A STUDY OF OBSTETRIC HYSTERECTOMY OVER A PERIOD OF 5 YEARS AT CUSMCH

Authors

  • RAHUL M RATHOD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India.
  • HARSHDEEP K JADEJA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-8503
  • BHAVESH B AIRAO Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i10.51789

Keywords:

Obstetric hysterectomy, Postpartum hemorrhage, Maternal mortality.

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed (1) to determine the indication of obstetric hysterectomy and (2) to determine the fetomaternal outcome.

Methods: This is a hospital-based retrospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.U.Shah Medical College and Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020.

Results: Out of 8881 deliveries during our study period, there were a total of 20 patients who underwent an obstetric hysterectomy, the incidence being 0.2%. Nine cases out of 6871 vaginal deliveries and 11 cases out of 2510 cesarean deliveries required an obstetric hysterectomy. Maximum patients, seven out of 20 were between 31 and 35 years age group followed by six patients between 36 and 40 years and five patients above 41 years. Only two patients were below 30 years of age. Most of the cases (70%) belonged to the lower middle class and 30% were from the upper middle class. About 60% were registered antenatal care (ANC) cases while 40% never visited any health-care facility. Out of 20 patients who underwent an obstetric hysterectomy, 18 patients (90%) were referred from another center while only 2 patients (10%) were admitted at our center. Eleven patients that are 55% delivered outside the institute among which three patients were home delivered by unskilled birth attendants. Nine patients were delivered at our center and among these sseven patients were referred from adjoining primary health-care centers, community health-care centers, and other private hospitals. Our institute being a tertiary hospital, maximum high-risk and complicated deliveries were referred.

Conclusion: Obstetric hysterectomy is an unwanted but necessary emergency in obstetrics. It is a life-saving procedure in many catastrophic conditions, although it curtails the future. Good ANC, identification of risk factors, timely referral, and intervention at a well-equipped hospital can reduce obstetric hysterectomies. With the increasing incidence of cesarean deliveries and morbidly adherent placenta, the need for obstetric hysterectomy is increasing. With the improvement of modern obstetrics and modern modalities for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage and adherent placenta, there is a reduction in the number of obstetric hysterectomies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baskett TF. Complications of the third stage of labour. In: Calder AA, Dunlop W, editors. The Third Stage of Labour. London: Baillièere Tindall; 1990. p. 69-85.

Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(1):97-105. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296658.83240.6d, PMID 18165397

Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: Causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):e536.1-5; discussion 91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.056

Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226-32. doi: 10.1097/01. AOG.0000219750.79480.84, PMID 16738145

Garmi G, Salim R. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:873929. doi: 10.1155/2012/873929, PMID 22645616

Mantri L, Mahadik K, Varma PR, Bhave S, Hase N, Dahake R. Obstetric hysterectomy: A retrospective study of 50 cases over a period of 2 years in a tertiary care center. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(2):688-91. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180092

Kore S, Kadam V, Raut A. Obstetric hysterectomy: A life-saving procedure. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(3):810-4. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160637

Kamble SN, Patil MB, Bhave S, Hase NK. Maternal outcomes in obstetric hysterectomy: A retrospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(7):2927-30. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770. ijrcog20172945

Najam R, Bansal P, Sharma R, Singh K, Mohini M, Chandwani D, et al. Obstetric hysterectomy: A life-saving emergency procedure. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5(2):212-5.

Chewans Biswas D, Das S, Biswas K, Mukherjee K, Deb T. A review of obstetric hysterectomy in a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(7):2736-40. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182723

Mohini M, Chandwani D, Patel NH, Goyal R, Verma S. Obstetric hysterectomy: A life-saving emergency procedure. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5(2):212-5.

Published

07-10-2024

How to Cite

RAHUL M RATHOD, HARSHDEEP K JADEJA, and BHAVESH B AIRAO. “A STUDY OF OBSTETRIC HYSTERECTOMY OVER A PERIOD OF 5 YEARS AT CUSMCH”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 10, Oct. 2024, pp. 135-7, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i10.51789.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)