EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUTEAL MUSCLE STRENGTHENING ON FLAT FOOT

Authors

  • Pooja Mulchandani Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
  • Trupti Warude Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
  • Amrutkuvar Pawar Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i6.17719

Keywords:

Flat foot, Gluteal muscle strengthening, Intrinsic muscle strengthening, Navicular drop, Ink test

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effect of gluteal muscle strengthening along with conventional exercises versus conventional exercises alone on flat foot.

Method: An experimental study conducted at Physiotherapy Department of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad. A total of 52 subjects were equally divided into two groups using convenient sampling with random allocation (Groups A and B). Baseline treatment was given to both groups (intrinsic muscle strengthening). Group A was given intrinsic muscle strengthening alone while Group B was given gluteal muscle strengthening along with intrinsic muscle strengthening.

Result: Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and unpaired t-test. In pre-intervention there was no statistically significant difference seen with p values for the navicular drop was 0.3563 and for Ink test was 0.7342. While on comparing the post-interventional values, the results between the two groups using paired t-test revealed that there was extremely significant difference seen with p-value for the navicular drop was <0.0001 and for Ink test was <0.0001.

Conclusion: From the study, it can be concluded that there was a significant effect of gluteal muscle strengthening on the flat foot.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, An KN. Three-dimensional analysis of flatfoot deformity: Cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19(1):447-51.

Perrin DH. The Injured Athlete. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 441-2.

Whitman R. A study of the weak foot with reference to its causes, its diagnosis, and its cure: With an analysis of a thousand cases of so-called flat-foot. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1896;1:42-77.

Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2010.

Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther 1987;67(5):688-94.

Bhoir T, Anap DB, Diwate A. Prevalence of flat foot among 18-25 years old physiotherapy students: Cross sectional study. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res 2014;3(4):272-8.

McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The foot core system: A new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med 2015;49(5):290.

Headlee DL, Leonard JL, Hart JM, Ingersoll CD, Hertel J. Fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles increases navicular drop. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008;18(3):420-5.

Distefano LJ, Blackburn JT, Marshall SW, Padua DA. Gluteal muscle activation during common therapeutic exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(7):532-40.

Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

Patwardhan SK, Bodas KS, Gundewar SS. Coping with arthritis using safer herbal options. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2010;2(1):1-11.

Nithya S, Ray S. An experimental study on effect of granisetron on model of diabetes induced neuropathic pain perception in rats. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6(1):483-6.

Durga GL, Jhansi CH, Ram VR, Nadendla RR. An epidemiological survey on prevalence of obesity and diseases burden in common public. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6(2):320-2.

Lephart SM, Ferris CM, Riemann BL, Myers JB, Fu FH. Gender differences in strength and lower extremity kinematics during landing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;401:162-9.

Daniel DK, Chandrasekaran C, Mano A. A study on prevalence of flat feet among school children in Kanchipuram population. Int J Anat Res 2015;3(3):1240-4.

Lange B, Chipchase L, Evans A. The effect of low-dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004;34(4):201-9.

Vicenzino B, Franettovich M, McPoil T, Russell T, Skardoon G. Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running. Br J Sports Med 2005;39(2):939-43.

Tae-Ho K, Eun-Kyung K, Do-Young J. The effect of arch support taping on plantar pressure and navicular drop height in subjects with excessive pronated foot during 6 weeks. J Korean Soc Phys Med 2011;6(4):489-96.

Abtahian A, Farzan S. A study of prevalence of flat foot in high school children. Biomed Res 2016;27(4):1295-301.

Kachoosangy RA, Aliabadi F, Ghorbani M. A prevalence of flat foot: Comparison between male and female primary school students. Iran Rehabil J 2013;11(18):22-4.

Published

01-06-2017

How to Cite

Mulchandani, P., T. Warude, and A. Pawar. “EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUTEAL MUSCLE STRENGTHENING ON FLAT FOOT”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 6, June 2017, pp. 219-21, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i6.17719.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)