Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 7, Issue 11, 326-329Original Article


ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPIC STUDY FOR THE ANTIBACTERIAL STUDY OF GARCINIA XANTHOCHYMUS HOOK. F. LEAF EXTRACT

SHIVANAND PAYAMALLE, HOSAKATTE NIRANJANA MURTHY*

Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580003, India
Email: nmurthy60@yahoo.co.in

Received: 24 Jul 2015 Revised and Accepted: 03 Oct 2015


ABSTRACT

Objective: The present study was undertaken to study the antibacterial effect of Garcinia xanthochymus Hook. f. (Clusiaceae), leaf extract against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using atomic force microscope.

Methods: Antibacterial study was done by disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration. Atomic force microscopy study was carried to find out morphological changes in bacterial cells.

Results: Among the tested extracts (petroleum ether, chloroform and methanol), methanol extract inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli. The minimum inhibitory concentration varied from 25 to 50 µg/ml. The atomic force microscope was used to study the morphological alterations induced by the leaf extracts in S. aureus, B. cereus and E. coli. Reduction in the cell size, the formation of clusters, indicating the maximum damage in S. aureus when treated with leaf methanol extract, whereas cell rupture and surface roughness were observed in B. cereus and E. coli. P. aeruginosa was susceptible to leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus.

Conclusion: The methanol extract of Garcinia xanthochymus leaf extract was found to be the most effective antibacterial property against S. aureus, B. cereus and E. coli.

Keywords:Garcinia xanthochymus, Antibacterial activity, Atomic force microscopy, Phytochemical study.


INTRODUCTION

There is a continuous and an urgent need to discover new antimicrobial compounds with diverse chemical structures and novel mechanism of action because there has been an alarming increase in the incidence of new and re-emerging infectious diseases. Another big problem is the development of resistance to the antibiotics in current clinical use [1]. The use of traditional medicine has expanded globally during the last decade and it has being continued to use, due to its primary health care of the poor in developing countries and also in countries where conventional medicine is predominantly used in the national health care system. About 80% of the world’s population’s health depending on herbal medicine, especially rural areas peoples of developing countries [2]. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a form of scanning probe microscopy developed recently for imaging the fine surface structures of various types of specimens at high-resolution [3]. It provides three-dimensional views and cross sections of microbial cells at any point, with simultaneous measurement of their sizes [4]. Compared to epifluorescence microscopy (EFM) and electron microscopy (EM) pre-treatment, such as fixation, staining or metal coating is not required. Atomic force microscopy were used study the flagella [5] and morphological changes [6] of bacteria.

Garcinia xanthochymus Hook. f. (Clusiaceae), commonly known as yellow gamboge, is a tree endemic to India. The fruits of this plant are used in traditional medicine for treating diarrhea, dysentery, dispelling worms, clearing away fire and removing food toxin [7]. Plants belonging to the Clusiaceae family are rich sources of xanthones, biflavonoids and benzophenones [8]. These compounds present in G. xanthochymus have shown a variety of bioactivities, including cytotoxicity [9], antimicrobial [4, 10], antioxidant [8, 12], antiviral [13] and antimalarial activity [14]. The present work carried to study the effect of Garcinia xanthochymus leaf extracts on S. aureus, B. cereus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteria using an atomic force microscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and sample preparation

Garcinia xanthochymus Hook. f. (Clusiaceae) leaves collected from forests near Siddapur of Uttar Kannada district, Karnataka, India. The plant identification was done by Dr. M. Jayaraj and a voucher specimen (KU/BOT-213) deposited in the Herbarium, Department of Botany, Karnatak University, Dharwad, India. The leaves were washed with water, dried under shade for two weeks, grounded into a fine powder by a mechanical grinder and stored in airtight bottles. The dried seed powder (50 g) extracted using 200 ml of petroleum ether till the colourless solvent runs; the same powder, dried and subsequently used for chloroform and methanol extraction using a soxhlet extractor. The solvents removed completely under vacuum; the extracts thus obtained were stored at 4 °C till used for further analysis.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

In this study, two gram positive bacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureus (NCIM 5021), Bacillus cereus (NCIM 2106) and two gramnegativebacterial strains, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NCIM 5029) and Escherichia coli (NCIM 2931) strains were used to test the antibacterial activity of G. xanthochymus leaf extracts. Bacterial strains were obtained from National Chemical Laboratory, Pune.

