ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE RELATED SUBSTANCE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY REVERSE‑PHASE – HIGH‑PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY

Authors

  • Rajesh Nawale Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Government College of Pharmacy, Dr. BAMU, Aurangabad - 431 005, Maharashtra, India.
  • Shankar Pol Department of Pharmacy, Research Scholar, YB Chavan College of Pharmacy, Dr. BAMU, Aurangabad - 431 001, Maharashtra, India.
  • Prashant Puranik Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, RTMNU, Nagpur - 440 033, Maharashtra, India.
  • Anwar Daud Research and Development Centre, ZIM Laboratories Limited, Kalmeshwar, Nagpur - 441 501, Maharashtra, India.
  • Vishal Rajkondawar Research and Development Centre, ZIM Laboratories Limited, Kalmeshwar, Nagpur - 441 501, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i10.27043

Keywords:

Dabigatran etexilate, International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines, Nil, Method development, Method validations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to develop and validate new, simple, and selective reverse-phase–high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the quantitative determination of Dabigatran Etexilate (DE) and its impurities in pharmaceutical dosage form as per the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines.

Method: Chromatographic analysis was performed on Princeton SPHER-l00 C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) HPLC column, maintained at 50°C column temperatures, 6°C sample tray temperature, and detection monitored at 225 nm. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) (33:67 V/V). The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 ml/min.

Results: The system suitability results indicate good performance of the system. Specificity study indicates that there is no interference of placebo and blank. The percentage relative standard deviation (RSD) of six preparations for known and unknown impurity in the sample solution is found below 10%; hence, the method is precise. The calibration curve for DE (unknown impurity), Impurity A was linear from 0.38 to 4.5 μg/ml (correlation coefficients [r2] for unknown Impurity [DE] and Impurity A are 0.996 and 0.999, respectively). The calibration curve for Impurity B and Impurity E was linear from 0.38 to 9.00 μg/ml (r2 for Impurity B and Impurity E are 0.999 and 0.999, respectively); hence, the method is linear. Accuracy for DE (unknown Impurity), Impurity A, Impurity B, and Impurity E are found within 80%–120%; hence, the method is accurate. The percentage RSD for a standard solution is found below 5% up to 24 h, and percentage impurity change in the sample solution is found below 0.1% up to 18 h; hence, standard solution is stable up to 24 h, and sample solution is stable up to 18 h.

Conclusion: The developed method is new, simple, adequate, specific, precise, linear, and accurate for the determination of DE and its impurities in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hauel N, Ries U, Priepke H, Wienen W, Stassen JM, Inventor; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma AG, Assignee. Disubstituted Bicyclic Heterocycles, their Preparation and their use as Medicaments. WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Patent Application WO1998037075. 1998. p. 1-201.

Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Gansser D, Roth W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;64:292-303.

Boehringer Ingelheim. USFDA PRADAXA (Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate) Capsules for Oral use Label/Patient Information Leaflets. US@FDA; 2010. p. 1-9.

Drugbank.ca/drugs/DB06695. Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate-Drug Bank; c2018. Available from: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB06695. [Last cited on 2018 Apr 22].

PRADAXA (Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate) Capsules 75mg and 150mg, NDA 22-512, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2010. p. 1-71.

Kumar VD, Balaraju K, Kumar AA. A Rapid RP-HPLC method development and validation for the quantitative estimation of dabigatran etexilate mesylate in capsules. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2015;7:352-6.

Hussain SS, Bhavani G, Kumar AA. UV spectrophotometric assay method development and validation of dabigatran etexilate in capsules. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2015;7:286-9.

Bomma S, Haque MA, Reddy PR, Bakshi V. Method development and validation for the determination of related compounds in dabigatran etexilate mesylate by RP-HPLC. Int J Med Nanotechnol 2014;1:186 93.

Dare M, Jain R, Pandey A. Method validation for stability indicating method of related substance in active pharmaceutical ingredients dabigatran etexilate mesylate by reverse phase chromatography. J Chromatogr Sep Tech 2015;6:1-10.

Nagadeep J, Kamaraj P, Arthanareeswari M. Gradient RP-HPLC method for the determination of potential impurities in dabigatran etexilate in bulk drug and capsule formulations. Arabian J Chem 2015. (Press).

Sreenivas N, Raghu BK, Douglas SP, Ray UK. Validation of stability-indicating reverse phase HPLC method for the determination of related substances in dabigatran etexilate mesylate drug substance. Pharm Lett 2015;7:272-9.

Hanimi RB, Maram RK, Woo HC, Venkat BR, Pasagadugula V. QbD approach method development for estimation of dabigatran etexilate along with its impurities and identification of degradants in capsule dosage form. Am J Anal Chem 2016;7:494-524.

Lee CR, Guivarch F, Van Dau CN, Tessiera D, Krstulovic AM. Determination of polar alkylating agents as thiocyanate/isothiocyanate derivatives by reaction headspace gas chromatography. Analyst 2003;128:857-63.

Kulkarni AA, Vaidya IS. Flow injection analysis: An overview. J Crit Rev 2015;2:19-24.

Published

07-10-2018

How to Cite

Nawale, R., S. Pol, P. Puranik, A. Daud, and V. Rajkondawar. “ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE RELATED SUBSTANCE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY REVERSE‑PHASE – HIGH‑PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 10, Oct. 2018, pp. 357-64, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i10.27043.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)