PRE AND POST EXPOSURE ANALYSIS OF CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE’S EFFECTIVENESS AGAINST BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION OF STETHOSCOPES

AISHWARYA HARIKRISHNAN; G. BHUVANESHWARI

doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2021v13i1.40799

Authors

AISHWARYA HARIKRISHNAN Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai
G. BHUVANESHWARI Department of Microbiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2021v13i1.40799

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Chlorhexidinegluconate, Stethoscope, Disinfection, Healthcare-associated infection, Nosocomial, Healthcare professional, Physician, Questionnaire

Abstract

Objective: The present study is to assess the effectiveness of chlorhexidinegluconate as a disinfectant for the stethoscope diaphragm, to survey the routine practices followed by health care professionals (HCPs) towards stethoscope disinfection and to ascertain their general awareness on the matter.

Methods: Questionnaire-based study conducted to assess the degree of awareness and attitude of HCPs towards stethoscope disinfection procedures. 200 responses were obtained and analyzed. Randomized, blind trial comparing bacterial load of stethoscope post-exposure to chlorhexidinegluconate vs. ethyl alcohol. The swabs collected from stethoscope diaphragm before and after exposure to disinfectant, were cultured using spread plate technique on nutrient agar. CFU count was compared.

Results: Out of 200, nearly all HCPs part of this study were aware that stethoscopes could be linked to transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) but only 78.5% (157) were accustomed to stethoscope disinfection practices. Although only 13.5% (27/200) of participants believed that chlorhexidinegluconate was effective, this study found it to be highly efficacious against bacterial recontamination.

Conclusion: We stress upon the importance of regular disinfection of the stethoscope after each use and encourage frequent cleaning of the device with chlorhexidinegluconate, which may reduce bacterial recontamination for a longer period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Maki DG. Stethoscopes and health care-associated infection. Mayo ClinProc March 2014;89:277-80.
2. Weldegebreal F, Admassu D, Meaza D. Non-critical healthcare tools as a potential source of healthcare-acquired bacterial infections in eastern Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. SAGE Open Med 2019;7.DOI:10.1177/2050312118822627.
3. Lecat P. A “solution” for infectious stethoscopes? Mayo ClinProc 2014;89:1318-20.
4. Alvarez JA, Ruiz SR, Mosqueda JL. Decontamination of stethoscope membranes with chlorhexidine: should it be recommended? Am J Infect Control 2016;44:e205-e209.
5. Sanders ER. Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods. J Vis Exp 2012;63:e3064.
6. HA Bukharie, H Al-Zahrani, AMRubaish. Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes. J Family Community Med 2004;11:31-3.
7. A Campos Murguia, X Leon Lara, JM Munoz. Stethoscopes as potential intrahospital carriers of pathogenic microorganisms. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:82-3.
8. Jain A, Shah H, Jain A, Sharma M. Disinfection of stethoscopes: gap between knowledge and practice in an Indian tertiary care hospital. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2013;6:236-9.
9. C Saunders. Factors influencing stethoscope cleanliness among clinical medical students. J Hospital Infection 2013;84:242-4.
10. Pratiksha S, Atosh T, Priti A. The role of stethoscopes in the transmission of hospital infections. Int J CurrMicrobiolApplSci 2019;8:2472-8.
11. GBhuvaneshwari, AS Shameembanu, M Kalyani. Disinfectant susceptibility testing of non-fermenting gram negative bacilli. Res J Pharm Tech 2018;11:1313-5.
12. GW Ghumman, N Ahmad, A Pop-Vicas. Stethoscope cleaning during patient care. RI Med J 2018. p. 18-20.