RISK FACTORS, MATERNAL, AND PERINATAL OUTCOME OF FETAL MACROSOMIA

Authors

  • Sree Sailaja Pidugu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0490-6229
  • MOUNISHA NV BODDEDA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • BALLA SUDHA RANI Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i2.50418

Keywords:

Macrosomia, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Shoulder dystocia

Abstract

Objective: Macrosomia is characterized by a birth weight exceeding 4000 g, regardless of gestational age, or >90th percentile for gestational age. This condition is linked to significant risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Globally, the prevalence of infants weighing ≥4000 g is estimated to be 9%. Various risk factors contribute to the development of fetal macrosomia, including a high pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), excessive weight gain during the antenatal period, high parity, male gender of the fetus, prolonged pregnancy, and maternal diabetes mellitus.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at GIMSR Teaching Hospital, over a 5-year period from May 2018 to May 2023. The study encompassed all singleton pregnancies with a birth weight equal to or exceeding 4000 g, irrespective of the delivery method. Maternal and neonatal records for the study population were systematically collected, and data were documented.

Results: Throughout the study duration, there were 167 cases where the birth weight equalled or exceeded 4,000 g. Most common maternal complication was prolonged labor and postpartum hemorrhage. Shoulder dystocia was seen in 2.9% of all deliveries and 10.8% of all vaginal deliveries. Most common neonatal complication was hypoglycemia.

Conclusion: The prevalence of macrosomia in our study was 3.86%. Main risk factors identified in our study were male gender, pre pregnancy BMI >25, previous macrosomic births, and excessive weight gain during pregnancy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sree Sailaja Pidugu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GITAM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology

References

Ng SK, Olog A, Spinks AB, Cameron CM, Searle J, McClure RJ. Risk factors and obstetric complications of large for gestational age births with adjustments for community effects: Results from a new cohort study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:460. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10- 460, PMID 20687966

Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann EF, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:332-46. doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2004.12.020, PMID 16098852

Frederick IO, Williams MA, Sales AE, Martin DP, Killien M. Pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and other maternal characteristics in relation to infant birth weight. Matern Child Health J 2008;12:557-67. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0276-2, PMID 17713848

Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M. Macrosomic births in the united states: Determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1372-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.302, PMID 12748514

Adesina OA, Olayemi O. Fetal macrosomia at the university college hospital, Ibadan: A 3-year review. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;23:30-3. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000043182, PMID 12623478

Siggelkow W, Boehm D, Skala C, Grosslercher M, Schmidt M, Koelbl H. The influence of macrosomia on the duration of labor, the mode of delivery and intrapartum complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278:547-53. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0630-7, PMID 18379807

Bjørstad AR, Irgens-Hansen K, Daltveit AK, Irgens LM. Macrosomia: Mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:664-9. doi: 10.3109/00016341003686099, PMID 20235897

Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ. Macrosomia-- maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:158-61. PMID 4022478

Groenendaal F, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Hypoglycaemia and seizures in large-for-gestational-age (LGA) full-term neonates. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:874-6. doi: 10.1080/08035250500544948, PMID 16801190

Chiavaroli V, Giannini C, D’Adamo E, De Giorgis T, Chiarelli F, Mohn A. Insulin resistance and oxidative stress in children born small and large for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009;124:695-702. doi: 10.1542/ peds.2008-3056, PMID 19651586

Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, Escobar GJ. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;87:220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.010, PMID 15548393

Abena Obama MT, Shasha VW, Fodjo J. Perinatal outcome of macrosomic births in Port Harcourt. W Afr Med J 1995;14:249-54.

Bergmann RL, Richter R, Bergmann KE, Plagemann A, Brauer M, Dudenhausen JW. Secular trends in neonatal macrosomia in Berlin: influences of potential determinants. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003;17:244-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00496.x, PMID 12839535

Kamanu CI, Onwere S, Chigbu B, Aluka C, Okoro O, Obasi M. Fetal macrosomia in African women: A study of 249 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:857-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0780-7, PMID 19018549

Okun N, Verma A, Mitchell BF, Flowerdew G. Relative importance of maternal constitutional factors and glucose intolerance of pregnancy in the development of newborn macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:285-90. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520- 6661(199709/10)6:5<285:AID-MFM9>3.0.CO;2-C, PMID 9360188

Nkwabong E. Maternal and neonatal complications of macrosomia. Trop Doct 2014;44:201-4. doi: 10.1177/0049475514539479, PMID 24958734

Said AS, Manji KP. Risk factors and outcomes of fetal macrosomia in a tertiary centre in Tanzania: A case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1044-3, PMID 27557930

Fuchs F, Bouyer J, Rozenberg P, Senat MV. Adverse maternal outcomes associated with fetal macrosomia: What are the risk factors beyond birthweight? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-90, PMID 23565692

Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: A study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;111:9-14. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00154-4, PMID 14557004

O’Leary BD, Nolan CE, Ciprike V. Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:959-64. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3797-x, PMID 30377707

Gherman RB. Shoulder dystocia: An evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002;45:345-62. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200206000-00006, PMID 12048394

Aranha A, Malabu UH, Vangaveti V, Reda ES, Tan YM, Sangla KS. Macrosomia in non-gestational diabetes pregnancy: Glucose tolerance test characteristics and feto-maternal complications in tropical Asia Pacific Australia. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014;4:436-40. doi: 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014APJTB-2013-0027, PMID 25182943

Published

07-02-2024

How to Cite

Pidugu, S. S., M. N. BODDEDA, and B. S. RANI. “RISK FACTORS, MATERNAL, AND PERINATAL OUTCOME OF FETAL MACROSOMIA”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 2, Feb. 2024, pp. 80-82, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i2.50418.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)