Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 7, Issue 11, 294-299Original Article


RP-HPLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF TIAPRIDE RELATED SUBSTANCE IN TABLET FORMULATION

JWAL DOCTORa,b, KOMAL CHAUDHARYb, DHARMIN JOSHIa, SANJAY PRAJAPATIa, PRITI J MEHTAb*

a(Astron division) Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Ahmedabad, bInstitute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, S. G Highway Ahmedabad 382481, Gujarat, India
Email: drpritimehta@nirmauni.ac.in

Received: 26 May 2015 Revised and Accepted: 03 Oct 2015


ABSTRACT

Objective: To develop a simple, precise, accurate related substance, reverse phase high-performance liquid chomatographic (RP-HPLC) method for the quantitative estimation of impurities which are present in dosage form of Tiapride Hydrochloride.

Methods: The chomatographic separation was achieved with Inertsil C8 (250 × 4.6) mm, 5µ column with mobile phase containing a gradient mixture of 0.05 mM aqueous Potassium di hydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) solution buffer: (with octanesulphonate and final pH of buffer was adjusted to 2.7 with Orthophosphoric acid): Acetonitrile: Methanol (800:150:50 v/v), flow rate of 1.5 ml/min and a detection wavelength of 240 nm.

Results: The method exhibited linearity between range 0.125 to 1200 µg/ml, shows well resolved degradation products from Tiapride hydrochloride tablet with 0.063 µg/ml of LOD (limit of detection) and 0.125 µg/ml of LOQ (limit of Quantification). Forced degradation studies proved that the method is specific for Tiapride Hydrochloride and N-oxide Tiapride reported in European pharmacopeia and British pharmacopeia is one of the degradation impurity confirmed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.

Conclusion: An accurate, precise, linear, robust and specific related substance RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the quantitative estimation of impurities presented in pharmaceutical dosage form of Tiapride Hydrochloride as per ICH guidelines. The method is stability indicating used for separation of degradation products and can be used for the identification of process related impurity.

Keywords: HPLC, LC-MS, Forced degradation, ICH guidelines, Tiapride Hydrochloride.


INTRODUCTION

Tiapride (N-2–Diethylaminoethyl)-2-methoxy-5 methylsulfonyl benzamide) hydrochloride is an atypical neuroleptic agent and used for the treatment of schizophrenia [1]. It is a selective dopamine D2-receptor antagonist with little propensity for causing catalepsy and sedation. It is likely that the small quantity of these un reacted intermediates may left over during the variety of reaction steps and finally decrease the yield and quality of the finished products. Monitoring of reactions as well as the purity and yield is very important to assess the viability of the processes used for the commercial production of Tiapride. Thus, there is a great need for the development of analytical methods for separation and determination of related substances for process development and quality control of Tiapride [2-4].

Fig. 1: Structure of tiapride hydrochloride

Literature search revealed that Liquid Chomatography with different detection systems such as spectrofluorimetric [5], UV spectrometric [6], photodiode array, mass spectrometric was used for quantitative determination of Tiapride in biological fluids. Several other approaches like cell based assay, immune assay, electrophoretic [7], polarimetric and high performance thin layer chomatography (HPTLC)[8],gas Chomatography (GC)[9],hydrophilic interaction liquid chomatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HILC)[10] have been tried to analyse tiapride in various matrices. Japan Pharmacopeia (JP)[11] adopted isocratic method for impurity profiling A-E of Tiapride API in HPLC, similarly capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) [12] and differential pulse anodic voltametric determination [13] method for separation of Tiapride hydrochloride and related impurities in pharmaceutical formulations as well as in human urine and plasma [14] also reported. European and British pharmacopeia has reported related substance reverse phase high performance liquid chomatographic method for active pharmaceutical ingredient of Tiapride Hydrochloride [15, 16]. But no single method is available for formulation and thus it is a challenging task for developing related substance method to detect minute amount of impurities in presence of pharmaceutical excipients using HPLC.

Forced degradation studies help to identify reactions that cause degradation of pharmaceutical products. They are part of development and integral component of validating analytical methods that indicate stability and detect impurities, impurities formed during manufacturing; storage or use and their properties are different from the desired product.

Any significant degradation product should be evaluated for characterization and quantification for its potential hazards [17]. The British Pharmacopeia and United State Pharmacopeia have also mentioned limits of impurities present in the APIs and formulations [18]. The regulatory authorities have also developed guidelines regarding stress testing on drug substances and drug products to detect the degradation products and degradation pathways. It also helps in establishing intrinsic stability of the drug substance as well as in developing stability indicating assay method [19-22].

