1Department of Nutrition and 2Physiology, Raja Narendra Lal Khan Women’s College, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India, 3Department of Physiology, Ramnagar College, Purba Medinipur, 721441, West Bengal, India, 4Food Chemistry Division, National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India
Email: koushikphysiology@yahoo.com
Received: 21 Sep 2018 Revised and Accepted: 04 Feb 2019
ABSTRACT
Objective: Tea is a widely consumed beverage worldwide. The effect of green tea is mainly due to its high polyphenols-(-) epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) content in the culture of cancer cell and bacterial cells. The present work was carried out to investigate the efficacy of green tea oil (GTO) against cancer cells and bacterial cells.
Methods: In this study green tea oil was prepared from green tea for different experiment and determination of fatty acids profile from green tea oil. In the present study, peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) was chosen as human peripheral blood lymphocytes and blood cancer MCF-7 cells were chosen as human cancer cells. To fulfill our aims and also to evaluate the activity of this phytomedicine against normal lymphocytes and cancer cells the cell samples were divided into 26 experimental groups in the following ways. Each Petri dish contains 2 X 105 cells.
Results: GTO shows a potent anticancer agent but nontoxic to normal cells. The GTO decreases the reduced glutathione (GSH) level and increase the oxidized glutathione (GSSG) level significantly (P<0.05) in MCF-7 cells. But in lymphocytes the GSH level and GSSG level were almost the same with the control group but doxorubicin (DOX) significantly decreased the GSH and increase the GSSG level. Green tea oil treatment causes generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in MCF-7 cells revealed by DCFH2DA staining. Agar diffusion test shows the GTO is effective against multi-drug resistant bacteria.
Conclusion: This phytomedicine has a potent anticancer activity without damaging the normal lymphocytes. So, this drug can be used for further treatment of anticancer and antibacterial.
Keywords: Green tea, Green Tea Oil, Polyphenols-(-) Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, Cancer, Phytomedicine
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2019v11i3.29888
Cancer is the second foremost life-threatening disease worldwide causes of human death. In spite of substantial advancement in biomedical researches on cancer biology, identifications of cancer biomarkers, different surgical procedures, antibody therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the overall survival rate of cancer patients have not significantly improved in the last few decades [1]. In the present scenario, different pathogenic bacteria particularly multidrug-resistant bacteria also have become national and international concern [2]. According to the centers for disease control (CDC) report, there has a possibility of a post-antibiotic world, where a minor cut or a small injury could be fatal because the antibiotic efficacies will loss. Among them, the most problematic pathogens are Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, all the bacterial strains show multidrug resistance. Natural assets or resources including plant derived molecules have been used to prevent human diseases for thousands of years. The therapeutic benefits of several plant products, as well as phyto-chemicals, have become one of the major areas of interest in cancer therapy and control of drug-resistant bacteria. Natural substances show a rising role in different biomedical applications. Severe side effects of various traditional and conventional chemotherapeutic drugs are one of the major problems for cancer therapy. Thus, to overcome this important issue, phytochemical based antimicrobial and anticancer drug development becomes the major thrust area of many researchers. Green tea (Camellia sinensis L.) contain various phytocomponents such as polyphenols (catechins), caffeine (called theine), tannin (flavonols), theophylline, theobromine, saponins, essential oils, carotene, and nutrients are vitamin C, B1, B12, K, flouride, iron, magnesium, calcium, strontium, copper, nickel, zinc, and trace elements like molybdenum and phosphorus, which have been found to protective effect against bacterial infections[4] and viral infections[5] as well as anticarcinogenic [6] and antimutagenic activities [7], inflammation [8], platelet aggregation [9] and elevation of vascular reactivity [10]. We consume mainly tea aqueous beverage for health benefits comes from mainly polyphenols consumption include catechins 45.5% (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, 18.2% (-)-epicatechin gallate, 10.1% (-)-epicatechin and 4.2% (-)-epigallocatechin [3] There is no data regarding green tea oil (GTO) which is considered a kind of edible oil because the predominant fatty acids (FAs) are the monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) i.e., oleic acid and the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) i. e, linoleic acid, they are essential in human nutrition and helps to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol and the triglycerides. Besides, it is most important that GTO contains mono, di, trichosanic acid (conjugated mono and polyunsaturated fatty acid). The present study was carried out to evaluate the GTO mediated selective cytotoxicity on cancer cells in vitro experimental settings. Doxorubicin (DOX) was taken as a positive control for the study as it is a potent chemotherapeutic agent. Simultaneously, human peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) was taken as a normal cell and any toxicity due to GTO treatment was carefully investigated.
