MANAGEMENT OF PAEDIATRIC EPIPHORA AND ITS SUCCESS RATE IN A TERTIARY EYE CARE CENTRE

Authors

Keywords:

Epiphora, Congenital nasolacrimal duct, Lacrimal sac massage, Probing, Intubation DCR

Abstract

Objective: To assess the children under 5years of age presenting with epiphora and to institute proper treatment with regular follow-up to get an overview of treatment success.

Materials & Methods: A prospective & non-randomized study was conducted on 518 eyes of 353patients 165(B/L) and 188 (U/L) that presented to us between April 2014- April 2015.Informed consent was taken from parents. Institutional Ethical Committee approval was taken. The patients were followed up for quarterly for 1st year to look for resolution of signs & symptoms and if required quarterly till the resolution of disease. Statistical analysis was done by using Chi-square & Fisher’s exact test to test the difference in proportions. P<0.05 was denoted as statistically significant.

Result: Congenital NLDO was the most common cause of childhood epiphora-76% (394/518) followed by trauma(iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic) seen in 18%(93/518),acquired NLDO in 4%(21/518)and punctual causes 2%(10/518). The overall treatment success rate was 82%. Individual success rate: Sac Massage: 85.9%, Probing: 73.95%, Dacryocystorhinostomy(DCR): 72%, Punctum Surgery: 100%.Though with increasing age, success rate of massage and probing reduced.

Conclusion: Sac massage is best treatment in children till 1year of age and probing is very effective till 3 years of age. Thus early treatment prevents further chances of surgical intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dr. MITA SAHA DUTTA

Associate Professor,  Department of Ophthalmology

 

References

Piest KL, Katowitz JA.Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Ophthalmol Clin North Am.1991; 4:201-9.[Google Scholar]

Guerry D,3rd,Kendig EL.,Jr Congenital impotency of the nasolacrimal duct.Arch Ophthal.1948;39:193-204[Pubmed]

Duke Elder S System of Ophthalmology Embryology Part1.Vol3.London:Henry Kimpton;1963:pp.241-5 [Google Scholar]

Michael A.Kipp,MD;Richard C.Allen,MD,PhD.Congenital NLDO.Oculofacial Plastic Surgery Education Center.Education Center:www.aao.org

Adnan Aslam Saleem(April 30th 2019).Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and the Visual System,Frontiers in Ophthalmology and Ocular Imaging,Alireza Ziaei,IntechOpen,DOI:10.5772/intechopen.82546.

Casady DR,Meyer DR,Simon JW,et al.Stepwise Treatment Paradigm for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction,DOI:10/1097/01.iop.0000225750.25592.7f

Kumar K,Dubey A,Borasi S,&Som V.(2018)Congenital Dacryocystitis-Clinical Profile and Outcome.Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology,3(3),21-26.https://doi.org/10.17511/jooo.2018.i03.03

Honovar SG, Prakash VE, Rao GN, Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction in older children Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 180:42-8

Mac Ewen CJ, young JD Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye (Lond) 1991; 5 : 596-600

Published

25-06-2024

How to Cite

Dr, KUSUM KUMARI PRASAD, Dr. SUDESHNA ROY, Dr. MITA SAHA DUTTA, and Dr DEBALINA GHANTA. “MANAGEMENT OF PAEDIATRIC EPIPHORA AND ITS SUCCESS RATE IN A TERTIARY EYE CARE CENTRE”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 8, June 2024, https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ajpcr/article/view/51404.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)