The present paper describes a reverse phase high-performance liquid chomatographic (RP-HPLC) method for separation and determination of Tiapride on related impurity by using Inertsil C8 (250 × 4.6) mm, 5µ column. Mobile phase used in the method was the mixture of Buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (800:150:50 v/v) where the phosphate buffer 0.05 M with pH 2.7 was used. The method was validated and found to be suitable for the quality assessment of Tiapride in pharmaceutical formulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemical and reagents

All Reagent were of analytical grade acetonitrile (HPLC Grade) was purchased from Finar Ltd. Methanol (HPLC Grade), Hydrochloric acid were purchased from Merck Specialities Pvt. Ltd., Worli, Mumbai. Purified water of Nano pure Diamond water purification system. Potssiumdihydrogen, Sodium hydroxide (AR Grade), orthophosphate (AR Grade), Hydrogen Peroxide (AR Grade) were purchased from Rankem Ltd. Sodium octane sulphonate (AR Grade), Orthophosphoric acid (HPLC Grade) were purchased from Spectrochem Ltd. Working Standard of Tiapride Hydrochloride was purchased from Easybuyer (Hong Kong) Ltd and marketed formulation Tiapride hydrochloride Tablet was purchased from INTAS Pharmaceutical LTD. Ahmedabad.

Instrumentation

Liquid chromatography

The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) System consist of Agilent Model of 1100/1200 series with Diode Array Detector and quaternary pump with Chomeleon software. pH measurement was carried out by PHAN (Lab India LTD) having resolution of±0.01 pH and accuracy of±0.01pH was used. pH meter was equipped with a combined glass–calomel electrode calibrated using standard buffer solutions of pH 4.0, 7.0 and 9.2.

Computer system was using Chomeleon Software before mobile phase delivered in to system. Mobile phase consists of Buffer: Acetonitrile: Methanol (800:150:50) where the phosphate buffer 0.05 M with pH 2.7 was filtered through 0.45 µ nylon filter and degassed by sonication for 15 min. HPLC analysis was carried out on a Inertsil C8 (250 × 4.6 mm), 5µ manufactured by GL Science at 40 °C at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min and the injection volume was 10 µl. The detection was performed at 240 nm.

Liquid chomatography mass spectroscopy (LC/MS)

The liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) system consist of Agilent model of 6400 series of triple quadrupole LC/MS with Trap control software. Mobile phase consist of gradient programme with mobile phase A (0.1 % Formic Acid) and mobile phase B (Acetonitrile HPLC Grade) with pH 2.7 were filtered through 0.45 µ nylon filter and degassed by sonication for 15 min. LCMS analysis was carried out on Inertsil C8 (250 × 4.6 mm), 5µ manufactured by GL Science at 40 °C at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min, the injection volume was 10 µl. The detection was performed at 240 nm. Mass detection was done by quadrupole mass analyser.

Force degradation studies

Tiapride Hydrochloride was subjected to different stress conditions such as hydrolysis, oxidation, dry heat and photolysis. A stock solution of 1000 μg/ml of the drug was prepared in the mobile phase. This was used further for all the stress studies. Tiapride Hydrochloride was subjected to hydrolytic decomposition under acidic condition using 8 ml of 5 M HCl for 24 hs at 80 °C, under basic condition using 8 ml of 5 M NaOH for 24 Hs at 80 °C with reflux, and under neutral condition with water at 80 °C for 24 h. For oxidative stress, the drug was treated with 30% H2O2 to reflux at 80 °C for 24 h. For thermal degradation, the solid drug and its 1% solution form in water were heated in a stability chamber at a temperature of 105 °C/75% relative humidity (RH) for 48 h. For photolytic degradation, the solid drug and its 1% solution form in water was exposed to the sample to light providing an overall illumination of not less than 72 h.

Sample preparation

Accurately weighed eight intact tablets (each tablet containing Tiapride Hydrochloride API equivalent to 25 mg) containing 200 mgTiapride Hydrochloride API and transferred into a200 ml volumetric flask, then 150 ml of diluent was added and sonicated for 15 min to disperse the tablets while mixing and resulting solution filter though 0.45 µ nylon filter before analysis.