Culture media and chemicals
Histopaque 1077, DMEM, penicillin, streptomycin, pentoxifylline (POF), Doxorubicin, were procured from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from GIBCO/Invitrogen, MTT reagent. Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), Tris–HCl, Tris buffer, Titron X-100, Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), ethanol (C2H5OH), iso-amyl alcohol, were procured from Merck Ltd., SRL Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. Di-methyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) was procured from Hi-media, India. All other chemicals were purchased from SRL, India and MERCK, India. sd FINE-CHEM Limited, India, HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. India and Crest Biosystems Goa, India.
Collection of green tea leaves
Green tea leaves was collected from heritage tea garden, Gopali, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (Geographical extension between 22 ° 28' 59" North to 22 ° 29' 19" North latitude and 87 ° 30' 20" East to 87 ° 30' 35" East), Paschim Medinipur District of West Bengal, India. The plants were identified by a renowned taxonomist (CNH/27/2017) in the Department of Botany, Raja Narendra Lal Khan Women’s College, Midnapore and also the voucher specimens were deposited in the Department of Botany, Raja Narendra Lal Khan Women’s College.
Green tea oil preparation
The oil content was extracted from green tea leaves by soxhlet apparatus using petroleum ether as a solvent for 6 h according to the american oil chemists’ society (AOCS) method [11]. At first 1 kg green tea leaves were soaked in warm water at 60 °C for 5 minute and discard the water for removing the water dissolving compounds from the tea leaves. Then the wet tea leaves was dried at 40±1 °C in an incubator and the dried parts were crushed in an electric grinder machine and fine dust (800 gm) was collect for the experimentation [12]. Dried and finely powdered dust (800 gm) was dissolved in hexane: isopropanol (3:2; v/v) on an airtight glass jar for 24 h and allow it for shaking incubation at 37 °C and filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper and the filtrate was collected. Then filtrate was evaporated by a rotary evaporator at 40 °C. The collected part was content total oil.
Determination of oil content
The ether was removed from the oil by rotary evaporator under pressure and the oil content was calculated from the weight of oil and dusts using the formula [13].
Determination of fatty acid profile by GC-FID
The fatty acid profile of edible oils and fats were determined according to the method of O’Fallon, Busboom, Nelson, and Gaskins (2007) and association of official analytical chemists (AOAC) official method 996.06 [14]. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared from the oils and fat samples by direct trans-esterification using 2% sulphuric acid in methanol. Separations of FAMEs were done and quantified it by Gas Chromatography coupled with flame ionization detector (FID) (Agilent Series, 7890 Series, USA). Briefly, forty milliliter (40 ml) of oil or 50 mg of fat sample was weighed and taken in a screw-capped Pyrex culture tube and 1 ml of C17 (1 mg/ml; Heptadecanoic acid; Sigma H3500) was added as internal standard. Potassium hydroxide (0.7 ml) and 5.3 ml of methanol with 0.05% of butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT) were added to the tube and incubated in a boiling water bath set at 55 °C for 90 min with vigorous shaking of 20 s for every 20 min. After incubation, the tubes were cooled under tap water followed by the addition of 2% sulphuric acid and incubation at 55 °C for 90 min. Further, n-Hexane (3 ml) was added to the tube, vortexed and centrifuged for 5 min at 2000 rpm. The n-Hexane layer was collected in a 5 ml test tube having 0.1 g of sodium sulphate. The tubes were again vortexed and the solvent was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. 1.5 ml of dichloromethane was added to the tube and mixed thoroughly. 0.5 ml of the dichloromethane with FAME was filtered through 0.22 mm PVDF syringe filter and injected to the gas chromatograph. SP 2560 (75 m x 0.18 mm x 0.14 mm) column was used for the gas chromatographic separation with following instrumental conditions: Injector temperature: 250 °C; Carrier gas: Hydrogen @ 0.6 ml/minute; Split Ratio: 1:100; Oven Program: 140 °C (Hold 1.5 min) to 220 °C @ 3 °C (Hold 1.0 min) to 230 °C (Hold 3 min); Detector: Flame Ionization Detector; Temperature: 260 °C; H2: 40 ml/minute; Zero Air: 400 ml/min; Injection Volume: 1 ml. The fatty acids present in the samples were quantified by area percentage calculation using Supelco 37 FAME Mixture (Sigma Cat. No. 47885-U) as the reference standard. Results were expressed as % fatty acids of oil. Internal standard, as well as Standard Reference Material (SRM)-1544, was used for analytical quality assurance.
Selection of human subjects for the collection of lymphocytes
Lymphocytes were collected from 6 healthy human subjects, abstaining from any kind of disease (hereditary disease, chronic disease) drug addiction and medication. After regular routine checkup and all the participants were belonging to the same geographical area was another protocol for the study. The study protocol approved by the Institutional Ethical committee (1905/PO/Re/S/2016/CPCSEA) of Raja Narendra Lal Khan Women’s College was in accordance with the Helsinki protocol previously reported from our laboratory [15].
