EFFICACY OF THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA ALONG WITH UNILATERAL ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING UNILATERAL MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY AND AXILLARY DISSECTION: A NOVEL MULTICENTRIC STUDY

Authors

  • NANDINI DESHPANDE Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
  • KAPIL AGARWAL Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
  • ROHIT HATGAONKAR Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Referral Rural Super-Specialty Hospital, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
  • NARESH PALIWAL Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-9196

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i6.48397

Keywords:

Thoracic segmental spinal, Erector spinae block, Modified radical mastectomy, Visual analog score

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to find out the efficacy of thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia combined with unilateral erector spinae block in patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study in which 40 patients with carcinoma breast undergoing modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection under thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia combined with unilateral erector spinae block were included on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Erector spinae plane block was given at T5 level and thoracic spinal anesthesia was then given at T5–T6 level in the same position by median or paramedian technique. Patients were assessed for severity of pain by visual analog scale score till 24 h of surgery.

Results: The mean age of studied cases was found to be 44.12±10.04 years. Mean weight of studied cases was 54.38±9.8 kg, whereas mean duration of surgery was found to be 98.24±16.86 min. The most common American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade to which patients belonged was found to be ASA III (55%) followed by ASA II (30%) and ASA I (15%). Eleven patients required rescue analgesia within first 24 h after surgery and mean doses of rescue analgesia in 1st 24 h after surgery was found to be 0.92±0.48. Four (10%) patients developed hypotension, whereas three (7.5%) patients had bradycardia. However, all these 7 (17.5%) had transient bradycardia or hypotension which could be managed by IV Atropine or IV mephentermine and fluid bolus.

Conclusion: Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia combined with unilateral erector spinae block is an excellent option for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Botteri E, Berstad P, Sandin S, Weiderpass E. Lifestyle changes and risk of cancer: Experience from the Swedish women’s lifestyle and health cohort study. Acta Oncol 2021;60:827-34. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1919756

Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2017;13:289-95.

doi: 10.1111/ajco.12661

Cody HS 3rd. Current surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14:45-52. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200202000- 00008

Gómez-Arnau JI, Aguilar JL, Bovaira P, Bustos F, De Andrés J, de la Pinta JC, et al. Postoperative nausea and vomiting and opioid-induced nausea and vomiting: Guidelines for prevention and treatment. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2010;57:508-24. doi: 10.1016/s0034- 9356(10)70711-8

Gulur P, Nishimori M, Ballantyne JC. Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia, morbidity and mortality. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006;20:249-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.10.002

Oddby-Muhrbeck E, Jakobsson J, Andersson L, Askergren J. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. A comparison between intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia in breast surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:52-6.

Coveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Iglehart JD, Leight GS, Steele SM, et al. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer experience in 156 cases. Ann Surg 1998;227:496-501.

Imbelloni LE, Quirici MB, Filho JR, Cordeiro JA, Ganem EM. The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal investigated with magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 2010;110:1494-5. doi: 10.1213/ ANE.0b013e3181d5aca6

Imbelloni LE, Pitombo PF, Ganem EM. The incidence of paresthesia and neurologic complications after lower spinal thoracic puncture with cut needle compared to pencil point needle. Study in 300 patients. J Anesth Clinic Res 2010;1:106.

Nagaraja P, Ragavendran S, Singh N, Asai O, Bhavya G, Manjunath N, et al. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2018;21:323.

Jonnesco T. Remarks on general spinal anesthesia. Br Med J 1909;2:1396-401.

Chauhan R, Sabharwal P, Sarna R, Meena S. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section in severe pre-eclampsia: Exploring a new dimension. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 2021;13:22.

Mahmoud AA, Hussein HA, Girgis K, Kamal AM, Nafady HA. The novel use of spinal anesthesia at the mid-thoracic level: A feasibility study. Egypt J Cardiothorac Anesth 2014;8:21-6.

Ellakany MH. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is safe for patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. Anaesth Essays Res 2014;8: 223-8.

Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999. Anesthesiology 2004;101:950-9.

Singh S, Kumar G, Akhileshwar. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised control study. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:200-4. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_758_18

Spannella F, Giulietti F, Damiani E, Faloia L, Stronati M, Venezia A, et al. Thoracic continuous spinal anaesthesia for high-risk comorbid older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: One-year experience of an Italian geriatric hospital. Minerva Anestesiol 2019;86:261-9.

Imbelloni LE, Fornasari M, Fialho JC, Sant’Anna R, Cordeiro JA. General anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2010;60:217-27.

McIsaac DI, Cole ET, McCartney CJ. Impact of including regional anaesthesia in enhanced recovery protocols: A scoping review. Br J Anaesth 2015;115(Suppl 2):ii46-56.

Bessa SS, Katri KM, Abdel-Salam WN, El-Kayal ES, Tawfik TA. Spinal versus general anaesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:550-5.

Turan A, Bajracharya GR, Leung S, Kara MY, Mao G, Botsford T, et al. Association of neuraxial anaesthesia with postoperative venous thromboembolism after noncardiac surgery: A propensity-matched analysis of ACS-NSQIP database. Anaesth Analg 2019;128:494-501.

Imbelloni LE. Spinal anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Glob J Anesthesiol 2014;1:1-8.

Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2005;100:4-10.

Lee RA, Van Zundert AA, Visser WA, Lataster LM, Wieringa PA. Thoracic combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia. Southern African J Anaesth Analg 2008;14:63-9.

Cho AR, Kwon JY, Kim KH, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Kim ES, et al. The effects of anesthetics on chronic pain after breast cancer surgery. Anesth Analg 2013;116:685-93.

Hogan Q. Size of human lower thoracic and lumbosacral nerve roots. Anesthesiology 1996;85:37-42.

Shatri G, Singh A. Thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. PMID: 34283453

Mazy A, El-Domiaty A, Mageed NA, Motawi AA, Messeha M. Comparison between thoracic paravertebral block and segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia in breast cancer surgery. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 2022;14:88. doi: 10.1186/s42077-022-00281-8

Premachandra A, Wang X, Saad M, Moussawy S, Rouzier R, Latouche A, Albi-Feldzer A. Erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for the prevention of acute postsurgical pain in breast cancer surgery: A prospective observational study compared with a propensity score-matched historical cohort. PLoS One 2022;17:e0279648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279648

Elakany MH, Abdelhamid SA. Segmental thoracic spinal has advantages over general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery. Anesth Essays Res 2013;7:390-5. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123263

Published

07-06-2023

How to Cite

DESHPANDE, N., K. AGARWAL, R. HATGAONKAR, and N. PALIWAL. “EFFICACY OF THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA ALONG WITH UNILATERAL ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING UNILATERAL MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY AND AXILLARY DISSECTION: A NOVEL MULTICENTRIC STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 6, June 2023, pp. 158-63, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i6.48397.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)