MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF PTERION AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Authors

  • Gyanaranjan Nayak Department of Anatomy, IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India.
  • Biswa Bhusan Mohanty Department of Anatomy, IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India.
  • Saurjya Ranjan Das Department of Anatomy, IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i10.19138

Keywords:

Pterion, Midpoint of zygomatic arch, Frontozygomatic suture

Abstract

 

 Objective: Pterion is an area formed by the union of frontal, parietal, temporal, and sphenoid bones. It exhibits variations in the sutural pattern of fusion of constituent bones. Basing on this, the pterion can be classified into four varieties. According to Murphy, these are sphenoparietal, frontotemporal, stellate, and epipteric. The anatomical location of the pterion is necessary for the surgical management of extradural hemorrhage, aneurysm, and brain tumors located in the anterior and middle cranial fossae.The purpose of this study is to find out the prevalence of different varieties of pterion and determine the position of pterion using anatomical landmarks.

Methods: The present study included fifty skulls of unknown age and sex. The skulls were studied macroscopically for the anatomical variations of pterion. The distance between the center of the pterion to the midpoint of zygomatic arch and pterion to the frontozygomatic suture was measured using Vernier calipers.

Results: The sphenoparietal variety was the most common variety of pterion found in the study followed by the epipteric variety and the stellate variety, respectively. The distance between pterion and back of the frontozygomatic suture was found to be 3.48 ± 0.21 cm on the right side and 3.41 ± 0.16 cm on the left side. The distance between pterion and the midpoint of upper border of the zygomatic arch was found to be 4.01 ± 0.19 cm on the right side and 3.94 ± 0.2 cm on the left side.

Conclusion: The findings will be helpful for radiologists and neurosurgeons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gyanaranjan Nayak, Department of Anatomy, IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India.

Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, I M S and SUM Hospital, S O A University, Bhubaneswar, PIN-751003, Odisha.

Biswa Bhusan Mohanty, Department of Anatomy, IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India.

Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, I M S and SUM Hospital, S O A University, Bhubaneswar, PIN- 751003, Odisha.

Saurjya Ranjan Das, Department of Anatomy, IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India.

Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, I M S and SUM Hospital, S O A University, Bhubaneswar, PIN-751003, Odisha.

References

Standring S, Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40st ed. London: Elsevier; 2015. p. 409-10.

Saxena RC, Bilodi AK, Mane SS, Kumar A. Study of pterion in skulls of Awadh area-in and around Lucknow. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2003;1(1):32-3.

Murphy T. The pterion in the Australian aborigine. Am J Phys Anthropol 1956;14(2):225-44.

Zalawadia A, Vadgama J, Ruparelia S, Patel S, Rathod SP, Patel SV. Morphometric study of pterion in dry skulls of Gujarat region. Natl J Integr Res Med 1991;1(4):25-9.

Anjana S, Satheesa KS, Bhaskar R, Pai SR. Morphometric study of pterion in adult dry skulls in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka state, India. Int J Anat Res 2015;3(4):1603-6.

Ersoy M, Evliyaoglu C, Bozkurt MC, Konuskan B, Tekdemir I, Keskil IS. Epipteric bones in the pterion may be a surgical pitfall. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003;46(6):363-5.

Urzì F, Iannello A, Torrisi A, Foti P, Mortellaro NF, Cavallaro M. Morphological variability of pterion in the human skull. Ital J Anat Embryol 2003;108(2):83-117.

Matsumura G, Kida K, Ichikawa R, Kodama G. Pterion and epipteric bones in Japanese adults and fetuses, with special reference to their formation and variations. Kaibogaku Zasshi 1991;66(5):462-71.

Lee UY, Park DK, Kwon SO, Paik DJ, Han SH. Morphological analysis of pterion in Korea. Korean J Phys Anthropol 2001;14(4):281-9.

Eboh DE, Obaroefe M. Morphometric study of pterion in dry human skull bones of Nigerians. Int J Morphol 2014;32(1):208-13.

Oguz O, Sanli SG, Bozkir MG, Soames RW. The pterion in Turkish male skulls. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26(3):220-4.

Katri CR, Gupta S, Soni JS. Study of pterion and incidence of epistemic bones in dry human skulls of Gujarat. Natl J Integr Res Med 2012;3(2):57-60.

Mwachka PM, Hassanali J, Odula P. Sutural morphology of the pterion among adult Kenyans. Braz J Morphol Sci 2009;26(1):4-7.

Wang Q, Opperman LA, Havill LM, Carlson DS, Dechow PC. Inheritance of sutural pattern at the pterion in Rhesus monkey skulls. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006;288(10):1042-9.

Hussain SS, Mavishetter GF, Thomas ST, Prasanna LC, Magi MP. A study of sutural morphology of the pterion and asterion among adult Indian skulls. Biomed Res 2011;22(1):73-5.

Spektor S, Valarezo J, Fliss DM, Gil Z, Cohen J, Goldman J, et al. Olfactory groove meningiomas from neurosurgical and ear, nose, and throat perspectives: Approaches, techniques, and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2005;57(4):268-80.

Bagé EM, Sola RG, González LR, Caniego JL, Cazón CC. Fusiform aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery. Rev Neurol 2002;34(7):655-8.

Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Mensforth RP, Barton TJ. Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: A method and blind tests of its accuracy. Am J Phys Anthropol 1985;68(1):1-14.

Published

01-10-2017

How to Cite

Nayak, G., B. Bhusan Mohanty, and S. Ranjan Das. “MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF PTERION AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 10, Oct. 2017, pp. 142-4, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i10.19138.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)