Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 10, Issue 4, 115-121Original Article
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A RP-HPLC METHOD FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF CURCUMIN, PIPERINE AND CAMPHOR IN AN AYURVEDIC FORMULATION
SULTANA SHAIKH1, VANDANA JAIN2*
1M. PHARM Student, Department of Quality Assurance, Oriental College of Pharmacy, Sanpada-Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400705, 2Associate Professor, Department of Quality Assurance, Oriental College of Pharmacy, Sanpada-Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400705
Email: vandana.jain@ocp.edu.in
Received: 08 Feb 2018 Revised and Accepted: 08 Mar 2018
ABSTRACT
Objective: To develop a novel, accurate, precise and linear reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method for simultaneous qualitative and quantitative estimation of curcumin, piperine and camphor in an ayurvedic formulation and validate as per international conference on harmonization (ICH) guidelines.
Methods: In the present work, good chromatographic separation was achieved isocratically using a shim-pack HPLC C18 column (4.6 x 250 mm, 5μm) and mobile phase consisting of 0.02 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) and acetonitrile in the ratio 40:60, at flow rate of 1 ml/min and column temperature maintained at 35 °C. The effluents obtained were monitored at 255 nm with UV-visible detector.
Results: The retention time of curcumin, piperine and camphor was found to be 6.57 min, 7.32 min and 8.57 min respectively. Linearity of curcumin and camphor were found in the range of 4-8 ppm and that of piperine was found to be 5-9 ppm. The correlation coefficient for curcumin, piperine and camphor were 0.998, 0.99 and 0.994 respectively. The high recovery values (98 %-102 %) indicate a satisfactory accuracy. The low percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) values in the precision study reveals that the method is precise.
Conclusion: The developed method is novel, simple, precise, rapid, accurate and reproducible for simultaneous quantitative estimation of curcumin, piperine and camphor in an ayurvedic formulation. Hence the developed method can be used for quantitative analysis and quality control of extracts and commercial samples of other species containing these three markers.
Keywords: Curcumin, Piperine, Camphor, Ayurvedic formulation, RP-HPLC, Validation, ICH
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2018v10i4.25216
INTRODUCTION
Standardization and analysis of chemical markers in an ayurvedic or poly herbal formulations is always a difficult task. Quantitative determination of chemical markers of each ingredient in any poly herbal preparation required optimal separation techniques by which these markers are separated with the highest resolution and least interferences from each other [1]. Herbal medicine has been enjoying renaissance among the customers throughout the world. However, one of the impediments in the acceptance of the ayurvedic medicines is the lack of standard quality control profiles. The quality of herbal medicine, i.e. the profile of the constituents in the final product, has implication in efficacy and safety. Due to the complex nature and inherent variability of the chemical constituents of plant-based drugs, it is difficult to establish quality control parameters. Modern analytical techniques are increasing to overcome these problems [2]. Separation, identification and determination of chemical components are very difficult for such polyherbal formulations. The advances in chromatographic separation techniques made it possible to quantify the chemical constituents in a mixture with comparatively little clean-up [3]. Particularly, methods using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with reversed phase columns are most commonly applied for the analysis of multiple constituents present in medicinal plants and herbal preparations.
In the present study we have selected an ayurvedic dental powder, which is used to maintain oral hygiene. It is indicated for various dental problems and makes teeth and gums stronger. The selected ayurvedic formulation contains curcuma longa (zingiberaceae), piper longum (piperaceae), cinnamomum camphora (lauraceae) and other crude drugs. Three chemical makers were selected for quantification, and one was from each medicinal herb used as raw materials, curcumin from C. longa, piperine from P. longum and camphor from C. camphora. These markers are responsible for the physiological action of the respective plants.
The literature survey reveals that various analytical methods for estimation of curcumin, piperine and camphor were reported alone and in combination with other drugs [4-10] but to the best of our knowledge, there is no such reported HPLC analysis method for simultaneous estimation of curcumin, piperine and camphor.
In the present investigation, we have developed a simple, optimized and validated HPLC method for the standardization of an ayurvedic formulation using three chemical markers namely curcumin, piperine and camphor. The method was validated as per the international conference on harmonization (ICH) guidelines. This novel validated method has applicability in industry as well as in academia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
HPLC grade curcumin, piperine and camphor (purity 99%) were procured as gift sample from Yucca Enterprises, Mumbai, India. An ayurvedic preparation Patanjali divya dant manjan used for analysis was procured from local market. HPLC grade solvents were purchased from Thomas Baker. RP-HPLC shimadzu (LC 2030) model with “Lab Solution” software was employed in this method. Analytical column used for the separation of analytes was shim-pack HPLC C18 (250 X 4.6 mm, 5 µm).
