Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 7, Issue 7, 408-413Original Article


PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING, ANTIOXIDANT POTENTIAL AND CYTOTOXIC ACTIVITY OF MELASTOMA MALABATHRICUM LINN. FROM DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

SULEIMAN DANLADI1, AMIRAH WAN-AZEMIN1, YAHAYA NAJIB SANI1, KHAMSAH SURYATI MOHD2, MAHADEVA RAO US1, SHARIF MAHSUFI MANSOR3, SARAVANAN DHARMARAJ1*

1School of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Medical Campus, Jalan Sultan Mahmud, 20400 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia, 2Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, University Sultan Zainal Abidin, Tembila Campus, 22200 Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia, 3Centre of Drug Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Email: saravanandharmaraj@unisza.edu.my

Received: 17 Mar 2015 Revised and Accepted: 21 May 2015


ABSTRACT

Objective: The initial study was to screen the phytochemical content of methanol extract of M. malabathricum from seven different locations. The other objective was to evaluate the total phenolic content (), Total flavonoid content (TFC), antioxidant potential and cytotoxic activity (on Hepatoma G2 cells) of these extracts and to determine the relationship between TPC and other parameters.

Methods: The preliminary phytochemical screening for the presence of the secondary metabolite was carried out according to standard procedures. The TFC and antioxidant activity were determined using Folin-Ciocalteu method, aluminium chloride (colorimetric) methodand1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity respectively.

Results: Qualitative phytochemical screening showed the presence of tannins, analkaloid, steroids, flavonoid, phenols, terpenoids and fixed oil but tested negative for the presence of glycoside and saponins. The samples were found to have high and antioxidant activity. The Bachok Kelantan sample (L7) showed highest phenolic content (671.51±50.07 mg of GAE/g) as well as highest DPPH free radical scavenging activity (80.81% and IC50 102 µg/ml). The highest cytotoxic activity against HepG2 cells (IC50 1.4 µg/ml) was shown by KualaTerengganu, Terengganu sample (L1). The Spearman correlation showed that, there is a strong positive correlation between and antioxidant activity (r = 0.714) as well as strong negative correlation between MTT IC50 and TPC (R =-0.649) of M. malabathricum from different locations. Moreover, there is a weak positive correlation between TFC and antioxidant activity (R = 0.286, p= 0.535). Also, there is poor correlation between TFC and cytotoxicity (R =-0.216, p= 0.64).

Conclusion: The phenolic compounds are associated with the cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of M. malabathricum, whereas flavonoids are poorly and weakly associated with cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of M. malabathricum respectively. The total phenolic content, mean flavonoid content and mean antioxidant activity of M. malabathricum from different locations were significantly different across seven locations (p<0.05).

Keywords: Melastoma malabathricum, Total phenolic content, Flavonoid, Antioxidant, Cytotoxicity.


INTRODUCTION

Melastoma malabathricum L. is a member of Melastomataceae, locally known as senduduk. The plant is about 1.5 to 5 m height,is available throughout Malaysia and commonly used in traditional medicine for treatment of various diseases such as wounds, to othache and sore [1,2]. Scientific investigations have shownthatM. Malabathricum has the positive therapeutic activity such as antiulcer [3], anticoagulant [4], hepatoprotective [5], antibacterial as well as anticancer [6]. An earlier study has shown that M. malabathricum has a promising effect against various cancer cell lines. It was reported that methanol, chloroform and aqueous extracts inhibit the proliferation of -7, Hela, Caov-3, HL-60, CEM-SS, -MB-231 cancer cell lines, with the effects being associated with antioxidant and polyphenolic content of the plant [7]. It was reported that extracts of leaves of M. malabathricum exhibited hepatoprotective activity through antioxidant activity [5, 8, 9]. In addition to cancer and hepatic ailments, several other pathologic conditions such as aging, and atherosclerosis diabetes are caused by free radicals, which are toxic to the cells [10]. Antioxidants are compounds or molecules that prevent effects of oxidation in tissues and protect cells from the toxic effect of free radicals [11]. Presently antioxidants obtained from natural sources play a vital role in combating several diseases and improving the quality of life, because of their safety and efficacy compared to synthetic antioxidants [12].