Isolation of peripheral blood lymphocytes
Blood samples were collected from six healthy human subjects in 5 ml heparin coated Vacutainers by the vein-puncture method according to the method of Hudson and Hay [16]. After diluting 5 ml blood 1:1 with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), Histopaque 1077 (Sigma) was used for density gradient centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 40 min at room temperature using a Pasteur pipette. The upper monolayer of the buffy coat which comprises Lymphocytes were collected and washed three times in balanced salt solution. The PBL were re-suspended in RPMI complete media supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated for 24 h in a 95% air/5% CO2 atmosphere in CO2 incubator at 37 °C.
Cell culture and maintenance
Breast cancer cell line MCF-7 which was gifted from Jadavpur University West Bengal. Breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and normal lymphocytes were cultured in a DMEM complete medium with 10% FBS, 2 mmol L-glutamine, 100U/ml penicillin, 100μg/ml streptomycin under 5% CO2 and 95% humidified atmosphere at 37 °C in CO2 incubator.
Drug preparation
The green tea oil was dissolved in 0.5% DMSO in distilled water and the working concentration of the drug was 1 mg/ml.
Experimental groups for in vitro cytotoxicity study
In the present study, PBL was chosen as human peripheral blood lymphocytes and MCF-7 cells were chosen as human cancer cells. To fulfill our aims and also to evaluate the activity of this phytomedicine against normal lymphocytes and cancer cells the cell samples were divided into 26 experimental groups in the following ways. Each Petri dish contains 2 X 105 cells.
Group I: Control i.e., PBL Cells+culture media, Group II: Control i.e., MCF-7 Cells+culture media, Group III: PBL Cells+5 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group IV: PBL Cells+5 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group V: MCF-7 Cells+5 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group VI: MCF-7 Cells+5 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group VII: PBL Cells+10 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group VIII: PBL Cells+10 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group IX: MCF-7 Cells+10 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group X: MCF-7 Cells+10 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XI: PBL Cells+25 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XII: PBL Cells+25 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XIII: MCF-7 Cells+25 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XIV: MCF-7 Cells+25 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XV: PBL Cells+50 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XVI: PBL Cells+50 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XVII: MCF-7 Cells+50 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XVIII: MCF-7 Cells+50 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XIX: PBL Cells+100 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XX: PBL Cells+100 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XXI: MCF-7 Cells+100 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XXII: MCF-7 Cells+100 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XXIII: PBL Cells+200 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XXIV: PBL Cells+200 µg/ml GTO in culture media, Group XXV: MCF-7 Cells+200 µg/ml Doxorubicin in culture media, Group XXVI: MCF-7 Cells+200 µg/ml GTO in culture media, after the treatment schedule the cells were collected from the Petri dishes separately and centrifuged at 2200 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to separate cells and supernatants [10]. The cells were washed twice with 50 mmol PBS, pH 7.4. A required amount of cells were lysed using hypotonic lysis buffer (10 mmol TRIS, 1 mmol EDTA and Titron X-100, pH 8.0) for 45 min at 37 °C and then processed for the biochemical estimation. Intact cells were used for ROS, and different microscopic observations.
Cellular toxicity assay
After the completion of treatment with tea oil at different concentrations, the treated cells such as PBLs and MCF-7 cells were washed with PBS (1X) for three times using centrifugation (2200 rpm for 3 min/wash) and the cells were prepared for cytotoxicity study. The cell viability was estimated quantitatively by nonradioactive, colorimetric assay systems using tetrazolium salt, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenil-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) according to the method of the previous report [17]. The percentage of proliferation was calculated by using the following equation:
Intracellular redox balance
Determination of reduced glutathione (GSH)
Quantization of GSH estimation in cell lysate (1 x 106 cells/ml) was performed according to the standard method [18]. After the treatment schedule with tea oil at different concentrations, an aliquot of the each sample was mixed with 25% of TCA and centrifuged at 2000×g for 15 min to settle down the precipitated proteins. The supernatant was aspirated and diluted to 1 ml with 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). After that, 2 ml of 0.6 mmol DTNB was added. After 10 min of the mixing, the optical density of the yellow-colored complex formed by the reaction of GSH and DTNB (Ellman’s reagent) was measured at 405 nm. A standard curve was obtained with standard reduced glutathione. The levels of GSH were expressed as µg of GSH/mg protein.
Determination of oxidized glutathione (GSSG)
After derevatization of GSH with 2-vinylpyidine, the GSSG level was measured according to the method of Kar Mahapatra et al. [19]. After the treatment schedule with tea oil at different concentrations, the PBLs and MCF-7 cells were washed three times and cell lysate was prepared. In brief, 2 μL of 2-vinylpyidine was added to a 0.5 ml of test sample and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. The reaction mixture was then deprotenized with 4% sulfosalicylic acid and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min to settle the precipitated proteins. The supernatant of the solution was collected and the GSSG level was estimated with the reaction of DTNB at the absorption of 412 nm and calculated with a standard GSSG curve. The level of GSSG was calculated with the standard GSSG curve. The levels of GSSG were expressed as µg of GSSG/mg protein.
