PERFORMANCE OF RAPID ANTIGEN TEST IN COMPARISON TO REAL-TIME RT-PCR IN DIAGNOSIS OF COVID-19 INFECTION: A SHORT STUDY

Authors

  • ARITRA BISWAS Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4204-7088
  • RAJA RAY Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  • ARPITA KHAMRAI Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6693-0127
  • DIPANKAR PAUL Virus Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4204-7088

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i7.47461

Keywords:

COVID-19, RAT, REAL TIME PCR, PANDEMIC, OUTBREAK

Abstract

Objective: The global pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still spreading. Because of this, it is urgently necessary to develop quick, easy, and accurate assays to identify severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. For the purpose of diagnosing COVID-19 cases, the quick SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s performance attributes should be assessed and contrasted with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was done during January to May, 2022 at IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India. 2842 paired samples were taken from all patients reporting to the hospital for Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) and RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the RAT.

Results: Of 2842 samples, 229 (8%) were positive, and 2613 (92%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time RT-PCR assay. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s sensitivity and specificity were 77.29% (177 out of 229) and 99.54% (2601 out of 2613), respectively. Positive predictive value was 93.65% and negative predictive value was 93% with the Ct value ≤35 of real-time RT-PCR result.

Conclusion: RAT-positive samples are also positive by real-time RT-PCR test though RAT-negative patient with symptom, should further test for real-time RT-PCR as sensitivity is bit low particularly in symptomatic patient respect to real-time RT-PCR result. Hence, we can conclude that specificity- and sensitivity-wise real-time RT-PCR method is best, but during pandemic/outbreak situation, RAT is good alternative for fast screening and point-of-care test of COVID-19 detection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle. J Med Virol 2020;92:401-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25678

Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1814-20.

Biswas A, Haldar J, Ray R, Raj HJ, Ray R. Evolving trend of patients with SARS-COV-2 in West Bengal, India. Indian J Appl Res 2020;10:1-3.

Li Z, Yi Y, Luo X, Xiong N, Liu Y, Li S, et al. Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. J Med Virol 2020;92:1518-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25727

Information about COVID-19. World Health Organization. https://www. who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19 [Last accessed on 2022 Oct 11].

Pandey AK, Mohanty A, Hada V, Rath RS, Kumar S, Kishore S. Comparison of the rapid antigen testing method with RT-qPCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Cureus J Med Sci 2021;13:8-12.

Pena M, Ampuero M, Garces C, Gaggero A, Garcia P, Soledad M, et al. Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals. Int J Infect Dis 2021;107:201-4.

Chaimayo C, Kaewnaphan B, Tanlieng N, Athipanyasilp N, Sirijatuphat R. Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand. Virol J 2020;17:177. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12985-020-01452-5

Published

07-07-2023

How to Cite

BISWAS, A., R. RAY, A. KHAMRAI, and D. PAUL. “PERFORMANCE OF RAPID ANTIGEN TEST IN COMPARISON TO REAL-TIME RT-PCR IN DIAGNOSIS OF COVID-19 INFECTION: A SHORT STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 7, July 2023, pp. 44-47, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i7.47461.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)