Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 7, Issue 1,52-55Original Article


ANTIBACTERIAL, ANTIFUNGAL AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITIES OF TUNISIAN OLEA EUROPAEA SSP. OLEASTER FRUIT PULP AND ITS ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS

GHAZGHAZI HANENE 1,2*, CHEDIA AOUADHI2, SAFA HAMROUNI2, WISSEM MNIF 3,4

1 National Research Institute of Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry (INRGREF). Laboratory of Management and Valorisation of Forest Resources.BP 10 2080-Ariana. Tunisia, 2Laboratoire des Ressources Sylvo-Pastorales de Tabarka. Institut Sylvo-Pastoral de Tabarka, Tunis. Université de Jendouba, 3 Faculty of Sciences and Arts in Balgarn PO BOX 60 Balgarn- Sabt Al Olaya 61985, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.. 4LR11-ES31 Biotechnologie et Valorisation des Bio-Géo Ressources, Institut Supérieur de Biotechnologie de Sidi Thabet, BiotechPole de  Sidi Thabet, 2020, Université de la Manouba, Tunisie.
Email: hanene8116@yahoo.fr

Received: 13 Jul 2014 Revised and Accepted: 25 Aug 2014


ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was conceived to evaluate the essential fatty acids, secondary metabolite, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Olea europaea ssp. oleaster fruits pulp methanolic extract.

Methods: Analysis of the lipid content from unexploited Olea europaea ssp. oleaster pulp was carried out using gas chromatography. The antioxidant activity was evaluated by DPPH radical scavenging. The antimicrobial activity was also tested against seven pathogenic bacteria, two fungal species and one yeast strain using two methods.

Results: The obtained results showed that the major components of fatty acids were oleic acid (77.4%) and elaidic acid (17.58%). Moreover, the tested extract was rich in phenol (84.04±0.01 mg GAE/g DW) than in flavonoids (60.41±0.02 mg RE/g DW). In addition, it showed puissant antioxidant (IC50 = 28±0.01 µg/mL), antibacterial and antifungal activities. The inhibition zones diameters and the minimum inhibition concentration values for tested microorganisms were in the range of 13- and 3.125-25 mg/mL, respectively.

Conclusion: This study shows that Olea europaea ssp. oleaster fruit pulp could be developed into ingredients for use in foods as the natural antioxidant and antimicrobial agent.

Keywords: Essential fatty acids, Antiradical activity, Antimicrobial activity, Olea europaea ssp. Oleaster, Secondary metabolite.


INTRODUCTION

Secondary metabolites are present in all higher plants. They play an important role in the plants protection against bacteria, virus, fungi and insects. For example, phenolic compounds are plant secondary metabolites which play important roles in disease resistance [1, 2]. In fact, Olaecea is one of the large plant families used as a framework to evaluate the occurrence of some typical secondary metabolites [3]. The olive (Olea europaea L.) is a small tree, which belongs to the family Oleaceae and is native to tropical and warm temperate regions of the world. Olea europea L. is the most widespread and important plant in the Mediterranean countries. Indeed, 98% of olive production worldwide is concentrated in the Mediterranean basin. A considerable part of olive production is processed. The olive is the cultivated form, whereas the oleaster is the wild form of Olea europaea subsp. Europaea [4]. They are called var. europaea and var. sylvestris, respectively [5]. The crop is propagated either by cuttings or grafts and therefore cultivars are clones. The transition between the oleaster and the olive is based on the size of the pit remains in artifact records. Nevertheless, they are more than 2000 cultivars in the Mediterranean basin that displays huge diversity based on fruit morphology, pit size and morphology. Several modern cultivars display as small pits as the oleaster, making the distinction criteria doubtful [6].

