Int J Curr Pharm Res, Vol 12, Issue 2, 28-31Original Article


TWO YEARS FOLLOW UP AFTER ERADICATION THERAPY OF PEPTIC ULCER

HASSAN KHUDER RAJAB*, ALI ESMAIL AL-SNAFI**

*Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Tikrit University, Iraq, **Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Thi qar University, Iraq
Email: abomannar64@yahoo.com

Received: 15 Nov 2019, Revised and Accepted: 22 Jan 2020


ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was performed to detect the recurrence rate for two years after eradication therapy of peptic ulcer.

Methods: Sixty-nine patients included in this study in Kirkuk city from January 2004 to January 2005 as 1st year follow up, and 49 patients from January 2005 to January 2006 as second year follow up study. A urea breath test and re-endoscopic examination were carried out to confirm peptic ulcer recurrence. A questionnaire was prepared to take the history of the disease and other relevant data of each patient.

Results: The recurrence was occurred in 6 (8.7%) and 8 patients (16.33%) in the 1st and 2nd years after eradication therapy. Highly risk of recurrence was smoking, age below 50 y and stress in 1st year follow up, and stress was the highly risk in the 2nd year follow up.

Conclusion: After triple and quadruple therapy of peptic ulcer, the recurrence is low, However, the possibility of H. pylori resistance should be considered.

Keywords: Peptic ulcer, Eradication therapy, H. pylori, Urea breath test


INTRODUCTION

The term (peptic ulcer) refers to an ulcer in the lower esophagus, stomach or duodenum, in the jejunum after surgical anastomosis to the stomach, or rarely in the ileum adjacent to a Meckel's diverticulum. A peptic ulcer can be also defined as a form of ulceration which develops in the epithelial lining surface expose to acid secretion of gastric glands [1].

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been described as an opportunistic pathogen attracted by changes in the gastric mucosa caused by inflammation and ulcer [2, 3]. The rediscovery of H. pylori has provoked a fundamental reevaluation of ideas on the etiology and management of peptic ulcer. Perhaps the strongest evidence linking H. pylori and peptic ulcer is the fact that eradication of infection effectively cures the disease and prevents ulcer relapse [4, 5]. However, although the role of this organism on uncomplicated peptic ulcer has been definitively established [6, 7], the precise relationship between H. Pylori and complicated ulcer disease has hardly been studied [8]. H. Pylori eradication has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the rate of ulcer recurrence [9]. In 1996, the NIH Consensus Conference stating that several trials indicated that H. pylori eradication also reduces the recurrence of ulcer complications, but the magnitude of this reduction remained to be firmly established [10].

Diagnosis of H. pylori was performed by endoscopy, biopsies from the antrum for rapid urease test and/or histological study (hematoxylin and eosin stain) [15], patients with positive rapid urease test or histology were considered definitively infected, and were treated with H. Pylori eradication regimen. However, when biopsies were not feasible, 13C-urea breath test was performed. Patients were considered infected if rapid urease test, histology or when 13C-urea breath tests were positive [11].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A previous clinical study (from July 2003 to January 2004) was carried out in the Gerneral hospital-Kirkuk city, on eighty-nine patients to determine the efficacy of triple and quadruple therapy [Omeprazole 20 mg BID+Amoxicillin 500 mg QID+Metronidazole500 mg TID, Ranitidine l50 mg BID+Amoxicillin 500 mg QID+ Metronidazole 500 mg TID, Omeprazole 20 mg BID+Amoxicillin 500 mg QID+Clarithromycin 500 mg BID and Omeprazole 20 mg BID+Amoxicillin500 mg QID+Metronidazole500 mg TID+ Clarithromycin500 mg BID], in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease[1]. After documentation of ulcer healing by the endoscopic and urease test, a follow-up study was performed for 2 y. The first year follow up (from January 2004 to January 2005) was carried out on 69 patients. In the 2nd year follow up, only 49 patients were continued. The study was carried out from January 2005-to January 2006, urea breath test and re-endoscopic examination was performed to identified the recurrence. A questionnaire was prepared to take the history of the disease and other relevant data of each patient. All patients with recurrence were re-treated by triple eradication therapy. Chi-square test was used to determine the significantly between groups.

The study was conducted after obtaining the approval of the ethical committees at the Faculty of Medicine, Tikrit University and Kirkuk Health Directorate.

