21761354.

  17. Passier A, van Puijenbroek E. Mirtazapine-induced arthralgia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60(5):570-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02481.x, PMID 16236049.

  18. Meczekalski B, Podfigurna Stopa A, Genazzani AR. Hypoestrogenism in young women and its influence on bone mass density. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26(9):652-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.486452, PMID 20504098.

  19. Golob AL, Laya MB. Osteoporosis: screening, prevention, and management. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99(3):587-606. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.010, PMID 25841602.

  20. Muntean AG, Pang L, Poncz M, Dowdy SF, Blobel GA, Crispino JD. Cyclin D-Cdk4 is regulated by GATA-1 and is required for megakaryocyte growth and polyploidization. Blood. 2007;109(12):5199-207. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-059378, PMID 17317855.

  21. Grossel MJ, Hinds PW. Beyond the cell cycle: a new role for Cdk6 in differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2006;97(3):485-93. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20712, PMID 16294322.

  22. Owen LJ, Monaghan PJ, Armstrong A, Keevil BG, Higham C, Salih Z, Howell S. Oestradiol measurement during fulvestrant treatment for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2019;120(4):404-6. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0378-9, PMID 30679781.

  23. Szostakowska M, Trębinska Stryjewska A, Grzybowska EA, Fabisiewicz A. Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: molecular mechanisms and future goals. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(3):489-97. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5023-4. PMID 30382472.

  24. Lee SK. 011 CDK inhibitor showing early promise in drug-resistant cancers. Oncology Times. 2014;36:39-40.

  25. Stein J, Connor S, Virgin G, Ong DE, Pereyra L. Anemia and iron deficiency in gastrointestinal and liver conditions. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(35):7908-25. doi: 10.3748/ wjg.v22. i35.7908, PMID 27672287.

  26. Newburger PE, Dale DC. Evaluation and management of patients with isolated neutropenia. Semin Hematol. 2013;50(3):198-206. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2013.06.010, PMID 23953336.

  27. Liang Q, Yao X, Tang S, Zhang J, Yau TO, Li X, Tang CM, Kang W, Lung RW, Li JW, Chan TF, Xing R, Lu Y, Lo KW, Wong N, To KF, Yu C, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Yu J On. Integrative identification of epstein–barr virus–associated mutations and epigenetic alterations in gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(6):1350-62.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.036, PMID 25173755.

  28. Balaban CD, Yates BJ. What is nausea? A historical analysis of changing views. Auton Neurosci. 2017;202:5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.07.003, PMID 27450627.

  29. DuPont HL. Acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompetent adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(16):1532-40. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMra1301069, PMID 24738670.

  30. Vary JC Jr. Selected disorders of skin appendages-acne, Alopecia, Hyperhidrosis. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99(6):1195-211. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.07.003, PMID 26476248.

  31. Potturi Ramadevi, Kantipudi Rambabu. Bioanalytical method development and validation for ezetimibe and pitavastain and its applications to pharmacokinetic studies in rabbit plasma by using LCMS/MS. IJRPS 2021;11(4):7854-62. doi: 10.26452/ ijrps.v11i4.4670.

  32. Eluru A. Surendra Babu K. Bioanalytical method development and validation for Aplidine in rat plasma and their pharmacokinetic studies by LCMS. WJPPS. 2019;8:1201-9.

  33. Ramchandran D, Kethipalli A, Krishnamurthy M. Bioanalytical method development and validation of daunorubicin and cytrarabine in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application in pharmacokinetic studies. J Pharm Sci Res. 2020;12:381-6.

  34. Naykode MD, Bhagwat DA, Jadhav SD, More HN. Analytical and bioanalytical method for quantification of pure azilsartan, not its salts by RP-HPLC. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017;10(3):708-14. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00133.0.

  35. Mayanka Singh M, Manoj Charde M, Rajesh Shukla R, Rita MC. Determination of calcipotriene in calcipotriene cream 0.05% w/w by RP-HPLC method development and validation. Research J Pharm and Technol. 2011;4:1219-23.

  36. Malathi S, Arunadevi N. Development and validation of stability-indicating simultaneous estimation of metformin and alogliptin in tablets by high-performance thin-layer chromatography. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2020;12:68-73.

  37. Senthil Rajan D, Muruganathan G, Shivkumar K, Ganesh T. Development and validation of HPLC method for simultaneous quantification of vasicine, glycyrrhizin and piperine in poly herbal cough syrup. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2020;12:15-9.

  38. Palani Shanmugasundaram, Kamarapu SK, Shanmugasundaram P, Kamarapu SK. RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation and validation of amlodipine besylate and atenolol in bulk and tablet dosage form in biorelevant dissolution medium (Fassif). Research J Pharm and Technol. 2017;10(10):3379-85. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00601.1.

  39. Gomathy S, Narenderan ST, Meyyanathan SN, Gowramma B. Development and validation of HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of apigenin and luteolin in commercial formulation. Crit Rev. 2020;7:4785-90.

  40. Kumar AS, Manidipa Debnath, Seshagiri Rao JVLN, Gowri Sankar D. Development and validation of a sensitive RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate in tablet dosage form by using PDA detector in gradient mode. Research J Pharm and Tech 2016;9:549-54.

  41. Malak Y, Al-Bathish AA, Gazy MK. El-Jamal. Rp-hplc and chemometric methods for the determination of two anti-diabetic mixtures; metformin hydrochloride-canagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride-gliclazide in their pharmaceutical formulation. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2020;12:83-94.

  42. Gadhvi MP, Bhandari A, Suhagia BN, Desai UH. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of atazanavir and ritonavir in their combined tablet dosage form. Research J Pharm and Technol. 2013;6:200-3.

  43. Koya Prabhakara Rao NL, A Amara Babu, Kalyani Koganti, Babji Palakeeti. Koduri SV Srinivas. Relat subst method dev validation LC-Ms/MS method for the quantification of selexipag and its related impurities in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic studies. SN Applied Sciences. 2021;3:321.

  44. Hasanah YIF, Harahap Y, Suryadi H. Development and validation method of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxy cyclophosphamide with 4-hydroxy cyclophosphamide-D4 as internal standard in dried blood spots using UPLC-MS/MS. Int J Appl Pharm. 2021;13:148-52.

  45. Naveen VMK, Veeraswami B, Srinivasa Rao G. High response bioanalytical validation approach of nadolol and bendroflumethiazide by LC-MS/MS on rat plasma. Int J Res Pharma Sci. 2020;11:2272-9.

  46. Gowri Kusuma Kumari GK, Rambabu Kantipudi R. Bio analytical method development and validation for avapritinib in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Sci Res. 2021;13:134-7.

  47. Hemanth Kumar AK, Sudha V, Vijayakumar A, Padmapriyadarsini C. Simultaneous method for the estimation of bidaquiline and delamanid in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2021;13:36-40.

  48. Siva Madhu Chaitanya, Srinath Nissankararao, Satya Lakshmi Gandham. A sort of validated bioanalytical method developed for the estimation of etoposide and cisplatin in rat plasma by using two different advanced liquid chromatographic techniques like HPLC and UPLC and its application in bioequivalence studies. IJRPS 2021;12(1):708-17. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v12i1.4167.

  49. Syed Rafi S, Kantipudi Rambabu K. Bio-analytical method development and validation of avelumab, axitinib and its application to pharmacokinetic studies in rabbit plasma by using LCMS/MS. Int J App Pharm. 2021;13:198-204. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2021v13i5.42415.