Plants are potential sources of natural bioactive compounds such as antioxidants [11]. The methanolic extract of the flower of M. Malabathricum was found to have strong DPPH free radical scavenging activity. Naringerin and kaemferol-3-0-(,6”-di-0-p-trans-coumaroyl) glucoside isolated from the flowers of M. malabathricum were found to be active DPPH free radical scavengers and they inhibit the proliferation of 7 [13]. Other than these isolated constituents, the plant contains several phytochemical constituents such as alkaloid, coumarin, glycoside, flavonoid, terpenoid, saponin, phenol, steroid and tannins [14–16].

The environment often influences the chemical content and activity of the plant. Similar plants may vary in their chemical contents and activity due to the nature of the soil constituents and the weather of the environment. This study was carried out to evaluate the TPC, TFC, antioxidant potential through DPPH free radicals cavenging activity and cytotoxicity of methanol extract of M. malabathricum from seven different locations, and to determine their relationship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and standards

Gallic acid, 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, quercetin, Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent, sodium carbonate solution, methanol, ethanol, HCl, H2SO4, iodine, zinc, ferric chloride, aluminium nitrate, potassium acetate and potassium iodide were obtained from Merck (Germany). The HepG2 and Chang liver cells were sourced from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), whereas other items are T75 flask (Costar), 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA), RPMI-1640 media (Gibco, USA), dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma, USA), hydrogen peroxide (Sigma, USA), penicillin and streptomycin (Nacalai-Tesque, Japan).

Plant materials

M. malabathricum Leaves were collected in April from the seven different localities around the northeast coast of Peninsula Malaysia. These are Kuala Terengganu, Kemaman, Jertih; from the state of Terengganu, as well as Tumpat, Bakong Luar, Jeram Perdah, Bachok; from state of Kelantan, and coded as L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6 and L7, respectively. The samples were identified by Science Officer; Noorhaslinda Haron and deposited with the specimen voucher 00245 in the Herbarium Unit, Department of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA). The plant samples were washed with tap water, rinsed with distilled water and dried at 50 °C.

Preparation of extracts

The dried samples of the leaves from the different locations were grinded into powder form; each plant sample was weighed and soaked in methanol at the ratio of 1:10 (w/v) for 3d. Extracts were then decanted and filtered through filter paper. The filtrate was concentrated in a rotary evaporator at 40 °C, and the extracts were dried at 50 °C and kept in a freezer at 4 °C for further use.

Determination of percentage yield (%)

The percentage yield of the extract was determined gravimetrically using the dry weight of extract (x) and soaked samples material (y) using the formula:

The extraction yield was calculated for each extract, and the result was expressed as a percentage yield (%).

Preliminary qualitative phytochemical screening

The qualitative evaluation of the presence of groups of metabolites was accomplished for seven different locations of M. Malabathricum leaves according to the established procedures [17-21].

Saponins

The extract (50mg) is diluted with distilled water and made up to 20ml. The suspension is shakens in the graduated cylinder for 15min. A 2cm layer foam indicates the presence of saponins [17].

Tannins

An amount of extract weighing 50mg is dissolved in distilled water, and 3ml of 10% solution of lead acetate was added. Formation of bulky white precipitate indicated the presence of tannins[18].

Alkaloids

A fifty mg of an extract is stirred with dilute HCl and filtered. A few ml of filterate is taken into a test tube and to the filtrate, afew drops of Wagner’s reagent are added. A reddish-brown precipitate indicated the presence of alkaloids[19].

Steroids

About 100mg of dried extract was dissolved in 2ml of chloroform. Sulphuric acid was carefully added to form a lower layer. A reddish brown colour at the interface was an indicative of the presence of steroidal ring [20,21].

Phenols

To 1ml of an alcoholic solution of the sample, 2ml of distilled water followed by a few drops of 10% aqueous ferric chloride solution were added. Formation of blue or green colour indicated the presence of phenols [20,21].

Terpenoid

2ml of chloroform and 1ml of conc. H2SO4 was added to 1 mg of extract and observed for reddish brown colour that indicated the presence of terpenoid [20,21].

Fixed oils

A small amount of dried extract is pressed between two filter papers, oil stains on the paper indicate the presence of fixed oils[17].

Flavonoids

In a test tube containing 0.5ml of alcoholic extract of the samples, 5 to 10 drops of diluted HCl (1%) and small amount of Zn was added and the solution was boiled for few minutes. The appearance of reddish pink or dirty brown colour indicated the presence of flavonoids [20,21].

