Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 8, Issue 12, 180-183Original Article


USING ESSENTIAL OILS TO COMBAT THE THREAT OF MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT BACTERIA, PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA

JENIES GRULLON1, JAMES P. MACK1, ALBERT ROJTMAN2

1Department of Biology, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ, 2Department of Pathology, Meridian Health, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ
Email: mack@monmouth.edu

Received: 16 Aug 2016 Revised and Accepted: 05 0ct 2016


ABSTRACT

Objective: The development of antibiotics was a revolutionary scientific discovery and medical advancement that greatly extended the life expectancy of mankind. Through less than 100 y of using antibiotics to treat infectious bacteria, some of these highly adaptive organisms have developed resistance to the drugs. The healthcare field is greatly concerned with the threat of many common infections that have been considered treatable for decades, regaining its ability to be severely fatal; thus, making alternative treatments currently in high demand. This study concentrated on investigating an alternative treatment for a specific gram-negative bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), a resistance-gaining bacteria that commonly infects hospitalized patients with weakened immune systems and/or open wounds.

Methods: Prior to the age of modern medicine, human beings relied on nature for medicinal treatments. In our research, we focused on determining the in vitro efficacy of using the essential oils, cassia and cinnamon bark, their major component, cinnamaldehyde, as well as the major component of manuka honey, methylglyoxal, as an alternative treatment against P. aeruginosa We tested cassia, cinnamon bark, cinnamaldehyde, and methylglyoxal using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method; the diameter of the zone of inhibition for each treated bacterial sample was measured and compared with the standard antibiotic treatments, tobramycin, and amikacin.

Results: This study showed that the selected essential oils, cinnamaldehyde, and methylglyoxal were as effective or better in inhibiting the growth of P. aeruginosa compared to the standard aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Conclusion: The tested essential oils, cinnamaldehyde, and methylglyoxal may be useful as an alternative treatment for infections caused by P. aeruginosa and may also provide communities where antibiotics are not readily available, a cost-effective way to treat this infectious disease.

Keywords: Essential oils, Multi-drug resistant, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Cinnamon, Cassia, Methylglyoxal, Antibiotic resistance.


INTRODUCTION

The history of using natural plant products in medicinal practices dates back to 4,500 B. C. in Ancient Egyptian civilizations. It is then that medicinal oils extracted from a variety of plants were first recorded as the treatment for various human maladies [1, 2]. Today, antibiotics, synthetically produced or naturally occurring chemicals, are amongst the most commonly prescribed drugs in the world, effective in treating pathogenic bacterial infections. Not very long ago, in the early 20th century, pneumonia, tuberculosis, diarrhea, and diphtheria were among the leading causes of death [4]. Due to the development of antibiotics mortality rates by these diseases and other bacterial infectious diseases have been significantly reduced while dramatically increasing human life expectancy. For that reason, scientists and medical professionals alike, consider antibiotics as one of the most revolutionary developments in human history [2, 5].

Unfortunately, the success of this class of drugs has been accompanied by the rapid growth of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. These strains have emerged due to the widespread use, overuse and misuse of antibiotics along with the opportunistic nature of these pathogenic organisms [5]. Over-prescription, incorrect dosage, lack of patient compliance as well as agricultural and other consumer industry applications of this class of drugs have all contributed to the increased threat of antibiotic resistance [3]. Various biochemical and physiological mechanisms allow these small organisms to develop and retain resistance [5].

Antibiotic resistance is a complex problem with the power to have catastrophic consequences on our very way of life. It is a significant global healthcare threat that has the potential to return us to the pre-antibiotic era where mortality due to infectious diseases was much greater [3, 5, 6]. The United States government has acknowledged antibiotic resistance as a global crisis and has set out initiatives to work nationally and internationally to prevent and control death due to this resistance [7]. The emergence of newer multi-drug resistant bacterial strains has continued its relentless growth [5] and research to find suitable solutions continue. Today, antibiotics continue to serve as the primary treatment for infectious diseases but plants used centuries ago for their antibacterial properties may serve as our salvation and return to the medical field to combat multi-drug resistance [8].

