Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 6, Issue 11, 71-76Original Article

DRUG USE INDICATORS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IN A TERIARY HEALTHCARE FACILITY IN NIGERIA

OGBONNA BRIAN O*1, EZENDUKA CHARLES C1

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria.
Email: summitpharm@yahoo.com

Received: 24 Apr 2014 Revised and Accepted: 15 Jun 2014


ABSTRACT

Objective: The study analyzed the utilization pattern of antidiabetic drugs at the outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in Nigeria to document information for enhancing the rational use of drugs in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of prescription records of patients with type2 diabetes, seen between the months of May and October, 2013 was carried out; adapting the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommended drug use indicators. Data was analyzed for drug use indicators, concurrent illnesses and co-prescribed medications.

Results: A total of 286 prescriptions of T2DM were collected and analyzed. Mean age of patients was 61(±11.8) years. The number of drugs per prescription averaged 4(±1.6), with majority of prescriptions, 70% containing between 3 and 5 drugs each. Metformin (55.8%) was the most commonly prescribed antidiabetic drug followed by glibenclamide (35.1%). Antibiotics were prescribed in 11% of encounters. The percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name was 58%. Hypertension was identified in 42.2% of the diabetic patients as the most co-existing condition.

Conclusion: The study suggests a significant compliance to T2DM treatment guidelines but with scope for improved rational use of drug to reduce the risk of drug therapy problems and enhance patients’ quality of life. It provides a baseline data for further studies on institutional drug use in diabetes.

Keywords: Drug utilization, Type 2 diabetes, Antidiabetics, Treatment guideline, Rational drug use.


INTRODUCTION

Type -2- diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic progressive disease of global importance characterized by hyperglycemia and cardiovascular complications. It is estimated to affect about 366 million people worldwide in 2011 [1]. It has become a disease of public health importance in Nigeria affecting an estimated 6 million people with prevalence projected to rise to 5.5% in 2030 [2, 3]. As a chronic condition, treatment of T2DM occurs over a patient’s lifetime requiring regular monitoring and treatment to ensure effective control and improved patient’s quality of life. Treatment of T2DM involves the use of oral antidiabetic drugs referred to as hypoglycemic agents [4]. Injectable insulin is used in patients who do not tolerate or respond properly to the oral agents or in conditions where they are contraindicated like in pregnant women [5, 6]. However, due to the presence of other medical conditions often occurring with T2DM, a wide range of pharmaco-therapeutic agents are co-administered to the patients, exposing them to irrational use of drugs and the risks of drug related problems due to poly-pharmacy [4]. These lead to failed treatment outcomes and poor patients’ quality of life. Drug utilization study (DUR) as recommended by the WHO [3]; provides the basis for regularly monitoring drugs prescription and dispensing pattern to identify opportunities for policy interventions to improve the rational drug use for enhanced patient’s quality of life [7]. Few studies have been published on the use pattern of anti-diabetic drugs in Nigeria, which is necessary for promoting the rational use of drugs in diabetics. The study was aimed to evaluate the prescription of antidiabetic drugs in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary healthcare facility in south-eastern Nigeria, to document information for improving rational use of antidiabetic drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting

The study was conducted at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital at Nnewi, south east Nigeria. It is a tertiary health facility providing specialized clinical and teaching services with bed space of over 500. It is a major referral health center in Anambra state, south-east Nigeria owned by the federal government. It has a work force of over 2400 staff spread across various clinical and non-clinical departments, comprising about 400 doctors, 400 nurses, 52 registered and intern pharmacists. Over 21,000 patients are treated annually at the outpatients unit of the hospital. Patients pay for their drugs at the hospital pharmacy while out-of-stock drugs are purchased from community pharmacies outside the hospital. The city of Nnewi is the second biggest commercial city in Anambra State after Onitsha and the people are known predominantly for trading, farming and commerce.

Data collection and analysis

The study was based on the retrospective analysis of patients records treated for T2DM in the teaching hospital, using the WHO method of DUR [7] adapted for diabetes. Data were collected from the hospital records manually kept at the medical records and pharmacy departments respectively. Records of patients diagnosed with T2DM who were prescribed hypoglycemic drugs were selected. Prescription and patient folders were examined and relevant information on patients demographics, diagnosis, drugs prescribed, cost of prescription were manually copied into an Excel work sheet designed accordingly. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, in SPSS version 16 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences Inc. USA) package

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the hospitals research and ethics committee prior to the commencement of the study. Utmost confidentiality of information was maintained by excluding patients name and their information that could reveal their identity.

