1Department of Pharmaceutics, Rayat Bahra Institute of Pharmacy, Hoshiarpur 146001, Punjab, 2Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmacy, Dalewal, District: Hoshiarpur-144208, Punjab, India, 3Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India, 4Quantum Solutions, Chandigarh, India. Email: deepakpharmacist89@yahoo.com
Received: 27 Sep 2014 Revised and Accepted: 25 Oct 2014
ABSTRACT
Objective: To develop a simple, rapid, accurate, precise and economical spectroscopic method for the simultaneous determination of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined pharmaceutical tablet formulation and validate as per ICH guidelines.
Methods: In this method, the 6.8 pH phosphate buffer was selected for the developing spectral characteristics of the three drugs. The overlay spectra of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol hydrochloride and Cetirizine hydrochloride were resolved by making the use of simultaneous equation method based on measurement of absorbance at three wavelengths.
Results: The λmax of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine hydrochloride were found to be 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm. The method obeyed Beer Lambert’s law in the concentration range of 10-100 µg/ml for SAL, 2- 18 µg/ml for AMB HCl and 2-20 µg/ml for CET HCl. The high values of correlation coefficient (R) indicated good linearity of calibration plot for the drugs. Result of percentage recovery study confirms the accuracy of proposed method. Percentage RSD for precision and accuracy of the method was found to be less than 2%. LOD values for SAL, AMB, and CET were found to be 0.523 𝜇g/mL, 0.450 𝜇g/mL and 0.457 𝜇g/mL, respectively. LOQ values for SAL, AMB, and CET were found to be 1.372 𝜇g/mL, 1.424 𝜇g/mL and 1.386 𝜇g/mL, respectively.
Conclusion: A rapid, economical, accurate, precise and reproducible simultaneous equation spectroscopic method was developed and validated. The proposed method can be employed for routine analysis of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined pharmaceutical tablet formulation.
Keywords: Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride, Cetirizine Hydrochloride, Simultaneous equation, Absorbtivity, Absorbance, Absorption Maxima., ICH guidelines, Validation.
INTRODUCTION
Salbutamol Sulphate (SAL), (fig. 1) official in Indian Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia, is chemically known as (RS)-1-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxy-methylphenyl)-2-(tert-butylamino) ethanol sulphate. It is a white or almost white, crystalline powder. It is freely soluble in water, slightly soluble in ethanol (95 %) and in ether; very slightly soluble in dichloromethane. The drug is official in Indian Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia [1, 2]. Salbutamol sulphate is a short-acting ß2-adrenergic receptor agonist used for the relief of bronchospasm in conditions such as asthma and COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) [3].
Fig. 1: Chemical Structure of Salbutamol Sulphate
Ambroxol hydrochloride [AMB HCl] (fig. 2) official in Indian Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia, is chemically Trans-4-[(2-amino-3, 5-dibromobenzyl) amino]-cyclohexanol hydrochloride. It is a white or yellowish crystalline powder. It is sparingly soluble in water; soluble in methanol; practically insoluble in methylene chloride [4, 5]. Ambroxol hydrochloride is a potent mucolytic & mucokinetic, capable of inducing bronchial secretion. It depolymerises mucopolysaccharides directly as well as by liberating lysosomal enzymes network of fibres in tenacious sputum is broken. It is particularly useful in if mucus plugs are present. Ambroxol hydrochloride (AMB) is semi-synthetic derivative of vasicine obtained from Indian shrub Adhatoda vasica. It is a metabolic product of bromhexine. Used in a variety of respiratory disorders including chronic bronchitis, also used in the treatment of cough [6].