The tree, famous for its fruit, also called the olive, is commercially important in the Mediterranean region as a prime source of olive oil [7]. This plant can be used in crude from without refining. Thus conserving the essential vitamins, fatty acids and other natural elements of dietic importance. Olea europaea L. is widely studied for its alimentary use (the fruits and the oil are important components in the daily diet of a large part of the world’s population), whereas the leaves are important for their secondary metabolites such as the secoiridoid compounds, oleacein and oleuropein. Previous investigations carried out on olive leaf extracts have demonstrated their hypotensive, hypoglycaemic, hypouricaemic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [8-10]. Even though they are a number of studies about the secondary metabolite and biological activities of O. Oleaster,the information about the characteristic of oleaster has been scarcely investigated. The aims of the current work were to evaluate the essential fatty acid composition, secondary metabolite as well as antimicrobial and antiradical activities of O. Oleaster pulp harvested in the north-western part of Tunisia (Béja).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and preparation of the methanol extract

The plant material (fruits pulp of Olea europaea ssp. oleaster) used in this study was collected from the north-western part of Tunisia (Béja) in March 2012. The plant was botanically confirmed using available literature [11]. The air-dried fruits pulp was finely ground with a blade-carbide gringing (IKA-WERK Type: A: 10). Triplicate sub-samples of were separately extracted by stirring with 10 ml of pure methanol for 30 min. The extract was then kept for 24 h at , filtered through a Whatman No. 4 filter papers, evaporated under vacuum to dryness and stored at until analyzes [12].

Fatty acids extraction and analysis conditions

Fatty acids (FAs) of O. oleaster fruit pulp was extracted with cylohexane in a soxhlet apparatus for 6 h. The extract was concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator at . The extract was kept in obscurity at until analyzes. For FAs analyses, 20 mg of oil was stabilized with 1 mL TBME (Tert Butyl Metyl Ether). Then, FAs were derivatized into their corresponding methyl esters (FAMEs) by adding 50 μL of trimethyl sulfonium hydroxide (TMSH, 0.5M) in methanol. The analyses were done on a capillary gas chromatography Varian (CPG). The injection was split 1:100 at . The column used was Select CB for FAME fused silica WCOT ( x 0.25 mm; film thickness ). The temperature gradient was for 40 min, then 15 °C/min to , and for 10 min. The analysis time was 55 min. The detector FID was set up . The helium was the carrier gas at 1.2 mL/min.

Determination of total phenolic contents

Total phenolic contents of the tested extract were determined using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent according to the method previously reported by Slinkard and Singleton [13]. Total phenolic content of plants was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram dry weight (mg GAE/g DW) through the calibration curve with gallic acid.

Determination of total flavonoids contents

Total flavonoid contents were determined according to that previously described by Popova et al. [14], with some modifications. 1 mL of 2% aluminium trichloride (AlCl3) in methanol was mixed with the same volume of 1 mL of plant extract and the volume was made up to 25 mL with methanol. The mixture was left for 40 min and the absorbance at 420 nm was measured in a Shimadzu 160-UV (Tokyo, Japan) spectrophotometer. The results are given as rutin equivalent per gram dry weight (mg RE/g DW). All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Condensed tannin content

In presence of concentrated H2SO4, condensed tannins were transformed by the reaction with vanillin to anthocyanidols [15]. 50 μL of the methanolic organ extract - appropriately dilute was mixed with 3 mL of 4% methanol vanillin solution and 1.5 ml of H2SO4. After 15 min, the absorbance was measured at 500 nm. Condensed tannin content of tested extract (three replicates per treatment) was expressed as mg catechin equivalents per gram dry weight (mg CE/ g DW) through the calibration curve with catechin.

Antioxidant activity evaluation using free radical scavenging activity (DPPH)

The effect of methanolic extract of Olea europaea ssp. oleaster fruit pulp on DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) scavenging was estimated according to Hatano et al. [16] Tests were carried out in triplicate. The ability to scavenge the DPPH radical was calculated using the following equation: Scavenging effect (%) = [(A0-A1)/A0] × 100, where A0 and A1 are the absorbance of the control and the sample, respectively, after 30 min at 517 nm. Sample concentration providing 50% inhibition (IC50) was obtained plotting the inhibition percentage against sample (extract solution) concentrations.

Antimicrobial activity

Microbial strains

The methanol extracts of O. Oleaster fruit pulp was tested for their antibacterial and antifungal activities against ten indicators microorganisms including seven bacteria reference pathogenic (Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Salmonella typhimurium NCTC 6017, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Aeromonas hydrophila EI, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644, and Bacillus cereus ATCC 1247), two fungi (Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus) and one yeast (Candida albicans ATCC 2091) species [17].