Antibacterial activity

Antibacterial activity was tested using a modified disc diffusion method [15]. 100 µl of bacterial culture were spread on the nutrient agar plates. Sterile filter paper discs (6 mm in diameter) impregnated with 10 µl the plant extract (50 mg/ml) were placed on the cultured plates and incubated at 37 oC. The Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) without extracts served as negative control standard gentamicin (30 µg/Disc) was used as positive control. After 24 h of incubation, the diameter in mm of clear zones around the discs was recorded.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration

The broth microdilution method of minimum inhibitory concentration was determined [15]. Bacteria were grown in nutrient broth until the number of bacteria reaches 0.2 OD at 600 nm. 10 μl of plant extract dissolved in DMSO, gentamicin and control DMSO was pipetted into corresponding wells containing 190 µl of nutrient broth and twofold serially diluted. The concentrations used for plant extracts were in the range of 1.56 to 200 µg/ml while the concentrations used for gentamicin were in the range of 0.78 to 50 μg/ml. Five microliter of inoculum was pipetted into each corresponding well of a 96-well plate. After 24 h, the optical density at 600 nm of each well was recorded using a multi mode plate reader (Tecon, Switzerland).

Atomic force microscopy

The bacteria which were sensitive to the leaf extracts were used for the AFM study. One hundred microliter of the suspension containing log-phase bacterial cells (OD at 600 nm=0.2) cultured in nutrient broth medium were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min in 4 °C. The cells were gently washed with 500 μl of sterile 20 mM phosphate buffer of pH 6.8 and centrifuged to collect bacterial pellets. Then the bacteria were incubated for 24 h without (control) and in the presence of plant extract at 28 °C in 20 mM phosphate buffer of pH 6.8 in a final volume of 550 μl. After centrifugation, the bacterial pellet was gently washed thrice with 500 μl of sterile double distilled water. After the final centrifugation, the bacteria were suspended in 10 μl of sterile double distilled water. The samples were applied to a surface of the clean microscopic slide and allowed to dry overnight at 28 °C before imaging by atomic force microscopy [16]. All measurements in contact modes were carried out by using a Nanosurf Easy Scan 2 AFM with a maximum scan range of 10 μm × 10 μm for x, y and 3 μm for z-axis. A rectangular Si cantilever/tip (Tap 190 ALG) with a spring constant of 48 N/m and resonance frequency of 190 kHz was used. A resolution of the obtained scans was 256 × 256 pixels at scan rate 0.7 Hz. Two kinds of images: a topography image and a deflection (a contact mode) or amplitude (a tapping mode) image was obtained simultaneously. From the topographic images of both treated and untreated cells, mean length, width and mean height of each cell were measured using the imaging software (Nanosurf Easy Scan 2, Switzerland). In each sample (control as well as treated), an average of 5 cells were imaged to find out the effect of plant extracts on cell surface morphology.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Antimicrobial study

Methanol extracts of leaf showed good antibacterial activity against S. aureus (15.33±0.33 mm), B. cereus (17.33±0.88 mm) and E. coli (12.00±0.57 mm), whereas the petroleum ether, chloroform extract of leaf and DMSO did not show any activity against all the tested bacteria (table 1). The MIC values obtained in this study from all the extracts tested ranged from 1.56 to 200 µg/ml for broth dilution method. The MIC value of 25 µg/ml was observed against S. aureus and B. cereus. highest and of 50 µg/ml were observed against E. coli (table 1).

The highest antibacterial activity of G. xanthochymus was observed for B. cereus with a mean diameter of inhibition of 17.33±0.88 mm followed by S. aureus (15.33±0.33 mm) and E. coli (12.00±0.57 mm). The MIC values obtained in this study from all the extracts tested ranged from 1.56 to 200 µg/ml for broth dilution method. The highest MIC value of 50 µg/ml was observed against E. coli where as a lowest MIC value of 25 µg/ml was observed against S. aureus and B. cereus. The petroleum ether and chloroform extract did not inhibit the growth of any tested bacteria. None of the extracts showed MIC against P. aeruginosa (table 1). According to the MIC studies of the G. xanthochymus leaf extracts, the S. aureus and B. cereus were highly sensitive to the leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus followed by E. coli and P. aeruginosa. This may be due to the cell wall nature of the Gram-negative bacteria which is different from that of Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus and B. cereus in having a lipopolysaccharide layer. The methanol extract of the leaf was more effective against S. aureus and B. cereus among all the tested bacteria, but P. aeruginosa was resistant to all the tested extracts (table 1). Extensive phytochemical studies have shown that a variety of oxygenated and prenylated xanthones are rich in Garcinia spp [17]. Since xanthones have phenolic functional groups, they show a wide range of biological activities including antimicrobial activities [18].

There are some reports on the antibacterial effects of G. xanthochymus plant extracts,Manohar et al. [10] reported the inhibitory effects of G. xanthochymus seed oil over Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus spp, and Staphylococcus epidermidis and Tandon et al. [4] reported the Streptococcus faecalis and Klebsiella pneumonia inhibited by the xanthochymol of G. xanthochymus fruits.

