COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE CORNEAL ASTIGMATISM IN PHACOEMULSIFICATION AND MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY

Authors

  • NAYANTARA NAIR Department of Ophthalmology, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • DIVYA N. Department of Ophthalmology, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • V. PANIMALAR Department of Ophthalmology, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • A. VEERAMANI Department of Ophthalmology, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • BINDU BHASKARAN Department of Ophthalmology, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i6.40295

Keywords:

Cataract, Superior incision, Superotemporal incision, SIA, 3 mo, 28 mm incision, 55 mm incision

Abstract

Objective: Globally a significant proportion of treatable blindness is caused by cataract, especially in India and southeast Asia. Treatment of cataract is surgical correction with intraocular lens implantation. The main drawback of surgical correction is induction of postoperative astigmatism in patients. The aim of this study was to compare the degree of astigmatism in manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification 3 mo postoperatively

Methods: The study was a retrospective case study on postoperative corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery. It was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Thandalam, Tamil Nadu. A total of 100 patients were selected and divided into two groups, group A (=50) underwent phacoemulsification and group B (=50) underwent manual small incision cataract surgery. Preoperative astigmatic status of the patients was noted from patient records. Both groups were evaluated 3 mo postoperatively using automated keratometry. The data collected was analyzed using Microsoft Excel Independent T test, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Power of the study was 80% with an alpha error of 5%.

Results: Mean postoperative astigmatism at 3 mo was 0.91±0.255D and 0.34±0.110D due to manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification, respectively.

Conclusion: Postoperative astigmatism was greater in manual small incision cataract surgery than phacoemulsification. Improvement in preoperative astigmatism was seen in patients who underwent superotemporal incision phacoemulsification

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. World Health Organisation. Action plan for the prevention of avoidable blindness and visual impairment. Available from: https://www.iapb.org/wp-content/uploads/ACTION_PLAN_WHA62-1-2009-2013.pdf [Last accessed on 29 Jul 2020]
2. Minassian DC, Mehra V. 3.8 million blinded by cataract each year: projections from the first epidemiological study of incidence of cataract blindness in India. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74:341-3.
3. Murthy GVS, Jain BK, Shamanna BR, Subramanyam D. Improving cataract services in the Indian context. Community Eye Heal J 2014;27:4-5.
4. Directorate General of Health Services. Available from: https://dghs.gov.in/content/1354_3_NationalProgrammeforControlofBlindnessVisual.aspx. [Last accessed on 10 Aug 2020]
5. Lamba PA, Sood NN. Changes of refraction after cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 1971;19:7-13.
6. Ruit S, Tabin G, Chang D. A prospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.023
7. Burgansky Z, Isakov I, Avizemer HBE. Minimal astigmatism after sutureless planned extracapsular cataract extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:499-503.
8. Bhandari A, Bhandari D. A randomized comparative study of visual outcome and complications following manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;5:539-42.
9. Taneja M. Management of astigmatism in cataract. Delhi J Ophthalmol 2015;25:252-8.
10. Sharma N, Vandana, Shinghal P. To compare postoperative astigmatism in temporal clear corneal incision phacoemulsification and temporal manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017;3:177-9.
11. El-Sayed SH, El-Sobky HM, Badawy NM, El-Shafy EA. Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery for treatment of cataract. Menoufia Med J 2015;28:191-6.
12. Gokhale NS, Sawhney S. Reduction in astigmatism in manual small incision cataract surgery through change of incision site. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:201-3.
13. Daule N, Tupe P. Comparision of keratometric astigmatism by phacoemulsification in superior scleral tunnel incision versus temporal clear corneal incision. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res 2018;1:420-8.
14. Tejedor J, Perez Rodriguez JA. Astigmatic change induced by 2.8-mm corneal Incisions for cataract surgery. Investigative Opthalmol Visual Sci 2009;50:989.

Published

15-11-2020

How to Cite

NAIR, N., D. N., V. PANIMALAR, . A. VEERAMANI, and B. BHASKARAN. “COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE CORNEAL ASTIGMATISM IN PHACOEMULSIFICATION AND MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 12, no. 6, Nov. 2020, pp. 85-88, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i6.40295.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)