Bacterial strains were grown in trypto-caseine soja agar (TSA) and incubated at for 24h. Fungal species were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate at 28oC for 72h. Candida albicans was grown on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plate at for 48h.

Disc diffusion method

The antibacterial and antifungal activities of the methanol extract of O. Oleaster fruit pulp were determined, firstly, by disc diffusion assay [17]. Briefly, 100 μL of suspension containing 108 CFU/mL of bacteria cells, 106CFU/mL of yeast, and 104spore/mL of fungi were spread on Petri plates containing TSA, SDA, and PDA medium, respectively. The paper discs ( in diameter) were separately impregnated with 15 μL of the evaluated extract and placed on the agar which had previously been inoculated with the selected test microorganisms. Gentamicin (10 µg/disc) and amphotericin B (20 µg/disc) were used as a positive reference for bacteria and fungi, respectively. Discs without samples were used as a negative control. Plates were kept at 4 ºC for 1 h. The inoculated plates were incubated for 24 h for pathogenic bacterial strains, 48 h for yeast and 72 h for fungi isolates at , and , respectively.

Antimicrobial activity was assessed by measuring the diameter of the growth-inhibition zone in millimetres (including disc diameter of ) for the tested micro-organisms comparing to the controls. The measurements of inhibition zones were carried out three times and values were the average of three replicates.

Determination of MIC and MBC

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were also determined using a broth dilution method [17]. All antibacterial and antifungal tests were performed in TCS and Sabouraud broth, respectively. Overnight broth cultures were diluted in peptone water (0.1% (v/v)) to obtain working culture (105 CFU/mL). Serial dilutions, ranging from 0.07 to 50 mg/mL of the studied extract, were used, including one growth control (TCS for bacterial strains and Sabouraud for fungal ones) and one sterility control (appropriate medium + tested extract). Tubes were incubated for 24 h for pathogenic bacterial strains, 48 h for yeast and 72 h for fungi at , and , respectively and the MICs and MBCs were determined. Microbial growth was indicated by the presence of turbidity and a ‘pellet’ on the tube bottom. MICs were determined presumptively as the first tube, in ascending order, which did not produce a tube bottom. To confirm MICs and to establish MBCs, 10 μL of broth was removed from each well and inoculated on TCS plates for bacterial strains, on PDA plates for fungal and on SDA for yeast. After incubation, the number of surviving organisms was determined. The MIC was the lowest concentration which resulted in a significant decrease in inoculum viability (> 90%), while the MBC was the concentration where 99.9% or more of the initial inoculum was killed. Each experiment was repeated at least three times and the modal MIC and MBC values were selected.

Results and discussion

Fatty acid composition

As shown in table 1, twenty fatty acids were detected in the O. oleaster oil. Oleic acid (77.4%) and elaidic acid (17.58%) were considered as major fatty acids. It is clearly shown that this oil is an important source of essential fatty acids. This gives a nutritional and medicinal importance for these plant seeds. Moreover, the monounsaturated fatty acid has an important physiological role [18]. Oleic acid was found in larger amounts in pulp of O. oleaster indicates that the oil obtained from these varieties are of good quality and beneficial for health, because this un-saturated fatty acid constitutes structural component of membranes. Fatty acids have important functions such as being used as a source of energy invertebrate and invertebrate animals and forming structure of biological membranes [19]. It is possible to generalize fatty acids found in high organized plants and animals.

Table 1: Fatty acid composition of Olea europaea ssp. oleaster fruit pulp

Nomenclature Percent (%) Name
C10:0 0.39 ±0.01 Capric acid
C12:0 0.07 ±0.001 Lauric acid
C13:0 0.30 ±0.005 Tridécyclic acid
C14:0 0.11 ±0.005 Myristic acid
C15:1 0.08 ±0.005 Pentadecyclic
C16:0 0.06 ±0.006 Palmitic acid
C17:0 0.07 ±0.005 Marguaric acid
C17:1 0.07 ±0.0005 Heptaguaric acid
C18:0 0.05 ±0.002 Stearic acid
C18:1 cis 77.40 ±0.45 Oleic acid (omega- 9)
C18:1 trans 17.58 ±0.28 Elaidic acid
C18:2 1.30 ±0.05 Linoleic acid
C18:3 0.82 ±0.01 α-linolenic
C20:0 0.10 ±0.01 Arachidic acid
C20:3 0.17 ±0.005 Homo-gamma-linolenic acid
C20:4 0.12 ±0.005 Eicosatetraenoic acid
C22:0 0.83 ±0.005 Behenic acid
C22:1 0.24 ±0.005 Erucic acid
C24:0 0.18 ±0.005 Lignoceric acid

