COMPARISON AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SINGLE-BUNDLE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION ALONE WITH LATERAL EXTRA-ARTICULAR TENODESIS AS AN ADJUNCT TO ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENTRE CONSTRUCTION IN ANTEROLATERAL INSTABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i1.50227Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Lateral extra-articular tenodesis, International knee documentation committeeAbstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcome of ACLR alone, with patients who underwent ACLR with LET.ACL injuries rarely occur in isolation, and associated meniscal, chondral, and ligamentous lesions all influence the outcome of treatment
Materials and methods: This prospective study conducted in 30 patients with ACL deficient knee with high grade pivot (grade-II &grade-III) Skeletally mature to 56 years of age , 2 or more of: competitive pivoting sport, Chronic ACL insufficiency, Revision ACLR and Generalized ligament laxity - Beighton score of 4 greater.
Results: A total of 30 patients were evaluated in this study.15 cases were operated for ACLR and 15 cases for ACLR + LET. Most of the patients were in the age group of 21-30 with all male gender indicating ACL injuries are common in young males with history of road traffic accident (63.33%) at the time of injury. The mean operating time in our study (also the total tourniquet time) was 110 minutes (range 100 - 130 minutes). Instability was controlled well in ACLR + LET group .Two patients in ACLR+LET group have complained of instability episodes. Preoperatively, Grade 2 pivot shift was observed in 80% in control and 33.33% in other group. Grade 3 pivot shift on examination was found in 20% in control group and 66.66% in experimental group. Post-surgery patients who received ACLR alone had Grade 1 pivot in 60% , Grade 2 in 33.33% and Grade 3 in 6.67%. Combined group (ACLR+LET) had grade 1 in 33.33, Grade 2 in 60% and Grade 3 pivot in 66.66%. Regarding preoperative IKDC scores, patients treated with ACLR alone had 26.66% below 45, 40% between 45-55, 6.66% in 60-70,70-80 and in patients treated with both ACLR+LET had 6.66% in 40-50, 20% in 50-60,46.66% in 60-70, 26.66% in 70-80 before surgery. Post-surgery, patients in both groups had excellent scores (90-100 IKDC score).
Conclusions: The combination of LET and intra-articular ACLR is effective in eliminating the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon. Adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis can improve patient outcome without the need for future revision ACL surgery and its obligatory intense postoperative rehabilitation, in moderately active patients.
Downloads
References
Miller RH 3rd, Azar FM. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 12th ed., Vol. 2133. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2013.
Paschos NK, Howell SM. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Principles of treatment. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:398-408. doi: 10.1302/ 2058-5241.1.160032, PMID 28461919
Ayeni OR, Chahal M, Tran MN, Sprague S. Pivot shift as anoutcome measure for ACL reconstruction: A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:767-77. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011- 1860-y, PMID 22218828
Inderhaug E, Stephen JM, Williams A, Amis AA. Anterolateraltenodesisor anterolateral ligament complex reconstruction: Effect of flexion angle at graft fixation when combined with ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:3089-97. doi: 10.1177/0363546517724422, PMID 28898106
Tsujii A, Yonetani Y, Kinugasa K, Matsuo T, Yoneda K, Ohori T, et al. Outcomes more than 2 years after meniscal repair for longitudinal tears of the lateral meniscus combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2021;49:684-92. doi: 10.1177/0363546520981976, PMID 33449798
Jagadeesh N, Dhawan T, Sheik F, Shivalingappa V. Does hamstring graft size affect functional outcome and incidence of revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction? Cureus 2022;14:e21158. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21158, PMID 35165608
Nomura Y, Kuramochi R, Fukubayashi T. Evaluation of hamstring muscle strength and morphology after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015;25:301-7. doi: 10.1111/ sms.12205, PMID 24646218
Baron JE, Shamrock AG, Cates WT, Cates RA, An Q, Wolf BR, et al. Graft preparation with intraoperative vancomycin decreases infection after ACL reconstruction: A review of 1,640 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:2187-93.
Song GY, Hong L, Zhang H, Zhang J, Li Y, Feng H. Clinical outcomes of combined lateral extra-articular tenodesis and intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in addressing high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon. Arthroscopy 2016;32:898-905. doi: 10.1016/j. arthro.2015.08.038, PMID 26524939
Hewison CE, Tran MN, Kaniki N, Remtulla A, Bryant D, Getgood AM. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces rotational laxity when combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of the literature. Arthroscopy 2015;31:2022-34. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.089, PMID 26116497
Rezende FC, de Moraes VY, Martimbianco AL, Luzo MV, da Silveira Franciozi CE, Belloti JC. Does combined intra- and extraarticular ACL reconstruction improve function and stability? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:2609-18. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4285-y, PMID 25845949
Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Russo A, Takazawa Y, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, et al. ST/G ACL reconstruction: Double strand plus extra-articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008;18:573-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00697.x, PMID 18208432
LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L, Esterberg JL, Tso A. An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: An in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1405-14. doi: 10.1177/0363546503262687 PMID 15310564
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 G.Sri Rama Murthy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.