PREVALENCE OF GENERALIZED LIGAMENT LAXITY IN ADULT INDIAN POPULATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE

TUSHAR GOGIA; TIRTHANKAR DASGUPTA; ARAVIND RAJAN; IRFAN KHAN; PAWAN KUMAR KAJAL; AJIT KUMAR MISHRA

doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.49933

Authors

TUSHAR GOGIA epartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India.
TIRTHANKAR DASGUPTA epartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India.
ARAVIND RAJAN epartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India.
IRFAN KHAN Department of Orthopaedics, Military Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
PAWAN KUMAR KAJAL epartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India.
AJIT KUMAR MISHRA epartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.49933

Keywords:

Generalized ligament laxity, Prevalence study, Beighton’s score, Joint laxity

Abstract

Objective: Generalized ligament laxity (GLL) is defined as increased range of motion across multiple joints in an individual. Its prevalence has been reported to be between 5% and 15%. Although there has been implication of increased prevalence in Indian population, there are relatively few studies related to the prevalence of GLL in adult Indian population. There is also a dearth of literature on, which specialty outpatient department (OPD), these patients commonly present to, with their complaints. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of GLL in adult Indian population.

Methods: 5400 patients were selected from various OPDs of a tertiary care hospital after informed consent. After stratification for age and sex, Beighton’s score assessment was done.

Results: Using the Beighton’s score of four or more, to assess the prevalence of generalized ligament laxity, a total of 735 (13.61%) participants had GLL in the entire study population of 5400. Significantly higher number of patients were found to have GLL from the sample recruited from orthopedic OPD (p=0.013) as compared to other OPDs. The highest Beighton’s score was 8/9, recorded in a 29-year female in the orthopedic OPD. It was observed that in all OPDs, the mean Beighton’s scores were higher in female than in male participants in each subgroup; also, there was a decline in mean scores with increase in age in all OPDs which can be inferred as a decrease in GLL with age.

Conclusion: This study is the largest Indian study to investigate the prevalence of GLL in the adult population in India. The study found that there was a significant prevalence of GLL in the adult population especially in females compared to males in all ages, though prevalence of GLL reduced with age. This study has implications of prevention of injuries in people with GLL. Although orthopedic surgeons generally primarily manage the people with GLL, they do not have a high index of suspicion toward the same. Identifying these individuals and making a diagnosis regarding the same is problematic but doing so will help these individuals live a pain-free life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bird HA. Joint hypermobility in children. Rheumatol (Oxf Engl) 2005;44:703-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh639, PMID 15827037

Juul-Kristensen B, Røgind H, Jensen DV, Remvig L. Inter-examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Rheumatol (Oxf Engl) 2007;46:1835-41. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem290, PMID 18006569

Kobayasi T. Dermal elastic fibres in the inherited hypermobile disorders. J Dermatol Sci 2006;41:175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.10.002, PMID 16326076

Clinch J, Deere K, Sayers A, Palmer S, Riddoch C, Tobias JH, et al. Epidemiology of generalized joint laxity (hypermobility) in fourteen-year-old children from the UK: A population-based evaluation. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:2819-27. doi: 10.1002/art.30435, PMID 21547894

Junge T, Henriksen P, Hansen S, Østengaard L, Golightly YM, Juul-Kristensen B. Generalised joint hypermobility and knee joint hypermobility: Prevalence, knee joint symptoms and health-related quality of life in a Danish adult population. Int J Rheum Dis 2019;22:288-96. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13205, PMID 29076645

Kumar A, Wadhwa S, Acharya P, Seth S, Khokhar S, Singh R, et al. Benign joint hypermobility syndrome: A hospital-based study from northern India. Indian J Rheumatol 2006;1:8-12. doi: 10.1016/S0973- 3698(10)60515-8

Mullick G, Bhakuni DS, Shanmuganandan K, Garg MK, Vasdev V, Kartik S, et al. Clinical profile of benign joint hypermobility syndrome from a tertiary care military hospital in India. Int J Rheum Dis 2013;16:590-4. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.12024, PMID 24164848

Hootman JM, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL, Martin M, Blair SN. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries among sedentary and physically active adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:838-44. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200205000-00017, PMID 11984303

Krivickas LS, Feinberg JH. Lower extremity injuries in college athletes: Relation between ligamentous laxity and lower extremity muscle tightness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1139-43. doi: 10.1016/ s0003-9993(96)90137-9, PMID 8931525

Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 1973;32:413-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.32.5.413, PMID 4751776

Carter C, Wilkinson J. Persistent joint laxity and congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964;46:40-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.46B1.40, PMID 14126235

Remvig L, Flycht L, Christensen KB, Juul-Kristensen B. Lack of consensus on tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: Hypermobile type and joint hypermobility syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2014;164A:591-6. doi: 10.1002/ ajmg.a.36402, PMID 24464988

Vallis A, Wray A, Smith T. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the Beighton score compared to the Contompasis score to assess generalised joint hypermobility. Myopain 2015;23:21-7. doi: 10.3109/10582452.2016.1140255.

Murray KJ. Hypermobility disorders in children and adolescents. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20:329-51. doi: 10.1016/j. berh.2005.12.003, PMID 16546060

Hakim AJ, Cherkas LF, Grahame R, Spector TD, MacGregor AJ. The genetic epidemiology of joint hypermobility: A population study of female twins. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2640-4. doi: 10.1002/art.20376, PMID 15334479

Russek LN, Errico DM. Prevalence, injury rate and, symptom frequency in generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome in a “healthy” college population. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1029-39. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-2951-9, PMID 25930211

Al-Jarallah K, Shehab D, Al-Jaser MT, Al-Azemi KM, Wais FF, Al-Saleh AM, et al. Prevalence of joint hypermobility in Kuwait. Int J Rheum Dis 2017;20:935-40. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12556, PMID 25529052

Grahame R, Jenkins JM. Joint hypermobility-asset or liability? A study of joint mobility in ballet dancers. Ann Rheum Dis 1972;31:109-11. doi: 10.1136/ard.31.2.109, PMID 5016858

Tingle A, Bennett O, Wallis A, Palmer S. The links between generalized joint laxity and the incidence, prevalence and severity of limb injuries related to physical exercise: A systematic literature review. Phys Ther Rev 2018;23:259-72. doi: 10.1080/10833196.2018.1481626

Ramesh R, Von Arx O, Azzopardi T, Schranz PJ. The risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture with generalised joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:800-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15833, PMID 15911662

Rünow A. The dislocating patella. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:1-53. doi: 10.3109/17453678309154170