RESULTS

A total record of 286 patients with T2DM were collected and analyzed. There were more female cases, 61% than male, 39%. Average age of the cohort was 61(± 11.8) years with majority falling between 55 and 75 years. Table 1 summaries the characteristics of the group in terms of co-morbidities, showing hypertension as the most common co-existing condition found in 42% of the diabetics. 11.4% of the patients were also treated for malaria infection. Diabetic foot ulcer, 60% were identified as the most common diabetic complication.

Table 1: Distribution of common co-morbidity in the study group

Co-morbidity Frequency Percentage (%)
Hypertension 121 42.2
Arthritis 11 3.8
Malaria 33 11.4
Depressive illness 7 2.4
Liver disease 4 1.4
Hyperlipidemia 16 5.7
Heart disease 4 1.4
Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) 9 3.3
Peptic ulcerative disease (PUD) 11 3.8
Pneumonia 5 1.9
Kidney disease 3 0.9
Gastroenteritis 7 2.4
Seizure disorders 3 0.9

Summary of drug use indicators is presented in Table 2 which shows the average number of drugs per prescription as 4 (±1.6), with majority (70%) of encounters falling between 3 and 5 drugs per prescription. About 12% of the cohort was prescribed monotherapy anti-diabetic drug.

The median cost of medication (including co-medication) per patient was N2, 254 (US$14.54), ranging from N60 to N15, 840 (US$0.34 – 102.19). Median statistics was used in cost estimation due to skewed nature of the cost data

Table 2: Drug use indicators

Indicator Value
Total number of prescriptions analyzed 286
Total number/frequency of drugs prescribed 1,148
Average number of drugs per prescription (Standard deviation) 4 (±1.6)
Percentage of encounters with antibiotics prescription 11%
Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name 58%
Percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drug list 85%
Percentage of prescription on monotherapy 12%
Median cost of medication per encounter N2,254 (US$14.54)

1US Dollar = 155 Nigerian Naira

Findings show that antihypertensives were the most co-prescribed/non-anti-diabetic medication at 16 % closely followed by vitamin preparations, 5.6%. (Table 3)

Table 3: Distribution of commonly prescribed medications

Medication class Frequency Percentage (%)
Antidiabetics 513 44.67
Antihypertensives 184 16.06
Antibiotics 47 4.10
Antimalarials 32 2.81
Analgesics/anti- inflammatory agents 48 4.22
Antilipidemia 22 1.88
Antiulcer 30 2.58
Antidepressants 5 0.47
Vitamin preparations 65 5.63
Others 202 17.58

n = 1148

Table 4 shows the pattern of anti-diabetic drugs prescription in the study group, with metformin as the most frequently used anti-diabetic drug in 55.8% of the time, followed by glibenclamide, 35%. Metformin+glibenclamide was the most used combination therapy in the study group.

Table 4: Distribution of anti-diabetic drugs

Anti-diabetic Number of prescriptions Percentage (%)
Metformin 286 55.8
Glibenclamide 180 35.1
Pioglitazone 35 6.8
Glimepiride 5 1.0
Gliclazide 4 0.8
Insulin 3 0.6

n = 513

DISCUSSION

The study revealed the predominance of T2DM in the cohort between ages 55 and above, at an average age of 61 years, indicating higher prevalence of diabetes among the elderly in the community, corroborating the findings of similar studies in Nigeria and other African settings which reported averages of between 45 and 65 years [4, 8, and 9]. Advancing age has been identified as a risk factor for diabetes [10], and in Nigeria a report suggested that the incidence of diabetes peak after 45 – 50 years [11]. The higher proportion of female cases in this study is consistent with other studies in Nigeria [9, 12], to suggest that women suffer from diabetes more than men. However, contributing to the higher proportion of female cases in this study may be the fact that women tend to use public health facilities more than men [13].

The study showed an average of 4 drugs per prescription, higher than the value, 2.6 reported 3.3 by Adibe et al (2009), in south-east Nigeria [14], Jimoh et al (2011), in north-west Nigeria [9] and similar to 4 drugs reported by Bnouham et al (2006) in south-west Nigeria [15]. The WHO recommended 2 -3 drugs per prescription for developing countries [7], suggesting a tendency for poly-pharmacy in this study. Many of the prescriptions recorded up to 7 to 9 drugs per prescription, thereby increasing the risks of drug related problems and reduced quality of life of patients. This indicates the need for improved rational use of drugs for the patients in view of the long-term therapy in diabetes. The use of fewer drugs reduces side effects, drug interactions and minimizes cost [16]. However the relatively higher average number of drugs in this study can be attributed to the extent of co-morbidity associated with diabetes and hence the need to manage such conditions. Consequently it was not surprising that antihypertensives were the most co-prescribed/non-diabetic medication considering the predominance of hypertension as the most common co-morbidity in the study, findings similar to previous studies in Nigeria and other settings [9, 11, 14]. The use of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) in this study as the most prescribed antihypertensives is consistent with their documented benefits in T2DM through the prevention of diabetic nephropathy [17], a major complication in diabetes. Similarly the use of metformin, a biguanide as the most prescribed anti-diabetic in the study conforms to current clinical guideline recommendation as the preferred agent in T2DM [18 – 21].

