ESTIMATION OF CARDIAC SURGERY RESULTS

Authors

  • Alexey Leonidovich Charyshkin Department of Surgery, Ulyanovsk State University, 432970 Ulyanovsk, Russia.
  • Alexander Nikolaevich Yudin Department of Surgery, Ulyanovsk State University, 432970 Ulyanovsk, Russia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i12.19920

Keywords:

Median sternal incision, Post-operative complications, Cardiac surgery, X-ray

Abstract

Objective: Estimation of cardiac surgery results after median sternal incision.

Methods: This work contains the results of surgical treatment of 220 patients who had cardiac surgeries performed by means of the median sternal incision at the State Healthcare Institution Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital†during 2000–2014.

Results: The following surgical interferences were made: Coronary artery bypass grafting – 14 (6.3%), mammary coronary bypass – 5 (2.3%), combined coronary artery and mammary coronary bypass grafting – 81 (36.8%), aortic valve replacement – 53 (24.1%), mitral valve replacement – 44 (20%), atrial septal defect plasty – 7 (3.2%), ventricular septal defect plasty – 3 (1.4%), myxomas – 5 (2.3%), and mediastinal neoplasms removal – 8 (3.6%). The most frequent early complications after median sternal incision were wound pyoinflammatory complications that were observed in 32 (14.5%) patients, pneumonia – defined in 17 (7.7%) patients, mediastinitis – found in 5 (2.3%) patients, sepsis – detected in 2 (0.9%) patients, and acute cerebrovascular disease – observed in 1 (0.5%) patient. The fatal outcome was observed in 2 (0.9%) cases; the cause of death of the first (0.5%) patient was multiple organ failure against the background of sepsis, and the cause of death of the second patient (0.5%) was acute cerebrovascular disease.

Conclusion: The most frequent early post-operative complications the patients have after cardiac surgeries are wound pyoinflammatory complications (14.5%), pneumonia (7.7%), and mediastinitis (2.3%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bokeria LA, Stupakov IN, Gudkova RG. [The Features of Cardiovascular and X-ray Endovascular Surgery Statistics in the Russian Federation]. Zdravookhranenie 2013; 5: 22-32.

Shenoy R, Bhat R, Srinivasan M, Mahabala C, Bhaskaran U. Correlation Between Insulin Resistance and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-Diabetes. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016; 9(6): 331-333.

Charyshkin AL, Yakovlev SA, Bekin VYu. [Preperitoneal Blockade among Patients after Laparotomy]. Vestnik eksperimentalnoi i klinicheskoi khirurgii 2011; IV(2): 354-355.

Charyshkin AL, Vanina NV, Lebedeva LM, Charyshkina YuV. Technique for Tracheostoma Closure. Life Sci. J. 2013; 10(7s): 344-347.

Charyshkin AL, Yudin AN. The Results of Treatment of Patients after Median Sternotomy. Life Sci. J. 2014; 11(11): 342-345.

Bouchot O., et al. Reoperative Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis of Early and Late Outcome. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2007; 5(1): 45.

Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Breivik Hals EK, et al. Assessment of Pain. Br. J. Anaesth. 2008; 101(1): 17-24.

Francel TJ, Kouchcukos NT. A Rational Approach to Wound Difficulties after Sternotomy: The Problem. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2001; 72(4): 1411-1418.

Pechetov AA. [Methods of joining the sternum with various materials after the median sternotomy]. Diss., Moscow; 2010.

Johnson C. Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Pain Scale: What Is the Difference? Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 2005; 4: 43-44.

Al-Ruzzeh S, Athanasiou T, Mangoush O, Wray J, Modine T, George S, et al. Predictors of Poor Midterm Health Related Quality of Life after Primary Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Heart 2005; 91(12): 1557-1562.

Published

01-12-2017

How to Cite

Charyshkin, A. L., and A. N. Yudin. “ESTIMATION OF CARDIAC SURGERY RESULTS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 12, Dec. 2017, pp. 407-10, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i12.19920.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)