COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COMBINATION ANTI-CANCER DRUG THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HER2-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS

Authors

  • SRI SAI NIKITHA KOTA Department of , Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-3878
  • Sailaja Bandhakavi Department of , Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.48522

Keywords:

Cost-effectiveness analysis, Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Docetaxel, Quality-adjusted life years, Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, Probabilistic sensitivity analysis

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review article is to conduct a basic meta-analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of the trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel (THP) combination compared to the trastuzumab and docetaxel (TH) alone in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients. The analysis aims to measure the costs involved and the health outcomes of the therapy to identify the most cost-effective treatment option.

Methods: The researchers collected costs and quality-adjusted life years data from studies that investigated the cost-effectiveness of different treatment regimens for HER2-positive breast cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted using these data, and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 1000 iterations was performed using an Excel spreadsheet. The input data used in the analysis were obtained from four studies deemed appropriate for the meta-analysis.

Results: The outputs obtained from the meta-analysis were plotted on an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) scatterplot. The ICER scatter plots of the four studies showed that the THP combination was 0% cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of I$100,000/QALY and 2.38% cost-effective at a WTP of I$200,000/QALY. However, at a higher WTP of I$500,000/QALY, the THP combination was found to be 52.8% cost-effective compared to the TH combination.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this meta-analysis, the THP combination treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer patients is cost-effective compared to the TH combination at a willingness to pay threshold of I$500,000/QALY. However, at lower WTP thresholds, the THP combination may not be cost-effective. These results provide valuable insights for prescribers in identifying and selecting the most cost-effective treatment option among the alternatives available for HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sailaja Bandhakavi, Department of , Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Professor
Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology
Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam,
Tirupati-517502, A.P

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. PMID: 33538338

Capelan M, Pugliano L, De Azambuja E, Bozovic I, Saini KS, Sotiriou C, et al. Pertuzumab: New hope for patients with HER2- positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2013;24:273-82. doi: 10.1093/ annonc/mds328. PMID: 22910839

Nami B, Maadi H, Wang Z. Mechanisms underlying the action and synergism of trastuzumab and pertuzumab in targeting HER2- positive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018;10:342. doi:10.3390/ cancers10100342

Walley T, Haycox A. Pharmacoeconomics: Basic concepts and terminology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;43:343-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2125.1997.00574.x. PMID: 9146844; PMCID: PMC2042759

Ahmad A, Patel I, Parimilakrishnan S, Mohanta GP, Chung H, Chang J. The role of pharmacoeconomics in current Indian healthcare system. J Res Pharm Pract 2013;2:3-9. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.114081. PMID: 24991597; PMCID: PMC4076893

Dilokthornsakul P, Thomas D, Brown L, Chaiyakunapruk N. Interpreting pharmacoeconomic findings. In: Clinical Pharmacy Education, Practice and Research. Ch. 19. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. p. 277-87. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814276-9.00019-2

Tawfik GM, Dila KA, Mohamed MY, Tam DN, Kien ND, Ahmed AM, et al. A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Trop Med Health 2019;47:46. doi: 10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6. PMID: 31388330; PMCID: PMC6670166

Basu A. How to conduct meta-analysis: A Basic tutorial. PeerJ 2017;5:e2978v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2978v1

Diaby V, Alqhtani H, van Boemmel-Wegmann S, Wang CY, Ali AA, Balkrishnan R, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab-containing treatment sequences for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan. Breast 2020;49:141-8. doi: 10.1016/j. breast.2019.11.012. PMID: 31805500; PMCID: PMC7375554

Attard CL, Pepper AN, Brown ST, Thompson MF, Thuresson PO, Yunger S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab therapy for locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer in Canada. J Med Econ 2015;18:173-88. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.979938. PMID: 25347449

Garrison LP Jr., Babigumira J, Tournier C, Goertz HP, Lubinga SJ, Perez EA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pertuzumab with trastuzumab and chemotherapy compared to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in the United States. Value Health 2019;22:408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.014. Erratum in: Value Health 2019;22(7):843. PMID: 30975391

Durkee BY, Qian Y, Pollom EL, King MT, Dudley SA, Shaffer JL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:902-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.9105. PMID: 26351332; PMCID: PMC5070553

World Health Organization, Baltussen RM, Adam T, Tessa TT, Hutubessy RC, Acharya A, et al. Making Choices in Health: WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42699

Boshuizen HC, van Baal PH. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Be a Bayesian. Value Health 2009;12:1210-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524- 4733.2009.00590.x

Geenen JW, Vreman RA, Boersma C, Klungel OH, Hövels AM, Ten Ham RM. Increasing the information provided by probabilistic sensitivity analysis: The relative density plot. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2020;18:54. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00251-7

Fenwick E, Marshall DA, Levy AR, Nichol G. Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: An example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-52

Published

07-12-2023

How to Cite

KOTA, S. S. N., and S. Bandhakavi. “COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COMBINATION ANTI-CANCER DRUG THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HER2-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 12, Dec. 2023, pp. 20-25, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.48522.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)