In this, in vitro study, an alternative method of treating infections caused by the multi-drug resistant bacterium, P. aeruginosa, was explored. P. aeruginosa is gram-negative, aerobic, bacillus bacterium that has over time developed resistance to multiple antibiotics. The bacterium is found widely in the environment but has become a health problem in hospital settings [9]. P. aeruginosa most commonly causes pneumonia, infections of the bloodstream, urinary tract infections, swimmers ear infections, as well as surgical site and burn site infections [3]. P. aeruginosa commonly infects those patients with weakened immune system, and if left untreated can lead to severe illness and even death. 51,000 healthcare-associated drug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections result in roughly 400 deaths per year [3].

P. aeruginosa infections are most effectively treated with aminoglycosides including amikacin, gentamicin, streptomycin, tobramycin and neomycin which interfere with the 30S subunit during protein synthesis in the bacterium. However, P. aeruginosa has shown an increase in resistance to these once most effective antibiotics [1, 6, 8, 10]. Physicians are running out of antibiotics to treat these serious multi-drug resistant bacterial infections, particularly those caused by gram-negative bacteria like P. aeruginosa [3, 8]. Gram-negative bacteria have an outer membrane, making the inhibition of its growth significantly more challenging [3]. The outer membrane contains various proteins as well as lipopolysaccharides (LPS). The LPS, which is composed of a lipid, a core polysaccharide, and a highly variable O-antigen, forms an extra barrier in gram-negative bacteria to make them more resistant to growth inhibitors [1]. Of the most threatening gram-negative pathogens, P. aeruginosa ranks second, with a 58% mortality rate [10].

The developments of new strategically designed and effective antibiotics have been limited. Even if developed, such new drugs may only serve to temporarily manage the treatment or control of multi-drug resistance bacterial infections [3] because the ability of bacteria to develop resistance to the traditional antibiotics will persist. Therefore, the demand for developing and proving alternative antimicrobial therapies is high [12, 13]. Examples of alternative treatments that have continuously demonstrated their efficacy and thus earning respect in the medical field are essential oils [14] and honey [12]. Essential oils are contained within granular cells of a variety of plant’s components including seeds, bark, roots, leaves, flowers, wood, balsam and resin; these parts are all responsible for the particular smell and flavor associated with each plant [14]. Essential oils are extracted from aromatic medicinal plants using conventional techniques such as distillation [2]. The composition of essential oils was determined to be complex mixtures of chemicals including various alcohols, aldehydes, terpenes, ethers, ketones, phenols and oxides [2]. Honey is commonly used in wound dressing because of its reputation for having antibacterial properties [11]. The two antimicrobial components identified as being responsible for the effectiveness of honey are hydrogen peroxide and phytochemical components [7, 12].

Our research studied the in vitro antibacterial effects of the essential oils cassia and cinnamon bark (their primary component is cinnamaldehyde) and the major component of manuka honey (Leptospermum scoparium), methylglyoxal [14] on an ATCC strain of P. aeruginosa. These compounds were tested as emollients using lanolin and jojoba oil as carriers. Methylglyoxal and cinnamaldehyde both contain functional group aldehyde, which is known to be responsible for the antibacterial properties of some essential oils. The antimicrobial activity of essential oils and their components is likely due to their ability to inhibit or interact with multiple targets of the cell, including their membranes and cytoplasmic structures [2]. Their hydrophobic properties facilitate their penetration into cell membranes causing the alteration to the structure of membranes as well as leakage of cell contents and sometimes completely change the morphology of the organism’s cells [1, 2].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The drug-resistant bacterial sample

The bacterial sample used for this research was P. aeruginosa (Schroeter) Migula (ATCC® 27853™).

Supply of standard antibiotics

The standard antibiotics implemented in this study were obtained from BD (Becton, Dickinson, and Company) NJ, USA and are listed below:

Essential oils and components

Obtained from dōTERRA Essential Oils of West Pleasant Grove, Utah were the following essential oils: cassia and cinnamon. According to dōTERRAEssential Oils obtains all of their essential oils were obtained via the steam distillation method. The chemical components trans-Cinnamaldehyde, (99%) and methylglyoxal (40% in H2O) were both obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Missouri, USA.

The emollients

The carrier oils used in this study were Jojoba Oil from Sigma-Aldrich Missouri, USA and Liquid Lanolin from Now® Solutions, Bloomingdale, IL, USA.

Preparation of medium

The medium used to provide a stable and supportive environment for the P. aeruginosa during the susceptibility tests, as well as promote its growth during this study was BD DifcoMueller Hinton II Agar. The agar was prepared using dehydrated powder following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, the formed agar was properly autoclaved and poured into sterile Petri dishes to solidify.