Validation

Preparation of solution

Stock solution of Tiapride hydrochloride was prepared in mobile phase as diluent to study accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection and quantification. The specified concentration of Tiapride was taken as 1000 µg/ml.

Accuracy

The accuracy of the method was determined by performing the recovery studies from previously analysed tablet sample by standard addition method at four different levels (LOQ, 50,100,120 %). Accuracy is performed at range of LOQ Level to 120 % level for Tiapride Hydrochloride.

Precision

Accurately weighed 8 intact tablets and transferred into 200 ml volumetric flask.150 ml of diluent was added and sonicated for 15 min to disperse the tablets, resulting solution was allowed to cool at ambient temperature and volume was made up with diluent, mixed well. It was filtered through 0.45 µ nylon filter.

Robustness

Robustness was performed by carrying out deliberate changes in flow rate (±0.2 ml/min), mobile phase ratio (±5 ml) and pH of the mobile phase (±0.2 units), temperature (±0.2 units), variation of extraction Time (±5).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Stress studies and method development

Tiapride is a very stable substance, but it can be degraded under certain conditions. Several analytical methods were reported for determination of Tiapride API including pharmacopeia but no method has been reported for the dosage form. Moon Y et al., has developed HILIC/MS/MS for determination of Tiapride in human plasma. Similarly Metwally et al., described stability indicating method for Tiapride in pure form, pharmaceutical preparation and in human plasma. In order, to develop an efficient and simple RP-HPLC method for the analysis of drug in tablet dosage forms, preliminary tests were conducted to select optimum and adequate chomatographic conditions. Initially Potassium di hydrogen phosphate, sodium per chlorate, ammonium acetate was evaluated for system suitability parameters and overall chomatographic performance. In the sequential trials Potassium di hydrogen phosphate was found to be suitable for effective separation of parent peak and impurities.

The pH had an effect on the retention times of the Tiapride and its related compounds. Resolutions and peak symmetry are found good at pH 2.7. C18, Phenyl and C8 column has been tried but in phenyl column impurities were merging with the main peak and in C18 column good separation was observed but poor peak shape formed.

 Then again try with Inertsil C8 (250 × 4.6 mm), 5 µm with [acetonitrile: methanol: buffer ] 150:52:797 v/v/v and mixture of 5.44 gm Potassium di hydrogen phosphate (KH2P04) and 0.08 gm of sodium octanesulphonate with 1.5 ml/min, column temperature 40 °C, in order to get good resolution between Tiapride and its impurities and get al. l symmetrical peaks. Thus method was finally optimised with mixture of 5.44 gm Potassium di hydrogen phosphate (KH2P04) and 0.08 gm of sodium octanesulphonate, pH adjusted to 2.7 with ortho phosphoric acid and using the ratio of buffer: acetonitrile: methanol 800:150:50 v/v/v.

The force degradation study was carried out in different stress conditions. Results obtained concluded that no peaks were detected at the retention time of Tiapride peak from the blank and placebo preparation. Tiapride Hydrochloride tablet was degraded in oxidative, alkali and in acid hydrolytic conditions, all degradation products were well separated from Tiapride peak, no degradation observed in water stress condition and thermal conditions. Tiapride peak was homogenous and spectrally pure in all degradation sample preparation of related substance (table 1).

Fig. 2: HPLC Chomatogram of test in oxidative condition (30 % H2O2/80 °C, 72 H)


Table 1: Force degradation study of tiapride hydrochloride tablet

Condition

Related substance

Peak purity

Match factor

% Assay of tiapride

% Degradation

% Single impurity

% Total impurity

Without Degradation

0.046

0.066

997.711

99.9

0

Hydrolytic Degradation

(Acid) 5M HCl/80 °C/72 Hs

4.322

5.379

998.201

94.1

5.8

Hydrolytic Degradation

(Base) 5M NaOH/80 °C/24 Hs

5.293

6.766

998.334

92.9

7.00

Oxidative Degradation

(80 °C/30 %H2O2/72 Hs)

6.097

7.323

998.426

91.6

7.00

Thermal Degradation (105 °C)

0.058

0.148

997.803

99.2

7.7

Hydrolytic Degradation

(Water)80 °C/72 Hs

0.046

0.093

997.864

99.4

ND

Photo Degradation

(UV Uncontrolled)

0.049

0.068

997.938

99.5

ND

Photo Degradation

(UV controlled)

0.045

0.064

997.803

99.6

ND


Fig. 3: HPLC Chomatogram of placebo

Validation

Robustness

It was observed that deliberate changes made in the method with regards to the flow rate, mobile phase composition and the pH of the mobile phase did not cause any significant changes in the resolution, accuracy and precision indicating that the method is robust.

