COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE SODIUM IN FACILITATION OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION

Authors

  • MEKALA APPARAO Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
  • RONTALA SARAIAH Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
  • KOTA RAJU Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
  • ADDULA ARPITHA REDDY Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i10.49505

Keywords:

Better ease of insertion, Propofol., Thiopentone, Laryngeal mask airway

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to compare the conditions to facilitate the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with the two most commonly used agents – thiopentone and propofol, after adequate pre-medication with midazolam and fentanyl.

Methods: It is prospective randomized study conducted on 70 patients of either sex, belonging to 20–60 years of age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II who were admitted to elective minor surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients in both the groups received pre-induction doses of glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg), midazolam (0.04 mg/kg), and fentanyl (2 mcg/kg) and were induced with either propofol (2 mg/kg) or thiopentone (5 mg/kg), to facilitate insertion of LMA. The parameters were studied and were conditions for insertion, time taken, hemodynamic changes during insertion of LMA, and immediately thereafter.

Results: Conditions for insertion, ease of insertion was significantly greater in propofol group when compared to thiopentone group. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were compared between the 2 groups. It was observed that there was a fall in all these parameters in both groups, but it was more pronounced in the propofol group. Although this was statistically extremely significant (p<0.001), it was not clinically significant.

Conclusion: It was concluded that, due to better ease of insertion, lesser time taken for insertion, and better recovery profiles observed with propofol, it seemed to be slightly superior to thiopentone as an induction agent for insertion of the LMA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mandal SK, Nandi MG, Ghosh S, Ray MK. A comparative study between intravenous propofol and an equipotent dose of thiopentone for the incidence of sore throat after Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion. J Med Sci Clin Res 2019;7:888-93.

Dorsch J, Dorsch SE. Laryngeal Mask Airways. Understanding Anaesthesia Equipment. 4th ed. United States: Williams & Wilkins;1994. p. 463-502.

Namrata JG, Parikh GP. Midazolam or mini-dose succinylcholine as aco-induction agent to aid laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol Anaesthesia. Int Res J Med Sci 2015;4:62-8.

Jarineshin H, Kashani S, Vatankhah M, Abdulahzade Baghaee AA, Sattari S, Fekrat F. Better hemodynamic profile of laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015;17:e28615. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.28615

Sengupta J, Sengupta M, Nag T. Agents for facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion: A comparative study between thiopentone sodium and propofol. Ann Afr Med 2014;13:124-9. doi: 10.4103/1596- 3519.134405, PMID 24923372

Kumar R, Jajee PR. A comparative study between propofol and thiopentone with lignocaine spray for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2012;3:172-6.

Chavan SG, Mandhyan S, Gujar SH, Shinde GP. Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion and pressor response in patients undergoing gynecological procedures. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017;33:97-101. doi: 10.4103/joacp. JOACP_313_15, PMID 28413280

Khatoon SN, Tipu MR, Hasan S, Billah KB, Chowdhury GA, Alam AS. A comparative study of smooth insertion of laryngeal mask airway with propofol and thiopentone combined with midazolam. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J 2018;17:38-41. doi: 10.3329/cmoshmcj.v17i1.39441

Amr YM, Amin SM. Comparison of two regimes of thiopental and propofol for I-gel supraglottic airway device insertion. Anesth Essays Res 2010;4:25-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.69302, PMID 25885083, PMCID PMC4173335

Dwivedi MB, Nagrale M, Dwivedi S, Singh H. What happens to the hemodynamic responses for laryngeal mask airway insertion when we supplement propofol with butorphanol or fentanyl for induction of anesthesia: A comparative assessment and critical review. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2016;6:40-4. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.177369, PMID 27051621

Gurjar SS, Babita, Sharma KK, Raju RB, Karnawat R. Comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion: A randomized control trial. Glob Anesth Perioper Med 2016;2:147-51. doi: 10.15761/GAPM.1000139

Gupta BK, Acharya G, Arora KK. A comparative study of ease of insertion of laryngeal mask airway with propofol and thiopentone with lignocaine spray. Int J Contemp Med Res 2019;6:35-8. doi: 10.21276/ ijcmr.2019.6.3.59

Saloi DK, Bharali P, Das I, Basumatary J, Mahanta P. To compare the intravenous bolus dose of propofol with an equipotent dose of intravenous thiopentone for the facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion. Cureus 2022;14:e31917. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31917, PMID 36579208

Gunjan, Dey S. A comparative study between intravenous propofol and an equipotent dose of thiopentone for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2018;17:65-76.

Basunia SR, Mukherjee K, Dutta SS, Biswas SK, Ray S, Mandal P, et al. A comparative evaluation of midazolam-thiopentone with propofol on laryngeal mask airway insertion condition. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2014;3:10643-51. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2014/3386

Gunaseelan S, Prabu RK. Comparison of two doses of succinylcholine to facilitate the laryngeal mask airway insertion under propofol anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective minor surgical procedures. Asian J Med Sci 2017;8:21-6. doi: 10.3126/ajms.v8i4.17079

Thiopental 500mg Powder for Solution for Injection; 2021. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/9376/smpc [Last accessed on 2021 Dec 31].

Gudivada KK, Jonnavithula N, Pasupuleti SL, Apparasu CP, Ayya SS, Ramachandran G. Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017;33:342-7. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_100_16, PMID 29109633

Shetabi H, Montazeri K, Ghoodjani Y. A comparative study of the effect of anesthesia induction with the use of four drug combinations including “propofol,” “etomidate-propofol,” “thiopental,” and “midazolam-thiopental” on hemodynamic changes during the insertion of laryngeal mask in eye surgery. Adv Biomed Res 2022;11:11. doi: 10.4103/abr. abr_152_20, PMID 35386541

Moosavi Tekye SM, Pashang SM. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of etomidate versus propofol, Rapid Sequence Intubation, on none surgical patients. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci 2014;57:602-8.

Published

07-10-2023

How to Cite

APPARAO, M., R. SARAIAH, K. RAJU, and A. ARPITHA REDDY. “COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE SODIUM IN FACILITATION OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 10, Oct. 2023, pp. 171-5, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i10.49505.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)