Glycosides

A small amount of alcoholic extract of samples was dissolved in 1ml water, and then aqueous sodium hydroxide was added. Formation of a yellow colour indicated the presence of glycosides [20, 21].

Determination of total phenolic content (TPC)

The total phenolic content of M. malabathricumleaves were determined according to the method ofSchalbert et al., 1989 [22] with slight modification. The extracts of the leaves were diluted to 100µg/ml concentration. The Folin-ciocalteau reagent was also diluted at the ratio of 1:10 before use. A 1.25 ml portion of Folin-Ciocalteau reagent were added to 0.25 ml mixture above and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 2 min and then 1 ml of sodium carbonate solution (75 % w/v) was added. The solutions were mixed and kept in a dark place for 30 min. The absorbances of the total phenols was determined spectrophotometrically at 760 nm and the gallic acid aqueous solutions in the range of 2.5-160µg/ml were used as a standard.

Total flavonoid content (TFC)

Flavonoid content of methanol extracts of M. malabathricumleaves were determined according to the method of Moreno et al., 2000 [23] with slight modifications. A0.25 ml aliquot of the diluted extract at 200µg/ml was mixed with solutions comprising 50 µl of 10% aluminium chloride, 50 µl of 1 M aqueous potassium acetate and 2.15 ml of 95% ethanol. After incubation for 40 min at room temperature, the absorbance was recorded spectrophotometrically at 415 nm. Total flavonoid was calculated from the calibration curve using quercetin as a standard and expressed as mg/g.

Determination of DPPH free radical scavenging activity

The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of methanol extracts of M malabathricum leaves was estimated, by adapting the method of Miser-Salihoglu et al., 2013 [24] with minor modification. A 20 µl of extract at different concentrations (1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.625, 0 µg/ml respectively) was added in 96 well microplate and then a 200 µl of 0.1 mM solution of DPPH was added to the wells. Quercetin was used as standard while DMSO 20 µl served as blank negative control (reaction mixture without test extract). The mixtures were shaken vigorously and allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min. Then the absorbances were measured at 517 nm using microplate reader. Each sample was assayed in triplicate,and the percentage of inhibition was calculated. The IC50 values were also calculated as the concentration of a test sample required to give 50% radical scavenging activity (DPPH). The results were compared with that of the quercetin standard.

Where A = Absorbance

Cell line and culture

The HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma cell) and Chang liver (normal cell line) cells were cultured in a sterile T75 flask (Costar) containing D-MEME and RPMI-1640 media respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100.0 unit/ml penicillin and 100.0μg/ml streptomycin) in 5% CO2 humidified air at 37 °C. Exponentially growing cells were used for all the experiments [25].

Assessment of cell viability

The assessment of cell viability on Hep G2 and Chang liver cells was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolzyl-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays. Briefly, human cell lines were seeded in 96-well microplate plates at concentration 1.0 x 105cells/well. After incubation for 24 h, either the methanol extracts of the seven locations or hydrogen peroxide was added at 100μg/ml, followed by two-fold dilutions. The treated plates were then incubated for a prolonged period of 72 h. Then, 20.0μl of MTT solution (5.0 mg/ml) was added to each well and was incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. All medium was removed from each well and replaced with 100.0 µl dimethylsulfoxide. The solubilized formazan produced by metabolically active cells was measured by scanning the 96-well plates at 570 nm with reference at 630 nm wavelengths using Infinate M200 microplate reader from Tecan, Switzerland. The IC50 (50% inhibition concentration) values were determined as the concentration of an extract to result in 50% growth inhibition of the cancerous cells. Data was expressed as mean±SE of three or more experiments.

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were carried out in triplicate and expressed as means±SD. The means were compared by one-way ANOVA, and the values were considered to be significantly different at P<0.05. Furthermore, Spearman's Correlation was also carried out to estimate the inter relation ship between TPC, TFC, MTT Assay IC50 & DPPH % Inhibition of free radicals of different locations M. malabathricum.

RESULTS

Percentage yield

The percentage yields of extracts of M. malabathricum leaves from different locations is shown in table 1, and L7 was found to have the highest percentage yield followed by L3 while L5 gave the lowest percentage yield.