Determination of lipid peroxidation
Lipid peroxidation in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) level was estimated by the method of Das et al. [20]. In brief, after the treatment schedule with drug and DOX, cell lysate (1 x 106 cells/ml) of PBLs and MCF-7 were prepared. This cell lysate was used as the sample for MDA level estimation. The levels of lipid peroxidation were expressed in terms of nmol/mg protein.
Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) measurement
Measurement of intracellular ROS generation was performed using H2DCFDA according to our previously reported method [17]. In brief, after the treatment schedule with drug and DOX on PBLs and MCF-7, the cells were washed with culture media followed by incubation with 1 mg/ml H2DCFDA for 30 min at 37 ℃. Then, the cells were washed three times with fresh culture media. As a positive control, PBLs were incubated with H2O2 (100 mmol) for 30 min prior to the analysis [21]. After H2DCFDA exposure, DCF fluorescence images were observed by a fluorescence microscope (NIKON ECLIPSE LV100POL). All experiments were done in triplicate.
Protein estimation
Protein estimation was measured by using a commercially available standard kit (AGAPPE) by semiautoanalyser (AGAPPE) by a standard protocol for photometric determination [22].
Antimicrobial activity
Disc agar diffusion (DAD)
Susceptibility of GTO to different multidrug resistant bacteria was determined by the DAD technique according to Bauer et al. 1966. The test indicator bacterium (Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25093 and Escherichia coli ATCC 8739) taken from an overnight culture (inoculated from a single colony) was freshly grown for 4 h having 106 CFU/ml were standardized against MacFarland’s standard. With this culture, a bacterial lawn was prepared on Mueller-Hinton agar. 6-mm sizes well are prepared and used to observe drugs susceptibility patterns against GTO. GTO and standard antibiotics solutions were prepared. The diameter of zone of bacterial growth inhibition surrounding the well (including the well), was measured [15].
Statistical analysis
All the parameters were repeated at least three times. The data were presented as mean±SEM (n = 6). Performing one-way ANOVA test (using a statistical package, Origin 6.1, Northampton, MA 01060, USA) the means of control and treated group were compared by multiple comparison t-tests, P<0.05 as a limit of significance.
Total oil content (%)
The total oil content from green tea was 40 ml. The total oil content 5% in green tea.
Fatty acid composition of GTO
Data revealed that GTO contained a very different fatty acid profile with the maximum amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids (60.04%). Among the polyunsaturated fatty acid, linolenic acid was found to be the highest amount (39.01%). Results show in table 1.
Table 1: Fatty acid profile of GTO
Fatty acids (% of FAMEs) | GTO |
C14:0 (Myristic) | 1.81 |
C16:0 (Palmitic) | 23.36 |
C18:0 (Stearic) | 4.08 |
C16:1 (Palmitoleic) | 1.18 |
C18:1n9c (Oleic) | 9.53 |
C18:2n6c (Linoleic) | 21.03 |
C18:3n3 (Linolenic) | 39.01 |
Cell death assay by MTT
The cytotoxicity of the GTO and DOX was checked towards normal lymphocytes (PBL) and MCF-7 cell lines in vitro. The tea oil was charged in these cells for cell death assay at different concentrations (1μg/ml, 5μg/ml, 10μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 50μg/ml, 100μg/ml and 200μg/ml). After 24 h treatment schedule the % of MCF-7 breast cancer cells were killed by 18.20%, 23.16%, 33.81%, 45.05%, 74.81%, 81.12%, 93.84% at the dose 1μg/ml, 5μg/ml, 10μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 50μg/ml, 100μg/ml and 200μg/ml respectively whereas DOX killed 11.2%, 58.19%, 83.82%, 91.89%, 95.29%, 96.64%, 96.91% at their respective doses. The lymphocytes were killed by 2.83%, 6.42%, 9.15%, 11.72%, 13.13%, 15.1%, 20.86% due to GTO treatment whereas DOX killed 10.2%, 48.19%, 76.82%, 88.89%, 91.29%, 95.64%, 97.91% at the dose 1μg/ml, 5μg/ml, 10μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 50μg/ml, 100μg/ml and 200μg/ml respectively. From this study it has been clear that the effective dose of GTO was 50μg/ml. In this dose the cancer cell killing is significant and this dose was biocompatible to normal cells. So, this dose was selected for the rest of the experiments.
Fig. 1A and 1B: In vitro cell death assay of drug treated, DOX-treated MCF-7 and Lymphocytes were measured by the MTT method as described in materials and methods, values are expressed mean±SEM (n=6), symbol indicates the difference significantly each other
Estimation of reduced glutathione level
The GSH level was decreased in case of MCF-7 cells by 24.95% significantly (P<0.05) compared to the control, when treated with the drug. But in case of lymphocytes, the GSH level was almost same with the control group but DOX significantly (P<0.05) decreased the GSH level compared to the control group and drug-treated group at the dose of 50μg/ml.