Use of the kirby-bauer disk diffusion method

Following the isolated culturing of P. aeruginosa samples, a disk diffusion method was used to measure the zones of inhibitions caused by the compounds applied. The cultures of P. aeruginosa were grown to match a 1x108 Colony Forming Units per milliliter (ml) in 0.5 McFarland standard test tube with tryptic soy broth.

The P. aeruginosa cultures were then streaked onto the solidified Mueller Hinton II agar plates for optimum growth. The antibacterial activity of the specific five (5) μl combinations of methylglyoxal, cinnamaldehyde, essential oils, and emollients were applied directly to sterile blank paper discs (6 mm) BD Difco using Positive Displacement Pipettes from Ranin Instruments, San Diego, CA. These saturated discs were then applied to the middle of the streaked Petri dishes. Similarly, the standard antibiotic amikacin and tobramycin susceptibility test discs were positioned onto the center of streaked Petri dishes. After incubating at 37 °C for approximately 24 h, the diameter of the zones of inhibition for each triplicate set was measured, averaged, and compared with that of the standard antibiotics used in a clinical setting [15].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cassia and cinnamon essential oils, their major component cinnamaldehyde, as well as methylglyoxal, derived from manuka honey, were all tested for their ability to inhibit the growth of multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa in this study. Realistically, because essential oils and their components cause skin irritation when applied directly to the skin, diluting these compounds is necessary for their dermal application. In this in vitro study emollients were prepared by diluting the essential oils and chemicals in lanolin and jojoba oils as carriers. In order to ensure that the carrier oils themselves were not having an antimicrobial effect on the P. aeruginosa, they were tested at 100% concentration first. Results from these experiments showed that lanolin and jojoba oils had no antimicrobial properties inhibiting the growth of P. aeruginosa (table 1). These results ensured that the zones of inhibition observed in the tests using dilutions with carrier oils could solely be attributed to the properties of essential oils or ability of chemical components to act as an antimicrobial agent.

Table 1: Mean diameter of zone of inhibition of 100% carrier oils: lanolin and jojoba oil

Carrier oil Mean diameter of zone of inhibition (mm)
Lanolin 0
Jojoba oil 0

The zones of inhibition of dilutions at various concentrations were tested to determine the emollient’s minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). At the MIC, the emollient(s) tested demonstrated results that were similar or greater in its effectiveness as the standard antibiotics measured. Before being able to determine the MIC for the emollients, the zone of inhibition of the standards (antibiotics, tobramycin, and amikacin) were found (table 2).

Table 2: Mean diameter of zone of inhibition

Antibiotic Mean diameter of zone of inhibition (mm)
Amikacin 21
Tobramycin 23

The compounds were diluted at 25%, 50%, and 80% concentrations; results demonstrated the MIC to be 80% (table 3 and fig. 1). Essential oils are known to work less efficiently on gram-negative bacteria due to the hydrophilic outer membrane [3] which may explain the high observed MIC compared to experiments with gram-positive organisms. The experiment was performed in triplicates under aseptic conditions; measurement of zones of inhibitions of each set was averaged to yield a mean diameters zone of inhibition.

Table 3: Mean diameter of zone of inhibition of cassia, cinnamon, methylglyoxal, and cinnamaldehyde at various dilutions in lanolin and jojoba oil

Essential oil (concentration Carrier oil Mean diameter of zone of inhibition (mm)
Cassia (80%) Lanolin 25
Jojoba oil 26.5
Cassia (50%) Lanolin 16
Jojoba oil 21
Cassia (25%) Lanolin 14
Jojoba oil 13
Cinnamon (80%) Lanolin 22
Jojoba oil 24
Cinnamon (50%) Lanolin 12
Jojoba oil 14
Cinnamon (25%) Lanolin 8
Jojoba oil 4
Methylglyoxal (80%) Lanolin 21
Jojoba oil 20
Methylglyoxal (50%) Lanolin 10
Jojoba oil 15

