THE ROLE OF AUTOLOGOUS HAMSTRING GRAFT IN IMPROVING FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: PROSPECTIVE STUDY AT GGH, KURNOOL

Authors

  • pasupuleti archana babu Department of Orthopaedics, GGH, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4570-3620
  • Priyanka Department of Orthopaedics, KMC, Kurnool, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48303

Keywords:

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, Hamstring, Endobutton, Arthroscopy.

Abstract

Objectives: The prevalence of knee ligament injuries is on the rise due to increasing engagement in sports activities. Among the various ligaments present in the knee joint, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured. Several procedures have been described for the reconstruction of a torn ACL, ranging from open to arthroscopic techniques. In this particular study, we utilized an autograft from the hamstring muscle for ACL reconstruction. The graft was secured with an Endobutton on the femoral end and an interference screw at the tibial end. If necessary, cancellous screws or a suture wheel was used as well.

Methods: This is a 2-year prospective study conducted between April 2021 and March 2023 at GGH, Kurnool, which included 20 cases of complete ACL tear. All patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using a hamstring graft. Following the procedure, all patients were assessed using the lysholm knee scoring questionnaire and were monitored at specific intervals, including 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, to evaluate their progress.

Results: After 1 year, the lysholm knee scoring questionnaire was used to evaluate the results of the ACL reconstruction with the hamstring graft. The findings revealed that 30% (6 cases) of the cases reported excellent results, 50% (10 cases) of the cases showed good results, 15% (3 cases) of the cases showed fair results, and 5% (1 case) of the cases obtained poor results. In addition, 80% of patients achieved functional restoration to their pre-injury level. At 1-year follow-up, our study found that the average pre-operative lysholm score was 63.24, while the average post-operative score was 91.98, which showed a statistically significant improvement in the post-operative lysholm score compared to the pre-operative score (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of a hamstring graft for the reconstruction of a torn ACL can result in excellent to good outcomes. However, it should be noted that proper patient selection and physiotherapy play a significant role in achieving favorable results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Paschos NK, Howell SM. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Principles of treatment. EFORT Open Rev 2017;1:398-408. doi 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160032. PMID: 28461919; PMCID: PMC5367541

Pardiwala DN, Rao NN, Anand K, Raut A. Knee dislocations in sports injuries. Indian J Orthop 2017;51:552-62. doi 10.4103/ortho. IJOrtho_229_17. PMID: 28966379; PMCID: PMC5609377

Svantesson E, Senorski EH, Webster KE, Karlsson J, Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, et al. Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:2415-34. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x. PMID: 32767052; PMCID: PMC7429530

Dargel J, Gotter M, Mader K, Pennig D, Koebke J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R. Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament and implications for surgical reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2007;2:1- 12. doi 10.1007/s11751-007-0016-6. PMID: 18427909; PMCID: PMC2321720

Macaulay AA, Perfetti DC, Levine WN. Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices. Sports Health 2012;4:63-8. doi 10.1177/1941738111409890. PMID: 23016071; PMCID: PMC3435898

Widner M, Dunleavy M, Lynch S. Outcomes following ACL reconstruction based on graft type: Are all grafts equivalent? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019;12:460-5. doi 10.1007/s12178-019-09588-w. PMID: 31734844; PMCID: PMC6942094

Migliorini F, Torsiello E, Trivellas A, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. Bone-patellar tendon-bone versus two-and four-strand hamstring tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction in young adults: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023;13:6883. doi 10.1038/ s41598-023-33899-1. PMID: 37106008; PMCID: PMC10140035

Samitier G, Marcano AI, Alentorn-Geli E, Cugat R, Farmer KW, Moser MW. Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2015;3:220-40. PMID: 26550585; PMCID: PMC4628627

Arida C, Tsikrikas CG, Mastrokalos DS, Panagopoulos A, Vlamis J, Triantafyllopoulos IK. Comparison of bone-patella tendon-bone and four-strand hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective study. Cureus 2021;13:e19197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19197. PMID: 34877191; PMCID: PMC8642134

Hadi H, Bagherifar A, Tayebi F, Ansaria M, Shahsavaripour A, Qomashi I, Jabalameli M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons has no deleterious effect on hip extension strength. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2019;7:278-83. PMID: 31312687; PMCID: PMC6578478

Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: A meta-analysis. BMJ 2006;332:995- 1001. doi 10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F. PMID: 16603564; PMCID: PMC1450040

Brown TN, Palmieri-Smith RM, McLean SG. Sex and limb differences in hip and knee kinematics and kinetics during anticipated and unanticipated jump landings: Implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:1049-56. doi: 10.1136/ bjsm.2008.055954. PMID: 19372596

Bourke HE, Gordon DJ, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA. The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for ‘isolated’ anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:630-7. doi 10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28675. PMID: 22529082

Khan I, Ullah S, Khattak SK, Khan Z, Ahmad I, Khan A. Functional outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft with fixation using endobutton at femoral end and bioabsorbable screw at tibial end. Mymensingh Med J 2022;31:1142-7. PMID: 36189564

Kautzner J, Kos P, Hanus M, Trc T, Havlas V. A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: A prospective randomized study. Int Orthop 2015;39:125-30. doi 10.1007/s00264-014-2495-7. PMID: 25128968

Laxdale G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J. A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2005;21:34-42. doi 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.014. PMID: 15650664

Williams RJ 3rd, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:225-32. doi 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00003. PMID: 14960665

Frank RM, Hamamoto JT, Bernardoni E, Cvetanovich G, Bach BR Jr., Verma NN, Bush-Joseph CA. ACL reconstruction basics: Quadruple (4-strand) hamstring autograft harvest. Arthrosc Tech 2017;6:e1309- 13. doi 10.1016/j.eats.2017.05.024. PMID: 29354434; PMCID: PMC5622412

Gulick DT, Yoder HN. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical outcomes of the patella tendon and hamstring tendon grafts. J Sports Sci Med 2002;1:63-71. PMID: 24701126; PMCID: PMC3967431

Published

07-11-2023

How to Cite

babu, pasupuleti archana, and Priyanka. “THE ROLE OF AUTOLOGOUS HAMSTRING GRAFT IN IMPROVING FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: PROSPECTIVE STUDY AT GGH, KURNOOL”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 11, Nov. 2023, pp. 184-7, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48303.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)