Fig. 2: Chemical Structure of Ambroxol Hydrochloride
Cetirizine hydrochloride [CET HCl] (fig. 3) official in Indian Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia, is chemically [2-[4-[(4-chlorophenyl) phenylmethyl]-1-piperazinyl]ethoxy]acetic acid and the active metabolite of the piperazine H1- receptor antagonist hydroxyzine. It is white or almost white powder, freely soluble in water, practically insoluble in acetone and in methylene chloride [7, 8]. It is a non-sedative second generation anti-histamine drug used in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, perennial allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria also used as adjuvant in seasonal asthma. Cetirizine inhibits the release of histamine and of cytotoxic mediators from platelets, as well as eosinophil chemotaxis during the secondary phase of allergic response [9].
Fig. 3: Chemical Structure of Cetirizine Hydrochloride
The combination of these three drugs is not official in any pharmacopoeia; hence, no official method is available for the simultaneous estimation of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined tablet dosage form. Literature survey revealed that there are several methods that have been reported for the estimation of these drugs individually or in combination with other drugs by using UV spectrophotometry, [10-21], chromatographic methods such as RP-HPLC [22–33], RP-UPLC [34], HPTLC [35-37] and LC-MS [38]. As per literature, no analytical method could be traced for the analysis of SAL, AMB, and CET in combined tablet dosage form. Therefore, simple, rapid, and reliable method for simultaneous estimation of these drugs in combination seemed to be necessary. Spectrophotometric methods of analysis are more economic and simpler, compared to methods such as chromatography and electrophoresis. Hence an attempt has been made to develop new simultaneous equation spectrophotometric method which is simple, rapid, reproducible, and economical method for simultaneous estimation of SAL, AMB, and CET in combined tablet dosage form. The presently developed method was validated as per International Conference on Harmonization guidelines (ICH) [39-40].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Apparatus and Instrument
A double UV Visible Spectrophotometer (UV- 1800 Shimadzu, Japan) was used. Absorption and overlain spectra of both test and standard solutions were recorded over the wavelength range of 200-400 nm using 1 cm quartz cell at fast scanned speed and fixed slit width of 1.0 nm. All weighing of ingredients were done on digital weighing balance (DV 215 CD Ohaus, USA) and bath sonicator (PCI analytical Pvt. Ltd) was also used in study. Glasswares used in each procedure were soaked overnight in a mixture of chromic acid and sulphuric acid rinsed thoroughly with double distilled water and dried in hot air oven.
Reagents and materials
Pure drug samples of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine hydrochloride were supplied as gift sample by Trojan Pharma Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India. All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.
Selection of common solvent
Phosphate buffer of pH 6.8 was selected as common solvent for developing spectral characteristics of drug. The selection was made after assessing the solubility of the drugs in different solvents.
Preparation of standard stock solution
Standard stock solution of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride were prepared by dissolving 10 mg of Salbutamol Sulphate, 10 mg of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and 10 mg of Cetirizine Hydrochloride separately in 10 ml of pH 6.8 Phosphate buffer solution and sonicated for 15 minutes in bath sonicator and filtered through whatman filter paper in order to get dilution of 1 mg/1 ml i. e. 1000 µg/ml.
Determination of absorption (λ) maximas
By appropriate dilution of standard stock solutions of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride with pH 6.8 phosphate buffer, solution containing 10 µg/ml of Salbutamol Sulphate, 10 µg/ml of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and 10 µg/ml of Cetirizine Hydrochloride was scanned separately and then in mixture form in the range of 200-400 nm.
Calibration plots for salbutamol sulphate, ambroxol hydrochloride and cetirizine hydrochloride
The calibration plots were constructed for Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and for Cetirizine hydrochloride using pH 6.8 phosphate buffer solutions at their respective absorption maximas in order to find the linearity range of drugs at their respective absorption maximas.
