EVALUATION OF MODIFIED NITRITE TEST AS A DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN URINARY TRACT INFECTION OF CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i2.46486Keywords:
Modified nitrite test, Urinary tract infection, Urine cultureAbstract
Objective: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common infection in children. Urine culture is the gold standard method for diagnosing urine infection but it takes more than 48 h to give results. The objective is to evaluate the diagnostic ability of modified nitrite test as a rapid diagnostic screening test for diagnosis of UTI in children.
Methods: An observational and cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Udaipur over a period of 1 year. Children aged up to 60 months with suspected UTI were enrolled in the study. Children with congenital urogenital anomalies and prior antibiotic treatment were excluded from the study. Urine culture and modified nitrite test was done for every children.
Results: Ninety children with suspected UTI were enrolled in the study. Urine culture was positive in 14 (15.55%) out of 90 urine samples. When modified nitrite test was compared to positive urine culture, true positives were 9 and 1 was false positive. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and Accuracy was 64.29%, 98.68%, 90%, 93.75%, and 93.33%, respectively.
Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity of modified nitrite test are good enough as a diagnostic test for detection of UTI. It can be used as a point of care test for rapid screening and identifying the cases.
Downloads
References
Elder JS. Urinary tract infections. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Arvin AM, editors. Nelson Text Book of Pediatrics. 18th ed., Ch. 538. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2007. p. 2223-4.
Anigilaje EA, Adedoyin OT. Correlation between dipstick urinalysis and urine sediment microscopy in detecting haematuria among children with sickle cell anaemia in steady state in Ilorin, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2013;15:135. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.15.135.1854, PMID 24319525
Perkins J, Perkins K, Vilke GM, Almazroua FY. Is culture-positive urinary tract infection in febrile children accurately identified by urine dipstick or microanalysis? J Emerg Med 2012;43:1155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.05.006, PMID 22795471
Thuo N, Ohuma E, Karisa J, Talbert A, Berkley JA, Maitland K. The prognostic value of dipstick urinalysis in children admittedto hospital with severe malnutrition. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:422-6. doi: 10.1136/ adc.2009.168211
Taneja N, Chatterjee SS, Singh M, Sivapriya S, Sharma M, Sharma SK. Validity of quantitative unspun urine microscopy, dipstick test leucocyte esterase and nitrite tests in rapidly diagnosing urinary tract infections. J Assoc Physicians India 2010;58:485-7. PMID 21189695
Kavitha J, Anuradha D, Aravind MA, Ganesh J. Efficacy of urine screening and culture methods in childhood urinary tract infections and analysis of the causative pathogens. Int J Contemp Pediatr 2017;4:1798-802. doi: 10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20173788
Tahirovic H, Pasic M. A modified nitrite test as a screening test for significant bacteriuria. Eur J Pediatr 1988;147:632-3. doi: 10.1007/ BF00442479, PMID 3053191
Senthilkumar KM, Chandrasekaran C, Anandan H, Balaji N, Sivakumar KV. Screening of pediatric urinary tract infection using modified nitrite test. Int J Sci Stud 2016;4:42-4.
Goldsmith BM, Campos JM. Comparison of urine dipstick, microscopy, and culture for the detection of bacteriuria in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1990;29:214-8. doi: 10.1177/000992289002900402, PMID 2331830
Robertson AW, Duff P. The nitrite and leukocyte esterase tests for the evaluation of asymptomatic bacteriuria in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:878-81. PMID 3285267
Downs SM. Technical report: Urinary tract infections in febrile infants and young children. The urinary tract subcommittee of the American academy of pediatrics committee on quality improvement. Pediatrics 1999;103:e54. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e54, PMID 10103346
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Sunny Malvia, Puneet Jain, Niha Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.