Fig. 2: Intracellular reduced glutathione (GSH) levels of drug-treated and DOX-treated MCF-7 cells and PBLs. The levels of GSH were expressed as mg of GSH/mg protein. Values are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6) of three experiments; superscripts indicate significant difference (P<0.05) compared with the control group
Estimation of oxidized glutathione level
The GSSG level of drug-treated MCF-7 group was elevated significantly (P<0.05) by 130.17% compared with the control of MCF-7 cells. The level of DOX-treated MCF-7 cells increased by 143.62% compared to the control at the dose 50μg/ml. But in case of lymphocytes, the GSSG level was little bit decreased compared to the control group whereas DOX-treated group, in case of Lymphocytes the GSSG level was increased by significantly (p<0.05) 142.6% compared to the control group.
Fig. 3: Intracellular oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels of drug-treated, DOX-treated, MCF-7 cells and lymphocytes. The levels of GSSG were expressed in term of mg of GSSG/mg protein, values are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6) of three experiments; superscripts indicate significant differences (P<0.05) compared with the control group
Fig. 4: Estimation of MDA levels of drug-treated and DOX-treated MCF-7 cells and PBLs. MDA level in terms of lipid peroxidation was expressed as n mole/mg protein, values are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6) of three experiments; superscripts indicate significant differences (P<0.05) compared with the control group
Estimation of lipid peroxidation
In the case of MCF-7 cells the MDA level was elevated significantly (P<0.05) by 16.29% in GTO treated group (50μg/ml) compared to the control group. But in the case of DOX-treated MCF-7 cells showed that the MDA level increased by 26.22% significantly (P<0.05) compared with the control group. Green tea oil (GTO) treated Lymphocytes increased the MDA level by 10.09% whereas DOX increased the MDA level by 31.47% significantly (P<0.05) compared to the control group at the dose of 50μg/ml.
Estimation of intracellular ROS measurement
The generation of ROS has been shown to contribute to GTO-triggered cytotoxicity in cancer cells. In this study, we measure the intracellular ROS, 2,7-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH2-DA) was used as an intracellular ROS indicator for the GTO and DOX-treated MCF-7 cells and normal Lymphocytes. After exposure, the cells were stained with DCFH2DA for 30 min. We found that the GTO and DOX-treated MCF-7 cells became DCF+, indicating that ROS were generated and participated in the GTO mediated cell death (fig. 5). In contrast, after the same procedure without GTO and DOX, no fluorescent cells or mild fluorescent cells were found, indicating no or less ROS generation. The ROS production, as well as DCF fluorescence intensity, was altered significantly in both types of cells in DOX treatment. Densitometry study revealed that the GTO and DOX treatment has not significantly altered ROS level in human peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL), but in MCF-7 cells the intracellular ROS level was highly significant (P<0.05). GTO and DOX treatment were able to significantly (p<0.05) increased ROS level compared with the control group.
Fig. 5: Intracellular reactive oxygen species measurement was done from GTO treated MCF-7 cells and lymphocytes. The levels of ROS was considered as DCF fluorescence intensity and recorded by Fluorescence microscopic images Here A) Control MCF-7 cells B) GTO treated MCF-7 cells C) control lymphocytes D) GTO treated lymphocytes
Intracellular reactive oxygen species measurement was done from DOX-treated MCF-7 cells and lymphocytes. The levels of ROS was considered as DCF fluorescence intensity and recorded by Fluorescence microscopic images Here E) Control MCF-7 cells F) DOX-treated MCF-7 cells G) Control lymphocytes H) DOX-treated lymphocytes.
Antimicrobial activity
This was evident from the study that the values of the diameter of the zone of inhibition obtained during the evaluation of antibacterial activity. The zones of inhibition of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli against GTO and standard antibiotics are shown in fig. 7 and table 2. In the agar diffusion test, the diameter of the inhibition zone of GTO (25µg) and vancomycin (25µg) toward S. aureus are 22 mm and 25 mm respectively. The diameter of the inhibition zone of GTO (25µg) and Imipenem (25µg) toward E. coli are 27 mm and 29 mm respectively and the zone of inhibition of GTO (25µg) and amikacin (25µg) toward P. aeruginosa are 30 mm and 23 mm respectively. A plant-derived oil showed potent function in the inhibition of growth of well-known pathogenic bacteria. This green tea oil has really proved to be beneficial to minimize the total microbial growth inhibition.
