FETOMATERNAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH THREATENED ABORTION IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN SOUTH KERALA

Authors

  • Kitty Elizabeth Mammen Department of , Travancore Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.
  • PRASANNA VENUGOPAL Department of , Travancore Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.
  • ASIYA S Department of , Travancore Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i8.48709

Keywords:

Bed rest, Placenta previa, Cesarean section, Vaginal bleeding in pregnancy, Threatened miscarriage, Spontaneous miscarriage

Abstract

Objective: Pregnancy complications due to threatened abortion are related with contrary pregnancy outcomes. The main aim of the present study was to analyze the changes in pregnancy outcomes among the women who experienced threatened abortion and normal pregnant control women.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was performed among 117 pregnant women who were attending our Travancore Medical College Hospital, Kollam, during the period from January 2021 to January 2023 (2 years). The control group was developed from an equal number of asymptomatic women who were receiving antenatal care during the same period. Demographic parameters, clinical and ultrasound observations, treatment plans, and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.

Statistical Analyses: Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics.

Results: Spontaneous abortion rate of 15.38% was observed with the threatened abortion group and control group as 5.1% (p=0.005). Women with threatened abortion had higher odds for placenta previa (p=0.048), pre-mature rupture of membranes (p=0.021), post-partum hemorrhage (p=0.001), and pre-term birth.

Conclusion: Threatened abortion seems to be an important hazard to fetal survival and may intensify the threat for operational delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chung TK, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Mongelli JM, Spencer JA, Haines CJ. Threatened abortion: Prediction of viability based on signs and symptoms. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:443-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03129.x, PMID 10687760

Uerpairojkit B, Charoenvidhya D, Tannirandorn Y, Wacharaprechanont T, Manotaya S, Samritpradit P, et al. Sonographic findings in clinically diagnosed threatened abortion. J Med Assoc Thai 2001;84:661-5. PMID 11560215

Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988;319:189-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401, PMID 3393170

Farrell T, Owen P. The significance of extrachorionic membrane separation in threatened miscarriage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:926-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09915.x, PMID 8813316

Park IY, Park CH, Lee G, Shin JC. 3432. Prognosis of threatened abortion by embryonic/fetal heart beat rate. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32:264. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.02.1204

Abdalla HI, Burton G, Kirkland A, Johnson MR, Leonard T, Brooks AA, et al. Age, pregnancy and miscarriage: Uterine versus ovarian factors. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1512-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep. a138289, PMID 8253944

Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: Population based register linkage study. Br Med J 2000;320:1708-12.

Şükür YE, Göç G, Köse O, Açmaz G, Özmen B, Atabekoğlu CS, et al. The effects of subchorionic hematoma on pregnancy outcome in patients with threatened abortion. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2014;15:239-42. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2014.14170, PMID 25584033

Sivasane DS, Daver RG. Study of pregnancy outcome of threatened abortion and its correlation with risk factors in a tertiary care hospital of Mumbai, India. Int J Rerprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018;7:4598-603.

Agrawal S, Khoiwal S, Jayant K, Agarwal R. Predicting adverse maternal and perinatal outcome after threatened miscarriage. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2014;4:41251. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2014.41001

Dadkhah F, Kashanian M, Eliasi G. A comparison between the pregnancy outcome in women both with or without threatened abortion. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.02.005, PMID 20231080

Petriglia G, Palaia I, Musella A, Marchetti C, Antonilli M, Brunelli R, et al. Threatened abortion and late-pregnancy complication: A case-control study and review of literature. Minerva Ginecol 2015;67:491-7. PMID 25668506

Elovitz MA, Baron J, Phillippe M. The role of thrombin in preterm parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1059-63. doi: 10.1067/ mob.2001.117638, PMID 11717633

Redman CW, Sargent IL. Pre-eclampsia, the placenta and the maternal systemic inflammatory response--a review. Placenta 2003;24 Suppl A: S21-7. doi: 10.1053/plac.2002.0930, PMID 12842410

Norwitz ER. Defective implantation and placentation: Laying the blueprint for pregnancy complications. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13:591-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60649-9, PMID 17007686

Lockwood CJ, Krikun G, Rahman M, Caze R, Buchwalder L, Schatz F. The role of decidualization in regulating endometrial hemostasis during the menstrual cycle, gestation, and in pathological states. Semin Thromb Hemost 2007;33:111-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958469, PMID 17253197

Johns J. The Pathophysiology of Threatened Miscarriage and its Effect on Pregnancy Outcome. Vol. 12. London: UCL University College London; 2007. p. 2021.

De Sutter P, Bontinck J, Schutysers V, Van der Elst J, Gerris J, Dhont M. First-trimester bleeding and pregnancy outcome in singletons after assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1907-11. doi: 10.1093/ humrep/del054, PMID 16501033

Outcome of Pregnancies Threatening to Miscarry Predicted Accurately for First Time. Time Siencedaily; 2011. Available from: https://www. sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110705071536.htm [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 12].

Thinkhamrop J, Hofmeyr GJ, Adetoro O, Lumbiganon P, Ota E. Antibiotic prophylaxis during the second and third trimester to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and morbidity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;1:CD002250.

Lurie S, Gur D, Sadan O, Glezerman M. Relationship between uterine contractions and serum magnesium levels in patients treated for threatened preterm labour with intravenous magnesium sulphate. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:247-8. doi: 10.1080/01443610410001660715, PMID 15203617

Kawagoe Y, Sameshima H, Ikenoue T, Yasuhi I, Kawarabayashi T. Magnesium sulfate as a second-line tocolytic agent for preterm labor: A randomized controlled trial in Kyushu Island. J Pregnancy 2011;2011:965060. doi: 10.1155/2011/965060, PMID 21773032

Yilanlioğlu NC, Semiz A, Arısoy R. The efficiency of emergency cerclage for the prevention of pregnancy losses and preterm labour. Perinat J 2019;27:1-5. doi: 10.2399/prn.19.0271001

Shinde K, Karake AV, Shekhawat G, Shivale H. The efficacy of cervical encerclage on the course of labour in well selected cases: A prospective study at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:3319-23. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173188

Devall AJ, Papadopoulou A, Podesek M, Haas DM, Price MJ, Coomarasamy A, et al. Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;4:CD013792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013792.pub2, PMID 33872382

Published

07-08-2023

How to Cite

Mammen, K. E., P. VENUGOPAL, and A. S. “FETOMATERNAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH THREATENED ABORTION IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN SOUTH KERALA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 8, Aug. 2023, pp. 72-75, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i8.48709.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)