EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER ELECTIVE COLO-RECTAL SURGERY USING DUTCH LEAKAGE SCORE – A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • SUJIT KUMAR MOHANTY Department of General Surgery, S.C.B MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  • SHUSHRUTA MOHANTY Department of Pathology, M.K.C.G Medical College, Berhampur, Odisha, India
  • ASHIS KUMAR SUKLA Department of FMT, M.K.C.G Medical College, Berhampur, Odisha, India.
  • SANJAYA KUMAR SAHOO Department of Community Medicine, DDMCH, Keonjhar, Odisha, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-4849
  • IPSITA SAHOO Department of General Surgery, Fakir Mohan MCH, Balasore, Odisha, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.49967

Keywords:

Colorectal surgery, Intestinal anastomosis, Anastomotic leak, Dutch Leakage Score

Abstract

Objective: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after colorectal surgery, with reported incidence of 2–7%. To limit the clinical consequences, it should be detected and treated as soon as possible. Leak usually becomes apparent between 5 and 7 days postoperatively. A standardized post-operative score, Dutch Leakage Score (DLS) can be a useful clinical tool to reduce delay in diagnosis of anastomotic leak (AL) and reduce mortality. A score of <4 was considered negative while a score of 4 or more was considered positive.

Methods: Total 110 patients were enrolled after written informed consent during March 2021–October 2022 at a tertiary care hospital in Odisha. DLS was measured before surgery and on POD2, POD3, and POD6.

Results: Among the 110 patients, the AL rate was 16.4%. With respect to AL, DLS cutoff of 2.5 on POD2 had positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.10% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.70%. DLS cutoff of 4.0 on POD3 had a PPV of 80.90% and a NPV 98.90%. DLS cutoff of 3.0 on POD6 had a PPV of 84.20% and a NPV of 96.70%.The most common day of AL was the fifth P.O.D (in seven patients) followed by sixth P.O.D (in five patients).

Conclusion: DLS is a good positive and excellent negative predictor of AL. DLS is an easy bedside assessment to gauge the likelihood of AL in the early post-operative period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

SUJIT KUMAR MOHANTY, Department of General Surgery, S.C.B MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY,

S.C.B MCH,CUTTACK,ODISHA

SHUSHRUTA MOHANTY, Department of Pathology, M.K.C.G Medical College, Berhampur, Odisha, India

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY,

M.K.C.G MEDICAL COLLEGE,BERHAMPUR,ODISHA

ASHIS KUMAR SUKLA, Department of FMT, M.K.C.G Medical College, Berhampur, Odisha, India.

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF FMT,

M.K.C.G MEDICAL COLLEGE,BERHAMPUR,ODISHA

SANJAYA KUMAR SAHOO, Department of Community Medicine, DDMCH, Keonjhar, Odisha, India.

Assistant Professor,

Department of Community Medicine,

DDMCH,KEONJHAR,ODISHA

IPSITA SAHOO, Department of General Surgery, Fakir Mohan MCH, Balasore, Odisha, India.

SENIOR RESIDENT,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY,

FAKIR MOHAN MCH,BALASORE,ODISHA

References

Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson AR, Stitz R, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: A single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg 2011;35:186-95. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7, PMID 20972678

Phillips B. Reducing gastrointestinal anastomotic leak rates: Review of challenges and solutions. Open Access Surg 2016;5:5-14. doi: 10.2147/ OAS.S54936

Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4, PMID 15789125

Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011;253:890-9. doi: 10.1097/ SLA.0b013e3182128929, PMID 21394013

Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ. Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:865-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2004.06.026, PMID 15494283

Boushey R, Williams LJ. Management of Anastomotic Complications of Colorectal Surgery; 2018. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/ contents/management-of-anastomoticcomplications-of-colorectal-surgery

Slieker JC, Komen N, Mannaerts GH, Karsten TM, Willemsen P, Murawska M, et al. Long-term and perioperative corticosteroids in anastomotic leakage: A prospective study of 259 left-sided colorectal anastomoses. Arch Surg 2012;147:52. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1690, PMID 22249852

Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: Risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.015, PMID 19228539

Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: It’s later than you think. Ann Surg 2007;245:254-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85, PMID 17245179

Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001;88:1157-68. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x, PMID 11531861

Russ A, Kennedy GD. Postoperative complications. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Read TE, Saclarides TJ, Senagore AJ, Whitlow CB, editors. ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 121-40.

Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01002.x, PMID 17181849

Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: A proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery 2010;147:339-51. doi: 10.1016/j. surg.2009.10.012, PMID 20004450

van Helsdingen CP, Jongen AC, de Jonge WJ, Bouvy ND, Derikx JP. Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:3293-303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293, PMID 32684743

den Dulk M, Witvliet MJ, Kortram K, Neijenhuis PA, de Hingh IH, Engel AF, et al. The DULK (Dutch leakage) and modified DULK score compared: Actively seek the leak. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:e528-33. doi: 10.1111/codi.12379, PMID 24199233

Benedetti M, Ciano P, Pergolini I, Ciotti S, Guercioni G, Ruffo G, et al. Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein: study protocol of a prospective multicentre observational study by the Italian ColoRectal anastomotic Leakage (iC. G Chir 2019;40:20-5. PMID 30771794

Barker-Antonio A, Jarquin-Arremilla A, Cruz EH, Garcia-Manzano RA, Davila-Ruiz EO. Validation of the Dutch leakage score as a predictor of anastomotic leakage in intestinal surgery in a third level hospital. Int J Res Med Sci 2021;9:3251-5. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20214406

Published

07-12-2023

How to Cite

MOHANTY, S. K., S. MOHANTY, A. K. SUKLA, S. K. SAHOO, and I. SAHOO. “EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER ELECTIVE COLO-RECTAL SURGERY USING DUTCH LEAKAGE SCORE – A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 12, Dec. 2023, pp. 58-61, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i12.49967.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)