Table 1: Percentage yield for M. malabathricumleaves extracts fromseven different locations

Sample Percentage yield (%)
Kuala Terengganu (L1) 7.55
Kemaman,Terengganu (L2) 10.26
Jertih,Terengganu (L3) 10.74
Tumpat,Kelantan (L4) 8.21
Bakong Luar,Kelantan (L5) 5.94
Jeram Perdah,Kelantan (L6) 8.57
Bachok,Kelantan (L7) 18.29

Preliminary phytochemical screening

Preliminary qualitative phytochemical test of methanol extracts for seven locations of leaves of M. Malabathricum indicates the presence of alkaloid, steroids, phenols, fixed oil, terpenoids and tannins,but tested negatively for the presence of saponins,as well as glycoside and these results, are shown in table 2.

All samples show similar profile for all preliminary qualitative phytochemical screening sex cept for the test of tannins, which is more prominent in L1, L2, L3 and L7.

Total phenolic content (TPC)

TPC for all samples were determined as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in mg per g dry weight, from theequationY = 0.0033x+0.1244 withR2 = 0.9843. The sample L7 was found to have the highest TPC (671.51±50.07 mg of GAE/g) followed in sequence by L3, L4, L5, L1, L2 and then L6with the lowest TPC value and the results are shown in table 3.

Table 2: Qualitative analysis for phytochemical constituents of leaves of M. Malabathricum from seven locations

Tests L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7
Saponins - - - - - - -
Tannins ++ ++ ++ + + + ++
Alkaloids + + + + + + +
Steroids + + + + + + +
Phenols + + + + + + +
Terpenoids + + + + + + +
Fix oil + + + + + + +
Flavonoids + + + + + + +
Glycoside - - - - - - -

+indicates presence of the phytoconstituent; − indicates absence of the phytoconstituent

Table 3: Results of total phenolic content of methanol extract M. malabathricum from seven different locations

Localities TPC (mg of GAE/g of extract)
Kuala Terengganu (L1) 339.19±45.49ab
Kemaman, Terengganu (L2) 278.59±48.99a
Jertih, Terengganu (L3) 567.47±91.63cd
Tumpat, Kelantan (L4) 501.82±35.72bcd
Bakong Luar, Kelantan (L5) 479.60±17.76bc
Jeram Perdah, Kelantan (L6) 216.97±30.75a
Bachok, Kelantan (L7) 671.51±50.07d

Data are expressed as mean±SD (n = 3 in each locality); means were compared by Scheffe test (p<0.05). The mean Phenolic Content of M. Malabathricum from different locations is significantly different p<0.05.

Total flavonoid content

The TFC of methanol extract M. malabathricum leaves from different locations were determined as quercetin equivalent (QE) in mg per g dry weight, from the equationY = 0.0052x+0.0883 with R = 0.9963. All samples were found to contain flavonoid with the locationL2 recording highest TFC whereas L5 recorded lowest TFC,and the overall results are presented in table 4.

Table 4: Total flavonoid content of M. malabathricum from seven different locations

Locations TFC (QE mg/g of extract)
Kuala Terengganu (L1) 79.84±1.45b
Kemaman, Terengganu (L2) 102.92±12.77c
Jertih, Terengganu (L3) 38.49±2.94a
Tumpat, Kelantan (L4) 41.70±5.80a
Bakong Luar, Kelantan (L5) 35.93±1.47a
Jeram Perdah, Kelantan (L6) 42.34±2.00a
Bachok, Kelantan (L7) 76.96±1.16b

Data are expressed as mean±SD (n = 3 in each locality); means were compared by Dunnet’s C test (p<0.05). The mean flavonoid content of M. Malabathricum from different locations is significantly different p<0.05

Antioxidant (DPPH free radical scavenging activity)

The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of methanol extracts ofM. Malabathricum leaves from different locations, as well as the standard quercetin, were determined and compared using the IC50 values and the highest percentage of DPPH free radical inhibition. The results of IC50 are shown in table 5 whereas percentage inhibition of DPPH free radical scavenging activity at various concentrations is shown in fig. 1, and it can be noticed that among the locations tested; L7 was found to have lowest IC50 value and highest percentage inhibition of free radicalsor the highest antioxidant activity, which is shown in table 6. The results also show that L6 has percentage inhibition of free radical(antioxidant activity) below 50%, which is the lowest antioxidant activityamong seven samples, and its IC50 is above 1 mg/ml.

MTT Assay

The methanol extract of M. malabathricum from seven different locations possessed cytotoxic activity on HepG2 cell,and this is shown fig. 2. The L1 possessed the highestcytotoxic activity on Hep G2 cell with IC50valuesof 1.4 μg/ml, whereas L3 has the lowest activity with IC50 of 10.0 μg/ml. Each sample demonstrated cytotoxic effect at low concentration, and they kill 50% of Hep G2 at low concentration. The IC50 value for each sample has been presented in table 7.

