MEDIA MIX MODELING COMPARISON OF INTERACTION MODEL TO SIMPLE LOG-LINEAR MODEL

Authors

  • Priyanka Sharma VIT University Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • M Janaki Meena VIT University Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S P Syed Ibrahim VIT University Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10s1.19763

Keywords:

Media mix Model, Simple log linear model, Interaction model

Abstract

The objective of current study is to compare a new model for media mix problem with popular model named as simple log linear model. A modified approach proposed to improve the results of media mix model from simple log linear method includes the simultaneous effect of different media variables on sales. The combined effect caused by various media variables shows a synergy in the curve for sales and hence considering it makes the model much effective and accurate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liu Y, Laguna J, Wright M, He H. Media mix modeling - A monte carlo simulation study. J Mark Anal 2014;2(3):173-86.

Shao X, Li L. Data-driven multi-touch attribution models, KDD’11. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2011. p. 258-64.

Aaker DA. Building Strong Brands. New York, NY: Free Press; 1995.

Ambach G, Hess M. Measuring long term effects in marketing. Mark Res Summer 2000;AQ6 ???:22-7.

Leone RP. Generalizing what is known about temporal aggregation and advertising carry-over. Mark Sci 1995;14(3):141-50.

Logan JD. Applied Mathematics-A Contemporary Approach. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons; 1987.

Chu WL, Wu FS, Kao KS, Yen DC. Diffusion of mobile telephony: An empirical study in Taiwan. Telecomm Policy 2009;33(9):506-20.

Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J Mark 1990;54(1):1-26.

Alcaraz R. Conceptual reasons beyond technology for the delayed progress and innovation in marketing science. Appl Mark Anal 2014;1:21-31.

Taylor N. The economic value of volatility forecasts: A conditional approach. J Financ Econ 2013;12(3):433-78.

Raftery AE, Dean N. Variable selection for model-based clustering. J Am Stat Assoc 2006;101(473):168-78.

Green PE, Krieger AM. Alternative approaches to clusterbased market segmentation. J Mark Res Soc 1995;37(3):221-39.

Cain PM. Integrated brand marketing and measuring returns. Marketing Mix Modeling and Return on Investment. Basingstoke: Market Science Consulting; 2010.

Cain PM. Dynamic Marketing Mix Modelling and Digital Attribution. ???: Market Science Consulting; 2014.

Dash M, Andrews SB. A Study on Market Behaviour and Price Discovery in Indian Commodity Markets; 2010. Available from: https://www.ssrn. com/abstract=1722770; http://www.dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1722770.

Published

01-04-2017

How to Cite

Sharma, P., M. J. Meena, and S. P. S. Ibrahim. “MEDIA MIX MODELING COMPARISON OF INTERACTION MODEL TO SIMPLE LOG-LINEAR MODEL”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 13, Apr. 2017, pp. 390-3, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10s1.19763.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)