A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE HEALING EFFICACY OF NANO SILVER AND BETADINE IN DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.53130Keywords:
Nano silver dressings, diabetic foot ulcers, wound healingAbstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to study the efficacy of topical agents like betadine solution and nano silver solution/gel in the management of diabetic foot ulcer.
Materials: The study was a prospective, parallel-group, comparative trial. The patients were admitted with diabetic foot ulcer for a period of 2 years. A comparative study was done between both groups regarding the time of healing. Number of dressings and reduction of ulcer size was monitored. The number of patients included in our study was 60 out of which 30 were in test group with betadine solution and 30 were in another test group with nano silver solution.
Results: Age distribution, 25 patients are between 51 and 60 years of age. In sex distribution, males are affected more than females. In mode of onset, 68.75% of ulcers are traumatic in onset; plantar aspect and forefoot are most. Blood sugar levels between 200 and 300 mg% are in 38.33% of patients. Patients receiving insulin were 7l.66%, which helped in good glycemic control. Average duration of hospital stay is less with test Group l, that is, 30 patients stay. Percentage reduction of ulcer is between 91 and 99%, in 27 patients of test Group l While only six patients in test Group 2 had 91–99% reduction in ulcer size with p=0.00 and is highly significant, number of dressings required per patient are l0.225±2.957 in test group and are 21.65±3.847 in test Group 2, p=0.00 and significant.
Conclusions: Thus using nano silver dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers is found to be safe, effective, promoter of wound healing promote epithelization, and accelerates healing. Eliminates anaerobes and breaks microbial synergy more effectively than simple betadine dressing. Hence, nano silver gel proves to be more effective in the management of diabetic foot ulcer.
Downloads
References
Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Feb 14;14(2):88-98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151, PMID: 29219149
Goyal R, Singhal M, Jialal I. Diabetes mellitus type 2. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: https://nih.gov/books/nbk513253 [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 24].
Armstrong DG, Boulton AJ, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun;376(24):2367-75. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMra1615439, PMID: 28614678
Rao H, Pai A, Hussein I, Arun A, Ram HS, Pai A, et al. A comparative study between collagen dressings and conventional dressings in wound healing. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health. 2012 May 1;4:611-23.
Edmonds M, Manu C, Vas P. The current burden of diabetic foot disease. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Feb 8;17:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j. jcot.2021.01.017, PMID: 33680841
Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ. Who suffers most from leg ulceration? J Wound Care. 1998;7(8):383-5. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1998.7.8.383, PMID: 9832746
Miller CN, Carville K, Newall N, Kapp S, Lewin G, Karimi L, et al. Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: Comparing clinical observation and wound swabs. Int Wound J. 2011 Feb;8(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00747.x, PMID: 21078131
Münter KC, Beele H, Russell L, Crespi A, Gröchenig E, Basse P, et al. Effect of a sustained silver-releasing dressing on ulcers with delayed healing: The CONTOP study. J Wound Care. 2006;15(5):199-206. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2006.15.5.26909, PMID: 16711173
Singh B, Kapoor S, Gupta AK. Comparing the efficacy of nano crystalline silver dressing versus Betadine dressing in management of diabetic foot ulcer. Int Surg J. 2020;7(5):1424. doi: 10.18203/2349- 2902.isj20201568
Suhas K, Manvi PM. Efficacy of nano silver dressings over conventional dressings in chronic wounds. Int Surg J. 2018;5(12):3995. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185033
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 *Dr Kalangri Murali Krishna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.