Total polyphenol and flavonoids contents

The results of the quantitative determination of the polyphenols, tannins and flavonoids of the tested extract are summarized in table 2. This extract was rich in phenol than in flavonoids. In fact, total phenol content was 84.04±0.01 mg GAE/g DW, whereas total flavonoid content was 60.41±0.02 mg ER/g DW. The condensed tannin content was 40.8±0.01 mg CE/g DW. Generally, plant materials rich in phenolics are increasingly being used in the food industry because they retard oxidative degradation of lipids and improve the quality and nutritional value of food [20]. Phenolic compounds are considered secondary metabolites and these phytochemical compounds derived from phenylalanine and tyrosine occur ubiquitously in plants and are diversified [21].

Phenolic compounds of plants are also very important because their hydroxyl groups confer scavenging ability. The high contents of total phenolic compounds in O. oleaster fruit pulp methanolic extract can contribute to important antiradical and antimicrobial activities of this extract. Those findings justify the use of different plant organ of the studied species overall its distribution area in the world by ancient and actual local human populations.

Table 2: Total phenol, flavonoid, condensed tannin contents and antioxidant activities of Olea europea ssp. oleaster extract

Total phenol content (mg GAE/g DW)

Flavonoides

(mg ER/g DW)

Condensed tannin (mg CE/g DW)

DPPH

IC50 (µg/mL)

Positive control (BHT) (µg/mL)
84.04±0.01 60.41±0.05 40.08±0.01 28±0.01 27±0.01

Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of O. oleaster fruit pulp was evaluated by DPPH. The extract improved 50% inhibition at higher concentrations, indicating lesser antioxidant capacity. Lower IC50 value indicated higher antioxidant activity. The evaluated extract showed important antioxidant activity being close to control positive (Table 2). In fact, the obtained result was not significantly different from Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT), with its IC50 values were 28 µg/mLand 27 µg/mL, respectively. This could be assigned to the presence of some phenolic compounds (Table 2). It is well known that phenolic substances such as flavonoids, phenolic acids and tannins contribute directly to the antioxidant capacity of plants [22]. Indeed, various studies highlighted the correlation between the phenolic content and the antioxidant capacity of plant extracts [23, 24], indicating that extracts with highest polyphenol contents show higher antioxidant activity. Phenolic compounds exhibit considerable free radical-scavenging activities and metal ion-chelating properties, preventing metal-induced free radical formation [25]. In addition, phenols are organic compounds that contain a hydroxyl group bound directly to the aromatic ring, and the H-atom of the hydroxyl group can trap peroxyl radicals, preventing other compounds to be oxidized [26].

Antifungal and antibacterial activities

The in vitro antimicrobial potential of O. oleaster fruit pulp extract against the employed micro-organisms was assessed by the presence or absence of inhibition zones, MIC and MBC values. The obtained results showed that the tested extract had great potential for antibacterial, antifungal and anticandidal activities against all evaluated microorganisms (Table 3). The maximal inhibition zones diameters, MIC and MBC values for tested microorganisms, which were sensitive to the extract, were in the range of 13-, 3.125-25 mg/mL and 6.25-50 mg/mL, respectively. In addition, the extract appeared to be more efficient against fungus and yeast species than against bacterial strains. In fact, O. oleaster fruit pulp extract was most efficient against both Gram-positive (B. cereus, L. monocytogens, S. aureus) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, A. hydrophila, S. typhimurium). There is evidence in the literature that Gram-positive bacteria are more sensitive to plant oil and extracts than Gram-negative bacteria ones because of hydrophobic lipopolysaccharide in the outer membrane which provides protection against different agents [27, 28]; however, the results in this study showed that the methanolic extract of O. oleaster fruit pulp did not have selective antibacterial activity on the basis of the cell wall differences of bacterial microorganisms.

