SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA PRODUCING ENZYMES AGAINST ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT CELL FREE SUPERNATANT OF LACTOCOCCUS WITH THE FOCUS ON ITS DETERMINING QUANTITATIVELY BY OD (ENZYME LINKED IMMUNE SORBENT ASSAY)

Authors

  • Yusra Mb Mohsin College of Veterinary Medicine
  • Huda Zuheir Majeed
  • Ali Murtatha Hasan
  • Enaam Hamed Bataah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.16188

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Objective: The present work was conducted to explore the prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that produce lipase and protease enzymes in
40 samples, as well as detection of quality and quantity production and determine its susceptibility to antimicrobial.
Methods: The antimicrobial activity of Lactococcus cell free supernatant (CFS) on P. aeruginosa growth and quantity production of enzymes by two
methods (special media and OD) were also studied.
Results: A total of 8(20%) and 13(32%) isolates were found to be positive to P. aeruginosa producing lipase and protease, respectively. The in vitro
antimicrobial activity results revealed that all isolates producing enzymes showed sensitive to CFS of Lactococcus, only one isolate exhibited low
sensitivity to CFS 4 mm, however, these isolates varied in their sensitivity to CFS ranged 4-15 mm.
Conclusion: Results of the quantity production of P. aeruginosa enzymes with CFS of Lactococcus showed and exerts growth inhibitory activity and
reduce the production of enzymes. We could be concluded that CFS of Lactococcus has great potential antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa
growth and its ability on enzymes production.
Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Lactococcus, Cell-free supernatant, Optical density, Lipase, Protease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES

Srifuengfung S, Assanasen S, Tuntawiroon M, Meejanpectch S. Comparison between Pseudomonas aeruginosa siderophores and desferrioxamine for iron acquisition from ferritin. Asian Biomed 2010;4(4):631-5.

Kamel GM, Ezeldeen NA, El-Mishad MY, Ezzat RF. Susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against antimicrobial agents and some plant extract with focus on its prevalence in different sources. Glob Vet 2011;6(1):61-72.

Cornelis P, Dingemans J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013;3:75.

Saxena S, Banerjee G, Garg R, Singh M, Verma S, Kushwaha R. The antibacterial efficacy of different anti pseudomonal agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Curr Microb Appl Sci 2014;3(11):572-5.

Powthong P, Suntronthiticharoen P. Antimicrobial and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from chicken intestine, entrails of swine and soil against gastrointestinal and urogenital pathogens. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2013;3(1):1-18.

Jebur MS. Therapeutic efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus against bacterial isolates from burn wounds. North Am J Med Sci 2010;2(12):586-91.

Chowdhury A, Hossain MN, Mostazir NJ, Fakruddin M, Billah MM, Ahmed MM. Screening of Lactobacillus spp. from buffalo yoghurt for probiotic and antibacterial activity. Bacteriol Parasitol 2012;3(8):1-5.

Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Baily and Scotts Diagnostic Microbiology. 12th ed. Baltimore, USA: Mosby, Inc.; 2007. p. 266-77.

Johnson JR, Moseley SL, Roberts PL, Stamm WE. Aerobactin and other virulence factor genes among strains of Escherichia coli causing urosepsis: Association with patient characteristics. Infect Immun 1988;56:405-12.

Aminnezhad S, Kermanshahi RK, Ranjbar R. Evaluation of synergistic interaction between cell free supernatant of Lactobacillus strain and amikacin and gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2015;8(4):e16592.

Pundir R, Rana S, Kashyap N, Kaur A. Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from food samples: An in vitro study. J Appl Pharm Sci 2013;3(3):85-93.

Al-Jassani U. Effect of Lactobacillus filtrates in growth of some Aspergillus flavus isolated and their toxins, Thesis. College of Science/AL-Mustansiryah University; 2006.

Hassan NN. Effect of some microorganisms, chemical compounds and Citrullus colocynthis seed extract on the growth and composition of the biofilm of (Candida albicans). Thesis. University of Mustansiriya; 2014.

Chursi S, Sompetch K, Mukdee S, Jansrisewanpwong S, Srichai T, Maneenoon K, et al. Inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermis biofilm formation by traditional Thai herbal recipes used for wound treatment. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2012;8:97.

Harrison F. Dynamic social behavior in a bacterium: Pseudomonas aeruginosa partially compensates for siderophore loss to cheats. J. Evol Biol 2013;26(6):1370-8.

Denkova R, Denkova Z, Yanakieva V, Radeva V, Tumbarski Y. Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacilli of human origin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Unive Rousse Sci J 2013;52(10):11-5.

Dalie DK, Deschamps AM, Richard-Forget F. Lactic acids bacteria-potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: A review. J Food Control 2010;21:370-80.

Mohsin YM, Shawkat DS, Abd-Alsattar D. Novel probiotic Bifidobacterium overcomes synergistic effect of three natural biotic Omni drug and antibiotic against some UTI pathogen. Int J Sci Nat 2013;1(3):456-62.

Bager YM, Mohammed BB, Obaid KA, Hilal ZA. CFS of Lactobacillus: A natural agent against bacterial contamination of cosmetic toole. Int J Adv Biol Res 2014;4(3):258-64.

Muhsin Y, Majeed H, Shawkat D. CFS and crude bacteriocin of Lactococcus against growth and biofilm formation for some pathogenic bacteria. Int J Curr Microb Appl Sci 2015;4(7):35-42.

Denkova R, Denkova Z, Yanakieva V, Blazhera D. Antimicrobial activity of probiotic Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria and propionic acid bacteria, isolated from different sources. Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them: Science, Technology and Education. Badajoz: Formatex Research Center; 2013. p. 857-64.

Abaas H, Mohammed SA, Shawkat DS, Baker YM. Effect of Lactobacillus sp. Crud bacteriocin (CB) and cell-free supernatant (CFS) against E.coli growth and adherence on vaginal epithelial cell surface. Int J Adv Res 2016;4(1):614-20.

Beesam S, Thirtham MR, Komireddy KR, Venkata MR. Evaluation of probiotic characteristics in certain lactic acid bacteria strains by in vitro techniques. Acta Biologica India 2012;1(2):149-51.

Ravaei A, Poor ZH, Salehi TZ, Tamai IA, Ghane M, Pour JD. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of three Lactobacillus spp. against antibiotic resistance Salmonella typhimurium. Adv Stud Biol 2013;5(2):61-70.

Nilakhe S, Spare V. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of probiotic micro flora from neonatal origin. Asian J Multidisc Stud 2014;2(8):182-3.

Jungersen M, Wind A, Johansen E, Christensen JE, Stuer-Lanridsen B, Estesen D. The science behind the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium animals subsp. Lactis BB-12. Microorganisms 2014;2(2):92-110.

Published

01-03-2017

How to Cite

Mohsin, Y. M., H. Z. Majeed, A. M. Hasan, and E. H. Bataah. “SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA PRODUCING ENZYMES AGAINST ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT CELL FREE SUPERNATANT OF LACTOCOCCUS WITH THE FOCUS ON ITS DETERMINING QUANTITATIVELY BY OD (ENZYME LINKED IMMUNE SORBENT ASSAY)”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 3, Mar. 2017, pp. 291-4, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.16188.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)