Study limitations

As a retrospective study which relied only on information available in the hospital record, findings will highly depend on the accuracy of documentation, which may have explained the differences in some of the study findings with previous studies. Patients’ related information/use indicators were not collected to provide further data for comprehensive analysis of the drug use pattern in the facility.

CONCLUSION

The study indicated a significant compliance to treatment guidelines in the management of type 2 diabetes in the teaching hospital with slight tendency to poly-pharmacy and the risk of drug related problems. This suggests scope for improved rational use of drugs to improve treatment outcomes and enhanced quality of life for diabetic patients. The study contributes current information to research on the management of T2DM to enhance the quality of life of patients living with the chronic condition.

CONTRIBUTION

BOO and CCE designed the study, collected and analyzed data, prepared, read and agreed on the final the manuscript

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Authors declare no conflict of interest

REFERENCES

  1. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas. Fifth Edition; 2011.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO) Fact sheet to the ministerial Technical committee working group (TWG) on the UN High level meeting on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) WHO report for Nigeria. Abuja July; 2011.
  3. Akingbe OO. Non-communicable diseases in Nigeria: National Survey on hypertension, coronary heart diseases, diabetes mellitus, haemoglobinopathy, G6PD Deficiency and Anemia –National Expert Committee on Non-Communicable diseases. Federal Ministry of Health and Social Services. Lagos; 1997.
  4. Ogbonna BO, Ezenduka CC, Opara CA, Aghara LG. Drug therapy problems in type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Int J Innovative Res Development 2014;3(1):494-502.
  5. Israili ZH. Advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [published online ahead of print October 14] Am J Ther; 2009.
  6. Edelman SV, Henry RR. Diagnosis and Management of type 2 Diabetes. West Islip, NY: Professional Communications, Inc; 2007.
  7. WHO; Introduction to Drug Utilization Research/WHO International Working Group for Statistics Methodology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and Clinical Pharmacological Services; 2003.
  8. Nyenwe EA, Odia OJ, Ihekweaba AE, Ojule A, Babtunde S. Type 2 diabetes in adult Nigerians: a study of its prevalence and risk factors in port harcourt Nigeria. Diabetes Res Clin Prac 2003;62:177-85.
  9. Jimoh AO, Sabir AA, Chika A, Sani Z. Pattern of anti-diabetic drugs use in a diabetic outpatient clinic of a tertiary health institution in Sokoto, north-western Nigeria. J Med Sci 2011;11:241-5.
  10. Zinmet P. Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes: an epidemiological overview. Diabetol 1982;22:399-411.
  11. Johnson TO. Comparative study of screening methods for diabetes mellitus in the elderly Nigerian subjects. West Afr Med J Niger Pract 1971;20:243-6.
  12. Enwere OO, Falade GO, Slako BL. Prescribing pattern at the medical outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in southwestern Nigeria. Pharm Drug Saf 2007;16:1244-9.
  13. Adams OP, Carter AO. Are primary care practitioners in barbados following diabetic guidelines? A chart audit with comparison between public and private care sectors. Boil Med Chem Res Notes 2011;4:101186/1756-0500-4-199.
  14. Adibe MO, Aguwa CN, Ukwe CV, Okonta JM, Udeogoranya PO. Outpatient utilization of anti-diabetic drugs in the south-eastern Nigeria. Int J Drug Dev Res 2009;1:27-36.
  15. Bnouham M, Ziyyat A, Mekhfi H, Tahri A, Legssyer A. Medicinal plants with potential anti-diabetic activity. A review of ten years of herbal medicine research. Int J Diab Met 2006;14:1-25.
  16. Ezenduka CC, Ubochi VN, Ogbonna BO. The utilization pattern and cost analysis of psychotropic drugs at a neuropsychiatry hospital in Nigeria. 2014;4(3):325-37.
  17. Ontarget Investigators, Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, Dyal L. Temisartan, ramipril or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1547-59.
  18. IDF. Clinical guidelines task force. Global guidelines for type 2 diabetes: International Diabetes Federation, Brussels; 2005.
  19. CDA. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Canadian Diabetes Association; 2008.
  20. NIHCE. Type 2 diabetes: The management in primary and secondary cure (update). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.
  21. Nathan, DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Heine R J, Holman RR, Sherwin R, et al. management of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A conse sus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the study of diabetes. Diabetol 2006;29:1963–72.