Atomic force microscopy

Only the methanol extract of the leaf was considered for the AFM study of S. aureus, B. cereus and E. coli. The images of the untreated cells and the cells treated with DMSO showed the normal coccus shape for S. aureus, rod shape for B. cereus and E. coli (fig. 1 a-d, 2 a-d and 3 a-d). The mean length, width and height and root-mean-square roughness (Rrms) of these strains are represented in table 2. Distinct morphological changes were observed in bacteria treated with methanol extract of G. xanthochymus leaf and gentamicin (fig. 1 e-h, 2 e-h and 3 e-h).

Fig. 1: 6×6 µm2 AFM scans of S. aureus in tapping mode before and after 12 h treatment with leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus (2D and 3D scans): a-b) The untreated bacteria, c-d) Bacterial cells after treatment with DMSO, e-f) Bacterial cells after treatment with the methanol extract of leaf, g-h) Bacterial cells after treatment with gentamicin

Table 1: Antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus (n*=3)

Zone of inhibition in mm

Minimum inhibitory concentration in µg/ml

S. aureus

B. cereus

E. coli

P. aureginosa

S. aureus

B. cereus

E. coli

P. aureginosa

Petroleum ether

-

-

-

-

-

-

25

-

Chloroform

-

-

-

-

-

-

25

-

Methanol

15.33±0.33

17.33±0.88

12.00±0.57

-

25

25

50

-

Dimethylsulfoxide

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Gentamicin

22.00±1.15

27.66±0.33

27.00±0.57

22.33±0.88

0.78

0.78

1.56

1.56

 *Number of replicates used for experiments.

The AFM studies which were carried out to investigate the antibacterial activity of the leaf extracts showed significant morphological changes in the cell surface of the bacterial strains treated with leaf extracts when compared to control. The methanol extracts of G. xanthochymus leaf showed the highest damage of B. cereus cells compared to S. aureus and E. coli (fig. 1 e-f, 2 e-f and 3 e-f). The cell surface of all the bacteria which were used as a control was smooth with a typical shape, whereas the S. aureus treated with leaf extracts showed the cluster formation with smaller size cells. B. cereus treated with leaf methanol extract also showed changes in size when compared to the control (fig. 2 e-f).

Fig. 2: 6×6 µm2 AFM scans of B. cereus in tapping mode before and after 12 h treatment with leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus (2D and 3D scans):a-b) The untreated bacteria, c-d) Bacterial cells after treatment with DMSO, e-f) Bacterial cells after treatment with the methanol extract of leaf, g-h) Bacterial cells after treatment with gentamicin

The shrinkage and formation of grooves were observed in the cells of B. cereus. The cells treated with plant extracts and gentamicin (fig. 1 g-h, 2 g-h and 3 g-h) showed smaller clusters with collapsed cells, rough surface and large amount of debris closing to the cells, in addition, cells also showed characteristic damage such as the reduction in size. The E. coli treated with plant extracts did not show any significant changes in size, shape, cellular rupture and roughness of cells (fig. 3 e-f). The methanol extract of Garcinia xanthochymus leaf was more effective against Gram positive bacteria than Gram negative bacteria this can be attributed even to the difference in the structure and cell wall composition of the both types ofstrains of bacteria [19].

The cells treated with gentamicin have shown more cellular rupture, roughness and grooves on the surface of cells compared to the leaf extracts in all three bacterial species.

Fig. 3: 6×6 µm2 AFM scans of E. coli in tapping mode before and after 12 h treatment with leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus (2D and 3D scans):a-b) The untreated bacteria, c-d) Bacterial cells after treatment with DMSO, e-f) Bacterial cells after treatment with the methanol extract of leaf, g-h) Bacterial cells after treatment with gentamicin

Table 2: Size and roughness of the bacterial cells treated with the leaf extracts of G. xanthochymus measured by AFM in tapping mode

 