RESULTS

This study is a follow up trial, it carried out on 69 patients as 1st year post-eradication [aged 25-70 y (mean = 45.75 y), 44 males (63.8%) and 25 females (36.2%), 10 (14.5%) with gastric ulcer, and 59 (85.5%) with duodenal ulcer, 21 smokers (30. 5%) and 15 (21.7%) under stress, 49(71%) under age of 50 y and 9 (13%) were NSAIDs user to control pain]. 2nd year post-eradication follow up was carried out on 49 patients [aged 31.3-69 y, 31 males (63.26%) and 18 females (36.74%), 8 (16.3%) with gastric ulcer and 41 (83.7%) with duodenal ulcer, smokers 21(42.85%) and non smoker 28(57.15%), 18(36.7%) under stress, patients aged below 50 y were 28(54.14%), and 4(8.16%) of the patients used NSAIDs].

Patient’s profiles were mentioned in table 1. Recurrence was occurred in 5 smoker patients (83.33%) and in 3 non-smoker patients (37.5%) in the 1st year follow up study, and in 1 smoker patient (16.67%) and 5 non-smoker patients (62.5%) in the 2nd year follow up study (table 2).

Recurrence also occurred in 3 patients (50%) of NSAIDs users and 1 patient (12.5%) of those didn’t use NSAIDs in the 1st year follow up study, and in 3 patients (50%) of NSAIDs users and 17 patients (87.5%) of those didn’t use NSAIDs in the 2nd follow up the year (table 3).

In the 1st year follow up trial, recurrence was occurred in 3 (50%) patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers, and in the 2nd year follow up, it occurred in 2 patients (25%) with gastric ulcer and 6 patients (75%) with duodenal ulcer (table 4).

Occurrence of recurrence was significantly higher in patients under stress (66.67 vs 33.33%) in the 1st year follow up and (62.5 vs 37.5 %) in the 2nd year follow up trial (table 5).

Although the occurrence of recurrence was significantly higher in patients below the age of 50 y (66.6 vs. 33.33%), but in the 2nd year follow up trial, it was significantly higher in patients above 50 y (87.5%) compared with patients below the age of 50 y (12.5%) (table 6).

Table 1: Patients profiles

Risk factors Number
1st year 2nd year
Below 50 y old 4 1
Smoker 5 3
Gastric ulcer 3 2
Under stress 4 5
NSAIDs user 3 1

Table 2: Recurrence according to smoking

Smoking Positive recurrence No recurrence Chi-square
1st year 2nd year 1st year 2nd year
Smoker 5 =83.33% 3=37.5% 16 =25.39% 18=43.9% 10.07*
Non smoker 1 =16.67% 5=62.5% 47 =74.61% 23=56.1%
6 8 63 41

*Significant

Table 3: Recurrence according to using of NSAIDs

NSAIDs Positive recurrence No recurrence Chi-square
1st year 2nd year 1st year 2nd year
User 3=50% 1=12.5% 6 =9.5% 3 = 7.3% 10.035*
Not user 3=50% 7=87.5% 57=90.5% 38=92.7%
6 8 63 41

*Significant

Table 4: Recurrence according to the ulcer site

Site of ulcer Positive recurrence No recurrence Chi-square
1st year 2nd year 1st year
Gastric ulcer 3=50% 2=25% 7 =11.11%
Duodenal ulcer 3=50% 6=75% 56=88.89
6 8 63

*Significant

Table 5: Recurrence according to stress

Stress Positive recurrence No recurrence Chi-square
1st year 2nd year 1st year 2nd year
Under stress 4=66.67% 5=62.5% 11=17.47 13 =31.7% 12.93*
Not stress 2=33.33% 3=37.5% 52=82,53 28=68.3%
6 8 63 41

*Significant

Table 6: Recurrence according to age

Age Positive recurrence No recurrence Chi-square
1st year 2nd year 1st year 2nd year
Under 50 y 4=66.67% 1=12.5% 45 =71.4% 27=65.85% 10.89*
Above 50 y 2=33.33% 7=87.5% 18 =28.6% 14=34.15%
6 8 63 41

*Significant

DISCUSSION

Recurrence rate of peptic ulcer in our study is 6 (8.7%) patients and 8(16.33%) patients in 1st and 2nd post-eradication therapy, these results were in agreement with Sekine et al., Metzgen et al., Enderset et al., Cheon et al., Hilddbrand et al., Rollar et al., Kin et al., Lai and Lan, Chey et al., Ryu et al., and Yakoob et al. [12-22], who recorded 4.4-20% recurrence rate per a year.

