EVALUATION OF BLOOD PRESSURE VARIATIONS DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF INTRAVASCULAR CONTRAST MEDIA IN CECT ABDOMEN

Authors

  • Arathy Mary John Department of Medical Imaging Technology, SOAHS, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576 104, Karnataka, India.
  • Sushil Yadav Department of Medical Imaging Technology, SOAHS, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576 104, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i6.25284

Keywords:

Abdomen scan, Computed tomography, Contrast enhanced, Diastolic blood pressure, Intravenous administration, Low-osmolar contrast media, Non-contrast enhanced, Non-ionic contrast media, Systolic blood pressure

Abstract

Objective: Hemodynamic changes may occur with the rapid intravenous injection of contrast media due to the osmolality of contrast media. This study is aimed to evaluate the blood pressure variation during the administration of intravascular contrast media in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen.

Methods: The study was performed in 146 subjects, who underwent abdomen CT scan with 64-slice Philips Brilliance CT scanner in the department of radio-diagnosis and imaging. Using convenience sampling technique, 73 subjects who were referred for CECT abdomen scan and another 73 subjects who were referred for non-CECT (NCECT) abdomen scan were included in the study. Among the CECT group, intravascular contrast media was injected into the patient during the scan. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded just before and immediately after the scan in CECT and NCECT groups, by two readers independently. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure for both groups was calculated with standard deviation. The data were analyzed using repeated measures of ANOVA.

Results: Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures increased with the injection of contrast media among CECT scan group. No significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were found before and after the scan of NCECT group.

Conclusion: An increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressures is associated with the intravascular administration of non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: Considerations and appoaches. Radiology 2010;256:32-61.

Kumar L. Harmacovigilance/reporting adverse drug reactions: An approach to enhance health surveillance and extending market share by minimizing the chances of drug withdrawals. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2015;7:1-7.

Juchem BC, Dall’Agnol CM. Immidiate Adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast median in computed tomography. Rev Latinoam Enfermagem 2007;15:78-83.

Morris TW, Prentice L, Ventura J. A comparison of the systemic responses to rapid intravenous injections of ioxilan, iohexol, and diatrizoate in rabbits. Invest Radiol 1989;24:294-7.

Rossi P, Young IS, Panke WF. Techniques, usefulness, and hazards of arteriography of pheochromocytoma: Review of 99 cases. JAMA 1968;205:547-53.

Gold RE, Wisinger BM, Geraci AR, Heinz LM. Hypertensive crisis as a result of adrenal venography in a patient with pheochromocytoma. Radiology 1972;102:579-80.

Aspelin P, Stacul F, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, van der Molen AJ. Effects of iodinated contrast media on blood and endothelium. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1041-9.

Cooper MW, Reed P J. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: The effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;22:267-77.

Sachiko N, Yoshito T, Ayako TT, Tetsuya H, Makato A, Keigo E, et al.Hypertensive crisis due to contrast-enhanced computed tomography in a patient with malignant pheochromocytoma. Jpn J Radiol 2011;29:449-51.

Tamuli1 S, Kakati S, Das S, Singh KD, Ghosh SK. Comparative studies of efficacy and effects on oxidative stress of amlodipine and ramipril in the hypertensive patients of north east India. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2015;7:118-21.

Bald KS, Edwln LW, Robert WA, Henrl LA. Brief communication: Radiographic contrast infusion and catecholamine release in patients with pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:27-33.

Harnish P, Mukherji M, Kido DK. Physiologic effects of contrast media in the rabbit. Invest Radiol 1987;22:901-4.

Saithoh H, Hayakawa K, Nishimura K, Okuno Y, Murayama C, Miyazawa T, et al. Intracarotidnlood pressure changes during contrast medium injection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:51-4.

Published

07-06-2018

How to Cite

John, A. M., and S. Yadav. “EVALUATION OF BLOOD PRESSURE VARIATIONS DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF INTRAVASCULAR CONTRAST MEDIA IN CECT ABDOMEN”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 6, June 2018, pp. 309-11, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i6.25284.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)