Methods
Selection of wavelength
Suitable wavelength for the HPLC analysis was determined by recording UV spectrums in the range of 200-400 nm for individual drug solutions of curcumin, piperine and camphor then overlapped. UV overlain spectra of these three markers showed that the drugs absorb appreciably at 255 nm and hence 255 nm was taken as a detection wavelength for HPLC analysis (fig. 1).
Fig. 1: UV overlap spectrum of curcumin, piperine and camphor
Chromatographic conditions
The method was developed using reverse phase, shim-pack HPLC C18 column (250 X 4.6 mm, 5 µm). The run time was of 10 min. The mobile phase used was 0.02 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid) and acetonitrile in the ratio 40:60 at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, column temperature maintained at 35 °C and a detection wavelength of 255 nm using a UV-visible detector.
Preparation of 0.02 M phosphate buffer (pH 3.5)
About 3.48 g of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate was accurately weighed and dissolved in 950 ml of water. The pH was adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid and the volume was made up to 1000 ml in volumetric flask. The solution was then filtered using 0.45 µ membrane filter.
Preparation of standard solution
100 mg of curcumin, piperine and camphor standard were accurately weighed and transferred into 100 ml volumetric flask respectively. About 70 ml solvent was added, sonicated to dissolve and diluted up to the mark using solvent (1000 ppm). Final concentration of curcumin, piperine and camphor were made to 6 ppm, 7 ppm and 6 ppm respectively by suitable dilutions.
Sample preparation
Accurately about 500 mg of dental powder was extracted with 100 ml methanol. The sample solution was filtered to obtain a clear solution. The stock solution after suitable dilutions was used for further analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Method development
A reverse phase HPLC method was developed keeping in mind the system suitability parameters, i.e. resolution factor between peaks, tailing factor, number of theoretical plates, runtime and the cost effectiveness. The developed optimized method resulted in the elution of curcumin at 6.57 min, piperine at 7.32 min and camphor at 8.57 min. Fig. 2,3 and 4 represent chromatograms of curcumin, piperine and camphor standard solution respectively. The total run time was 10 min. System suitability tests are an integral part of method development and are used to ensure adequate performance of the chromatographic system. Retention time, number of theoretical plates, peak resolution and peak tailing factor were evaluated for six replicate injections of the standard working concentration. The results given in table 1 were within the acceptable limits [11].
Fig. 2: Typical chromatogram of curcumin standard solution
Fig. 3: Typical chromatogram of piperine standard solution
Fig. 4: Typical chromatogram of camphor standard solution
Table 1: Results of system suitability studies
| Parameters | Acceptance limits | Curcumin | Piperine | Camphor |
| Retention time (min) | - | 6.57 | 7.32 | 8.57 |
| Resolution factor | Not less than 2 | - | 5.82 | 7.50 |
| Number of theoretical plate | Not less than 2000 | 9472 | 8495 | 6654 |
| Tailing factor | Not more than 2 | 1.17 | 0.984 | 1.03 |
In order to test the applicability of the developed method to an ayurvedic formulation, dental powder extract was chromatographed and it is shown in fig. 5. The sample peaks were identified by comparing the relative retention times with standard markers (fig. 2-4). System suitability parameters were within the acceptable limits, ideal for the chromatographed sample. Integration of the separated peak area was done and each marker concentration was determined by using the peak area concentration relationship obtained in the standardization step. For the analysis of sample, extract of 500 ppm of dental powder was injected in triplicate and quantified for three active markers using linear regression equation. The results of dental powder extract analysis are reported in table 2.
Fig. 5: Typical chromatogram of marketed ayurvedic formulation
Table 2: Analysis of dental powder extract
| Formulation | Marker | Amount found (ppm) n=3 | Content (%) |
Dental powder extract (500 ppm) |
Curcumin | 4.675 | 0.935 |
| Piperine | 5.693 | 1.138 | |
| Camphor | 4.261 | 0.852 |
#n: number of injections
Method validation
Validation of the analytical method is the process that establishes by laboratory studies in which the performance characteristics of the method meet the requirements for the intended analytical application. The developed HPLC method was validated according to ICH guidelines [12] for validation of analytical procedures. The method was validated for the parameters like linearity, accuracy, system precision, method precision, robustness, limit of detection and limit of quantitation.
Specificity
Fig. 2-5 for standard drug solutions and sample chromatogram reveals that the peaks obtained in the standard solutions and sample solution at working concentrations are only because of the drugs as blank has no peak at the retention time of curcumin, piperine and camphor. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the method developed is said to be specific [13, 14].