The antimicrobial effect of phenols has long been known. In literature, it has been indicated that the antibacterial and antifungal activities depends on the nature of the phenolic compound. There are several phenolic acids, such as chlorogenic, caffeic, vanillic and syringic, as well as some other phenolic compounds like quercetin, hydroxytyrosol and resveratrol identified to have antimicrobial activity [29, 30]. In fact, [31]. showed that oleuropein and other phenolic compounds (p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic and p-coumaric acids) completely inhibit the growth of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (B. cereus, E. coli, Kl. pneumoniae) and fungi (Asp. flavus). Phenolic structures similar to oleuropein seem to produce its antibacterial effect by damaging the bacterial membrane and/or disrupting cell peptidoglycans [32, 33]. All these found can explain the growth inhibition power of Olea europaea ssp. oleaster fruit pulp against the tested strains.

Table 3: Zones of growth inhibition (mm), the MIC and MBC values (mg/ml) of Olea europaea ssp. oleaster fruit pulp methanol extract against ten microorganisms.

 Micro-organismsa

Inhibition zone diameters (mm)b

MIC (mg/mL)

MBC (mg/mL)

Extract

Antibiotics

Gram negatif bacteria

E. coli ATCC 8739

17±0.5

241

12.5

25

S. typhimurium NCTC 6017

16±1

231

12.5

25

A. hydrophila EI

15±0.5

231

25

50

P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853

18±2

211

12.5

25

Gram positif bacteria

S. aureus ATCC 29213

17±1

201

12.5

25

L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644

14±0.5

181

25

50

B. cereus ATCC1247

13±0.5

211

25

50

Fungus

Asp. flavus

17±1

112

3.125

6.25

Asp. niger

18±0.9

122

3.125

6.25

Yeast

C. albicans

16±0.5

172

6.25

12.5

aFinal bacterial density was around 105 cfu/mL. bInhibition zone diameters (mm) produced around the wells by adding 15 µL of methanol extract.1Gentamicin. 2Amphotricin. ±: Standard deviation.

Conclusion

The essential fatty acids, secondary metabolite and biological activities of O. oleaster fruit pulp methanolic extract have been studied here for the first time.

The fatty acids composition revealed that this oil contained twenty acids with the major components were oleic acid (77.4%) and elaidic acid (17.58%). Moreover, the tested extract was rich in phenol (84.04±0.01 mg GAE/g DW) than in flavonoids (60.41±0.02 mg RE/g DW). In addition, it showed strong antiradical, antibacterial, antifungal and anticandidal activities. In this manner, the methanolic extract of O. oleaster fruit pulp may be suggested as potential sources of natural antioxidants as well as pharmaceuticals and natural therapies of infectious diseases in the human as antimicrobial agents.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Declared None.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.