Duodenal ulcer recurrence, even in those with perforating duodenal ulcer, was less than gastric ulcer after the eradication therapy, which was in agreement with that recorded by Crofts et al. [23].

Recurrence was significantly more frequent in smokers (5 patients, 23.8%) compared to nonsmokers (1 patient, 2.08%). According to many previous studies, smoking decreased the efficacy of peptic ulcer disease therapy. However, the peptic ulcer was twice as common as, among smokers as non-smokers, and death from these diseases was twice as frequent as than in smokers compared to non-smokers. Smoking delay healing of ulcer and increase relapse rate. Furthermore, cigarettes depressed the immunity and contributed to increase the liability to infection [24-30].

Our study revealed that recurrence was occurred in 33.3% of patients used NSAIDs and in 5% in patients not using NSAIDs. In spite of there was no significant difference between them in the occurrence of ulcer, significant differences were recorded in recurrence of ulcer between them, these results were in agreement with that recorded by many authors [13, 31-34], who found that using of NSAIDs affected the overall result of the treatment of peptic ulcer diseases.

Recurrence was occurred in 30 % of patients with gastric ulcer, and in 5.08% of patients with duodenal ulcer. A high recurrence rate among patients with gastric ulcer than duodenal ulcer was recorded by Al-Snafi and Rijab [1], however, Chan et al., [32] found that there was no significant differences between the healing rate and recurrence between gastric and duodenal ulcers when used the same treatments. According to some studies, it seemed that low-efficacy therapy did not actually cure H. pylori infection in the gastric mucosa, and only temporarily suppressed it and did not completely eradicate it from the host [23, 24].

Recurrence among patients under stress in our study was 26.66 % which was significantly higher than patients didn’t complain about stress (3.7%). The same fact was recorded by US department of health and human services in the patient not under stress that is significant differences, a high recurrence rate obtain in those under continuous stress than with normal lifestyle, this in agreement with the data of US department of health and human services, according to the collected data, the stress was one of the etiology of peptic ulcer diseases, and it usually caused a relapse of the treatment [35].

No significant differences were recorded in the recurrence of peptic ulcer diseases between patients above 50 y old (10%) and patients below 50 y old (8.16%), this in agreement with the data of US department of health and human services, which mentioned that stress and income were positively correlated with the recurrence of peptic ulcer disease with minimal correlation to age of the patient [35].

CONCLUSION

1-Multi-causes of peptic ulcer should be considered (affect the end result of treatment).

2-Possibility of H. pylori resistance need to be study.

3-Using of NSAIDs, stress, smoking and ulcer site are a real risk for the end result of eradication therapy of peptic ulcers.

FUNDING

Nil

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

All the authors have contributed equally.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Declared none

REFERENCES

  1. Al-Snafi AA, Rijab HKH. The efficacy of triple and quadruple therapy for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. J Pharm Sci 2005;1:36-44.

  2. Mihmanli M, Isgar A, Kabukcuoglu F, Turkay B, Cikla B, Baykan A. Effect of Helicobacter pylori in perforation of duodenal ulcer. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:1610–2.

  3. Ayman El-Nakeeb, Amir Fikry, Abd El-Hamed TM. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on ulcer recurrence after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Int J Surgery 2009;7:126–9.

  4. O'Connor HJ, Kanduru C, Bhutta AS. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on peptic ulcer healing. Postgrad Med J 1995;71:90-3.

  5. Coghlan JG, Gilligan D, Humphries H, McKenna D, Dooley C, Sweeney E, et al. Campylobacter pylori and recurrence of duodenal ulcers-A 12-month follow-up study. Lancet 1987;2:1109-11.

  6. Rokkas T, Karameris A, Mavrogeorgis A, Rallis E, Giannikos N. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for the prevention of peptic ulcer re-bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:1-4.

  7. Kuipers EJ, Thijs JC, Festen HP. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995;9:59–69.

  8. Gisbert JP, Pajares JM. Helicobacter pylori and bleeding peptic ulcer: what is the prevalence of the infection in patients with this complication? Scand J Gastroenterol 2003;38:2–9.

  9. Hopkins RJ, Girardi LS, Turney EA. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori eradication and reduced duodenal and gastric ulcer recurrence: a review. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1244-52.

