USE OF STERILE WATER FOR INJECTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Authors

  • PALASH MAZUMDER Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deben Mahata Government Medical College, Purulia, West Bengal, India
  • SWADHA PANDEY Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6223-9678
  • DEBJIT MANDI Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gangarampur Sub Divisional Hospital, West Bengal, India
  • SHYAMALI DUTTA Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-6061

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50495

Keywords:

Pregnancy, Saline solution, Injection subcutaneous, Labor pain, Back pain, Mothers, Prospective studies

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to assess the efficacy of sterile water for injection (SWI) in reducing labor pain, compare it with a saline procedure, and see which one is superior. Parameters assessed were pain relief based on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and duration of labor from intervention to delivery associated with administration of subcutaneous SWI versus normal saline injection (NSI).

Methods: This is a prospective randomized interventional hospital-based comparative study of mothers who were in active labor with back pain and undergoing treatment in the labor room of Eden Hospital, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. The study was conducted on 66 willing pregnant mothers, divided into two groups of 33 each with one injected with normal saline and the other with sterile water.

Results: The NPRS score was almost equal in 2 groups at 15 min, but with an increase in duration, it was seen that the score was low in the sterile water group compared to the normal saline group. The association was statistically significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion: This study hypothesized that subcutaneous SWI for relieving labor pain is better than subcutaneous NSI. Based on this study, it is concluded that both the SWI and NSI reduce labor pain, but the SWI produced a significantly greater reduction of pain as measured by the numeric pain rating score and also better satisfaction. Therefore, SWI is a safe, simple, and cost-effective method and can be used as a pain-relieving method, especially in the absence of other pain-relieving options.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):769-81. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002, PMID 21665125

Simkin P, Klaus P. When Survivors Give Birth: Understanding and Healing the Effects of Early Sexual Abuse on Childbearing Women. Seattle: Classic Day Publishing; 2004. p. 127-56.

Mårtensson L, Wallin G. Sterile water injection as treatment for low-back pain during labour: A review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(4):369-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00856.x, PMID 18837842

Hawkins J, Bucking B. Obstetrical anesthesia. In: Gabbe S, Niebyl J, Simpson J, Landon MB, Galan HL, editors. Obstetrics Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2012. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4377-1935-2.00017-x

Hosseini L, Najar S, Haghighizadeh MH. Effect of subcutaneous injection of isotonic, sterile water, labour pain, type of labour, and satisfaction with pain management in nulliparous women. Hayat J. 2010;16:41-7.

Mårtensson L, Nyberg K, Wallin G. Subcutaneous versus intracutaneous injections of sterile water for labour analgesia: A comparison of perceived pain during administration. BJOG. 2000;107(10):1248-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11615.x, PMID 11028576

Ader L, Hansson B, Wallin G. Parturition pain treated by intracutaneous injections of sterile water. Pain. 1990;41(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/0304- 3959(90)90017-8, PMID 2142271

Bahasadri S, Ahmadi-Abhari S, Dehghani-Nik M, Habibi GR. Subcutaneous sterile water injection for labour pain: A randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(2):102-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00536.x, PMID 16638030

Wiruchpongsanon P. Relief of low back labor pain by using intracutaneous injections of sterile water: A randomized clinical trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(5):571-6. PMID 16756038

Genç Koyucu R, Demirci N, Ender Yumru A, Salman S, Ayanoğlu YT, Tosun Y, et al. Effects of intradermal sterile water injections in women with low back pain in labor: A randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Balk Med J. 2018 Mar;35(2):148-54. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.0879, PMID 29072177

Fogarty V. Intradermal sterile water injections for the relief of low back pain in labour -- a systematic review of the literature. Women Birth. 2008;21(4):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.08.003, PMID 18926789

Trolle B, Moller M, Kronborg H, Thomsen S. The effect of sterile water blocks on low back laborpain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(1):1277-81.

Marzouk T, Abd-Eifttah H, Nabi H. Effect of subcutaneous isotonic, sterile water injection at the lumbosacral region on labour back pain. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2015;5:98-104.

Saxena KN, Nischal H, Batra S. Intracutaneous injections of sterile water over the Secrum for labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53(2):169-73. PMID 20640118

Fouly H, Herdan R, Habib D, Yeh C. Effectiveness of injecting lower dose subcutaneous sterile water versus saline to relief labor back pain: randomized controlled trial. Eur J Midwifery. 2018;2(3):3. doi: 10.18332/ejm/85793, PMID 33537564

Rezaie M, Shaabani S, Jahromi FS, Jahromi ME, Dakhesh S. The effect of subcutaneous and intracutaneous injections of sterile water and normal saline on pain intensity in nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial. Iran J Nurs Midwif Res. 2019 Sep;24(5):365-71. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_87_18, PMID 31516523

Published

07-05-2024

How to Cite

MAZUMDER, P., S. PANDEY, D. MANDI, and S. DUTTA. “USE OF STERILE WATER FOR INJECTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 5, May 2024, pp. 29-32, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50495.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)