Development of simultaneous equation
The absorbances were measured at all the selected wavelengths and absorptivities for three drugs were determined at all three wavelengths. The concentrations of drugs in sample solution were determined by using following formula:
At 276 nm A1 = ax1CS + ay1CA + az1CC ……………. (1)
At 244 nm A2 = ax2CS + ay2CA + az2CC ………….…. (2)
At 230 nm A3 = ax3CS + ay3CA + az3CC ……………….(3)
Where, CS, CA and CC are the concentration of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride, A1, A2 and A3 are absorbance at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively, ax1, ax2 and ax3 are absorptivities of Salbutamol Sulphate at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively; ay1, ay2 and ay3 are absorptivities of Ambroxol Hydrochloride at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively; az1, az2 and az3 are absorptivities of Cetirizine Hydrochloride at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively.
Validation of proposed method
The optimized UV spectrophotometric method was completely validated according to the procedure described in ICH guidelines. The performance parameters evaluated for the method were linearity, precision, accuracy, limits of detection and quantitation, and assay of drug.
Linearity
The linearity of measurement was evaluated by analyzing different concentrations of the standard solution of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride.
Precision
Repeatability
The precision of the instrument was checked by repeated scanning and measurement of absorbance of solutions (n = 6) for Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride (10 μg/ml for each drug) without changing the parameter of the proposed spectrophotometry method.
Intermediate precision
Precision of method was determined in terms of intraday and interday variations (%RSD). Intraday precision (%RSD) was assessed by analyzing standard drug solutions within the calibration range, three times on the same day. Interday precision (%RSD) was assessed by analyzing drug solutions within the calibration range on three different days.
Limit of detection and Limit of quantitation
The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were separately determined based on standard deviation of the y-intercept and the slope of the calibration curve by using the equations (4) and (5), respectively.
Where, δ: standard deviation of y-intercept and S: slope of calibration curve.
Recovery (Accuracy) Studies
In order to check the accuracy, reproducibility and precision of the proposed method, recovery study was carried out by taking standard mixture solution of SAL, AMB and CET and absorbances were determined at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively.
Assay (Analysis) of Drug
Ten tablets (200 mg) were powdered in a mortar pestle and the blend equivalent to 2 mg of Salbutamol Sulphate, 7.5 mg of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and 5 mg of Cetirizine Hydrochloride were weighed and dissolved in 100 ml of pH 6.8 phosphate buffer solutions.
The solution was sonicated for 15 minutes, filtered through whatman filter paper, suitably diluted with pH 6.8 phosphate buffer and the drug content was analyzed form simultaneous equation method by using double beam UV spectrophotometer at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, the result of which was given in table 8
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Selection of Absorption maximas
Wavelengths of absorption maximas were determined for three drugs. SAL showed absorption maxima at 276 nm, AMB HCl showed absorption maximas at 244 nm, CET HCl showed maximum absorbance at 230 nm with reference to British Pharmacopoeia and Indian Pharmacopoeia.
Fig. 4: Overlain UV Spectra of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride Solution (10𝜇g/mL concentration of each drug solution)
From the overlain spectra of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride (fig. 4); three wavelengths 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm, λmax of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine hydrochloride were selected for further spectroscopic studies. Therefore, for simultaneous equation method, wavelengths selected for analysis were 276 nm for SAL, 244 nm for AMB HCl and 230 nm for CET HCl.
Linearity of Calibration curves
From the calibration plot of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride at their respective absorption maximas, the linearity was observed in the concentration range of 10–100 𝜇g/mL for Salbutamol Sulphate, 2-18 µg/ml for Ambroxol Hydrochloride and 2-20 µg/ml for Cetirizine Hydrochloride at all three wavelengths, which were validated by least square method. Coefficient of correlation (R) was found to be 0.999 for Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride as given in table 4. The high value of correlation coefficient (R) also indicates good linearity of calibration curve for the drugs as shown in fig. 5, fig. 6 and fig. 7.