  10. Soll AH. Medical treatment of peptic ulcer disease. JAMA 1996;275:622-9.

  11. Gisbert JP, Abraira V. Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:848–63.

  12. Sekine H, Ohara S, Iijima K, Kato K. Recurrence rate of H. pylori after successful eradication and second eradication therapy after the initial failure of treatment. Nippon Rinsho 1999;57:116-20.

  13. Metzger J, Styger S, Sieber C. Prevalence of Helicobacter infection in peptic ulcer perforation. Swiss Med 2001;133:99-103.

  14. Enders KW, Lam YH, Joseph JY. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents the recurrence of ulcers after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation. Ann Surg 2000;231:153-8.

  15. Cheon JH, Kim N, Lee DH, Kim JM, Kim JS, Jung HC, et al. Long-term outcomes after Helicobacter pylori eradication with second-line, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in Korea. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:515-9.

  16. Hildebrand P, Bardhan P, Rossi L, Parvin S, Rahman A, Arefin MS, et al. Recrudescence and reinfection with Helicobacter pylori after eradication therapy in Bangladeshi adults. Gastroenterology 2001;121:792-8.

  17. Rollan A, Giancaspero R, Fuster F, Acevedo C, Figueroa C, Hola K, et al. The long-term reinfection rate and the course of duodenal ulcer disease after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a developing country. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:50-6.

  18. Kim N, Lim SH, Lee KH, Jung HC, Song IS, Kim CY. Helicobacter pylori reinfection rate and duodenal ulcer recurrence in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998;27:321-6.

  19. Lai KC, Lan SK. The need for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. HKMJ 1999;5:163-8.

  20. Chey WD, Wong BC. American college of gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1808-25.

  21. Ryu KH, Yi SY, Na YJ, Baik SJ, Yoon SJ, Jung HS, et al. Reinfection rate and endoscopic changes after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:251–5.

  22. Yakoob J, Abid S, Jafri W. Low recurrence rate of Helicobacter infection in spite of high clarithromycin resistance. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;13:33.

  23. Crofls TJ, Kenneth GMP, Robert JCS, Syndeny SCC, Arthur KCL. A randomized trial of non-operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Eng J Med 1989;320:970-3.

  24. Laurence DR, Bennett PN. Clinical pharmacology. Churchill Livingstone, UK; 1990. p. 336-8.

  25. Zittle TT, Jehle EC, Becker HD. Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today-indication, technique and outcome. Langerbacks Arch Sung 2000;85:84-96.

  26. Marashall B, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancent 1983;1:1273-5.

  27. Sebastian M, Chandran VP, Elashaal YI, Sim AJ. Helicobacter pylori infection in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Br J Surg 1995;82:360-2.

  28. Sharma AK, Mittal S, Malvi SK. Association of Helicobacter pylori with peptic perforation in Chattisgarh region of India. Trop Gastroenterol 2000;21:42-3.

  29. Ng EK, Chung SC, Sung JJ, Lam YH, Lee DW, Laa JY, et al. High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer perforation not caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Surg 1996;83:1779-81.

  30. Rahman M, Nazmul Ahsan HAM, Hussein D. Non-operative management of perforated peptic ulcer. Pak J Med Sci 2003;19:101-5.

  31. Frezza M, Gorji N, Melato M. The histopathology of NSAIDs induce gastroduodenal damage correlation with Helicobacter pylori, ulcers, and hemorrhagic events. J Clin Pathol-Br Med J 2001;54:521-5.

  32. Chan FK, Sung JJ, Suen R, Lee YT, Wu JC, Leung WK, et al. Dose eradication of Helicobacter pylori impair healing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated bleeding peptic ulcer? A prospective randomized study. Alment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:1201-5.

  33. Silra FM, Zaterka S, Eisig JN, Chehter EZ, Chinzon D, Laudanna AA. Factor affecting Helicobacter pylori eradication using a seven-day triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, tinidazole and clarithromycin in Brazillian patients with peptic ulcer. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2001;56:11-6.

  34. Debongniue JC, Wibin E, Timmermans M, Mairesse J, Dekoninck X. Are perforated gastroduodenal ulcers related to Helicobacter pylori infection. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1995;58:208-12.

  35. US department of health and human services. Knowledge about the causes of peptic ulcer disease. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 1997;46:985-6.