ARP-HPLC STABILITY INDICATING METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF NETUPITANT AND PALONOSETRON IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM

Authors

  • P. BHANU CHANDAR School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India 533003
  • M. SANDHYA MADHURI School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India 533003
  • K. NIRMALA HYMA School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India 533003
  • S. ANUSHA School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India 533003
  • SK. NABI RASOOL School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India 533003

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2022v14i4.1985

Keywords:

Netupitant, Palonosetron, Stability studies, Validation

Abstract

Objective: A simple, precise, sensitive, rapid, accurate, and specific method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Netupitant and Palonosetron in Pharmaceutical dosage form.

Methods: The separation was done on the ODS C18 column of dimensions (150 mm x 4.6, 5 μm) with the mobile phase 0.1N potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate pH 3.3 and acetonitrile in a 50:50 ratio, at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min and injection volume of 10 μl. The optimum wavelength selected was 274 nm and the temperature of the column was maintained at 30 ℃.

Results: The retention time was 2.199 min and 2.893 min and they were linear in the concentration range of 75-450 μg/ml and 0.125-0.75 μg/ml for Netupitant and Palonosetron, respectively. The repeatability and intermediate precision were found to be within acceptable limits. Regression equation of Netupitant and Palonosetron is Y=6329x+42914 and Y= 258884x+3103.9, respectively. LOD was found to be 0.33μg/ml, 0.99μg/ml and LOQ was 0.01μg/ml, 0.04μg/ml for Netupitant and Palonosetron. The correlation coefficient (R2) value was found to be 0.999 and %recovery was obtained as 100.32%and 99.6% for Netupitant and Palonosetron, respectively. Forced degradation studies reveal that the drugs are unstable under acidic conditions.

Conclusion: The flexibility, accuracy, precision of the developed method ensures applicability in routine analysis of pharmaceutical dosage form.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adel N. Overview of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and evidence-based therapies. Am J Manag Care. 2017 Sep;23(14);Suppl:S259-65. PMID 28978206.

Drug bank Online-Database for drugs and drug target info. Available from: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB09048

Drug bank Online-Database for drugs and drug target info. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00377.

Manoranjani M. Method development and validation for simultaneous quantification of netupitant and palonosetron in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form and their forced degradation study by RP-HPLC. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2019;12(2):119-23.

Uttamprasad Panigrahy. A novel validated RP-HPLC-dad method for the simultaneous estimation of netupitant and Palonosetroninbulk and pharmaceutical dosage form with forced degradation studies. International Journal of Chem Tech Research. 2015;8(10):317-37.

Vijaykumar G. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of netupitant and palonosetron in pharmaceutical dosage form. IAJPS. 2018;5(12):16746-55.

Srikanthinturi. A validated novel RP-HPLC method development for the estimation of palonosetron hydrochloride in bulk and capsule dosage forms. Pelagia Research Library. 2011;2(5):223-34.

Kalavati. Development and validation of stability indicating UPLC method for the estimation of palonosetron in bulk and its pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Research. 2019;14(3):144-54.

Indian pharmacopoeia. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 1996.

Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL. Practical HPLC method development. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, INC. New York; 1997. p. 645-9.

International Conference on Harmonization on Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology; 2005.

International Conference on Harmonization on Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology; 2005.

International Conference on Harmonization. Stability guidelines. Vol. Q1; 2019. DOI:10.22214/ijraset.2019.12163

Hokanson GC. A life cycle approach to the validation of analytical methods during Pharmaceutical Product Development. Part 1: The initial validation process. Pharm Technol. 1994:92-100.

Beckett AH, Stanlake JB. Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry. Vol. I and II. CBS Publishers and New Delhi, India: Distributors; 2000.

Sethi PD. Quantitative analysis of drugs in pharmaceutical formulations. 3rd ed. CBS Publishers and New Delhi, India: Distributors; 1997.

Willard HH, Merrit LL, Dean JA, Settle FA. Instrumental method of analysis. 7th ed. CBS Publishers and New Delhi, India: Distributors; 1986.

Day RA, Underwood AL. Quantitative analysis. 6th ed. PHI learning is privately limited. New Delhi, India; 2009.

Published

15-07-2022

How to Cite

CHANDAR, P. B., M. S. MADHURI, K. N. HYMA, S. ANUSHA, and S. N. RASOOL. “ARP-HPLC STABILITY INDICATING METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF NETUPITANT AND PALONOSETRON IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, no. 4, July 2022, pp. 60-67, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2022v14i4.1985.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)