COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INCIDENCE, SEVERITY, AND RELATION OF SORE THROAT AFTER ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION AT DIFFERENT CUFF PRESSURES

Authors

  • Tanveer Singh Kundra Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-1637
  • Deepak Berry Department of Anaesthesia, Government Multispeciality Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i1.45469

Keywords:

Cuff pressure, postoperative sore throat, postoperative anaesthetic complication, hoarseness, duration of intubation

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the incidence, severity, and relation of sore throat after endotracheal intubation at different cuff pressures. The secondary objective of the present study was to evaluate whether regular monitoring of cuff pressure has any additional advantage during surgical procedures.

Methods: Study design – A prospective, comparative, and randomized study. Group A – 25 female patients of age 20–35 where cuff pressure was kept at 15 cm H2O. Group B – 25 female patients of age 20–35 where cuff pressure was kept at 20 cm H2O. Group C – 25 female patients of age 20–35 where cuff pressure was kept at 25 cm H2O. Group D – 25 female patients of age 20–35 where cuff pressure was kept at 30 cm H2O. The patient was visited at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h following extubation and enquired about the incidence of sore throat.

Results: The incidence and severity of sore throat ranged from as low as 16% in group A to as high as 60% in group D at 24 h. Groups B and C showed incidences of 28% and 40%, respectively. The incidence of sore throat was found to be 12% in group A to as high as 40% in group D at 48 h postoperatively, which was further decreased to just one patient with a scratchy feeling in group A and three patients in group D at 72 h with incidence ranging from 4% to 12% only.

Conclusion: As the cuff pressure goes on increasing, the incidence and severity of sore throat also increase, and cuff pressure should be monitored and regulated continuously. Moreover, the cuff pressure should not exceed 25 cm of H2O to minimize post-operative sore throat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tanveer Singh Kundra, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology

Assistant Professor

References

McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: Cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia 1999;54:444-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2044.1999.00780.x, PMID 10995141

Lee JY, Sim WS, Kim ES, Lee SM, Kim DK, Na YR, et al. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative sore throat after endotracheal intubation in Korean patients. J Int Med Res 2017;45:744-52. doi: 10.1177/0300060516687227, PMID 28173712

Christiansen CL, Koch J, Halkier P. Throat complaints following brief intubation. Ugeskr Laeger 1986;148:1143-6. PMID 3727083

Sprague NB, Archer PL. Magill vs Mallinckrodt tracheal tubes-comparative study of post-operative sore throat. Anaesthesia 1987;42:306-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb03046.x, PMID 3578733

Capan LM, Bruce DL, Patel KP. Succinylcholine induced post-operative sore throat. Anesthesiology 1983;59:202.

Loeser EA, Kaminsky A, Diaz A, Stanley TH. The influence of endotracheal cuff design and lubrication on post-operative sore throat. Anesthesiology 1983;58:376-8.

Saarnivaara L, Grahne B. Clinical study on endotracheal tube with high residual volume, low pressure cuff. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1981;25:89-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01614.x, PMID 7324830

Jensen PJ, Hommelgaard P, Søndergaard P, Eriksen S. Sore throat after operation: Influence of tracheal intubation, intracuff pressure and type of cuff. Br J Anaesth 1982;54:453-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/54.4.453, PMID 7066143

Seaglobin D, VanHasselt GL. Endotracheal cuff pressureand tracheal mucosal blood flow. Endoscopic study of four large volume cuffs. BMJ 1984;288:965-8.

Raeder JC, Borchgrevink PC, Sellevold OM. Tracheal tube cuff pressures. The effect of different gas mixtures. Anaesthesia 1985;40:444-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10846.x, PMID 4014621

Aqil M, Khan MU, Mansoor S, Mansoor S, Khokhar RS, Narejo AS. Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: A randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope. BMC Anesthesiol 2017;17:127. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0421-4, PMID 28899338 [published correction appears in BMC Anesthesiol 2018;18:112. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0575-8, PMID 30119647]

Shrestha S, Maharjan B, Karmacharya RM. Incidence and associated risk factors of postoperative sore throat in tertiary Care Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2017;15:10-3. PMID 29446355

Published

07-01-2024

How to Cite

Kundra, T. S., and D. Berry. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INCIDENCE, SEVERITY, AND RELATION OF SORE THROAT AFTER ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION AT DIFFERENT CUFF PRESSURES”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 15-18, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i1.45469.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)