LATERAL APPROACH OF POPLITEAL BLOCK VERSUS UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR BELOW KNEE SURGERIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Mayura D Pujari Department of Anesthesiology Prakash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Urun Islampur, Maharashtra, India.
  • Pooja D Kakade Department of Anesthesiology Prakash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Urun Islampur, Maharashtra, India.
  • Aparna G Benare Department of Anesthesiology Prakash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Urun Islampur, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i6.48335

Keywords:

popliteal block, unilateral spinal anesthesia, lower limb surgeries, analgesia

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of the study were to compare efficacy and side effects of popliteal block and unilateral spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing below knee surgeries.

Methods: This was a comparative study comprising patients undergoing below knee surgeries. Sixty patients were divided into two groups depending on whether surgery was done under unilateral spinal anesthesia (Group SA) or popliteal block (Group PB). The parameters compared between the studied groups included hemodynamic changes, onset of motor block, onset and duration of analgesia, duration of motor block, onset of pain, and amount of rescue analgesia required. Side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, and urinary retention were compared between the two groups. SSPS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results: There were 14 (46.67%) males and 16 (53.33%) females, whereas, in Group PB, there were 13 (43.33%) males and 17 (56.67%) females. Mean age of patients in Group SA was found to be 42.93±16.79 and 39.57±14.05 in Group PB. The mean age and gender distribution and ASA grades of patients in both the groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference. The mean duration of sensory as well as motor block was found to be significantly less in Group SA as compared to Group PB and the difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Group PB showed a better hemodynamic as well as analgesic profile as compared to Group SA. The analgesic requirement in first 24 h was more in Group SA as compared to Group PB and the difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Adverse effects in both the groups were comparable (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Popliteal block provides better analgesia and hemodynamic stability as compared to unilateral spinal anesthesia and, hence, can be considered preferred mode of anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.v

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bansal L, Attri JP, Verma P. Lower limb surgeries under combined femoral and sciatic nerve block. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:432-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.177186, PMID: 27746528; PMCID: PMC5062190

Hodgson PS, Liu SS. New developments in spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2000;18:235-49. doi: 10.1016/s0889- 8537(05)70162-0, PMID: 10935009

Guntz E, Herman P, Debizet E, Delhaye D, Coulic V, Sosnowski M. Sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa: Description of a new medial approach. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:817-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03018455, PMID: 15470171

Myerson MS, Ruland CM, Allon SM. Regional anesthesia for foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle 1992;13:282-8.

Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Monahan AM, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, et al Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: Neuromodulation of the sciatic nerve for postoperative analgesia following ambulatory foot surgery, a proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:580-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP

Vermeylen K, De Puydt J, Engelen S, Roofthooft E, Soetens F, Neyrinck A, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone and clonidine as adjuvants to a ropivacaine sciatic popliteal block for foot surgery. Local Reg Anesth 2016;9:17-24. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S96073

Hegewald K, McCann K, Elizaga A, Hutchinson BL. Popliteal blocks for foot and ankle surgery: Success rate and contributing factors. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014;53:176-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.008, PMID: 23747220

Eccles CJ, Swiergosz AM, Smith AF, Bhimani SJ, Smith LS, Malkani AL. Decreased opioid consumption and length of stay using an IPACK and adductor canal nerve block following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021;34:705-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700840, PMID: 31683348

Gedikoglu M, Eker HE. Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block: An effective alternative technique to control ischaemic severe rest pain during endovascular treatment of critical limb ischaemia. Pol J Radiol 2019;84:e537-41. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.91271

Vadhanan P, Tripaty DK, Adinarayanan S. Physiological and pharmacologic aspects of peripheral nerve blocks. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015;31:384-93. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.161679

Bondar A, Morau D, Kollipara S, Iohom G. Peripheral nerve blockade. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011;2011:973239. doi: 10.1155/2011/973239, PMID: 21837237; PMCID: PMC3147119

Zetlaoui PJ, Bouaziz H. Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesth Analg 1998;87:79-82. doi: 10.1097/00000539- 199807000-00017, PMID: 9661550

Enk D, Prien T, Van Aken H, Mertes N, Meyer J, Brussel T. Success rate of unilateral spinal anesthesia is dependent on injection flow. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:420-7.

Karaarslan S, Tekgül ZT, Şimşek E, Turan M, Karaman Y, Kaya A, et al. Comparison between ultrasonography-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block and spinal anesthesia for hallux valgus repair. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37:85-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100715600285, PMID: 26293156

Zhang L, Tong Y, Li M, Niu X, Zhao X, Lin F, et al. Sciatic-femoral nerve block versus unilateral spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol 2015;81:1359-68. PMID: 26394364

Imbelloni LE. The state of the art of unilateral spinal block. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2007;57:589-91. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942007000600001, PMID: 19462135

Taboada M, Rodríguez J, Valiño C, Carceller J, Bascuas B, Oliveira J, et al. What is the minimum effective volume of local anesthetic required for sciatic nerve blockade? A prospective, randomized comparison between a popliteal and a subgluteal approach. Anesth Analg 2006;102:593-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189188.08679.2a, PMID: 16428568

Krobot R, Premuzic J, Sokol N. Comparison of unilateral spinal anaesthesia and popliteal sciatic nerve block in the elderly undergoing transmetatarsal amputation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012;29:121.

Hossary Z, Attar H, Amin OA, Mowafy SM. A comparison of spinal anesthesia versus lateral approach of popliteal nerve block for diabetic foot surgeries. Med J Cairo Univ 2015;83:463-72.

Jeon HJ, Park YC, Lee JN, Bae JS. Popliteal sciatic nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in hallux valgus surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013;64:321-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.321, PMID: 23646241; PMCID: PMC3640164

Published

07-06-2023

How to Cite

Pujari, M. D., P. D. Kakade, and A. G. Benare. “LATERAL APPROACH OF POPLITEAL BLOCK VERSUS UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR BELOW KNEE SURGERIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 6, June 2023, pp. 153-7, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i6.48335.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)