Cassia, at an 80% dilution in both jojoba oil and lanolin carrier oils, inhibited the growth of P. aeruginosa better than antibiotics amikacin and tobramycin (fig. 1). Cinnamon at the MIC in jojoba oil performed better than both amikacin and tobramycin and performed better than amikacin when diluted with lanolin. At the MIC in jojoba oil methylglyoxal in both carrier, oils performed nearly as well as amikacin and tobramycin in inhibiting the growth of P. aeruginosa. Other studies testing the efficacy of these essential oils, methylglyoxal, and other plant extracts have also demonstrated the success of their antimicrobial properties [8, 12, 16]. This study appears to be the first also to test the efficacy of the major component cinnamaldehyde for its role in the antimicrobial properties of essential oils cassia and cinnamon. The results of this isolated component of cassia and cinnamon oils at MIC were found to be more effective than the standard antibiotics (fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Mean diameter of zone of inhibition (mm) of 80% essential oil with 20% carrier oil with and standard antibiotics

CONCLUSION

In summary, this in vitro study demonstrated the potential of using emollients containing the essential oils, cassia and cinnamon bark, its major component cinnamaldehyde, as well as the major component of manuka honey, methylglyoxal for inhibiting P. aeruginosa infections. The results showed that the emollients tested could be a possible alternative treatment for P. aeruginosa applied topically (possibly).

Further research must be done to develop their clinical application and effectiveness with P. aeruginosa and other bacterial pathogens. Treatment of P. aeruginosa infections with essential oils could make a major global impact on treating hospital patients infected with this bacterium. This approach could also be used for bacterial infections (P. aeruginosa and other similar bacteria) in underdeveloped countries where access to antibiotics is limited.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to thank Dr. Datta Naik, Professor of Chemistry, Monmouth University for his continuous and helpful commentary; Dr. Albert Rojtman of Jersey Shore University Medical Center for his collaboration and support. We also thank Mr. Kevin Young of dōTERRA for his support. Lastly, we thank the Summer Research Program and the Monmouth University Grant-in-Aid for Creativity for providing the funds to make this research project possible.

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

All authors have none to declare.

REFERENCES

  1. Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, De Martino L, Coppola RC, De Feo V. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2013;6:1451-74.
  2. Boire NA, Riedel S, Parrish NM. Essential oils and future antibiotics: new weapons against emerging 'superbugs? J Ancient Diseases Preventive Remedies 2013;2:1-4.
  3. CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the united states. U. S. Dep Health Hum Serv Cent Dis Ctrl and Prev; 2013. p. 1-27.
  4. Zaffiri L, Gardner J, Toledo-Pereyra LH. History of antibiotics. From salvarsan to cephalosporins. J Inv Sur 2012;25:67.
  5. Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Am Soc Microbiol 2010;74:417-33.
  6. Anil C, Shahid RM. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pseudomonas aerugionsa clinical isolates at a tertiary care hospital in Katahmandu, Nepal. Asian J Pharam Clin Res 2013;6:235-7.
  7. The White House. National Strategy for Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria. Washington, DC. The Center for Disease Control; 2015. p. 1-2.
  8. Qureshi WK, Palayekar V, Dayan E, Mack J, Rojtman A. Combating the antibiotic resistance threat. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2015;7:68-72.
  9. National Center for Infectious Diseases [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Pseudomonas aeruginosa in healthcare settings; [about 2 screens]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/pseudomonas.html. [Last accessed on 17 Feb 2015].
  10. Moore D [Internet]. Antibiotic classification and mechanism. Available from: http://dev.orthobullets.com/basic-science/9059/ antibiotic-classification-and-mechanism. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2015].
  11. Planquette B, Timsit JF, Misset BY, Schwebel C, Azoulay E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia: predictive factors of treatment failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;118:69-76.
  12. Cooper RA, Halas E, Molan PC. The efficacy of honey in inhibiting strains of pseudomonas aeruginosa infected burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 2002;23:366-70.
  13. Kavanaugh NL, Ribbeck K. Selecter antimicrobial essential oils eradicate pseudomonas spp. and staphylococcus aeureus biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:4057-61.
  14. Lawless, J. The illustrated encyclopedia of essential oils: The complete guide to the use of oils in aromatherapy and herbalism. New York: Barnes and Noble; 1995.
  15. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;45:493-6.
  16. Santhanamari T, Meenakshi PR, Velayutham S. In vitro antibacterial activity of extracts of lawsonia inermis and punica granatum against clinically isolaticed antiobiotic resistant pseudomonas aeuruginosa and staphylococcus aureus. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2011;4:62-4.

How to cite this article