Fig. 5: Standard Calibration Plot of Salbutamol Sulphate at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm in pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer
Fig. 6: Standard Calibration Plot of Ambroxol Hydrochloride at 244 nm, 230 nm and 276 nm in pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer
Fig. 7: Standard Calibration Plot of Cetirizine Hydrochloride at 230 nm, 244 nm and 276 nm in pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer
Table 1: Absorbance and Absorptivity of Salbutamol Sulphate at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively
Concentration
(µg/ml) |
*Absorbance at 276 nm± S. D | *Absorbance at 244 nm± S. D | *Absorbance at 230 nm ± S. D | Absorptivity at 276 nm | Absorptivity at 244 nm | Absorptivity at 230 nm |
10 | 0.071 ± 0.002 | 0.026 ± 0.003 | 0.250 ± 0.003 | 0.0071 | 0.0026 | 0.025 |
20 | 0.138 ± 0.003 | 0.043 ± 0.004 | 0.485 ± 0.002 | 0.0069 | 0.0022 | 0.024 |
30 | 0.211 ± 0.002 | 0.064 ± 0.002 | 0.713 ± 0.001 | 0.0070 | 0.0021 | 0.024 |
40 | 0.264 ± 0.001 | 0.067 ± 0.001 | 0.930 ± 0.002 | 0.0066 | 0.0017 | 0.023 |
50 | 0.327 ± 0.002 | 0.081 ± 0.002 | 1.151 ± 0.003 | 0.0065 | 0.0016 | 0.023 |
60 | 0.385 ± 0.003 | 0.084 ± 0.003 | 1.362 ± 0.002 | 0.0064 | 0.0014 | 0.023 |
70 | 0.459 ± 0.001 | 0.108 ± 0.002 | 1.599 ± 0.002 | 0.0066 | 0.0015 | 0.023 |
80 | 0.512 ± 0.001 | 0.109 ± 0.002 | 1.794 ± 0.004 | 0.0064 | 0.0014 | 0.022 |
90 | 0.571 ± 0.001 | 0.122 ± 0.003 | 1.969 ± 0.002 | 0.0063 | 0.0014 | 0.022 |
100 | 0.628 ± 0.002 | 0.146 ± 0.002 | 2.125 ± 0.003 | 0.0063 | 0.0015 | 0.021 |
Mean | ax1= 0.0066 | ax2= 0.0017 | ax3= 0.023 |
*Each value is the average of three determinations
Table 2: Absorbance and Absorptivity of Ambroxol Hydrochloride at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively
Concentration
(µg/ml) |
*Absorbance at 276 nm ± S. D | *Absorbance at 244 nm± S. D | *Absorbance at 230 nm ± S. D | Absorptivity at 276 nm | Absorptivity at 244 nm | Absorptivity at 230 nm |
2 | 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.044 ± 0.001 | 0.034 ± 0.002 | 0.0020 | 0.022 | 0.017 |
4 | 0.014 ± 0.001 | 0.101 ± 0.002 | 0.079 ± 0.004 | 0.0035 | 0.025 | 0.020 |
6 | 0.020 ± 0.004 | 0.152 ± 0.003 | 0.119 ± 0.002 | 0.0033 | 0.025 | 0.020 |
8 | 0.024 ± 0.003 | 0.197 ± 0.001 | 0.152 ± 0.003 | 0.0030 | 0.025 | 0.019 |
10 | 0.029 ± 0.002 | 0.248 ± 0.002 | 0.190 ± 0.002 | 0.0029 | 0.025 | 0.019 |
12 | 0.034 ± 0.001 | 0.297 ± 0.004 | 0.229 ± 0.001 | 0.0028 | 0.025 | 0.019 |
14 | 0.038 ± 0.002 | 0.343 ± 0.002 | 0.262 ± 0.001 | 0.0027 | 0.025 | 0.019 |
16 | 0.051 ± 0.001 | 0.401 ± 0.002 | 0.309 ± 0.003 | 0.0032 | 0.025 | 0.019 |
18 | 0.058 ± 0.003 | 0.452 ± 0.003 | 0.347 ± 0.002 | 0.0032 | 0.025 | 0.019 |
Mean | ay1= 0.0030 | ay2= 0.025 | ay3= 0.019 |
*Each value is the average of three determinations
