A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON THE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND METHODS PRACTICED IN DISINFECTING AND DISPOSAL OF FACEMASKS AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC

Authors

  • PAVITHRA S SARJI Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Formerly PES College of Pharmacy), PES University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1966-4849
  • NAGARATHNA POOJARY Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Formerly PES College of Pharmacy), PES University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • VINEELA NEKKANTI Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Formerly PES College of Pharmacy), PES University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • R SRINIVASAN Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Formerly PES College of Pharmacy), PES University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i2.46442

Keywords:

Facemask, disposal, disinfection, infectious waste, COVID-19, cross-contamination, decontamination, infection, viral transmission

Abstract

Objectives: The vast amount of facemasks generated as waste should be disposed of appropriately and responsibly to prevent adverse effects on health and the environment. This study aims to assess the knowledge and methods commonly practiced by the public to disinfect and dispose of used facemasks.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2021 to December 2021 in the South Part of Karnataka using a face-validated questionnaire. The questionnaire included subject demographic details and methods to disinfect and dispose of masks. The data were recorded and analyzed using Microsoft Excel.

Results: A total of (n=501) participants took part in the study. This study observed that the most commonly practiced method was to wash the masks with specific cleaners (n=259, 53%). We also assessed knowledge regarding the methods of disposal of a mask. The majority of the participants in our study are aware of the correct method for disposal of used masks(n=342, 68.26%), while (n=159, 31.73%) of subjects are not aware of the right facemask disposal method. Subjects who are educated (p=0.008) and regular mask users (p=0.011) are aware of the right method for mask disposal.

Conclusion: Many people are unaware of the correct disposal methods. Hence, Manufacturers and Scientists should identify an effective way to disinfect and dispose of used masks and educate the public to practice the proper method of facemask disposal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use and Care of Masks. Georgia, United States: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronovirus/2019-ncov/ prevent-getting-sick/about-face-coverings.html [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 05].

World Health Organization. Safe Management of Wastes from Health- Care Activities: A Summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://apps.who.ont/iris/bitstream/ handle/10665/253491/WHO-FWC-WSH-17.05-eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Last accessed on 2022 Jul 01].

Mejjad N, Cherif EK, Rodero A, Krawczyk DA, El Kharraz J, Moumen A, et al. Disposal behavior of used masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Moroccan community: Potential environmental impact. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:4382.

Dharmaraj S, Ashokkumar V, Hariharan S, Manibharathi A, Show PL, Chong CT, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic face mask waste: A blooming threat to the marine environment. Chemosphere 2021;272:129601. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129601, PMID 33497928

Sangkham S. Face mask and medical waste disposal during the novel COVID-19 pandemic in Asia. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 2020;2:10052.

Scalvenzi M, Villani AR, Ruggiero A. Community knowledge about the use, reuse, disinfection and disposal of masks and filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a study conducted in a dermatology clinic at the University of Naples in Italy. J Community Health 2021;46:786-93. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00952-3, PMID 33258051

Fischer RJ, Morris DH, van Doremalen N, Sarchette S, Matson MJ, Bushmaker T, et al. Effectiveness of N95 respirator decontamination and reuse against SARS-CoV-2 virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:2253-5. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201524, PMID 32491983

Education Increases Awareness and Concern for the Environment. UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report; 2015. Available from: https://world-education-blog.org/2015/12/08/education-increases-awareness-and-concern-for-the-environment [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 06].

Hirsh JB. Personality and environmental concern. J Environ Psychol 2010;30:245-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004

Mobley C, Vagias WM, DeWard SL. Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: The influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environ Behav 2010;42:420-47. doi: 10.1177/0013916508325002

Soni S, Sornapudi SD, Babel S. Use of face masks in India during COVID-19: An exploration of the behavioral tendencies of mask users. Indian Res J Ext Educ 2022;22:73-80.

Padmanabhan KK, Barik D. Health hazards of medical waste and its disposal. Energy Toxic Org Waste Heat Power Gener 2019;99-118.

Mastorakis NE, Bulucea CA, Oprea TA, Bulucea CA, Dondon P. Environmental and health risks associated with biomedical waste management. Dev Energy Environ Econ 2010;287-94.

Ilyas S, Srivastava RR, Kim H. Disinfection technology and strategies for COVID-19 hospital and bio-medical waste management. Sci Total Environ 2020;749:141652. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141652, PMID 32822917

Selvaranjan K, Navaratnam S, Rajeev P, Ravintherakumaran N. Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: A review and potential solutions. Environ Chall 2021;3:10039.

Published

07-02-2023

How to Cite

SARJI, P. S., N. POOJARY, V. NEKKANTI, and R. SRINIVASAN. “A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON THE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND METHODS PRACTICED IN DISINFECTING AND DISPOSAL OF FACEMASKS AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 2, Feb. 2023, pp. 12-14, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i2.46442.

Issue

Section

Short Communication(s)