Fig. 6: Bar diagram represents the diameter of zone of inhibition on nutrient broth. Here, Zone 1: Standard antibiotic and Zone 2: green tea oil
More than 25% of new drugs are derived from natural products or their synthetic analogues. Plant-derived chemicals or phytochemicals and different microbial extracts from various biological origins are the main source of new drug development [23]. The phyto-components of green tea are polyphenols, carotene, caffeine, flavonols, theophylline, the bromine, saponins, essential oils, and some vitamins (vitamin C, B1, B12) and minerals (K, F, Fe, Mg, Ca, Cu, Ni, Zn, Mo,P etc), possess a variety of biological activities, including anticarcinogenic, antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory etc [4,5,6,8]. The present study showed that green tea oil (GTO) significantly killed the MCF-7 cells selectively in a dose-dependent manner, with no significant toxic effects on PBLs (fig. 1A) at the dose 50 μg/ml. Very less amount of lymphocytes were dead at this dose. So, this plant-derived single compound (GTO) is nontoxic to the normal healthy cells (lymphocytes) and highly active against cancer cells (MCF-7). Cytotoxicity of a chemical compound has been defined as the independent cellular killing property and the mechanism of cell death differ from the existing one [24]. So, 50μg/ml dose was selected as a biological safe dose and it was used for further experiments. Anticancer agent DOX killed the lymphocytes significantly (P<0.05) at the selected dose for GTO. Comparative cytotoxicity study of green tea oil with doxorubicin, the most potent anticancer drug showed that though GTO killed a lower amount of cancer cells as compared to doxorubicin but GTO showed good compatibility with PBL.
Glutathione is an important cellular reluctant, involved in protection against different cellular peroxides, free radicals, and toxic compounds in the cell [25, 26]. This study showed that level in normal cells decreased slightly which was not significantly (p<0.05) when treated with GTO, but decreased significantly (p<0.05) when treated with . These results revealed that the GTO maintains the normal cellular redox balance in PBL which is very much necessary for the normal cellular metabolic process. From our result, it was also found that levels in cancer cell line were decreased significantly (p<0.05) when treated with GTO and . In case of cancer cell lines, GTO can alter the cellular redox balance and helps these cells towards the oxidative damage. From the experiment, it was observed that GSSG level in normal cells slightly (not significantly) increased when treated with GTO, but increased significantly (p<0.05) when treated with . So, results revealed that the GTO is less toxic to normal cells than . From this experiment, it was observed that GSSG level in cancer cells increased significantly (p<0.5) when treated with GTO and indicate the killing of -7 cells. So, this phytomedicine performed as a better anticancer agent without hampering normal cells. These results we observed due to alteration of the membrane structure. In normal cells, the stability of the membrane is much higher compared to the cancer cells, leading to the different cellular uptake of the GTO. The uptake of GTO is higher in cancer cell causes cancer cell killing and due to the stable structure of normal cells restricts to uptake the GTO results lower amount of cell killing [27]. Lipid peroxidation in term of MDA is another marker of an oxidative stress response, which higher in cancer tissues that leads to cell membrane damage [25]. In our study, an elevated level of MDA in DOX and GTO treated cells suggested the DOX-induced cell damage (fig. 4).
Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) are the important biomolecules and ions containing unpaired electrons and acts as a free radical and shows an important role in cell signaling processes, leading to oxidative cellular damage and cell death [28]. In the normal physiological system, a lower amount of ROS was formed during metabolism, which is effectively quenched by several antioxidant enzymes of the glutathione system. In addition, cellular ROS production takes place by the mitochondrial respiratory chain reaction, superoxide-generating enzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and arachidonic metabolic reaction [29, 30]. From the microscopic image showing in fig. 5 revealed that the ROS generation inside the MCF-7 cells and lymphocytes. The fluorescence intensity of drug-treated MCF-7 cells was more intense compared to the control MCF-7 but in the case of lymphocytes that kind of phenomenon was not observed. The fluorescence intensity from the lymphocytes after the drug treatment was very poor and the ROS generation inside the MCF-7 cells was high after the treatment with DOX compared to the control. In the case of lymphocytes, the cells became ruptured and the ROS generation was observed inside the lymphocytes. This increased the levels of ROS stimulate the release of different pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α. This TNF-α activates nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase, JNK), as well as ultimately produces cell death by apoptotic and necrotic pathways [31]. The GTO can induce oxidative stress in the cancer cells which was the key factor of the toxicity. High amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can cause oxidative damage to cellular lipids, proteins and DNA [32]. In lowered concentration of the GTO the generation of ROS was low which implies the toxicity should be stumpy, but at higher concentration, the generation of ROS was higher along with the high toxicity towards MCF-7 cells.