Test samples

Size of the bacterial cells in µm

Rrms

Length

Width

Height

S. aureus

Control

1.10±0.06

0.90±0.07

0.55±0.06

0.012±0.31

DMSO

1.08±0.13

0.96±0.98

0.44±1.02

0.012±0.94

Leaf Methanol

0.99±0.14

0.63±0.04

0.19±0.01

0.053±4.17

Gentamicin

0.35±1.35

0.44±0.68

0.08±0.36

0.131±1.35

B. cereus

Control

2.87±0.86

1.10±0.05

0.33±0.06

0.038±0.65

DMSO

2.91±0.62

1.14±0.74

0.36±0.83

0.041±0.58

Leaf Methanol

1.72±0.36

0.91±0.21

0.25±0.04

0.088±6.48

Gentamicin

1.73±0.64

0.58±1.00

0.09±1.51

0.112±0.98

E. coli

Control

1.91±0.09

0.80±0.09

0.18±0.04

0.011±0.02

DMSO

1.88±0.53

0.82±0.94

0.19±0.57

0.011±0.64

Leaf Methanol

1.15±0.14

0.78±0.07

0.17±0.02

0.038±3.18

Gentamicin

1.04±0.58

0.59±0.72

0.10±0.39

0.135±1.02


CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated that methanol leaf extracts of Garcinia xanthochymus showed potent antibacterial activity against gram positive, S. aureus and B. cereus and gram negative, E. coli bacteria. Further work needs to carried out to isolate active compound responsible for antibacterial activity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology (DBT-KUD-IPLS program BT/PR14555/INF/22/126/2010), New Delhi and Department of Atomic Energy (BRNS project No. 2013/35/ BRNS/20), Mumbai for financial assistance.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Declared None

REFERENCES

  1. Rojas R, Bustamante B, Baure J, Fernandez I, Alban J, Lock O. Antimicrobial activity of selected peruvian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 2003;88:199-204.
  2. World Health Organization. General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland; 2001.
  3. Dufrene YF. Atomic force microscopy, a powerful tool in microbiology. J Bacteriol 2002;184:5205-13.
  4. Braga PC, Ricci D. Atomic force microscopy: application to investigation of Escherichia coli morphology before and after exposure to cefodizime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:18-22.
  5. Umeda A, Saito M, Amako K. Surface characteristics of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in an atomic force microscope image. Microbiol Immunol 1998;42:159-64.
  6. Bolshakova AV, Kiselyova OI, Filonov AS, Frolova OY, Lyubchenko YL, Yaminsky IV. Comparative studies of bacteria with an atomic force microscopy operating in different modes. Ultramicroscopy 2001;86:121-8.
  7. Ambasta SP. The Useful Plants of India: Publications and Information Directorate, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. New Delhi; 1986. p. 231.
  8. Baggett S, Protiva P, Mazzola EP, Yang H, Ressler ET, Basile MJ, et al. Bioactive benzophenones from Garcinia xanthochymus fruits. J Nat Prod 2005;68:354-60.
  9. Han QB, Qiao CF, Song JZ, Yang NY, Cao XW, Peng Y, et al. Cytotoxic prenylated phenolic compounds from the twig bark of Garcinia xanthochymus. Chem Biodiversity 2007;4:940-6.
  10. Manohar SH, Naik PM, Patil LM, Karikatti SI, Murthy HN. Chemical composition of Garcinia xanthochymus seed, seed oil, and evaluation of its antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 2014;20:148-55.
  11. Tandon RN, Srivastava OP, Baslas RK, Kumar P. Preliminary investigation on the antimicrobial activity of a phytochemical, xanthochymol from the fruits of Garcinia xanthochymus Hook. F. Curr Sci 1980;49:472-3.
  12. Zhong FF, Chen Y, Wang P, Feng H, Yang G. Xanthones from the bark of Garcinia xanthochymus and 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical-scavenging activity. Chin J Chem 2009;27:74-80.
  13. Lin YM, Flavin MT, Schure R, Chen FC, Sidwell R, Barnard Dl, et al. Antiviral activities of biflavonoids. Planta Med 1999;65:120-5.
  14. Likhitwitayawuid K, Chanmahasathein W, Ruangrungsi N, Krungkrai. Xanthones with antimalarial activity from Garcinia dulcis. Planta Med 1998;64:281-2.
  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. 9th ed. CLSI document M07-A9 CLCI, Wayne. Pennsylvania; 2012.
  16. Sahu K, Bansal H, Mukherjee C, Sharma M, Gupta PK. Atomic force microscopic study on morphological alterations induced by photodynamic action of Toluidine Blue O in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J Photochem Photobiol B 2009;96:9-16.
  17. Bennet GJ, Lee HH. Xanthones from Guttiferae. Phytochemistry 1989;28:967-98.
  18. Hussain RA, Owegby AG, Parimoo P, Waterman PG. Kolanone, a novel polyisoprenylated benzophenone with antimcrobial properties from the fruit of Garcinia kola. Planta Med 1982;44:78-81.
  19. Campos DA, Ribeiroa AC, Costa EM, Fernandes JC, Tavaria FK, Araruna FB, et al. Study of antimicrobial activity and atomic force microscopy imaging of the action mechanism of cashew tree gum. Carbohyd Polym 2012;90:270-4.