Table 5: Results of 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) scavenging activity of methanol extract of M. malabathricum from seven different locations and standard quercetin

Sample IC50 (µg/ml)
Kuala Terengganu (L1) 148
Kemaman, Terengganu (L2) 388
Jertih, Terengganu (L3) 210
Tumpat, Kelantan (L4) 210
Bakong Luar, Kelantan (L5) 692
Jeram Perdah, Kelantan (L6) >1000
Bachok, Kelantan (L7) 102
Q (Quercetin) 30

Fig. 1: Percentage inhibition of DPPH free radical by methanol extracts of M. malabathricum from seven different locations and Quercetin


Table 6: The highest percentage inhibition of DPPH free radical scavenging activityby extracts of M. malabathricum from different locationsand quercetin

Locations DPPH % Inhibition
Kuala Terengganu (L1) 80.69±0.20cd
Kemaman, Terengganu (L2) 78.46±0.13bc
Jertih, Terengganu (L3) 80.77±0.14cd
Tumpat, Kelantan (L4) 78.35±1.06bc
Bakong Luar, Kelantan (L5) 75.41±2.08b
Jeram Perdah, Kelantan (L6) 36.13±1.61a
Bachok, Kelantan (L7) 80.81±0.86cd
Q (Quercetin) 83.84±0.34d

Data are expressed as mean±SD (n = 3 in each locality); means were compared by Dunnet’s C test (p<0.05). The mean antioxidant of M. malabathricumfrom different locations is significantly different p<0.05

DISCUSSION

The present study showed that methanolic extracts of M. Malabathricum leaves from the seven locations had similar phytochemical content among them. All the tested samples contained flavonoid, phenols, tannins, terpenoids, steroids and alkaloids. This is in agreement with screening by earlier researchers [3, 16], but these earlier reports, as well as work of others [7, 9], mentioned the presence of saponin which is not present in our study. Furthermore, our screening did also not detect glycosides which were also not detected in an earlier study [26].

Fig. 2: MTT assay of methanol extract of M. malabathricum from seven different locations on HepG2 cell


Table 7: IC50 (μg/ml) of MTT assay of methanol extract of M. malabathricum from seven different locations on HepG2 cell

Sample IC50 (μg/ml)
Kuala Terengganu (L1) 1.4
Kemaman, Terengganu (L2) 5.6
Jertih, Terengganu (L3) 10.0
Tumpat, Kelantan (L4) 7.5
Bakong Luar, Kelantan (L5) 2.2
Jeram Perdah, Kelantan (L6) 2.8
Bachok, Kelantan (L7) 7.5

The screening which indicated high tannin content as well as positive results for phenol demonstrates a high total phenolic content for these samples which is similar to findings of earlier researchers [3, 12, 15], who reported that M. malabathricum contains several chemical compound and high TPC.

The location L7 has the highest TPC (671.51±50.07 mg of GAE/g) as well as highest antioxidant activity (80.81%), and correspondingly the lowest IC50 value. On the other hand, the sample L6 possessed the lowest TPC (216.97±30.75 mg of GAE/g)as well as lowest antioxidant activity (36.13%) with the overall antioxidant activity less than IC50. The results show that there are significant differences in both the phenolic content and antioxidant activity of M. malabathricumfrom different locations.

The results for correlation between different parameters are shown in table 8 and the Spearman correlation showed that there is a moderate negative correlation between the TPC and TFC (R =-0.357, p= 0.432) and although often this is not the case but it has been reported. For example, this finding is in line with the finding of [27], which shows that there is a negative correlation between TPC and TFC of S. scabrum. The Spearman correlation showed that there was a strong positive correlation (R = 0.714, p = 0.71) between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of M. malabathricum from the different locations. Additionally, there is weak positive correlation between TFC andantioxidant activity (R = 0.286, p= 0.535). The coefficient of determination or R2 for TPC with radical scavenging activity is 0.510 whereas R2 between TFC and scavenging activity is 0.082.