Linearity

The response of the drug was found to be linear over the concentration range from 0.125µg/ml to 1200 µg/ml. The regression equation was observed to be Y = 16.056x–10.569.

Specificity

The method was found to be specific as absence of any interference at retention times of peak of interest, and it was evaluated by observing the chromatogram of blank samples and samples of Tiapride. The elution peak of unknown impurity was separated from Tiapride.

Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)

Limit of detection, LOD was found to be 0.063µg/ml and the limit of quantification, LOQ was found to be 0.125µg/ml using % test concentration method.

Accuracy

Recovery studies were performed from 0.125 μg/ml to 1200 μg/ml for Tiapride.

The method showed % recovery in the range of 99.3% to 108.0 % which suggest that the method is accurate. Recovery data is given in table 2.

Fig. 4: HPLC chromatogram of standard tiapride HCl (1000 µg/ml)


Fig. 5: HPLC chromatogram of tiapride HCltablet (1000 µg/ml)


Table 2: Results of recovery studies

Accuracy level

Concentration of tiapride (µg/ml)

Area

Recovered amount of tiapride (µg/ml)

%Recovery

LOQ

0.125

2.17248

0.135

108.0

2.06807

0.129

103.2

2.15334

0.134

107.2

 

Mean

106.1

% RSD

2.42

50 %

499.99

8038.138

500.611

100.1

8017.607

499.332

99.9

8010.751

498.292

99.8

 

Mean

99.9

% RSD

0.15

100%

999.991

15953.16

993.555

99.4

15968.48

994.508

99.5

15962.62

994.144

99.4

 

Mean

99.4

% RSD

0.06

120 %

1199.989

19142.09

1192.159

99.3

19158.39

1193.175

99.4

19257.15

1199.325

99.9

 

Mean

99.2

% RSD

0.32


Precision

Absolute difference in individual impurity and total impurity of test preparation was found to be less than 0.05 and 0.010 respectively. Method precision data is represented in table 3.

Characterization of Impurity by LC/MS study of degraded samples

10 µg/ml of Tiapride N Oxide impurity solution was injected in liquid chromatography system and retention time (RT) was obtained at 11.884 min (fig. 6). Overlay chromatogram of the reference standard of Tiapride N oxide impurity and degradation sample was shown in fig. 7.

Mass spectrum of Tiapride N-Oxide is shown in fig. 8. The molecular weight of Tiapride N-oxide is 344 and [M+H]+ion peak obtained at m/z 345.08. LC/MS analysis shows peak obtained at RT 9.09 min with molecular weight 344 exactly match with Tiapride N-Oxide confirmed that this molecular mass was of Tiapride N-Oxide.

N-oxide impurity was generated during all degradation conditions. Thus, Tiapride N-Oxide is a degradation impurity which is reported impurity in European pharmacopeia, Japan pharmacopeia, and British pharmacopeia.

Table 3: Results of precision studies

 

%Single Impurity

% Total impurities

No

Method precision

Intermediate precision

Method precision

Intermediate precision

1

0.045

0.048

0.064

0.066

2

0.045

0.047

0.065

0.065

3

0.045

0.049

0.064

0.067

4

0.045

0.049

0.065

0.067

5

0.046

0.046

0.064

0.064

6

0.045

0.047

0.065

0.065

Mean

0.045

0.048

0.065

0.066

% RSD

1.14

2.54

0.85

1.84

Absolute difference in mean

0.003

Absolute difference in mean

0.001


Fig. 6: Chomatogram of reference standard of n oxide impurity


Fig. 7: Overlay HPLC chomatogram of standard impurity N oxide and oxidative degradation sample


Fig. 8: Mass spectrum of tiapride n oxide

CONCLUSION

European Pharmacopeia has reported related substance reverse phase high performance liquid chomatographic method for the active pharmaceutical ingredient of Tiapride Hydrochloride. This method is not yet applied for formulations. In current project validated method is applied for the formulation and validation was carried out as per ICH (Q3) guideline, which confirms that method is specific, precise, robust and accurate for the developed formulation analysis. This method can also work as stability indicating method as it can separate degradation products peak from each other as well as from drug peak. The method can also be used as in identification of process impurity testing. The impurity Tiapride N-Oxide which is reported in European Pharmacopeia, British Pharmacopeia and Japan Pharmacopeia is confirmed as a degradation impurity by using Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to thank the Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.(Astron division), Ahmedabad for supporting this work.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Declared None