Table 3: Absorbance and Absorptivity of Cetirizine Hydrochloride at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively
Concentration
(µg/ml) |
*Absorbance at 276 nm ± S. D | *Absorbance at 244 nm± S. D | *Absorbance at 230 nm ± S. D | Absorptivity at 276 nm | Absorptivity at 244 nm | Absorptivity at 230 nm |
2 | 0.010 ± 0.004 | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.077 ± 0.002 | 0.0050 | 0.0095 | 0.0385 |
4 | 0.022 ± 0.003 | 0.025 ± 0.003 | 0.135 ± 0.003 | 0.0055 | 0.0063 | 0.0375 |
6 | 0.031 ± 0.002 | 0.045 ± 0.002 | 0.209 ± 0.003 | 0.0051 | 0.0075 | 0.0348 |
8 | 0.044 ± 0.005 | 0.051 ± 0.005 | 0.267 ± 0.001 | 0.0055 | 0.0064 | 0.0334 |
10 | 0.057 ± 0.003 | 0.054 ± 0.003 | 0.332 ± 0.004 | 0.0057 | 0.0054 | 0.0332 |
12 | 0.068 ± 0.002 | 0.069 ± 0.002 | 0.393 ± 0.002 | 0.0056 | 0.0058 | 0.0328 |
14 | 0.082 ± 0.001 | 0.078 ± 0.001 | 0.468 ± 0.002 | 0.0058 | 0.0056 | 0.0334 |
16 | 0.090 ± 0.002 | 0.089 ± 0.002 | 0.530 ± 0.003 | 0.0061 | 0.0056 | 0.0331 |
18 | 0.099 ± 0.001 | 0.100 ± 0.003 | 0.585 ± 0.001 | 0.0057 | 0.0056 | 0.0325 |
20 | 0.104 ± 0.003 | 0.107 ± 0.001 | 0.653 ± 0.002 | 0.0054 | 0.0054 | 0.0327 |
Mean | az1= 0.0050 | az2= 0.0063 | az3= 0.0338 |
Development of simultaneous equation
The absorptivity values were found approximately same for all the concentrations hence all three drugs obeyed Beer Lambert’s law in an indicated concentration range as given in table 1, table 2 and table 3.
Substituting the values of ax1, ax2, ax3, ay1, ay2, ay3, az1, az2, az3 from table 1, table 2 and table 3 in eqn. 1, 2 and 3, the following equation was designed for the simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in tablet dosage form:
At 276 nm A1 = 0.0066 CS + 0.0030 CA + 0.0050 CC ……………. (6)
At 244 nm A2 = 0.0017 CS + 0.025 CA + 0.0063 CC …………. …. (7)
At 230 nm A3 = 0.023 CS + 0.019 CA + 0.0338 CC ……………. …. (8)
Where CS, CA and CC are the concentration of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride respectively, A1, A2 and A2 are absorbance values at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively, 0.0066, 0.0017 and 0.023 are absorptivities of Salbutamol Sulphate at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively, 0.0030, 0.025 and 0.019 are absorptivities of Ambroxol Hydrochloride at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively; 0.0050, 0.0063 and 0.0338 are absorptivities of Cetirizine Hydrochloride at 276 nm, 244 nm and 230 nm respectively. By solving equation (6), (7) and (8) simultaneously, the concentration of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined tablet dosage form can be calculated.
Validation of Proposed Method
The validation parameters were studied at all the wavelengths for the proposed method. The optical characteristics such as λmax, Beer’s Lambert’s law limit, Regression equation, Slope, Intercept, correlation coefficient, were calculated and are summarized in table 4.