To date, different studies have evaluated the antimicrobial effects of tea oil and demonstrated that tea oils were active to kill certain bacterial species [33, 34]. Antimicrobial activity of our synthesized green tea oil against gram-negative P. aeruginosa, E. coli and gram-positive S. aureus microorganisms showed that they revealed a strong antimicrobial activity against the test microorganisms (fig. 6). It was found that in low concentration of green tea oil possesses a higher reduction in microbial growth in both the cases. Green tea oil was observed to exhibit more antimicrobial activity on gram-negative microorganism than gram-positive ones. These results suggest that growths were inhibited due to the penetration of tea oils into the bacterial cell and acts as a bactericidal agent followed by the bacteriostatic activity. These results can be explained on the basis of the differences in the cell wall of each strain; the cellular wall of gram-positive strains is wider than the cell wall of gram-negative strains [35]. All the gram-negative bacteria have an outer membrane outside the peptidoglycan layer of cell wall, which is lacking in gram-positive organisms. This outer membrane acts as a selectively permeable barrier which protects bacteria from harmful agents, like different detergents, toxins, drugs, several degradative enzymes and penetrating nutrients to sustain bacterial growth. The lipid bilayer present in this outer membrane is asymmetric in type: the inner leaflet contains close-packed phospholipid chains, while the outer leaflet is composed of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules. Different genetic and chemical experiments have revealed that the LPS layer of the outer membrane plays an essential role in providing a selective permeability barrier for E. coli and other gram-negative bacteria [36]. Here again, the cellular outer membrane plays an important role in those results.
In conclusion, green tea oil showed potent anticancer activity towards MCF-7 cell lines without showing toxic impact on human blood lymphocytes (PBL). Selectivity and biocompatibility are the two basic requirements of the anti-cancer drug. Considering this fact, we found that GTO showed selective cytotoxicity on both cancer cells occurred by the alteration of cellular redox balance, disruption of cellular oxidative stress and thereby induction of apoptosis. It was also manifested that green tea oil showed the potent antibacterial activity against E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus bacterial strains. Thus this molecule can be used as a lead molecule for the generation of drugs in the treatment and management of cancer and bacteria.
We are thanks to Basic Scientific Research (BSR), University Grant Commission for infrastructure grants (No.-F.9-193/2011) in our institute, Raja Narendralal Khan Women,s College, Midnapore, Paschim Medinipur.
AOAC-Association of official analytical chemists, AOCS-American oil chemists’ society, ATCC-American type culture collection, BHT-Butylated hydroxyl toluene, CDC-Centers for disease control, CNH-Collection Number Herbarium, DAD-Disc agar diffusion, DMSO-Di-methyl sulfoxide, DOX-Doxorubicin, FAMEs-Fatty acid methyl esters, FID-Flame ionization detector, GSH-Reduced glutathione, GSSG-Oxidized glutathione, GTO-Green tea oil, LDL-Low density lipoprotein, MDA-Malondialdehyde, MTT-3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium, MUFA-Monounsaturated fatty acid, PBL-Peripheral blood lymphocyte, PBS-Phosphate buffered saline, POF-Pentoxifylline, PUFA-Polyunsaturated fatty acid, ROS-Reactive oxygen species, SDS-Sodium dodecyl sulphate, SRM-Standard reference material
Meghamala Mandal has made a contribution to design, analysis and conceptualizes the work. Sreenivas R J has made a contribution to the estimation of fatty acid profile. Dr. Koushik Das, Dr. Dilip Kumar Nandi and Dr. Balaram Das reviewing the article content critically. All authors read manually and approved the final manuscript.
There was no conflict of interests of the researchers
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. Ca-Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71–96.
World Health Organization. WHO global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance. The Organization: Geneva; 2001.
Shivaprasad HN, Khanam S. HPLC analisys of polyphenols in green tea extracts. Asian J Chem 2006;18:877-81.
Tahir A, Moeen R. Comparison of antibacterial activity of water and ethanol extracts of Camallia sinensis (L) kuntze against dental carries and antibacterial components. J Med Plant Res 2011;5:4504-10.
Williamson MP, McCormick TG, Nance CL, Shearer WT. Epigallocatechin gallate, the main polyphenols in green tea, binds to the T-cell receptor, CD4: potential for HIV-1 therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:1369-74.
Dreaosti IE, Wargovich MJ, Yang CS. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by tea: the evidence from experimental studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1997;37:761-70.
Wang H, Provan GJ, Helliwell K. Tea flavonoids: their functions, utilisation, and analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 2000;11:152-60.
Pajonk F, Riedisser A, Henke M, McBride WH, Fiebich B. The effects of tea extracts on proinflammatory signaling. BMC Med 2006;4:28.
Nileeka Balasuriya BW, Vasantha Rupasinghe HP. Plant flavonoids as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the regulation of Hypertention. Funct Foods Health Dis 2011;5:172-88.
Babu PV, Liu D. Green tea catechins and cardiovascular health. Curr Med Chem 2008;18:1840-50.
AOCS, Official Methods, and Recommended Practices; the American Oil Chemists Society: Champaign, IL; 1993. p. 113–68.
Das K, Tulsian T, Samanta P, Nandi DK. Effect of extract of Withania sominifera on dehydration induced oxidative stress-related uremia of male rat. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010b;21:75-80.
