ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN A CASE OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA USING SPECTRAL KARYOTYPING

Authors

  • Perumal Govindasamy Department of Centralised Molecular Diagnostics, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai – 600 006, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Pooja S Kulshreshtha Centre for Human Genetics, Biotech Park, Electronic City Phase I, Bengaluru – 560 100, Karnataka, India.
  • Prabu Pandurangan Department of Hematology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai – 600 006, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Anil Tarigopula Department of Centralised Molecular Diagnostics, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai – 600 006, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Jayarama S Kadandale Centre for Human Genetics, Biotech Park, Electronic City Phase I, Bengaluru – 560 100, Karnataka, India.
  • Chandra R Samuel Department of Genetics, Dr. ALMPGIBMS, University of Madras, Taramani, Chennai – 600 113, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i9.27133

Keywords:

Chromosomal abnormalities, Interphase FISH, Multiple myeloma, Spectral karyotyping

Abstract

Objective: It was proposed to determine the chromosomal abnormalities in a 49-year-old male patient with multiple myeloma (MM) employing both conventional and advanced molecular cytogenetic techniques.

Methods: GTG-banding and spectral karyotyping (SKY) on fixed metaphases obtained from LPS-stimulated bone marrow cells and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) on unsorted marrow cells were carried out to identify genetic markers of prognostic significance.

Results: The abnormal chromosomes observed through conventional cytogenetics could be resolved with SKY technique. The translocation t(4;14) (p16;q32) indicating FGFR3/IGH fusion and deletion of 13q14.3 was noticed using iFISH. The genetic abnormalities confirmed a poor prognostic outcome in the patient who died within 6 months of diagnosis.

Conclusion: This report emphasizes the need for multicolor FISH techniques besides iFISH to resolve complex abnormalities and to identify cryptic aberrations of importance in risk stratification of MM patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fairfield H, Falank C, Avery L, Reagan MR. Multiple myeloma in the marrow: Pathogenesis and treatments. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016;1364:32- 51.

Gutierrez NC, Camps J, Hernandez JM, Garcıa JL, Prat E, Gonzalez MB, et al. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization studies in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Hematol J 2003;4:67-70.

Harrison CJ, Mazzullo H, Cheung KL, Gerrard G, Jalali GR, Mehta A, et al. Cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: Interpretation of fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Br J Haematol 2003;120:944-52.

Sawyer JR. The prognostic significance of cytogenetics and molecular profiling in multiple myeloma. Cancer Genet 2011;204:3-12.

Talley PJ, Chantry AD, Buckle CH. Genetics in myeloma: Genetic technologies and their application to screening approaches in myeloma. Br Med Bull 2015;113:15-30.

Ross FM, Avet-Loiseau H, Ameye G, Gutiérrez NC, Liebisch P, O’Connor S, et al. Report from the European myeloma network on interphase FISH in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica 2012;97:1272-77.

Kishimoto RK, de Freitas SL, Ratis CA, Borri D, Sitnik R, Velloso ED. Validation of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) for multiple myeloma using CD138 positive cells. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2016;38:113-20.

Rao PH, Cigudosa JC, Ning Y, Calasanz MJ, Iida S, Tagawa S, et al. Multicolor spectral karyotyping identifies new recurring breakpoints and translocations in multiple myeloma. Blood 1998;92:1743-8.

Sawyer JR, Lukacs JL, Thomas EL, Swanson CM, Goosen LS, Sammartino G, et al. Multicolour spectral karyotyping identifies new translocations and a recurring pathway for chromosome loss in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2001;112:167-74.

Fett-Conte AC, Carvalho-Salles AB, Vendrame CB, Pedrassa P, Freitas PC, Varella-Garcia M. New complex chromosome abnormalities in multiple myeloma associated with a poor prognosis: A case report. Leukemia Res 2012;36:e140-2.

Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R, Bastard C, Bergsagel PL, Chesi M, et al. Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: A workshop report. Cancer Res 2004;64:1546-58.

Smol T, Daudignon A. Comparison of IGH profile signals using t(4;14) and IGH break-apart probes by FISH in multiple myeloma. Cytogenet Genome Res 2017;153:18-21.

He H, Fu W, Jiang H, Du J, Zhou L, Zhang C, et al. The clinical characteristics and prognosis of IGH deletion in multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2015;39:515-9.

Nadiminti K, Zhan F, Tricot G. Cytogenetics and chromosomal abnormalities in multiple myeloma-a review. Clon Transgen 2013;2:114.

Binder M, Rajkumar SV, Ketterling RP, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, et al. Occurrence and prognostic significance of cytogenetic evolution in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2016;6:e401.

Keats JJ, Reiman T, Maxwell CA, Taylor BJ, Larratt LM, Mant MJ, et al. In multiple myeloma, t(4;14)(p16;q32) is an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of FGFR3 expression. Blood 2003;101:1520-9.

Nanjangud G, Rao PH, Hegde A, Teruya-Feldstein J, Donnelly G, Qin J, et al. Spectral karyotyping identifies new rearrangements, translocations, and clinical associations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2002;99:2554-61.

Oliveira FM, Favarin MD, Calado RT, Alves AP, Godoi C, Falcao RP. Spectral karyotyping (SKY) reveals a new subset of MDS patients with clonal chromosomal abnormalities not detected by g-banding analysis. Blood 2011;118:1718.

Guo B, Han X, Wu Z, Da W, Zhu H. Spectral karyotyping: An unique technique for the detection of complex genomic rearrangements in leukemia. Transl Pediatr 2014;3:135-9.

Published

07-09-2018

How to Cite

Govindasamy, P., P. S. Kulshreshtha, P. Pandurangan, A. Tarigopula, J. S. Kadandale, and C. R. Samuel. “ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN A CASE OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA USING SPECTRAL KARYOTYPING”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 9, Sept. 2018, pp. 9-11, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i9.27133.

Issue

Section

Case Study(s)