REFERENCES

  1. Robert P, Allain H. Clinical management of agitation in the elderly with tiapride. Neurol Psychiatry 2001;16:42s-7s.
  2. Franz M, Dlabal H, Kunz S, Ulferts J, Gruppe H, Gallhofer B. Treatment of alcohol withdrawal: tiapride and carbamazepine versus clomethiazole. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;251:185-92.
  3. Mediavilla C, Mahia J, Bernal A, Puerto A. The D2/D3-receptor antagonist tiapride impairs concurrent but not sequential taste aversion learning. Brain Res Bull 2012;87:346-9.
  4. Rang HP, Ritter JM, Flower RJ, Henderson G. Rang and Dale's Pharmacology. 6th ed. London England: Elsevier Limited; 2007. p. 551.
  5. Jianguo LI, Fengjuan Zhao, Huangxian J. Simultaneous electrochemiluminescence determination of sulpiride and tiapride by capillary electrophoresis with cyclodextrin additives. J Chomatogr B 2006;835:84-9.
  6. Vihang UP, Muralikrishna KS, Chauhan PS, Dudhat PR, Mistry DH, Desai LH, et al. Comparative study of UV spectrophotometric methods for quantitative determination of tiapride hydrochloride in physical mixture by one way ANOVA technique. Indo Am J Pharm Res 2013;2:1492-502.
  7. Altria K. Quantitative electrophoresis aspects of the application of capillary to the analysis of pharmaceuticals and drug related impurities. J Chomatogr A 1993;646:245-57.
  8. Rankovic K, Filipic S, Nikolic K, Agbaba D. TLC determination of tiapride hydrochloride and its impurities in pharmaceuticals. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 2012;35:1336-45.
  9. Kamizono A, Inotsume N. Determination of sultopride and tiapride in serum by gas chromatography using a surface ionisation detector. J Chomatogr 1991;567:113-20.
  10. Moon Ya, Paek B I, Kim HH, Young HJ, Lee HW, Park HG, et al. Determination of tiapride in human plasma using hydrophilic interaction liquid chomatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Arch Pharm Res 2004;27:901-5.
  11. Japanese Pharmacopeia. Monograph of tiapride hydrochloride. 16th ed. Tokyo, Japan; 2011. p. 1494-5.
  12. Wang Y, Zhou L, Hui Y, Chen X. A Simple and rapid CZE determination of tiapride hydrochloride and related impurities in pharmaceutical formulations. Chomatographia 2009;70:293-7.
  13. Zayed S. Differential pulse anodic voltammetric determination of tiapride hydrochloride in pharmaceutical preparation and human urine using carbon paste electrodes. Anal Sci 2011;27:535-9.
  14. Nobilis M, Vybiralova Z, Szotakova B, Sladkova K, Kune M, Svoboda Z. High-performance liquid chomatographic determination of tiapride and its phase I metabolite in blood plasma using tandem UV photodiode-array and fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B: Biomed Sci Appl 2011;879:3845–52.
  15. British Pharmacopeia. Monograph of Tiapride Hydrochloride. 6th ed. London; 2010. p. 2091-2.
  16. Europeian pharmacopia. Monograph of tiapride hydrochloride. 7th ed. France; 2010. p. 3083.
  17. Alarfaj NA, Mostafa AA, Alghamdi Z. Complexometric-spectrophotometric determination of cisapride and tiapride in their formulations. ASIAN J Chem 2012;24:5507-10.
  18. US FDA. Guidance for Industry (draft) analytical procedures and method validation; 2000.
  19. ICH (Q3C)-(R3) Impurities: Guidelines for Residual Solvent (Step 5); 2002.
  20. Metwally FH, Abdelkawy M, Abdelwahab N. Stability-indicating methods for determination of tiapride in pure form, pharmaceutical preparation, and human plasma. J AOAC Int 2007;90:1554-65.
  21. ICH (Q1A). Stability testing of new drug substances and products. Geneva: International Conference on Harmonization, Switzerland; 2003.
  22. ICH (Q2B). Note for guidance on validation of analytical procedures: methodology. Geneva: International Conference on Harmonisation, IFPMA; 1996.