Rai GK, Bagati S, Rai PK, Rai SK, Singh M. Fatty acid profiling in rapeseed-mustard (Brassica species). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2018;7:148-57.
AOAC Official Method of Analysis, Method 996.06, Fat (Total, Saturated and Unsaturated) in Foods, AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD; 1995.
Chattopadhyay S, Dash SK, Ghosh T, Das D, Pramanik P, Roy S. Surface modification of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using phosphonomethyl iminodiacetic acid followed by folic acid: a biocompatible vehicle for targeted anticancer drug delivery. Cancer Nano 2013;4:103–16.
Hudson L, Hay FC. In: Practical Immunology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publication; 1989.
Dash SK, Ghosh T, Roy S, Chattopadhyay S, Das D. Zinc sulfide nanoparticles selectively induce cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on leukemic cells: involvement of reactive oxygen species and tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Appl Toxicol 2014;34:1130–44.
Mandal A, Patra A, Mandal S, Roy S, Mahapatra SD, Mahapatra TD, et al. Therapeutic potential of different commercially available synbiotic on acetaminophen-induced uremic rats. Clin Experimentl Nephrol 2015;19:168-77.
Kar Mahapatra SK, Chakraborty SP, Das S, Roy S. Methanol extract of Ocimumgratissimum protects murine peritoneal macrophages from nicotine toxicity by decreasing free radical generation, lipid and protein damage and enhances antioxidant protection. Oxid Med Cell Longevity 2009;2:222–30.
Das K, Chakraborty PP, Ghosh D, Nandi DK. Protective effect of aqueous extract of terminalia arjuna against dehydrating induced oxidative stress and uremia in the male rat. Indian J Pharm Res 2010a;9:153-61.
Armstrong JS, Steinauer KK, Hornung B, Irish JM, Lecane P, Birrell GW, et al. Role of glutathione depletion and reactive oxygen species generation in apoptotic signaling in a human B lymphoma cell line. Cell Death Differentiation 2002;9:252–63.
Mandal A, Das K, Roy S, Mondal Kch, Nandi DK. In vivo assessment of bacteriotherapy on acetaminophen-induced uremic rats. J Nephrol 2013;26:228–36.
Chintharlapalli S, Papineni S, Ramaiah SK, Safe S. Betulinic acid inhibits prostate cancer growth through inhibition of specificity protein transcription factors. Cancer Res 2007; 67:2816-23.
Graham Evans B, Tchounwou PB, Cohly HH. Cytotoxicity and proliferation studies with arsenic in established human cell lines: keratinocytes, melanocytes, dendritic cells, dermal fibroblasts, microvascular endothelial cells, monocytes, and T-cells. Int J Mol Sci 2003;4:13-21.
Gangopadhyay A, Chakraborty M, Haldar PK, Chaulya NC, Ghosh A. Evluation of anticancer activity of ethanolic extract of Cyperus kyllingia endl. in ehrlich ascites carcinoma-induced swiss albino mice. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2018;11:482-5.
Dash SK, Chattopadhyay S, Ghosh T, Tripathy S, Das S, Das D, et al. Antileukemic efficacy of monomeric manganese-based metal complex on KG-1A and K562 cell lines. ISRN Oncol 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/709269.
Paal JV, Neyts EC, Verlackt CCW, Bogaerts A. Effect of lipid peroxidation on membrane permeability of cancer and normal cells subjected to oxidative stress. Chem Sci 2016;7:489-98.
Rahman K. Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors. Clin Interventions Aging 2007;2:219–36.
Vallyathan V, Shi X. The role of oxygen free radicals in occupational and environmental lung diseases. Environ Health Perspect 1997;105:165–77.
Thannickal VJ, Fanburg BL. Reactive oxygen species in cell signalling. Am J Physiol 2000;279:L1005–L28.
Dash SK, Chattopadhyay S, Tripathy S, Mandal D. Betulinic acid, a natural bio-active compound: proficient to induce programmed cell death in Human myeloid leukemia. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;3:1348-74.
Lanone S, Rogerieux F, Geys J, Dupont A, E Maillot Marechat, J Doczkowski, et al. Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines. Particle Fibre Toxicol 2009;6:14.
Singh BR, Vadhana P, Bhardwaj M, Dubey S, Vadhana P. Comparative antimicrobial activity of tea tree oil (Melaleuca Oil) and common topical antimicrobials against bacteria associated with wound and topical infections. Pharm Anal Acta 2016;7:513.
Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:50-62.
Thiel J, Pakstis L, Buzby S, Raffi M, Ni C, Pochan DJ, et al. Antibacterial properties of silver-doped titania. Small 2007;3:799–803.
Amro NA, Kotra LP, Wadu Mesthrige K, Bulychev A, Mobashery S, Liu G. High-resolution atomic force microscopy studies of the Escherichia coli outer membrane: structural basis for permeability. Langmuir 2000;16:2789–96.