Precision
System precision
Six replicate injections of the standard solutions at working concentration showed percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) less than 2 concerning peak area for each marker, which indicates the acceptable reproducibility and thereby the precision of the system [15, 16]. System precision results are tabulated in table 3.
Method precision
Method precision was determined by performing the analysis of the sample under the test of repeatability at working concentration. Six injections of the sample from the same homogeneous mixture at working concentration showed % RSD less than 2 concerning content of three markers indicate that the method developed is precise by the test of repeatability [15,16] and hence can be understood that the method gives consistently reproducible results (table 4).
Table 3: System precision results
| S. No. | Peak area of curcumin (6 ppm) | Peak area of piperine (7 ppm) | Peak area of camphor (6 ppm) |
| 1 | 290208 | 415799 | 57236 |
| 2 | 299752 | 417624 | 57843 |
| 3 | 289557 | 416542 | 56874 |
| 4 | 297654 | 416547 | 57632 |
| 5 | 287654 | 426457 | 57438 |
| 6 | 296746 | 417542 | 56421 |
| Average | 293595 | 418419 | 57241 |
| SD | 5047 | 3998 | 522 |
| %RSD | 1.72 | 0.96 | 0.91 |
# SD: Standard deviation, # %RSD: Percent relative standard deviation
Table 4: Method precision results
| Marker | Intra-day | Inter-day | |
| Content (ppm) n=3 | % RSD | Content (ppm) n=3 | |
| Curcumin | 4.673 | 0.21 | 4.676 |
| Piperine | 5.688 | 0.22 | 5.649 |
| Camphor | 4.258 | 0.16 | 4.259 |
# n: number of injections, # %RSD: Percent relative standard deviation
Linearity
Standard solutions of curcumin, piperine and camphor at different concentration level were prepared in triplicates. Calibration curves were constructed by plotting the concentration level versus corresponding peak areas for each marker. The results show an excellent correlation between peak areas and concentrations level within the tested concentration range of 5-9 ppm for piperine and that of 4-8 ppm for curcumin and camphor (table 5). The correlation coefficients were greater than 0.99 for each marker, which meet the method validation acceptance criteria [15, 16] and hence the method is said to be linear (fig. 6-8).
Table 5: Data for linearity studies
| Marker | Concentration range (ppm) | Regression equation | R2 |
| Curcumin | 4-8 | y=90946x-261113 | 0.998 |
| Piperine | 5-9 | y=190503x-890249 | 0.990 |
| Camphor | 4-8 | y=9816.8x-2405.6 | 0.994 |
Fig. 6: Calibration curve of curcumin
Fig. 7: Calibration curve of piperine
Fig. 8: Calibration curve of camphor
Accuracy
Accuracy was determined by means of recovery experiments, by the determination of % mean recovery of each compound in the formulation at three different levels (80%, 100% and120%). At each level, three determinations were performed. Percent mean recovery was calculated as shown in table 6. The accepted limits of mean recovery are 98%-102% and all observed data were within the required range, which indicates good recovery values, affirming the accuracy of the method developed [15, 16].
Table 6: Recovery study for three markers in dental powder
| Compounds | Sample content [ppm] | Standard added [ppm] | Actual amount [ppm] | Total area found [n=3] | Amount recovered [ppm] |
% Recovery |
| Curcumin | 2.33 | 1.86 | 4.19 | 115032 | 4.135 | 98.70 |
| 2.33 | 4.66 | 164123 | 4.675 | 100.32 | ||
| 2.79 | 5.12 | 205132 | 5.126 | 100.12 | ||
| Piperine | 2.84 | 2.27 | 5.11 | 110256 | 5.25 | 102.77 |
| 2.84 | 5.68 | 195846 | 5.70 | 100.37 | ||
| 3.40 | 6.24 | 275541 | 6.12 | 98.16 | ||
| Camphor | 2.13 | 1.70 | 3.83 | 34518 | 3.76 | 98.20 |
| 2.13 | 4.26 | 38815 | 4.19 | 98.56 | ||
| 2.55 | 4.68 | 43412 | 4.66 | 99.72 |
# n: Number of injections
Robustness
To determine the robustness of the developed method, experimental conditions were deliberately altered, and the system suitability parameter tailing factor and peak area were evaluated. The solution was prepared as per the test method described earlier and injected at different variable conditions like column temperature (33 °C and 37 °C) and detection wavelength (254 nm and 256 nm). Robustness data clearly shows that the proposed method is robust at small but deliberate change [15, 16]. Robustness data are given in table 7.
