COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE VERSUS BUPIVACAINE PLUS TRAMADOL FOR PEDIATRIC INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES: A STUDY ON POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

Authors

  • AYUSHEE KHANDELWAL Department of Anesthesia, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • RASHMI GUPTA Department of Anesthesia, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • SURESH PANDEY Department of Anaesthesia, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar,Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.48734

Keywords:

Caudal, Bupivacaine, Tramadol, Children, Infraumbilical surgeries

Abstract

Objective: Effective post-operative pain management is crucial in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. Various regional anesthesia techniques, including caudal block, have been used to provide post-operative analgesia in children. The addition of tramadol, a synthetic opioid analgesic, to bupivacaine in caudal anesthesia has shown potential benefits. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of single-shot caudal bupivacaine alone versus bupivacaine plus tramadol for post-operative analgesia in pediatric infra-umbilical surgeries.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study was conducted at our institute. The present study will be carried out in 60 pediatric patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades I and II between the age of 1 and 8 years, undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. These children were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group B (n=30) received caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) and Group BT (n=30) received caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) with tramadol (1 mg/kg). The variables studied were hemodynamic changes, duration of analgesia, and incidence of side effects. Pain assessment was done at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-operatively using modified objective pain scale.

Results: It was observed that the mean duration of analgesia in Group BT (9.05±2.21) h was significantly longer (p=0.0001) than Group B (3.78±0.94) h. Hemodynamic parameters remained comparable during intraoperative and post-operative periods. There was no incidence of nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, pruritus, or decrease in respiratory rate in the two groups.

Conclusion: In our study, we concluded that a single-shot caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) plus tramadol (1 mg/kg) resulted in longer duration of analgesia when compared to 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) alone with no incidence of any side effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Society of Paediatric Anaesthesia. Relief of pain is a “basic human right”. Paediatr Anaesth 2001;11:681.

Langlade A. Pain management in children: A survey of current practice in a French teaching hospital. Paediatr Anaesth 2002;12:494-501.

Hampl K. Tramadol: Analgesic efficacy in postsurgical pain of children. Paediatr Anaesth 1997;7:225-30.

Wilson E, Smith R, Davis S. Comparative analysis of motor blockade in spinal anesthesia: Levobupivacaine and buprenorphine vs. bupivacaine and buprenorphine. Anesth Res J 2021;16:155-67.

Hong JY, et al. Effect of adding tramadol to 1.5% lidocaine for caudal anesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:774-8.

Gupta A, Gupta S, Dahiya R, et al. Comparative study of caudal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine-tramadol for postoperative analgesia in pediatric infra umbilical surgeries. Indian J Pain 2019;33:47-51.

Kundra P, Deepalakshmi K, Ravishankar M. Preemptive caudal bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative analgesia in children. Anesth Analg 1998;87:52-6.

Güneş Y, Gündüz M, Unlügenç H, Ozalevli M, Ozcengiz D. Comparison of caudal vs intravenous tramadol administered either preoperatively or postoperatively for pain relief in boys. Paediatr Anaesth 2004;14:324-8.

Senel AC, Akyol A, Dohman D, et al. Caudal bupivacaintramadol combination for postoperative analgesia in paediatric herniorrhaphy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:786-9.

Prakash S, Tyagi R, Gogia AR, Singh R, Prakash S. Efficacy of three doses of tramadol with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in paediatric inguinal herniotomy. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:385-8.

Khalid A, Siddiqui SZ, Haider S, Aftab S. Single dose caudal tramadol with bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone in pediartic inguinoscrotal surgeries. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2007;17:519-22.

Khan S, Memon MI. Comparison of caudal bupivacaine and bupivacaine-tramadol for postoperative analgesia in children with hypospadias repair. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008;18:601-4.

Doda M, Mukherjee S. Postoperative analgesia in children- comparative study between caudal bupivacaine and bupivacaine plus tramadol. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:463-6.

Laiq N, Khan MN, Tahmeedullah, Gandapur YK, Khan S. Comparison of caudal bupivacaine and bupivacaine-tramadol for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009;19:678-81.

Shrestha SK, Bhattarai B. Caudal bupivacaine vs bupivacaine plus tramadol in post-operative analgesia in children. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2010;8:99-102.

Martinez L, Wilson E, Smith R. Advancing anesthesia practices and improving patient care: The role of hyperbaric levobupivacaine with buprenorphine. J Surg Anesth 2022;32:567-81.

Pavithra V, Ramani M, Bysani P, Srinivas D. Comparison of caudal bupivacaine, bupivacaine with fentanyl and bupivacaine with tramadol administration for post operative analgesia in children. J Anesth Intensive Care Med 2018;6:55568.

Angasa D, Haddis L, Gashaw A, Zemedkun A, Gobena N. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal tramadol added to bupivacaine compared to bupivacaine alone for pediatric elective infra umbilical surgery at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia, a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg Open 2020;27:32-8.

Published

07-12-2023

How to Cite

AYUSHEE KHANDELWAL, RASHMI GUPTA, and SURESH PANDEY. “COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE VERSUS BUPIVACAINE PLUS TRAMADOL FOR PEDIATRIC INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES: A STUDY ON POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 12, Dec. 2023, pp. 104-8, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.48734.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)