This means that TPC contributed 51.0% whereas TFC contributed 8.2 % to the radical scavenging activity. Therefore,the finding of this study showed that there is a strong association between TPC, as well as DPPH radical scavenging activity,and this is in line with the finding of [28]. The contribution of compounds other than phenolics such as Vitamin C, tocopherols and even terpenoids to antioxidant activity has been reported [29]. For example, the study of [30] reported the presence of two saponins from Entada rheedii with antioxidant activity.

Table 8: Spearman's correlation toestimatethe interrelationship between TPC, TFC, MTT Assay IC50 & DPPH % Inhibitionoffree radicals of different locations M. malabathricum

TPC TFC (mg/g) DPPH % Inhibitionoffree radicals MTT Assay(µg/ml) IC50
TPC (mg/g) 1 -0.357 0.71 0.649
TFC (mg/g) 1 0.286 -0.216
DPPH % Inhibitionoffree radicals 1 0.468

MTT Assay

(µg/ml) IC50

1

In terms of cytotoxic effect, it is noticed that the sample obtained from Kuala Terengganu (L1) has the highest cytotoxic activity (1.4 µg/ml) against HepG2 cellwhereassample collected from Jertih, Terengganu (L3) has the lowest cytotoxic activity(10.0 µg/ml) against HepG2 cell.

It was also found out that there is a strong negative correlation between TPC and cytotoxicity (R =-0.649,p = 0.115), whereas, there is poorcorrelation between TFC and cytotoxicity (R =-0.216, p= 0.64). Overall, this finding indicates that the phenolic compounds are associated with cytotoxic activity of M. malabathricum, which is in line with the finding which showed antiproliferative activity of M. malabathricum is associated with its phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity [7]. The latter effect is shown by the moderate negative correlation between MTT IC50 and antioxidant effect (R =-0.468,p = 0.289). This indicates that DPPH free radical scavenging activity of different locations of M. malabathricum is moderately contributing toward cytotoxic activity. Some of the correlations showed to be insignificant at p>0.05,and this may beasa result of small samplesize. The present study highlights the differences in composition of methanolic extracts of M. malabathricum in terms of content of both phenolic and flavonoid group of chemicals when geographical locations are taken into consideration and also show that this invariably affects the activity that is of concern. These differences may possibly be relatedto the natural climatic differences which occur over aparticular geographical area to be influenced by several microclimatic factors.

CONCLUSION

From the finding of this study we can conclude that M. malabathricum can be an important source of therapeutic agent in the treatment of diseases such as cancer and liver diseases as shown by their prominent activity on Hep G2 cells whichis associated with its antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors graciously acknowledge the financial backing of Ministry of Education, Malaysia for granting Dr. Saravanan Dharmaraj the research grant for the execution of this work (RACE/F2/SKK/UniSZA/1). Suleiman Danladi and Yahaya Najib Saniwish to thank Kano State, Government of Nigeria for their scholarship.

