A COMPREHENSIVE AND PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS TO IMPROVE PATIENT OUTCOMES IN POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD BY OPTIMIZING NEOSTIGMINE DOSE AND TIMING WITH THE HELP OF TOF MONITORING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i5.3073Keywords:
Neuromuscular reversal, Train-of-Four monitoring, Postoperative outcomes, Anesthesia management, Residual paralysisAbstract
Objective: The objective is to find out the optimum neuromuscular reversal strategy using Train-of-Four (TOF) monitoring in the postoperative period for complete and risk-free recovery without residual paralysis. In this study, the neuromuscular blockade brought on by cisatracurium will be reversed using a neuromuscular monitor (TOF) and neostigmine administered at the best possible time and dose. In addition, we'll look at the prevalence of neuromuscular paralysis that persists after general anesthesia, as some research have revealed that paralysis may worsen and return once patients leave the recovery area.
Methods: A comprehensive prospective, randomized, double-blind and prospective analysis was conducted involving various study groups. Demographic data, residual neuromuscular weakness, negative head lift tests, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were assessed. TOF monitoring was used regularly to tailor neuromuscular reversal strategies.
Results: Incidence of regression of TOF ratio<0.9 and incidence of negative head lift test after extubation among different groups were statistically non-significant by Chi square test at 15 min (p value 0.4), 30 min (0.8) and 60 min (p value 0.9).
It also concludes that neuromuscular stimulation given for TOF monitoring is well tolerated by different group of the population in terms of VAS score (mean 3.9, ranging from 3.3 to 3.8).
Conclusion: This research suggests that tailoring strategies of neostigmine dose and time of its administration according to TOF ratio leads to complete recovery of neuromuscular function with all the doses (20/30/40 micrograms/kg). This study emphasizes the use of neuromuscular monitoring guided reversal methods to attain complete recovery without residual paralysis.
Downloads
References
Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d, PMID 20442260.
Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Knowledge and attitudes survey regarding residual neuromuscular blockade, anesthesia training, and airway management. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(1):171-81.
Claudius C, Viby Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(6):1117-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62f, PMID 18497614.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268, PMID 18635478.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268, PMID 18635478.
Eikermann M, Groeben H, Husing J, Peters J. Accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery of respiratory function from neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(6):1333-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00006, PMID 12766640.
Khuenl Brady KS, Wattwil M. Use of objective neuromuscular monitoring to prevent postoperative residual paralysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019;32(6):790-7.
Eriksson LI, Sundman E, Olsson R, Nilsson L, Witt H, Ekberg O. Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans: simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography of awake human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(5):1035-43. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199711000-00005, PMID 9366453.
Staals LM, de Boer HD, van Egmond J. Postoperative residual curarization in a nationwide cohort of anaesthetised patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(7):553-9.
Claudius C, Viby Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(6):1117-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62f, PMID 18497614.
Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Knowledge and attitudes survey regarding residual neuromuscular blockade, anesthesia training, and airway management. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(1):171-81.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 YOGESH CHAND MODI, SAVITA MEENA, PRADEEP CHARAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.