POST-STROKE VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS AND OTHER OPHTHALMOLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • ROOPA ROKHADE Department of Ophthalmology, SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
  • PRADEEP KUMAR JAIN Department of Neurosurgery, SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i9.52536

Keywords:

Stroke, Ophthalmological abnormalities, Visual field defects, Gaze palsy

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to estimate prevalence of visual field defects (VFDs) and other ophthalmological abnormalities in post-stroke patients.

Methods: This retrospective study, conducted in department of ophthalmology in collaboration of department of neurology of a tertiary care medical institute, analyzed data from 80 adult patients undergoing ophthalmological examination including perimetry for presence of VFDs. Demographic data, including age and gender were extracted. Medical records were reviewed to assess visual disturbances, systemic illnesses, and medications. Gender distribution and presence of risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension were analyzed. Ophthalmological findings and the type and severity of VFDs were noted from perimetry reports. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans were analyzed to identify brain lesions causing VFDs.

Results: In a study of 80 stroke patients, males were more prevalent (58.8%) than females (41.2%), with the most affected age group being 31– 40 years (33.8%). Hypertension was the most common risk factor (35.0%), and ischemic stroke was the most frequent type (66.3%). The anterior circulation was the predominant site of lesions (85.0%). The most frequent VFDs was complete homonymous hemianopia, observed in 20 patients (25.0%), followed by partial homonymous hemianopia in 6 patients (7.5%). Constriction and inferior quadrantanopia were each noted in 3 patients (3.75%), while superior quadrantanopia was seen in 2 patients (2.5%). Hemianopia combined with quadrantanopia and scotoma were the least common (1.25% each). The other common ophthalmological finding was gaze palsy which was seen in 13 (16.25%) patients.

Conclusion: Visual filed defects and other ophthalmological manifestations such as gaze palsies are common in post-stroke patients. Early detection and targeted rehabilitation of these abnormalities enhance recovery, reduce disability and optimize outcomes for stroke survivors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kuriakose D, Xiao Z. Pathophysiology and treatment of stroke: Present status and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 15;21(20):7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609, PMID: 33076218

Sekerdag E, Solaroglu I, Gursoy-Ozdemir Y. Cell death mechanisms in stroke and novel molecular and cellular treatment options. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(9):1396-415. doi: 10.2174/1570159X1666 6180302115544, PMID: 29512465

Du M, Mi D, Liu M, Liu J. Global trends and regional differences in disease burden of stroke among children: A trend analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):2120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17046-z, PMID: 37891500

Salvadori E, Papi G, Insalata G, Rinnoci V, Donnini I, Martini M, et al. Comparison between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in functional outcome at discharge from an intensive rehabilitation hospital. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 28;11(1):38. doi: 10.3390/ diagnostics11010038, PMID: 33379391

Magid-Bernstein J, Girard R, Polster S, Srinath A, Romanos S, Awad IA, et al. Cerebral hemorrhage: Pathophysiology, treatment, and future directions. Circ Res. 2022;130(8):1204-29. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCRESAHA.121.319949, PMID: 35420918

Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):105-18. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70266-2, PMID: 20083041

Chohan SA, Venkatesh PK, How CH. Long-term complications of stroke and secondary prevention: An overview for primary care physicians. Singapore Med J. 2019;60(12):616-20. doi: 10.11622/ smedj.2019158, PMID: 31889205

Sand KM, Thomassen L, Næss H, Rødahl E, Hoff JM. Diagnosis and rehabilitation of visual field defects in stroke patients: A retrospective audit. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2012;2(1):17-23. doi: 10.1159/000337016, PMID: 23060894 [Published correction appears in Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2015 Oct 13;5(3):114. doi: 10.1159/000440760, PMID: 26648967

Gall C, Franke GH, Sabel BA. Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Mar 26;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-33, PMID: 20346125

Cassidy TP, Bruce DW, Gray CS. Visual field loss after stroke: Confrontation and perimetry in the assessment of recovery. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;10(3):113-7. doi: 10.1053/jscd.2001.25457, PMID: 17903810

Ramezankhani A, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Gender differences in changes in metabolic syndrome status and its components and risk of cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Nov 2;21(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01665-8, PMID: 36324143

Kannan V, Justin C, Sai Prashanth PR, Alexander N. Clinical prevalence of stroke in a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2021;9(3):838-41. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20210509

Bushnell CD, Chaturvedi S, Gage KR, Herson PS, Hurn PD, Jiménez MC, et al. Sex differences in stroke: Challenges and opportunities. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38(12):2179-91. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18793324, PMID: 30114967

Ospel J, Singh N, Ganesh A, Goyal M. Sex and gender differences in stroke and their practical implications in acute care. J Stroke. 2023;25(1):16-25. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.04077, PMID: 36746379

Abdu H, Seyoum G. Sex differences in stroke risk factors, clinical profiles, and in-hospital outcomes among stroke patients admitted to the medical ward of dessie comprehensive specialized hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2022 Oct 21;12:133-44. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S383564, PMID: 36304698

Boehme AK, Esenwa C, Elkind MS. Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):472-95. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCRESAHA.116.308398, PMID: 28154098

Allen CL, Bayraktutan U. Risk factors for ischaemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2008;3(2):105-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00187.x, PMID: 18706004

Rowe FJ, Wright D, Brand D, Jackson C, Harrison S, Maan T, et al. A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: Prevalence, type, rehabilitation, and outcome. Biomed Res Int. 2013;6(1):719096. doi: 10.1155/2013/719096

Shrestha GS, Upadhyaya S, Sharma AK, Gajurel BP. Ocular-visual defect and visual neglect in stroke patients - A report from Kathmandu, Nepal [Defecto óculo-visual y desatención visual en pacientes de accidentes cerebro-vasculares. Informe desde Katmandú, Nepal]. J Optom. 2012;5(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2011.11.001

Pollock A, Hazelton C, Rowe FJ, Jonuscheit S, Kernohan A, Angilley J, et al. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 23;5(5):CD008388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008388.pub3, PMID: 31120142

Published

07-09-2024

How to Cite

ROOPA ROKHADE, and PRADEEP KUMAR JAIN. “POST-STROKE VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS AND OTHER OPHTHALMOLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 9, Sept. 2024, pp. 120-3, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i9.52536.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)