SENSITIVITY OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AS A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL IN DIFFERENTIATING NECK MASSES INTO BENIGN AND MALIGNANT LESIONS

MRUDULA VANDANA; VENKATESWAR RAO SRIRAMANENI; Venkat Narayana Goutham Valapala

doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i2.49106

Authors

MRUDULA VANDANA Department of Radiodiagnosis, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
VENKATESWAR RAO SRIRAMANENI Department Of Radiodiagnosis, Alluri Sitaramaraju Academy of Medical Sciences, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Venkat Narayana Goutham Valapala Department Of General Medicine, GITAM Institute Of Medical Sciences and Research, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-0780

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i2.49106

Keywords:

Computed tomography, Neck masses, Neck spaces, Benign, Malignant

Abstract

Objective: Neck masses have a diverse clinical profile that necessitates multimodality evaluation. Hence, the present study aids the use of computed tomography (CT) in identifying various structures in the neck, which are split into multiple regions by the cervical fascia.

Methods: This multi-centric study was conducted at two tertiary care centers. Sixty patients were studied who were referred to the radiodiagnosis department for evaluation. In the present study, CT findings were correlated with pathological findings.

Results: The results revealed that the sensitivity of CT in diagnosing and differentiating the neck mass was 86.3% and a positive predictive value of 100%, with a negative predictive value of 95.1%. Cross-sectional imaging of the CT of the neck provides detailed three-dimensional visualization of the masses and their relationship with adjacent blood vessels, glands, fascia, muscles, and neck spaces. The posterior extension of the lesion is better assessed by CT and surpasses ultrasonography.

Conclusion: Bony involvement, either by a primary bony lesion or a direct invasion by the neck mass, can be better evaluated because of the differential attenuation values in CT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pynnonen MA, Gillespie MB, Roman B, Rosenfeld RM, Tunkel DE, Bontempo L, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Evaluation of the neck mass in adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;157 Suppl 2:S1-30.

Cunqueiro A, Gomes WA, Lee P, Dym RJ, Scheinfeld MH. CT of the neck: Image Analysis and reporting in the emergency setting. Radiographics 2019;39:1760-81.

Kalender WA. Principles and applications of spiral CT. Nucl Med Biol 1994;21:693-9.

Lee JK, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP, editors. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006.

Haynes J, Arnold KR, Aguirre-Oskins C, Chandra S. Evaluation of neck masses in adults. Am Fam Physician 2015;91:698-706.

Mancuso AA, Dillon WP. The neck. Radiol Clin North Am 1989;27:407-34.

Anderson JC, Homan JA. Radiographic correlation with neck anatomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:311-9.

Rouviere H. Lymphatic System of the Head and Neck. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards; 1983.

Kelly HR, Curtin HD. Chapter 2 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck-imaging evaluation of regional lymph nodes and implications for management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2017;38:466-78.

Seoane J, Takkouche B, Varela-Centelles P, Tomás I, Seoane- Romero JM. Impact of delay in diagnosis on survival to head and neck carcinomas: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;37:99-106.

Yousem DM. Suprahyoid spaces of the head and neck. Semin Roentgenol 2000;35:63-71.

Smith MM, Heubi CH. Infections of the neck and pharynx in children. Curr Treat Options Pediatr 2018;4:211-20.

Ali SA, Kovatch KJ, Smith J, Bellile EL, Hanks JE, Truesdale CM, et al. Predictors of intratonsillar versus peritonsillar abscess: A case-control series. Laryngoscope 2019;129:1354-9.

Gamss C, Gupta A, Chazen JL, Phillips CD. Imaging evaluation of the suprahyoid neck. Radiol Clin North Am 2015;53:133-44.

Gupta A, Chazen JL, Philips CD. Imaging evaluation of the parapharyngeal space. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012;45:1223-32.

Kimura Y, Sumi M, Sumi T, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Nakamura T. Deep extension from carcinoma arising from the gingiva: CT and MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:468-72.

Neves F, Huwart L, Jourdan G, Reizine D, Herman P, Vicaut E, et al. Head and neck paragangliomas: Value of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:883-9.

Ferré JC, Brunet JF, Carsin-Nicol B, Larralde A, Godey B, Gauvrit JY. Optimized time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T: Appreciating the feasibility of assessing cervical paragangliomas. J Neuroradiol 2010;37:104-8.

Semaan MT, Megerian CA. Current assessment and management of glomus tumors. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;16:420-6.

Sira J, Makura ZG. Differential diagnosis of cystic neck lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:409-13.

Yedla N, Pirela D, Manzano A, Tuda C, Lo Presti S. Thyroid abscess: challenges in diagnosis and management. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2018;6:2324709618778709.

Lee SH, Yun SJ, Kim DH, Jo HH, Ryu S. Do we need a change in ED diagnostic strategy for adult acute epiglottitis? Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:1519-24.