A STUDY ON CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL PROFILE AND OUTCOME OF GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATIONS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • SANJAY D DAKHORE Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Gondia, Maharashtra, India
  • SAHAN M S Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, SG PGI, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • VIDHEY TIRPURDE Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Gondia, Maharashtra, India
  • SHILPA PANDE Department of Radiodiagnosis, AIIMS, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • SUNIL B WANKHADE Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Gondia, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51780

Keywords:

Gastrointestinal perforation, Abdominal pain, Operative interventions, Outcome

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of the study are as follows:

(1) To study the clinicopathological profile and outcome of gastrointestinal (GI) perforations. (2) To study the incidence, demographics, etiology, clinical features, management techniques, and factors influencing outcomes in cases of GI perforations.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the Department of General Surgery in a tertiary care center in central India. One hundred and twenty cases of GI perforation were included in this study. Demographic data, detailed medical history, and present complaints were recorded for each patient. Clinical features were assessed by thorough physical and systemic examinations. Relevant laboratory tests, imaging, and operative findings were investigated. Management included operative interventions and postoperative analysis with documentation of complications. For statistical purpose, p<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results: The study observed a significant male preponderance in cases of GI perforations (M: F ratio 1:0.27). Patients’ age ranged from 18 to 86 years, with the highest incidence in those over 50 years (33.6%). Most patients were from Class IV and V socioeconomic status. Abdominal pain (100%) and vomiting (76.2%) were common symptoms. Hypertension (17.2%) and diabetes (14.7%) were prevalent comorbidities, with alcohol consumption (40.16%) as a notable risk factor. Gastroduodenal perforations were most frequent (63.93%). Common surgical interventions included modified Graham’s patch (62.3%) and appendicectomy (12.3%). Surgical site infections (20.4%) were common complications. Mortality was 11.4%, primarily due to sepsis.

Conclusion: Early diagnosis and proper interventions are the cornerstone of management in cases of GI perforation. Prognosis depends on symptom duration, perforation site, peritoneal contamination, preoperative hypotension, and need for preoperative abdominal drainage. Chances of mortality increase in patients who present late after perforation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown CV. Small bowel and colon perforation. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(2):471-5. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2014.01.010

Berkowitz L, Schultz BM, Salazar GA, Pardo-Roa C, Sebastián VP, Álvarez-Lobos MM, Impact of cigarette smoking on the gastrointestinal tract inflammation: Opposing effects in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:74. 2018 Jan 30;9:74. doi:10.3389/ fimmu.2018.00074

Sharma A, Sharma RK, Sharma SK, Jhanwar A. Ileal Perforation in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2012;33(2):116-7. doi:10.4103/0253-7184.102123

Ceelen W, Hesse U, De Hemptinne B. Small bowel perforation following blunt abdominal trauma. Acta Chir Belg. 1995;95(4 Suppl):187-9.

Gedebou TM, Wong RA, Rappaport WD, Jaffe P, Kahsai D, Hunter GC. Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations. Am J Surg. 1996;172(5):454-8. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00236-X

Bielecki K, Kamiński P, Klukowski M. Large bowel perforation: Morbidity and mortality. Tech Coloproctol. 2002;6(3):177-82. doi:10.1007/s101510200039

Shin D, Rahimi H, Haroon S, Merritt A, Vemula A, Noronha A, et al. Imaging of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58(1):19-44. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2019.08.004

Nascimbeni R, Amato A, Cirocchi R, Serventi A, Laghi A, Bellini M, et al. Management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. A multidisciplinary review and position paper. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(2):153-165. doi:10.1007/s10151-020-02346-y

Alsowaina KN, Ahmed MA, Alkhamesi NA, Elnahas AI, Hawel JD, Khanna NV, et al. Management of colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and treatment algorithm. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(12):3889-98. doi:10.1007/s00464-019-07064-7

Bali RS, Verma S, Agarwal PN, Singh R, Talwar N. Perforation peritonitis and the developing world. ISRN Surg. 2014;2014:105492. doi:10.1155/2014/105492

Fakhry SM, Allawi A, Ferguson PL, Michetti CP, Newcomb AB, Liu C, et al. Blunt small bowel perforation (SBP): An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter update 15 years later. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(4):642-50. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000002176

Potey K, Kandi A, Jadhav S, Gowda V. Study of outcomes of perforated appendicitis in adults: A prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(4):694-700. 2023 Mar 16;85:694-700. doi:10.1097/ MS9.0000000000000277

Andersen IB, Jorgensen T, Bonnevie O, Grønbaek M, Sørensen TI. Smoking and alcohol intake as risk factors for bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers: A population-based cohort study. Epidemiology. 2000;11(4):434-9. doi:10.1097/00001648-200007000-00012

Yuan W, Zhou X, Cai Z, Qiu J, Li X, Tong G. Risk factors of gastrointestinal perforation with a poor prognosis. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:4637-47. 2023 Oct 16;16:4637-47. doi:10.2147/IJGM. S426676

Mimura T, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki H, Takizawa K, Hirasawa T, Takeuchi Y, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforation related with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. March 31, 2024;. doi:10.1111/jgh.16545

Kim SH, Shin SS, Jeong YY, Heo SH, Kim JW, Kang HK. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: MDCT findings according to the perforation sites. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(1):63-70. doi:10.3348/ kjr.2009.10.1.63

Sarkar S, Prasad C, Mukherjee D. A study to highlight the spectrum of perforative peritonitis and its outcome in a tertiary rural medical college. Paripex Indian J Res 2018 Feb;7(2):7-8.

Meena LN, Jain S, Bajiya P. Gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis in India: A study of 442 cases. Saudi Surg J 2017;5:116-21.

Utaal MS, Bali S, Batra P, Garg N. Clinical profile in cases of intestinal perforation. Int Surg J 2017;4:1002-8.

Ramakrishnaiah VP, Chandrakasan C, Dharanipragadha K, Sistla S, Krishnamachari S. Community acquired secondary bacterial peritonitis in a tertiary care hospital of South India: An audit with special reference to peritoneal Gastroenterol. 2012;33(4):275-81. doi: 10.7869/ tg.2012.70

Published

07-07-2024

How to Cite

SANJAY D DAKHORE, SAHAN M S, VIDHEY TIRPURDE, SHILPA PANDE, and SUNIL B WANKHADE. “A STUDY ON CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL PROFILE AND OUTCOME OF GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATIONS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 7, July 2024, pp. 51-55, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51780.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)