AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF EFFECT OF LABOUR INDUCTION ON MECONIUM ASPIRATION AND FOETAL OUTCOME
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3031Keywords:
Labor induction, Meconium aspiration, Fetal outcome, Meconium-stained amniotic fluidAbstract
Objective: Labor induction is a widely used procedure to initiate artificial uterine contractions, but its impact on meconium aspiration and fetal outcome needs further investigation, as meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) poses significant risks to the newborn, including respiratory distress and other complications.
Methods: This prospective observational study evaluates labor induction and evaluate the occurrence of meconium aspiration and overall fetal outcomes. Data from a tertiary care hospital were analyzed, including mode of induction, gestational age, Bishop score, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, Apgar scores, NICU admissions, and other relevant parameters. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify significant associations.
Results: This observational study aimed to explore the relationship between labor induction and meconium aspiration, as well as their impact on fetal well-being. Data analysis identified correlations between labor induction techniques, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal outcomes, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making and optimizing fetal outcomes.
Conclusion: The impact of labor induction on meconium aspiration and fetal outcomes was investigated in this study, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals and contributing to the improvement of safety guidelines for obstetric care.
Downloads
References
Kozhimannil KB. Cesarean delivery and labor induction among women with disabilities. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1173-8.
ACOG practice bulletin no. 107. Induction of labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386-97.
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566, PMID 30089070.
Alsammani MA, Moona NA. Predictors of success of single-dose methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(4):233-8. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0668-3. PMID 27382215.
Wing DA. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):801-12. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318187042e.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG practice bulletin no. 226. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;137(2):e12-24.
Haas DM, et al. Single-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):855-63.
Ten Eikelder MLG. Outpatient induction of labor with single versus double-balloon catheters. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):1447-55.
Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(24):1587-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206113262402, PMID 1584259.
Rouse DJ. A comparison of active and expectant management of labor in women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(5):449-59.
Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Dias S, Jones LV. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h217. PMID 25656228.
Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2. PMID 20927722.
Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Robinson JS. Elective birth at 37 w of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the twins timing of birth randomised trial. BJOG. 2012;119(8):964-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03340.x.
Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population-based study. BMJ. 2012;344:e2838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2838. PMID 22577197.
Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Volpe A. Randomized comparison of three induction regimens in nulliparous women: a pilot study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(9):1032-7. doi: 10.1080/00016340701419856.
Marconi AM, Paolini CL, Strigini F. Early versus late induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix: a comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(3):260:e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.036.
Menakaya UA, Adno A, Lanzarone V, Johnson NP, Condous G. Integrating the concept of advanced gynaecological imaging for endometriosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(5):409-12. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12403. PMID 26426947.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 RITU GUPTA, SWATI TRIVEDI, AYUSHI GUPTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
