EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF HYBRID SIMULATION IN ENHANCING THE LEARNING DOMAINS OF MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.51093Keywords:
Hybrid simulation, Learning domain, Medical undergraduate, PerceptionAbstract
Objectivs: Medical education, crucial for understanding physiological processes and clinical application, faces limitations in traditional methods. Simulation-based training addresses this gap, providing a secure environment for hands-on skill practice. The objectives of the study are to (1) evaluate the impact of simulation on enhancing the learning domains of medical undergraduates and (2) gauge students’ perceptions of simulation based medical education (SBME) through a pre-validated, pre-designed questionnaire.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study, involving 60 medical undergraduates, selected by convenient sampling. The study began after obtaining approval from the Institutional Human Ethics Committee and obtaining informed consent from students. A pre-test was conducted for all 60 students followed by a lecture on simulation and then a post-test. The students were then divided into two groups: Group A – SBME using part-task trainers and standardized patients and Group B – (non-SBME) with video lectures on simulation. After 1 month, an assessment of all domains, namely cognitive, affective, and psychomotor, was done by post-test and objective structured clinical examination, respectively. Perception was obtained using the pre-validated questionnaire.
Results: The assessment scores of all domains of Group A (SBME) showed significant improvement p<0.05 except cognitive domain.
Conclusion: SBME is an effective teaching method for improving the learning domains of medical undergraduates.
Downloads
References
Wang S, Ren X, Ye J, Wang W, Huang H, Qin C. Exploration of simulation-based medical education for undergraduate students. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 1;100(20):e25982. doi: 10.1097/ MD.0000000000025982, PMID 34011088
Bearman M, Nestel D, Andreatta P. Simulation-based medical education. In: Oxford Textbook of Medical Education. Oxford, UK: Oxford Academic; 2013.
Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2010 Jan-Apr;17(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/1319- 1683.68787, PMID 22022669
Stelfox HT, Palmisani S, Scurlock C, Orav EJ, Bates DW. The “To Err is Human” report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):174-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.017947, PMID 16751466
Liang K, Ng G, Lim G, Teo W, Bui D. Hybrid simulation versus high-fidelity simulation for lumbar puncture training: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1.
Fernandez R, Vozenilek JA, Hegarty CB. Hybrid simulation in medical education: A review of the evidence. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:33-43.
Bui D, Teo W, Ng G, Liang K, Lim G. Hybrid simulation-based training improves confidence and competence in managing cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):1-8.
Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. The 3D printing of anatomical models for physical hybrid simulation. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(2):238-42.
Brown WJ, Tortorella RA. Hybrid medical simulation - a systematic literature review. Smart Learn Environ. 2020;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/ s40561-020-00127-6
Scalese RJ, Obeso VT, Issenberg SB. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(Suppl 1):46-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0283-4, PMID 18095044
Goolsby C, Deering S. Hybrid simulation during military medical student field training-a novel curriculum. Mil Med. 2013;178(7):742-5.
Oh PJ, Jeon KD, Koh MS. The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(5):e6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.019, PMID 25680831
Rogers GD, Mey A, Chan PC. Development of a phenomenologically derived method to assess affective learning in student journals following impactive educational experiences. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1372566, PMID 28933577
Tolarba JE. Virtual simulation in nursing education: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Educ. 2021;13(3):48-54. doi: 10.37506/ijone.v13i3.16310
Kim J, Park JH, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: A meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:152. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7, PMID 27215280
Hautz WE, Schröder T, Dannenberg KA, März M, Hölzer H, Ahlers O, et al. Shame in medical education: A randomized study of the acquisition of intimate examination skills and its effect on subsequent performance. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(2):196-206. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1254636, PMID 28051893
Mankute A, Juozapaviciene L, Stucinskas J, Dambrauskas Z, Dobozinskas P, Sinz E, et al. A novel algorithm-driven hybrid simulation learning method to improve acquisition of endotracheal intubation skills: A randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01557-6, PMID 35135495, PMCID PMC8822842
Goolsby CA, Goodwin TL, Vest RM. Hybrid simulation improves medical student procedural confidence during EM clerkship. Mil Med. 2014 Nov;179(11):1223-7. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00072, PMID 25373045
Ross JG. Simulation and psychomotor skill acquisition: A review of the literature. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012;8(9):e429-35.
Torres A, Horodeńska M, Witkowski G, Bielecki T, Torres K. High-fidelity hybrid simulation: A novel approach to teaching pediatric and adolescent gynecology. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Apr;32(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.12.001, PMID 30529700
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 REGINA ROY, INDLA RAVI, THANGAM. C
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.