ABBREVIATIONS

ATCC: American Type Culture Collection

DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

GC: Gas Chromatography

IZ: Inhibition Zones

MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration

MBC: Minimum bactericidal concentration

REFERENCES

  1. Antolovich M, Prenzler P, Robards K, Ryan D, Sample preparation in the determination of phenolic compounds in fruits. Analyst 2000;125:989–1009.
  2. Servili M, Montedoro G. Contribution of phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil quality. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2002;104:602–13.
  3. Silva S, Gomes L, Leitão F, Coelho AV, Vilas Boas L. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of olea europaea l. fruits and leaves. Food Sci Tech Int 2006;12:385–96.
  4. Lumaret R, Ouazzani N. Ancient wild olives in mediterranean forests. Nat 2001;413;700.
  5. Green PS. A revision of Olea L (Oleaceae). Kew Bull 2002;57:91–140.
  6. Bartolini G, Prevost G, Messeri C, Carignani G, Menini UG, Olive germplasm: cultivars and world-wide collections. Rome Italy FAO; 1998.
  7. Boskou D. History and characteristics of the olive tree. In Olive Oil Chemistry and Technology; Boskou D, Ed. Am Oil Chem Soc Press: Champaign; 1996.
  8. Hansen K, Adsersen A, Christensen B, Brooegger S, Rosendal JS, Nyman U, et al. Hypoglycemic activity of olive leaf. Planta Med 1992;58:513-5.
  9. Benavente-Garcia O, Castillo J, Lorente J, Ortuno A, Del Rio JA. Antioxidant activity of phenolics extracted from Olea europaea L. leaves. Food Chem 2000;68:457–62.
  10. Altarejos A, Saldo S, Pérez-Bonilla M, LinaresPalomino PJ, van Beek TA, Nogueras M, et al. Preliminary assay on the radical scavenging activity of olive wood extracts. Fitoterapia 2005;76:348–51.
  11. Alapetite GP, Flore de la. Tunisie Angiospermes-Dicotyledones Apétales-Dialypétales. Programme flore et végétation Tunisiennes. Ed Min de l’En Sup et de la Rech Sci Et le Min de l’Agr ; 1979. p. 269-87.
  12. Mau JL, Chao GR, Wu KT. Antioxidant properties of methanolic extracts from several ear mushrooms. J Agric Food Chem 2001;49:5461–7.
  13. Slinkard K, Singleton V. Total phenol análisis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Vitic 1977;28:49-55.
  14. Popova M, Bankova V, Butovska D, Petkov V, Nikolova-Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, et al. Structure–antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med 1996;20:933-56.
  15. Sun B, Richardo-da-Silvia JM, Spranger I. Critical factors of vanillin assay for catechin and proanthocyanidins. J Agric Food Chem 1998;46:4267–74.
  16. Hatano T, Kagawa H, Yasuhara T, Okuda T. Two new flavonoids and other constituents in licorice root: their relative astringency and radical scavenging effect. Chem Pharm Bull 1988;36:2090-7.
  17. Aouadhi C, Ghazghazi H, Hasnaoui B, Maaroufi A, Secondary metabolite, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Teucrium polium L methanolic extract. Int J Agr Plant Prod 2013;4:1790-7.
  18. Colquhoun DM, Humphries JA, Moores D, Somerset SM. Effects of a macadamia nut enriched diet on serum lipids and lipoproteins compared to a low fat diet. Food Australia 1996;48:216-22.
  19. Stanley–Samuelson DW, Jurenka RA, Cripps C, Blomquist GJ, Renobales MD. Fatty acids in insects: composition, metabolism and biological significance. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 1988;9:1–31.
  20. Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha, JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, et al. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agri Food Chem 1999;47:3954-62.
  21. Naczk M, Shahidi F. Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food. J Chromatogr A 2004;1054:95-111. 
  22. Hayase F, Kato H, Antioxidative components of sweet potatoes. J Nutr Sci Vitami 1984;30:37–46.
  23. Sengul M, Yildiz H, Gungor N, Cetin B, Eser Z, Ercisli S. Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of some medicinal plants. Pak J Pharm Sci 2009;22:102–6.
  24. Riahi L, Chograni H, Elferchichi M, Zaouali Y, Zoghlami N, Mlik A. Variations in Tunisian wormwood essential oil profiles and phenolic contents between leaves and flowers and their effects on antioxidant activities. Ind Crops Prod 2013;46:290–6.
  25. Rice-Evans CA, Miller JM, Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationship of flavon-oids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med 19996;20;933-56.
  26. Nguyen A, Martin M, Shukla SS, Margave JL, Parga J. Pentachlorophenol biodegradation by the bacteria enterobacter cloacae. Res J Chem Environ 2003;7:3-8.
  27. Nikaido H, Vaara M. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol Rev 1985;49:1-32.
  28. Hogg S. Essential Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK; 2005.
  29. Chan MMY. Antimicrobial effect of resveratrol on dermatophytes and bacterial pathogens of the skin. Biochem Pharmacol 2002;63:99–104.
  30. Wen AM, Delaquis P, Stanich K, Toivonen P. Antilisterial activity of selected phenolic acids. Food Microbiol 2003;20:305–11.
  31. Aziz NH, Farag SE, Mousa LAA, Abo-Zaid MA. Comparative antibacterial and antifungal effects of some phenolic compounds. Microbios 1998;93:43–54.
  32. Bisignano G, Tomaino A, Lo Cascio R, Crisafi G, Uccella N, Saija A. On the in-vitro antimicrobial activity of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol. J Pharm Pharmacol 1999;51:971–4.
  33. Winkelhausen E, Pospiech R, Laufenberg G. Antifungal activity of phenolic compounds extracted from dried olive pomace. Bull Chem Technol Mac 2005;24:41–6.