CONFLICTOF INTERESTS

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Hussain F, Abdulla MA, Noor SM, Ismail S, Ali HM. Gastroprotective effects of Melastoma malabathricum aqueous leaf extract against ethanol-induced gastric ulcer iin rats. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 2008;4(4):438–41.
  2. Anbu J, Jisha P, Varatharajan R, Muthappan M. Antibacterial and wound healing activities of melastoma malabathricum linn. Afr J Infect Dis 2010;2(2):68–73.
  3. Balamurugan K, Nishanthini A, Mohan VR. Antiulcer activity of melastoma malabathricum L. Leaf Extracts (Melatomataceae). Int J Adv Res 2013;1(20):49–52.
  4. Khoo LT, Abas F, Abdullah JO, Rahayu E, Tohit M, Hamid M. Anticoagulant activity of polyphenolic-polysaccharides isolated from melastoma malabathricum L. EBCAM; 2014.
  5. Nishanthini A, Balamurugan K, Mohan VR. Evaluation of Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of melastoma. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2013;5(1):33–41.
  6. Alwash MSA, Ibrahim N, Yaacob WA, Din L Bin. Antibacterial, antioxidant and cytotoxicity properties of traditionally used Melastoma malabathricum linn leaves. Adv J Food Sci Technol 2014;6(1):6–12.
  7. Zakaria ZA, Rofiee MS, Mohamed AM, Teh LK, Salleh MZ. In vitro antiproliferative and antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents of the extracts of melastoma malabathricum leaves. J Acupuncture Meridian Studies 2011;4(4):248–56.
  8. Kamisan FH, Yahya F, Ismail NA, Din SS, Mamat SS, Zabidi Z, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of methanol extract of melastoma malabathricum leaf in rats. J Acupuncture Meridian Studies 2013;6(1):52–5.
  9. Mamat SS, Kamarolzaman MFF, Yahya F, Mahmood ND, Shahril MS, Jakius KF, et al. Methanol extract of Melastoma malabathricum leaves exerted antioxidant and liver protective activity in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med 2013;13:326.
  10. Ooi VEC, Liu F. A review of pharmacological activities of mushroom polysaccharides. Int J Med Mushrooms 1999;1(3):195–206.
  11. Chatatikun M, Chiabchalard A. Phytochemical screening and free radical scavenging activities of orange baby carrot and carrot (Daucus carota Linn.) root crude extracts. J Chem Pharm Res 2013;5(4):97–102.
  12. Alnajar ZAA, Abdulla MA, Ali HM, Alshawsh MA, Hadi AHA. Acute toxicity evaluation, antibacterial, antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Melastoma malabathricum. Molecules 2012;17:3547–59.
  13. Susanti D, Sirat HM, Ahmad F, Ali RM, Aimi N, Kitajima M. Antioxidant and cytotoxic flavonoids from the flowers of Melastoma malabathricum L. Food Chem 2007;103:710–6.
  14. Zakaria ZA, Raden MNRNS, Sulaiman MR, Abdul Ghani ZDF, Hanan Kumar KGFC. Antinoceptive and antiinflammatory properties of MEM chloroform extract. J Pharmacol Toxicol 2006;126(11):337–45.
  15. Sheela DA, Rajkumar J, Modilal MRD, Ilayaraja R. Antimicrobial activities of Avicennia marina, Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Melastoma malabathricum against clinical pathogens isolated from UTI. Int J Pharma Bio Sci 2012;3(3):698–705.
  16. Balamurugan K, Nishanthini A, Mohan VR. Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidaemic activity of ethanol extract of melastoma malabathricum l. leaf in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Int J Pharm Res Bio-Sci 2013;2(5):223–36.
  17. Kokate CK. Phytochemical Methods: Phytotherapy; 1999. p. 126–9.
  18. Evans WC. An index of medicinal plants. 7th ed. Textbook Pharmacognosy; 1997. p. 12–4.
  19. Wagner H. Pharmazeutische biology. 5th edn. Stuttgart, Germany: AUFI.15 Gustav fisher Vwelag; 1993.
  20. Richardson PM, Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 2 nd ed. Brittonia; 1990. p. 115.
  21. Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods. a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis 3rd ed. London; New York: Chapman and Hall; 1998.
  22. Schalbert A, Monties B, Jain G. Tannins in Wood: Comparison of Different Estimation Methods. J Agric Food Chem 1989;37:1324–9.
  23. Moreno MIN, Isla MI, Sampietro AR, Vattuone MA. Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina. J Ethnopharmacol 2000;71:109–14.
  24. Miser-Salihoglu E, Akaydin G, Caliskan-can E, Yardim-akaydin S. Evalution of antioxidant activity of various herbal folk medicines. J Nutr Food Sci 2013;3(5):222.
  25. Mena-Rejon G, Caamal-Fuentes E, Cantillo-Ciau Z, Cedillo-Rivera R, Flores-Guido J, Moo-Puc R. In vitro cytotoxic activity of nine plants used in Mayan traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 2009;121:462–5.
  26. Kumar S. Phytochemical evaluation of leaf extracts of Aegle marmelos. Int J Dev Res 2013;3(7):029–33.
  27. Anokwuru CP, Anyasor GN, Ajibaye O, Fakoya O, Okebugwu P. Effect of extraction solvents on phenolic, Flavonoid and antioxidant activities of three nigerian medicinal plants. Nat Sci 2011;9(7):53–61.
  28. Chalise JP, Acharya K, Gurung N, Bhusal RP, Gurung R, Skalko-Basnet N, et al. Antioxidant activity and polyphenol content in edible wild fruits from Nepal. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2010;61(4):425–32.
  29. Graßmann J. Terpenoids as plant antioxidants. Vitamins and Hormones; 2005. p. 505–35.
  30. Nzowa LK, Barboni L, Teponno RB, Ricciutelli M, Lupidi G, Quassinti L, et al. Rheediinosides A and B, two antiproliferative and antioxidant triterpene saponins from Entada rheedii. Phytochemistry 2010;71(2-3):254–61.