Table 7: Robustness data for curcumin, piperine and camphor
| Parameters | Curcumin (6 ppm) | Piperine (7 ppm) | Camphor (6 ppm) |
| Peak area | Tailing factor | Peak area | |
| Minus temp [33 °C] | 290201 | 1.17 | 415799 |
| Plus temp [37 °C] | 290152 | 1.09 | 413444 |
| Minus wavelength [254 nm] | 280642 | 0.99 | 413942 |
| Plus wavelength [256 nm] | 290212 | 1.37 | 405672 |
Sensitivity
The sensitivity of measurement of curcumin, piperine and camphor by use of the proposed method was estimated in terms of the limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD). LOQ and LOD were calculated by the use of the equations LOD = 3.3σ/S and LOQ = 10σ/S where σ is the standard deviation of intercepts of calibration plots and S is the average of the slopes of the corresponding calibration plot (table 8).
Table 8: LOD and LOQ for curcumin, piperine and camphor
| Compound | LOD (ppm) | LOQ (ppm) |
| Curcumin | 0.183 | 0.550 |
| Piperine | 0.069 | 0.209 |
| Camphor | 0.175 | 0.531 |
# LOD: limit of detection, # LOQ: limit of quantitation
The results obtained from above set of observations prove that the method is useful in qualitative and quantitative analysis of the markers from the complex herbal mixture formulation. Moreover, various analytical methods for estimation of curcumin, piperine and camphor were reported alone and in combination with other drugs [4-10] but as yet there is no reported HPLC analysis method for simultaneous estimation of curcumin, piperine and camphor combination and the novel method developed in this report is the first of its kind. The developed method is based on the use of very economical solvent, had short chromatographic time and hence can be performed with ease.
CONCLUSION
The results indicate that selected ayurvedic dental powder contains a number of markers that may be responsible for its therapeutic activity. The developed HPLC method will assist in the standardization of dental powder using biologically active chemical markers. The developed HPLC method for simultaneous determination of curcumin, piperine and camphor from ayurvedic dental powder is accurate, precise, reproducible and repeatable. Patanjali divya dental powder also contains a number of other constituents, which are currently the subject of further investigation, apart from those standards studied. With the growing demand for herbal drugs and increased belief in the usage of herbal medicine, the development of a standardization tool will help in maintaining the quality of this important ayurvedic preparation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors are thankful to Yucca Enterprises, Mumbai, Maharashtra for providing gift samples.
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
All the authors have contributed equally
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Declared none
REFERENCES
Ong ES. Extraction methods and chemical standardization of botanicals and herbal preparations. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 2004;812:23-33.
Asokar LV, Kakkar KK, Chakra OG. Glossary of Indian medicinal plants with active principles, Publication and Information Directorate, New Delhi; 1992. p. 122.
Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. I. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi; 2003. p. 10-50.
Pak Y, Patek R, Mayersohn M. Sensitive and rapid isocratic liquid chromatography method for the quantitation of curcumin in plasma. J Chromatogr B: Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 2003;796:339-46.
Heath DD, Pruitt MA, Brenner DE, Rock CL. Curcumin in plasma and urine: quantitation by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 2003;783:287-95.
Kalra R, Diwan A, Kumar J, Sharm S. Simultaneous estimation of artemether and curcumin by RP-HPLC method. Pharmacophore 2016;07:141-51.
Bajad S, Singla AK, Bedi KL. Liquid chromatographic method for determination of piperine in rat plasma: application to pharmacokinetics. J Chromatogr B: Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 2002;776:245-9.
Vyas NY, Patel S. Simultaneous estimation of curcuminoids, piperine, and gallic acid in an ayurvedic formulation by validated high-performance thin layer chromatographic method. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2016;9 Suppl 2:117-22.
Gallicano KD, Park HC, Young LM. A sensitive liquid chromatographic procedure for the analysis of camphor in equine urine and plasma. J Anal Toxicol 1985;9:24-30.
Noor AM, Mandal UK, Mohamed F, Chatterjee B. Fast and simple gas chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of camphor, menthol and methyl salicylate in analgesic ointment: application in stability study. J Pharm Invest 2017;47:275–85.
Vemula VR, Sharma PK. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of diclofenac and tolperisone in tablet dosage form. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2013;6 Suppl 3:186-9.
International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human use. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology ICH Q2(R1); 2005.
Sarat M, Murali PK, Rambabu C. Development and validation of RPHPLC method for simultaneous estimation of amlodipine besylate and benazepril Hcl in tablet dosage form. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2012;4:80-4.
Rao PV, Rambabu C. Validated reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of artemether and lumefantrine in fixed combined dosage form. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017; 10:159-63.
FDA, Guidance R. Validation of chromatographic methods center for drug evaluation and research (CDER). Food Drug Administration; 1994. p. 2.
FDA. ORA validation and verification guidance for human drug analytical methods. Food Drug Administration; 2003. p. 1.