Linearity
The linearity was observed in the concentration range of 10–100 𝜇g/mL for Salbutamol Sulphate, 2-18 µg/ml for Ambroxol Hydrochloride and 2-20 µg/ml for Cetirizine Hydrochloride at all three wavelengths, which were validated by least square method. Coefficient of correlation (R) was found to be 0.999 for Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride. Regression parameters are mentioned in table 4.
LOD and LOQ
LOD and LOQ of the drug were calculated as per ICH guideline. LOD values for SAL, AMB, and CET were found to be 0.523 𝜇g/mL, 0.450 𝜇g/mL, and 0.457 𝜇g/mL, respectively. LOQ values for SAL, AMB, and CET were found to be 1.372 𝜇g/mL, 1.424 𝜇g/mL, and 1.386 𝜇g/mL, respectively (Table 4). These data show that the proposed method is precise and sensitive for the determination of SAL, AMB, and CET.
Repeatability
Instrumental precision study was carried out by repeatability study. The % RSD values for SAL, AMB, and CET were found to be 1.6609, 1.9596, and 1.8547 respectively given in table 5. Low relative standard deviation (<2) indicates that the proposed method is repeatable.
Intermediate precision (Reproducibility)
Precision studies were carried out to study the intra-day and inter-day variations of the responses. The intraday and interday precisions were determined, results of which are given in table 6
Recovery (Accuracy) studies
Known amounts of Salbutamol Sulphate (20, 40, and 60 𝜇g/ml), Ambroxol Hydrochloride (4, 8, and 12 µg/ml) and Cetirizine Hydrochloride (6, 10 and 14 µg/ml) were added to a pre-quantified sample solution, and the amount of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride were estimated by proposed method.
Assay of Drugs
Based on the above results obtained, it can be concluded that the proposed spectroscopic method for simultaneous estimation of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride is rapid, economical, accurate, precise and reproducible. The utility of the developed method has been demonstrated by analysis of combined dose tablet formulation.
Hence, the proposed method can be employed for quantitative estimation of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined tablet dosage form. Simultaneous equation method can be used to carry out in-vitro dissolution study in combined tablet formulation of these drugs.
Table 4: Regression analysis data and summary of validation parameters for the proposed method
Optical Characteristics | Salbutamol
Sulphate |
Ambroxol Hydrochloride | Cetirizine Hydrochloride |
λmax. (nm) | 276 | 244 | 230 |
Linearity range (µg/ml) | 10-100 | 2-18 | 2-20 |
Regression equation
(y = mx + c) |
y= 0.006x+ 0.016 | y = 0.025x - 0.002 | y = 0.032x + 0.011 |
Slope (m) | 0.006 | 0.025 | 0.032 |
Intercept (c) | 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.011 |
Correlation coefficient (R) | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
LOD (µg/ml) | 0.523 | 0.450 | 0.457 |
LOQ (µg/ml) | 1.372 | 1.424 | 1.386 |
Precision (% RSD)
Repeatability (n=6) Intra-day (n=3) Inter-day (n=3) |
1.6609
1.2877 1.4785 |
1.9596
1.6166 1.6238 |
1.8547
1.7930 1.4048 |
As per the ICH guidelines, the method validation parameters checked were linearity, LOD and LOQ, repeatability, intermediate precision, accuracy (recovery) studies and assay of drug.
