COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK VERSUS SYSTEMIC ANALGESIA FOR INTERLOCKING NAIL IN INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF FEMUR: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED INTERVENTIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • VANDANA MANGAL Department of Anaesthesiology, Swai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur-302004, Rajasthan, India
  • KHUSHBOO MEENA Department of Anaesthesiology, Swai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur-302004, Rajasthan, India
  • CHANDRASHEKAR MEENA Department of Anaesthesiology, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
  • TUHIN MISTRY Department of Anaesthesiology, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i5.3057

Keywords:

Geriatric population, Comorbidities, Fractures, Internal fixation, Central neuraxial block

Abstract

Objective: The geriatric population is prone to multiple comorbidities, and their fragile bones and unsteadiness make them susceptible to fractures, commonly observed in the wrist and proximal end of the femur. Internal fixation of fractures under central neuraxial block allows for early mobilization. However, the presence of comorbidities in elderly patients puts them at higher risk for anesthesia and surgery.

Methods: To manage postoperative pain following surgery for proximal femur fracture, opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia techniques are employed. Regional anesthesia techniques such as fascia iliaca block, femoral nerve block, and quadratuslumborum block are utilized as part of a multimodal approach. Pain is subjective, and the inability to communicate does not negate the need for appropriate pain relief.

Results: Postoperative pain, if poorly managed, can result in complications, prolonged recovery, and chronic pain with reduced quality of life. Effective pain relief enhances patient satisfaction, reduces hospital stays and costs. Inadequate pain control activates the sympathetic nervous system, increases hormonal response, and contributes to adverse events. Opioids, though common, pose risks and adverse effects.

Conclusion: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a safe and easy-to-perform technique for postoperative pain management. It involves ultrasound-guided deposition of local anesthetic, allowing effective spread. Previous studies have shown its effectiveness for thoracic pain relief. This study evaluated lumbar ESPB and compared it with systemic analgesics in terms of ease of positioning and postoperative pain control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):248-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030, PMID 22227789.

World Health Organization. Cancer pain relief and palliative care: report of a WHO expert committee. World Health Organization; 2003.

International Association for the Study of Pain. IASP statement on pain management in patients with substance use disorders; 2019. Available from https://www.iasp-pain.org/PublicationsNews/NewsDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=8519andnavItemNumber=643.

Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Anal. 2003;97(2):534-40. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E, PMID 12873949.

Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H, PROSPECT Working Group. Procedure-specific pain management (PROSPECT)-the future is here. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019;33(2):279-85.

Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451, PMID 27501016.

Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(4):452-60. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814, PMID 28188621.

Scolletta S, Franchi F, Damiani E, Cennamo A, Domizi R, Meola A. Tissue oxygen saturation changes and postoperative complications in cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0905-5. PMID 31842777.

Jayadharmarajan R, Chin KJ, Chin VK. The analgesic efficacy of preoperative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having posterior spinal fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2020;34(1):57-65.

Karaca O, Pınar HU, Doğan R. Efficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and quality of life after open nephrectomy. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(6):435-42.

Senturk O, Aydin ME, Gucyetmez B. The effect of single-shot erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019;57:61-5.

Chung K, Kim E, Lee JH. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1896.

Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH. Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020;59:84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036, PMID 31280100.

Gomaa M, El Deeb A, Ramzy E. Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in unilateral rib fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019;54:61-7.

Rispoli L, Guida T, Durante V. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in thyroid surgery. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(2):e58-9.

Published

15-09-2023

How to Cite

MANGAL, V., K. MEENA, C. MEENA, and T. MISTRY. “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK VERSUS SYSTEMIC ANALGESIA FOR INTERLOCKING NAIL IN INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF FEMUR: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED INTERVENTIONAL STUDY”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 15, no. 5, Sept. 2023, pp. 70-73, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i5.3057.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)