A SURVEY ON MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO MAINFRAME ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Priyanka P School of Computing Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Deivanai K School of Computing Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10s1.19542

Keywords:

Mainframe, Data analysis, Commands

Abstract

Mainframe system processing includes a Batch Cycle†that approximately spans in regular interval on a daily basis. The core part of the cycle completes in the middle of the regular interval with key client deliverables associated with the end times of certain jobs are tracked by service delivery. There are single and multi-client batch streams, a QA stream which includes all clients, and about huge batch jobs per day that execute. Despite a sophisticated job scheduling software and automated system workload management, operator intervention is required. The outcome of our proposed work is to bring out the high priority job first. According to our method, the jobs are re-prioritized the schedules so that prioritized jobs can get the
available system resources. Furthermore, the characterization, analysis, and visualization of the reasons for a manual change in the schedule are to be considered. This work requires extensive data preprocessing and building machine learning models for the causal relationship between various system variables and the time of manual changes.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dumitru D. Prediction of recurrent events in breast cancer using the Naive Bayesian classification. Ann Univ Craiova Math Comput Sci 2009;36(2):92-6.

Wu X, Kumar V, Quinlan JS,·Ghosh J, Yang Q, Motoda H, et al. Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl Inf Syst 2008;14:1-37.

Ubeyli ED. Comparison of different classification algorithms in clinical decision making. Expert Syst 2007;24(1):17-31.

The IBM Archives, Which Contain a Wealth of History of the Mainframe. Available from: http://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/ mainframe/mainframe_intro.html.

Pugh EW, Johnson LR, Palmer JH. The definitive history of the development of the system/360. IBM’s 360 and Early 370 Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1991.

The IBM Publication Web Site for Z/OS. Available from: http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv.

JES2 Commands-Version 2, Release1 of z/OS (5650-ZOS). IBM Corporation; 1997, 2013.

Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: A comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med 2005;34(2):113-27.

Chen MS, Han J, Yu PS. Data mining: A overview from a database perspective. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2002;8(6):866-83.

Quinlan JR. Programs for Machine Learning. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann; 1993.

Schwarzer G, Vach W, Schumacher M. On the misuses of artificial neural networks for prognostic and diagnostic classification in oncology. Stat Med 2000;19(4):541-61. Kaur H, Wasan SK. Empirical study on applications of data mining techniques in healthcare. J Comput Sci 2006;2(2):194-200. Han J, Kamber M. Data Mining Concepts and Techniques. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. Hammerstrom D. Neural networks at work. IEEE Spectr 1993;30(6):26-32.

Pujari AK. Data Mining Techniques. Hyderabad: Universities Press (India) Ltd.; 2001.

Klosgen W, Zytkow JM, Zyt J, editors. Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 1 ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. st

Nurnberger A, Pedrycz W, Kruse R. Neural network approaches. In: Klosgen W, Zytkow JM, editors. Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.

Published

01-04-2017

How to Cite

P, P., and D. K. “A SURVEY ON MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO MAINFRAME ANALYSIS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 13, Apr. 2017, pp. 36-39, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10s1.19542.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)