Table 5: Repeatability Data for Proposed Method
Serial No. | Concentration (µg/ml) | Absorbance of SAL at 276 nm | Absorbance of AMB at 244 nm | Absorbance of CET at 230 nm |
1 | 10 ppm | 0.069 | 0.043 | 0.076 |
2 | 10 ppm | 0.070 | 0.041 | 0.074 |
3 | 10 ppm | 0.072 | 0.041 | 0.073 |
4 | 10 ppm | 0.070 | 0.042 | 0.072 |
5 | 10 ppm | 0.071 | 0.041 | 0.074 |
6 | 10 ppm | 0.069 | 0.042 | 0.073 |
Mean | 0.070 | 0.042 | 0.074 | |
SD | 0.001169 | 0.00081 | 0.00137 | |
% RSD | 1.6609 | 1.9596 | 1.8547 |
SD: Standard deviation, RSD: Relative Standard deviation
Table 6: Intra-day and inter-day precision data of SAL, AMB, and CET
Drug |
Amount Labeled |
Percentage obtained (n=3) |
SD |
% RSD |
|||
Intraday |
Interday |
Intraday |
Interday |
Intraday |
Interday |
||
SAL |
2 mg |
98.24 |
99.43 |
1.2656 |
1.4472 |
1.2877 |
1.4785 |
2 mg |
99.57 |
96.56 |
|||||
2 mg |
97.04 |
97.67 |
|||||
|
Mean |
98.28 |
97.89 |
|
|
|
|
AMB |
7.5 mg |
99.46 |
98.29 |
1.5800 |
1.6158 |
1.6166 |
1.6238 |
7.5 mg |
96.36 |
98.89 |
|||||
7.5 mg |
97.38 |
101.34 |
|||||
|
Mean |
97.73 |
99.51 |
|
|
|
|
CET |
5 mg |
97.33 |
99.45 |
1.7526 |
1.3757 |
1.7930 |
1.4048 |
5 mg |
99.67 |
96.78 |
|||||
5 mg |
96.24 |
97.54 |
|||||
|
Mean |
97.75 |
97.92 |
|
|
|
|
SD: Standard deviation, RSD: Relative Standard deviation
Table 7: Recovery studies
Salbutamol Sulphate
(µg/ml) |
Ambroxol Hydrochloride
(µg/ml) |
Cetirizine Hydrochloride (µg/ml) | Salbutamol Sulphate
% recovery ±S. D (𝑛=3) |
Ambroxol Hydrochloride
% recovery ±S. D (𝑛=3) |
Cetirizine Hydrochloride
% recovery ±S. D (𝑛=3) |
20 | 4 | 6 | 97.44 ± 2.01 | 96.67 ± 1.53 | 98.63 ± 0.76 |
40 | 8 | 10 | 100.33 ± 1.12 | 95.43 ± 0.41 | 99.79 ± 0.25 |
60 | 12 | 14 | 96.80 ± 1.45 | 98.80 ± 1.15 | 101.5 ± 1.29 |
SD: Standard deviation
Table 8: Assay of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride
Parameters | Salbutamol Sulphate | Ambroxol Hydrochloride | Cetirizine Hydrochloride |
Amount Present (mg)
(200 mg Tablet) |
2 | 7.5 | 5 |
% Drug Content ± SD | 97.37 ± 1.885 | 95.41 ± 0.828 | 99.75 ± 1.324 |
% RSD | 1.9364 | 0.8679 | 1.3278 |
SD: Standard deviation, RSD: Relative Standard deviation
CONCLUSION
The developed spectroscopic method i. e. simultaneous equation method is found to be simple, sensitive, accurate and precise and can be used for routine analysis of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined table dosage form. The developed method was validated as per ICH guidelines. The results demonstrated that simultaneous equation method by spectrophotometer could be useful technique for estimation of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in combined tablet dosage form and cost of analysis is less as compared to RP-HPLC, HPTLC, RP-UPLC and LC-MS method. Hence simultaneous equation method can be conveniently used for routine quality control analysis of SAL, AMB HCl and CET HCl in its combined pharmaceutical tablet formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors thankful to Trojan Pharma, Baddi, India for providing gift samples of Salbutamol Sulphate, Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that they do not have any financial and personal relationships with other people or any other organizations that could inappropriately influence this research work.
ABBREVIATIONS
SAL: Salbutamol Sulphate
CET HCl: Cetirizine Hydrochloride
AMB HCl: Ambroxol Hydrochloride
RSD: Relative Standard Deviation
SD: Standard Deviation
REFERENCES