DUAL TARGET REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR SARS-COV-2 FOR ENHANCING ACCURACY WITH E GENE AND ORF1B GENE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • GAUTAM BARIK Department of Microbiology, Jalpaiguri Government Medicla College, Jalpaiguri, West-Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-4849
  • ISHITA SARKAR Department of Community Medicine, Barasat Government Medical College, Barasat, West-Bengal, India
  • DHIRAJ BISWAS Department of Community Medicine, Deben Mahata Government Medical College and Hospital, Purulia, West-Bengal, India
  • SANJAYA KUMAR SAHOO Department of Community Medicine, Shri Jagannath Medical College, Puri, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.53318

Keywords:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, E gene, N gene, open reading frame 1b gene, RdRp gene, pandemic

Abstract

 Objectives: The pandemic of the recently emerged 2019- novel coronavirus infection was a challenge to public health. The current gold standard for the molecular diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the qualitative and quantitative detection of viral nucleic acids. However, superior combination of gene targets for SARS-CoV-2 detection is underexplored. To find out the possible combination of target genes for maximizing RT-PCR accuracy in SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Methods: This study is an observational, cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata. Study population included all SAR-CoV-2-infected patients attended either inpatient or outpatient department in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. 870 patient’s respiratory tract samples with the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 were collected. E gene, N gene, RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (open reading frame [ORF1ab]) gene, ORF1b gene, and human RNase P (Internal control) gene targets were detected.

Results: Among all the genes, E gene was the most frequently detected (n=665; 86.70%) closely followed by N gene (n=429; 83.30%). ORF1b could be detected in 69.73% (n=159). RdRp was least frequently detected in only 44.64% (n=175). The E gene and ORF1b could simultaneously be detected in 85.12% samples when tested together. E gene and N gene could be detected together in 71.16% and E gene and RdRp could be detected in only 53.41%.

Conclusion: Our study found that the combination of E gene and ORF1b gene as optimal targets for assay design as these two genes are expressed simultaneously, that will minimize inconclusive results and maximize diagnostic yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheng VC, Lau SK, Woo PC, Yuen KY. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Oct;20(4):660-94. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00023- 07, PMID 17934078

Weiss SR. Forty years with coronaviruses. J Exp Med. 2020;217(5):e20200537. doi: 10.1084/jem.20200537, PMID 32232339

Kahn JS, McIntosh K. History and recent advances in coronavirus discovery. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(11 Suppl):S223-7. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000188166.17324.60, PMID 16378050

Breslin JJ, Mørk I, Smith MK, Vogel LK, Hemmila EM, Bonavia A, et al. Human coronavirus 229E: Receptor binding domain and neutralization by soluble receptor at 37°C. J Virol. 2003;77(7):4435-8. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.7.4435-4438.2003, PMID 12634402

St-Jean JR, Jacomy H, Desforges M, Vabret A, Freymuth F, Talbot PJ. Human respiratory coronavirus OC43: Genetic stability and neuroinvasion. J Virol. 2004;78(16):8824-34. doi: 10.1128/ JVI.78.16.8824-8834.2004, PMID 15280490

Kumar R, Nagpal S, Kaushik S, Mendiratta S. COVID-19 diagnostic approaches: different roads to the same destination. Virusdisease. 2020;31(2):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s13337-020-00599-7, PMID 32656306

Wang H, Li X, Li T, Zhang S, Wang L, Wu X, et al. The genetic sequence, origin, and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;39(9):1629-35. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03899- 4. PMID 32333222, PMCID PMC7180649

Chan JF, Yip CC, To KK, Tang TH, Wong SC, Leung KH, et al. Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay validated in vitro and with clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5):e00310-20. doi: 10.1128/ JCM.00310-20, PMID 32132196, PMCID PMC7180250

Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2019- by real-time RT-PCR [published correction appears in Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(14):]:25(3):2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045, PMID 31992387 [published correction appears in Euro Surveill. 2020 Jul; 25. Vol. 30:]

[published correction appears in Euro Surveill. 2021 Feb; 26. Vol. 5:].

Ravi N, Cortade DL, Ng E, Wang SX. Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A comprehensive review of the FDA-EUA COVID-19 testing landscape. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;165:112454. doi: 10.1016/j. bios.2020.112454, PMID 32729549

Wang X, Yao H, Xu X, Zhang P, Zhang M, Shao J, et al. Limits of detection of 6 approved RT-PCR kits for the novel SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Chem. 2020 Jul 1;66(7):977-9. doi: 10.1093/ clinchem/hvaa099, PMID 32282874, PMCID PMC7184447

Artesi M, Bontems S, Göbbels P, Franckh M, Maes P, Boreux R, et al. A recurrent mutation at Position 26340 of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with failure of the E Gene quantitative reverse transcription-PCR utilized in a commercial dual-target diagnostic assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10):e01598-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01598-20, PMID 32690547, PMCID PMC7512182

Vanaerschot M, Mann SA, Webber JT, Kamm J, Bell SM, Bell J, et al. Identification of a polymorphism in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 that adversely impacts detection by reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;59(1):e02369-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02369-20, PMID 33067272

Colton H, Ankcorn M, Yavuz M, Tovey L, Cope A, Raza M, et al. Improved sensitivity using a dual target, E and RdRp assay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: experience at a large NHS Foundation Trust in The UK. J Infect. 2021 Jan;82(1):159-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.061. PMID 32474037, PMCID PMC7255707

Shirato K, Nao N, Katano H, Takayama I, Saito S, Kato F, et al. Development of genetic diagnostic methods for detection for novel coronavirus 2019(nCoV-2019) in Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 22;73(4):304-7. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.061. PMID 32074516

Published

07-12-2024

How to Cite

GAUTAM BARIK, ISHITA SARKAR, DHIRAJ BISWAS, and SANJAYA KUMAR SAHOO. “DUAL TARGET REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR SARS-COV-2 FOR ENHANCING ACCURACY WITH E GENE AND ORF1B GENE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2024, pp. 218-21, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.53318.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)